All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>
Cc: "Matthijs van Duin" <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com>,
	"David Rivshin" <drivshin@allworx.com>,
	"Benoît Cousson" <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Marek Belisko" <marek@goldelico.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Discussions about the Letux Kernel"
	<letux-kernel@openphoenux.org>,
	"Neil Armstrong" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:07:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160913220710.wo7jjyql362pttbs@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7C9DF12E-32C6-4D7C-BAAD-5CE9F8BA305A@goldelico.com>

* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> [160910 02:10]:
> > Am 10.09.2016 um 10:20 schrieb Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com>:
> 
> But with the patch submitted, I just want to give the dts of a single
> device I have even designed a more reasonable value than in current
> linux/master and don't really want to make it a fundamental discussion...

So what's the verdict here on this patch? Should we wait for the driver
to get fixed?

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns-xXXSsgcRVICgSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Matthijs van Duin"
	<matthijsvanduin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"David Rivshin"
	<drivshin-5fOYsn7Fw8lBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Benoît Cousson"
	<bcousson-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	"Russell King" <linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org>,
	"Marek Belisko" <marek-xXXSsgcRVICgSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"Discussions about the Letux Kernel"
	<letux-kernel-S0jZdbWzriLCfDggNXIi3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Neil Armstrong"
	<narmstrong-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:07:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160913220710.wo7jjyql362pttbs@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7C9DF12E-32C6-4D7C-BAAD-5CE9F8BA305A-xXXSsgcRVICgSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>

* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns-xXXSsgcRVICgSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org> [160910 02:10]:
> > Am 10.09.2016 um 10:20 schrieb Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:
> 
> But with the patch submitted, I just want to give the dts of a single
> device I have even designed a more reasonable value than in current
> linux/master and don't really want to make it a fundamental discussion...

So what's the verdict here on this patch? Should we wait for the driver
to get fixed?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-13 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-05  9:16 [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-09-10  3:17 ` Matthijs van Duin
2016-09-10  7:08   ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-09-10  7:14     ` [Letux-kernel] " H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-09-10  7:14       ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-09-10  8:20     ` Matthijs van Duin
2016-09-10  8:20       ` Matthijs van Duin
2016-09-10  9:10       ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-09-13 22:07         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2016-09-13 22:07           ` Tony Lindgren
2016-09-14  4:28           ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-09-14  4:28             ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2016-09-14 18:12             ` Tony Lindgren
2016-09-14 18:12               ` Tony Lindgren
2016-09-10 13:48   ` Neil Armstrong
2016-09-10 13:48     ` Neil Armstrong
2016-09-12 14:41     ` David Rivshin
2016-09-12 15:03       ` Neil Armstrong
2016-09-12 15:03         ` Neil Armstrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160913220710.wo7jjyql362pttbs@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drivshin@allworx.com \
    --cc=hns@goldelico.com \
    --cc=letux-kernel@openphoenux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=marek@goldelico.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthijsvanduin@gmail.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.