* Git bisected regression for ipsec/aead
@ 2016-08-19 19:21 Sowmini Varadhan
2016-08-25 8:49 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sowmini Varadhan @ 2016-08-19 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: herbert, linux-crypto; +Cc: joshua.a.hay, steffen.klassert
Hi Herbert,
In the process of testing ipsec I ran into panics (details below)
with the algorithm
"aead rfc4106(gcm(aes)) 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890 64"
git-bisect analyzed this down to
7271b33cb87e80f3a416fb031ad3ca87f0bea80a is the first bad commit
commit 7271b33cb87e80f3a416fb031ad3ca87f0bea80a
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue Jun 21 16:55:16 2016 +0800
crypto: ghash-clmulni - Fix cryptd reordering
:
Could you please take a look? here are additional details:
To reproduce the panic, I set up ipsec as follows, on 2 test machines
# #set up laddr to be local interface address, faddr as peer's addres.
# ip x p add dir out src $laddr dst $faddr proto tcp \
tmpl proto esp src $laddr dst $faddr spi 0x00000001 \
mode transport reqid 1
# ip x p add dir in src $laddr dst $faddr proto tcp \
tmpl proto esp dst $laddr src $faddr spi 0x00000001 \
mode transport reqid 1
# ip x s add proto esp src $laddr dst $faddr spi 0x00000001 \
mode transport reqid 1 replay-window 32 \
aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890 64 \
sel src $laddr dst $faddr proto tcp
# ip x s add proto esp dst $laddr src $faddr spi 0x00000001 \
mode transport reqid 1 replay-window 32 \
aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890 64 \
sel src $laddr dst $faddr proto tcp
Then run iperf i.e., start "iperf -s" on one node (server), and
"iperf -c $faddr -P 1" on the on the other (client). The client will
panic with something like this in the dmesg:
[ 124.627594] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000001000000c5
[ 124.627612] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 124.627620] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at lib/list_debug.c:62 __list_del_entry+0x
86/0xd0
[ 124.627621] list_del corruption. next->prev should be ffff88085cebd168, but w
as 00000000ffffff8d
[ 124.627622] Modules linked in:
:
:
[ 124.627650] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Tainted: G E 4.7.0-rc1-ipsec-offload-api2+ #15
[ 124.627651] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WTT/S2600WTT, BIOS GRNDSDP1.86B.0046.R00.1502111331 02/11/2015
[ 124.627666] [<ffffffff812df929>] dump_stack+0x51/0x78
[ 124.627667] [<ffffffff812fd1c6>] ? __list_del_entry+0x86/0xd0
[ 124.627673] [<ffffffff8106711d>] __warn+0xfd/0x120
[ 124.627676] [<ffffffff810671f9>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x49/0x50
[ 124.627677] [<ffffffff812fd1c6>] __list_del_entry+0x86/0xd0
[ 124.627683] [<ffffffff8109906b>] detach_tasks+0x1ab/0x280
[ 124.627685] [<ffffffff8109d58b>] load_balance+0x32b/0x860
[ 124.627691] [<ffffffff810cf219>] ? enqueue_hrtimer+0x49/0xa0
[ 124.627693] [<ffffffff810cddbc>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x4c/0x300
[ 124.627695] [<ffffffff8109e064>] rebalance_domains+0x144/0x290
[ 124.627696] [<ffffffff8109e3e9>] run_rebalance_domains+0x49/0x60
[ 124.627701] [<ffffffff816234bb>] __do_softirq+0xeb/0x2d8
[ 124.627703] [<ffffffff810cfa38>] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0xb8/0x170
[ 124.627706] [<ffffffff8106c755>] irq_exit+0xa5/0xb0
[ 124.627708] [<ffffffff816232b6>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x46/0x60
[ 124.627709] [<ffffffff8162198f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x7f/0x90
[ 124.627709] <EOI>
[ 124.627716] [<ffffffff814fe369>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xc9/0x2d0
[ 124.627718] [<ffffffff814fe35b>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xbb/0x2d0
[ 124.627719] [<ffffffff814ff833>] ? menu_select+0x103/0x3a0
[ 124.627721] [<ffffffff814fe587>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
[ 124.627723] [<ffffffff810a600e>] call_cpuidle+0x2e/0x40
[ 124.627724] [<ffffffff810a6088>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x68/0x100
[ 124.627725] [<ffffffff810a6275>] cpu_idle_loop+0x155/0x240
[ 124.627726] [<ffffffff810a6381>] cpu_startup_entry+0x21/0x30
[ 124.627732] [<ffffffff810441c3>] start_secondary+0x73/0x80
[ 124.627733] ---[ end trace d9352c1808e65391 ]---
[ 124.640240] paging request
[ 124.640557] at 00000001000000c5
:
[ 124.640809] IP: [<ffffffff810975a6>] account_system_time+0x66/0x130
[ 124.641146] PGD 85a8c3067 PUD 0
[ 124.641533] Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted
[ 124.641795] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 124.642049] Modules linked in: seqiv esp4 xfrm4_mode_transport sha256_generic drbg ansi_cprng ctr ghash_generic gf128mul ghash_clmulni_intel cryptd gcm autofs4 8021q garp stp llc sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand ipv6 iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support pcspkr i40e i2c_i801 i2c_core sg lpc_ich mfd_core xhci_pci xhci_hcd ixgbe dca hwmon mdio hed wmi ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler acpi_cpufreq acpi_pad ext4(E) mbcache(E) jbd2(E) sd_mod(E) sr_mod(E) cdrom(E) ahci(E) libahci(E) dm_mirror(E) dm_region_hash(E) dm_log(E) dm_mod(E)
[ 124.647568] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WTT/S2600WTT, BIOS GRNDSDP1
.86B.0046.R00.1502111331 02/11/2015
[ 124.648027] task: ffff88085f344100 ti: ffff88085f348000 task.ti: ffff880855cb
b2e0
[ 124.648293] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810975a6>] [<ffffffff810975a6>] account_system_time+0x66/0x130
[ 124.648814] RSP: 0018:ffff88087ec03d68 EFLAGS: 00010086
[ 124.649075] RAX: 0000000000010000 RBX: ffff88085f344100 RCX: 00000000ffffff8d
[ 124.649342] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000
[ 124.649609] RBP: ffff88087ec03d88 R08: 0000000000010000 R09: ffff880855cbb2a8
[ 124.649877] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
[ 124.650143] R13: ffff88085f32edd8 R14: ffff88087ec0fc80 R15: 0000001cdb6654dd
[ 124.650409] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88087ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 124.650676] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 124.650939] CR2: 00000001000000c5 CR3: 00000008564c3000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
[ 124.651204] Stack:
[ 124.651452] 0000000000000000 ffff88087ec03d70 ffff88087ec03d70 ffff88085f344100
[ 124.651983] ffff88087ec03da8 ffffffff81097730 ffff88087ec03dc8 ffff88087ec03e48
[ 124.653046] Call Trace:
[ 124.653296] <IRQ>
[ 124.653368] [<ffffffff81097730>] account_process_tick+0x40/0xa0
[ 124.653878] [<ffffffff810cc84c>] update_process_times+0x2c/0x70
[ 124.654143] [<ffffffff810de2d7>] tick_sched_handle+0x37/0x70
[ 124.654405] [<ffffffff810ded52>] tick_sched_timer+0x52/0xa0
[ 124.654666] [<ffffffff810cf685>] __run_hrtimer+0x85/0x210
[ 124.654926] [<ffffffff810ded00>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xc0/0xc0
[ 124.655193] [<ffffffff810bbff8>] ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0xb8/0x1f0
[ 124.655459] [<ffffffff810cf877>] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x67/0x90
[ 124.655724] [<ffffffff810cfa1b>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x9b/0x170
[ 124.655987] [<ffffffff810451e9>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x39/0x60
[ 124.656252] [<ffffffff816232b1>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x41/0x60
[ 124.656516] [<ffffffff8162198f>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x7f/0x90
[ 124.656777] <EOI>
:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Git bisected regression for ipsec/aead
2016-08-19 19:21 Git bisected regression for ipsec/aead Sowmini Varadhan
@ 2016-08-25 8:49 ` Herbert Xu
2016-08-25 15:45 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-08-27 10:13 ` Sowmini Varadhan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2016-08-25 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sowmini Varadhan; +Cc: linux-crypto, joshua.a.hay, steffen.klassert
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:21:24PM -0400, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> In the process of testing ipsec I ran into panics (details below)
> with the algorithm
> "aead rfc4106(gcm(aes)) 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890 64"
>
> git-bisect analyzed this down to
>
> 7271b33cb87e80f3a416fb031ad3ca87f0bea80a is the first bad commit
> commit 7271b33cb87e80f3a416fb031ad3ca87f0bea80a
> Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Tue Jun 21 16:55:16 2016 +0800
>
> crypto: ghash-clmulni - Fix cryptd reordering
This bisection doesn't make much sense as this patch just causes
cryptd to be used a little more more frequently. But it does
point the finger at cryptd.
> [ 124.627594] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000001000000c5
> [ 124.627612] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 124.627620] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at lib/list_debug.c:62 __list_del_entry+0x
> 86/0xd0
> [ 124.627621] list_del corruption. next->prev should be ffff88085cebd168, but w
> as 00000000ffffff8d
> [ 124.627622] Modules linked in:
So we have list corruption here, possibly caused by use-after-free.
I did spot one bug in the AEAD cryptd path where we end up using
the wrong tfm to track refcnt.
Does this patch help?
---8<---
Subject: crypto: cryptd - Use correct tfm object for AEAD tracking
The AEAD code path incorrectly uses the child tfm to track the
cryptd refcnt, and then potentially frees the child tfm.
Fixes: 81760ea6a95a ("crypto: cryptd - Add helpers to check...")
Reported-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
diff --git a/crypto/cryptd.c b/crypto/cryptd.c
index cf8037a..77207b4 100644
--- a/crypto/cryptd.c
+++ b/crypto/cryptd.c
@@ -733,13 +733,14 @@ static void cryptd_aead_crypt(struct aead_request *req,
rctx = aead_request_ctx(req);
compl = rctx->complete;
+ tfm = crypto_aead_reqtfm(req);
+
if (unlikely(err == -EINPROGRESS))
goto out;
aead_request_set_tfm(req, child);
err = crypt( req );
out:
- tfm = crypto_aead_reqtfm(req);
ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm);
refcnt = atomic_read(&ctx->refcnt);
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Git bisected regression for ipsec/aead
2016-08-25 8:49 ` Herbert Xu
@ 2016-08-25 15:45 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-08-27 10:13 ` Sowmini Varadhan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sowmini Varadhan @ 2016-08-25 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: linux-crypto, joshua.a.hay, steffen.klassert
On (08/25/16 16:49), Herbert Xu wrote:
> This bisection doesn't make much sense as this patch just causes
> cryptd to be used a little more more frequently. But it does
> point the finger at cryptd.
:
> So we have list corruption here, possibly caused by use-after-free.
> I did spot one bug in the AEAD cryptd path where we end up using
> the wrong tfm to track refcnt.
>
> Does this patch help?
Unfortunately no, I still see the panic.
--Sowmini
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: Git bisected regression for ipsec/aead
2016-08-25 8:49 ` Herbert Xu
2016-08-25 15:45 ` Sowmini Varadhan
@ 2016-08-27 10:13 ` Sowmini Varadhan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sowmini Varadhan @ 2016-08-27 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: linux-crypto, joshua.a.hay, steffen.klassert
On (08/25/16 16:49), Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:21:24PM -0400, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> > 7271b33cb87e80f3a416fb031ad3ca87f0bea80a is the first bad commit
> This bisection doesn't make much sense as this patch just causes
> cryptd to be used a little more more frequently. But it does
> point the finger at cryptd.
On additional testing, I think this might be related to some
subtle race/timing issue so that git-bisect may not necessarily
be able to pin-point the correct bad-commit: if I add a few
printks in other parts of the IPsec stack (and change the timing),
the problem does not reproduce. Let me try to collect more data
on this.
Meanwhile, if you can see some bug in the commit above, then
it probably makes sense to fix it upstream anyway.
--Sowmini
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-27 10:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-19 19:21 Git bisected regression for ipsec/aead Sowmini Varadhan
2016-08-25 8:49 ` Herbert Xu
2016-08-25 15:45 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-08-27 10:13 ` Sowmini Varadhan
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.