All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv4 1/7] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add common attr group fields
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:25:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160909102554.GF20192@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473330112-28528-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:21:46AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> In preparation for adding common attribute groups, add an array of
> attribute group pointers to arm_pmu, which will be used if the
> backend hasn't already set pmu::attr_groups.
> 
> Subsequent patches will move backends over to using these, before adding
> common fields.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c       | 3 +++
>  include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index f5e1008..145caf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -1039,6 +1039,9 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		goto out_free;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!pmu->pmu.attr_groups)
> +		pmu->pmu.attr_groups = pmu->attr_groups;
> +
>  	ret = cpu_pmu_init(pmu);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_free;
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> index e188438..8030814 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> -
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
>  
>  /*
> @@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ struct pmu_hw_events {
>  	struct arm_pmu		*percpu_pmu;
>  };
>  
> +enum armpmu_attr_groups {
> +	ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_EVENTS,
> +	ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_FORMATS,
> +	ARMPMU_NR_ATTR_GROUPS
> +};
> +
>  struct arm_pmu {
>  	struct pmu	pmu;
>  	cpumask_t	active_irqs;
> @@ -111,6 +117,7 @@ struct arm_pmu {
>  	struct pmu_hw_events	__percpu *hw_events;
>  	struct list_head	entry;
>  	struct notifier_block	cpu_pm_nb;
> +	const struct attribute_group *attr_groups[ARMPMU_NR_ATTR_GROUPS + 1];

Is the '+ 1' because the array has to be NULL terminated? Probably worth
a comment to disuade people from sending "obvious" fixes.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFCv4 1/7] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add common attr group fields
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:25:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160909102554.GF20192@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473330112-28528-2-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:21:46AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> In preparation for adding common attribute groups, add an array of
> attribute group pointers to arm_pmu, which will be used if the
> backend hasn't already set pmu::attr_groups.
> 
> Subsequent patches will move backends over to using these, before adding
> common fields.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c       | 3 +++
>  include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index f5e1008..145caf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -1039,6 +1039,9 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		goto out_free;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!pmu->pmu.attr_groups)
> +		pmu->pmu.attr_groups = pmu->attr_groups;
> +
>  	ret = cpu_pmu_init(pmu);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_free;
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> index e188438..8030814 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> -
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
>  
>  /*
> @@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ struct pmu_hw_events {
>  	struct arm_pmu		*percpu_pmu;
>  };
>  
> +enum armpmu_attr_groups {
> +	ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_EVENTS,
> +	ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_FORMATS,
> +	ARMPMU_NR_ATTR_GROUPS
> +};
> +
>  struct arm_pmu {
>  	struct pmu	pmu;
>  	cpumask_t	active_irqs;
> @@ -111,6 +117,7 @@ struct arm_pmu {
>  	struct pmu_hw_events	__percpu *hw_events;
>  	struct list_head	entry;
>  	struct notifier_block	cpu_pm_nb;
> +	const struct attribute_group *attr_groups[ARMPMU_NR_ATTR_GROUPS + 1];

Is the '+ 1' because the array has to be NULL terminated? Probably worth
a comment to disuade people from sending "obvious" fixes.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-09 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-08 10:21 [RFCv4 0/7] arm_pmu/perf tools: play nicely with CPU PMU cpumasks Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21 ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21 ` [RFCv4 1/7] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add common attr group fields Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-09 10:25   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-09-09 10:25     ` Will Deacon
2016-09-09 11:05     ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-09 11:05       ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21 ` [RFCv4 2/7] arm64: perf: move to common attr_group fields Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21 ` [RFCv4 3/7] arm: " Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21 ` [RFCv4 4/7] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: only use common attr_groups Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21 ` [RFCv4 5/7] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: expose a cpumask in sysfs Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-09 10:24   ` Will Deacon
2016-09-09 10:24     ` Will Deacon
2016-09-09 11:04     ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-09 11:04       ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21 ` [RFCv4 6/7] perf: util: only open events on CPUs an evsel permits Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-09  5:53   ` [tip:perf/core] perf evlist: Only " tip-bot for Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21 ` [RFCv4 7/7] perf: util: support alternative sysfs cpumask Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:21   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-09  5:54   ` [tip:perf/core] perf pmu: Support " tip-bot for Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 10:38 ` [RFCv4 0/7] arm_pmu/perf tools: play nicely with CPU PMU cpumasks Will Deacon
2016-09-08 10:38   ` Will Deacon
2016-09-08 11:29   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 11:29     ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-08 16:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-08 16:25   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-08 18:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-08 18:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-09  9:31     ` Will Deacon
2016-09-09  9:31       ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160909102554.GF20192@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.