Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates

Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates

[Sridhar Kondabathini]

Hi,

    When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on T1024RDB ( we used 
kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC support), then we
are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC specification (which is
~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes.

     Can you please help on this.

 

Regards,

Sridhar Kondabathini,
Research engineer,
PSG lab,
Center for Development Of Telematics
9480484821.




Disclaimer:
----------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely 
for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not the 
intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking 
any 
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The 
sender does not a


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates

[Ben Greear]

Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar
setup?

Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol?  How are you generating the
traffic?

Thanks,
Ben

On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote:
> Hi,
>
>      When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on T1024RDB ( we used
> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC support), then we
> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC specification (which is
> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes.
>
>       Can you please help on this.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sridhar Kondabathini,
> Research engineer,
> PSG lab,
> Center for Development Of Telematics
> 9480484821.
>
>
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> ----------
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely
> for
> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not the
> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking
> any
> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The
> sender does not a
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates

[Adrian Chadd]

... and what's "TEC specification" ?

-
a


On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar
> setup?
>
> Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol?  How are you generating the
> traffic?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>
> On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>      When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on
>> T1024RDB ( we used
>> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC
>> support), then we
>> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC
>> specification (which is
>> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes.
>>
>>       Can you please help on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sridhar Kondabathini,
>> Research engineer,
>> PSG lab,
>> Center for Development Of Telematics
>> 9480484821.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Disclaimer:
>> ----------
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
>> solely
>> for
>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you
>> are not the
>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
>> or taking
>> any
>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
>> prohibited. The
>> sender does not a
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath10k mailing list
>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>>
>
>
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates

[Sridhar Konabathini]

Hi,
    I didnt try with ath9k drivers on the same setup. 

    we are using  WiFi capacity test tool on Lanforge to test the performance, this will
generate the traffic. we are selecting the UDP protocol (packet - 1472 Bytes).

    As per TEC spec. required data rates are given below.

    Mode         Asso. rate         Throughput

802.11a            54 Mbps             28 Mbps

802.11g            54 Mbps             28 Mbps

    But we are getting only 26-27Mbps, how to improve this throughput ?

    [TEC(Telecommunication Engineering Centre, Govt. India) is a technical body,
prepares specification of common Telecom standards.]

Regards,
Sridhar


On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:26 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote
> .... and what's "TEC specification" ?
> 
> -
> a
> 
> On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar
> > setup?
> >
> > Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol?  How are you generating the
> > traffic?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ben
> >
> >
> > On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>      When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on
> >> T1024RDB ( we used
> >> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC
> >> support), then we
> >> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC
> >> specification (which is
> >> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes.
> >>
> >>       Can you please help on this.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Sridhar Kondabathini,
> >> Research engineer,
> >> PSG lab,
> >> Center for Development Of Telematics
> >> 9480484821.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Disclaimer:
> >> ----------
> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> >> solely
> >> for
> >> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you
> >> are not the
> >> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
> >> or taking
> >> any
> >> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
> >> prohibited. The
> >> sender does not a
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ath10k mailing list
> >> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> > Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ath10k mailing list
> > ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k


Regards,

Sridhar Kondabathini,
Research engineer,
PSG lab,
Center for Development Of Telematics
9480484821.




Disclaimer:
----------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely 
for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not the 
intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking 
any 
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The 
sender does not a


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates

[Ben Greear]

LANforge is going to be running a modified driver and firmware, though likely
it is no worse at performance in this case than stock code.

What is the device under test?

And, are you in an isolation chamber, using SMA cables, attenuation, etc?

There are lots of things that can impact wifi throughput so you have to provide
lots more details in order for anyone to understand why the throughput might be
less than expected.

And if it is specific to LANforge, please send email to support@candelatech.com

Thanks,
Ben


On 09/19/2016 08:46 PM, Sridhar Konabathini wrote:
> Hi,
>      I didnt try with ath9k drivers on the same setup.
>
>      we are using  WiFi capacity test tool on Lanforge to test the performance, this will
> generate the traffic. we are selecting the UDP protocol (packet - 1472 Bytes).
>
>      As per TEC spec. required data rates are given below.
>
>      Mode         Asso. rate         Throughput
>
> 802.11a            54 Mbps             28 Mbps
>
> 802.11g            54 Mbps             28 Mbps
>
>      But we are getting only 26-27Mbps, how to improve this throughput ?
>
>      [TEC(Telecommunication Engineering Centre, Govt. India) is a technical body,
> prepares specification of common Telecom standards.]
>
> Regards,
> Sridhar
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:26 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote
>> .... and what's "TEC specification" ?
>>
>> -
>> a
>>
>> On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar
>>> setup?
>>>
>>> Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol?  How are you generating the
>>> traffic?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>       When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on
>>>> T1024RDB ( we used
>>>> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC
>>>> support), then we
>>>> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC
>>>> specification (which is
>>>> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes.
>>>>
>>>>        Can you please help on this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Sridhar Kondabathini,
>>>> Research engineer,
>>>> PSG lab,
>>>> Center for Development Of Telematics
>>>> 9480484821.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Disclaimer:
>>>> ----------
>>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
>>>> solely
>>>> for
>>>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you
>>>> are not the
>>>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
>>>> or taking
>>>> any
>>>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
>>>> prohibited. The
>>>> sender does not a
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ath10k mailing list
>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>>> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ath10k mailing list
>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath10k mailing list
>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sridhar Kondabathini,
> Research engineer,
> PSG lab,
> Center for Development Of Telematics
> 9480484821.
>
>
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> ----------
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely
> for
> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not the
> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking
> any
> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The
> sender does not a
>

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates

[Sridhar Konabathini]

Hi,
   Yes, we are doing the testing in an isolation chamber (no attenuators used), antennas
are connected to RF card via SMA cable. Tx power is 5dBm. we are not suspecting Lanforge
as it gives required throughput in different WiFi setup.
  here Device Under test is T2014 based card.

Regards,
Sridhar

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:33:03 -0700, Ben Greear wrote
> LANforge is going to be running a modified driver and firmware, though likely
> it is no worse at performance in this case than stock code.
> 
> What is the device under test?
> 
> And, are you in an isolation chamber, using SMA cables, attenuation, etc?
> 
> There are lots of things that can impact wifi throughput so you have to provide
> lots more details in order for anyone to understand why the throughput might be
> less than expected.
> 
> And if it is specific to LANforge, please send email to support@candelatech.com
> 
> Thanks,
> Ben
> 
> On 09/19/2016 08:46 PM, Sridhar Konabathini wrote:
> > Hi,
> >      I didnt try with ath9k drivers on the same setup.
> >
> >      we are using  WiFi capacity test tool on Lanforge to test the performance, this
will
> > generate the traffic. we are selecting the UDP protocol (packet - 1472 Bytes).
> >
> >      As per TEC spec. required data rates are given below.
> >
> >      Mode         Asso. rate         Throughput
> >
> > 802.11a            54 Mbps             28 Mbps
> >
> > 802.11g            54 Mbps             28 Mbps
> >
> >      But we are getting only 26-27Mbps, how to improve this throughput ?
> >
> >      [TEC(Telecommunication Engineering Centre, Govt. India) is a technical body,
> > prepares specification of common Telecom standards.]
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sridhar
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:26 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote
> >> .... and what's "TEC specification" ?
> >>
> >> -
> >> a
> >>
> >> On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
> >>> Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar
> >>> setup?
> >>>
> >>> Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol?  How are you generating the
> >>> traffic?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ben
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>       When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on
> >>>> T1024RDB ( we used
> >>>> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC
> >>>> support), then we
> >>>> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC
> >>>> specification (which is
> >>>> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes.
> >>>>
> >>>>        Can you please help on this.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Sridhar Kondabathini,
> >>>> Research engineer,
> >>>> PSG lab,
> >>>> Center for Development Of Telematics
> >>>> 9480484821.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Disclaimer:
> >>>> ----------
> >>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> >>>> solely
> >>>> for
> >>>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you
> >>>> are not the
> >>>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
> >>>> or taking
> >>>> any
> >>>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
> >>>> prohibited. The
> >>>> sender does not a
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> ath10k mailing list
> >>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> >>> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> ath10k mailing list
> >>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ath10k mailing list
> >> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sridhar Kondabathini,
> > Research engineer,
> > PSG lab,
> > Center for Development Of Telematics
> > 9480484821.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Disclaimer:
> > ----------
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely
> > for
> > the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not the
> > intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking
> > any
> > action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The
> > sender does not a
> >
> 
> -- 
> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k


Regards,

Sridhar Kondabathini,
Research engineer,
PSG lab,
Center for Development Of Telematics
9480484821.




Disclaimer:
----------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely 
for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not the 
intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking 
any 
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The 
sender does not a


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates

[Ben Greear]

You normally need to add 30-60 db of attenuation to get best throughput
when directly cabling with SMA cables.  Please try adding more attenuation.

What firmware are you using on the T1024RDB?  Maybe also try using a different
firmware version to see if that helps.

Thanks,
Ben


On 09/20/2016 01:04 AM, Sridhar Konabathini wrote:
> Hi,
>     Yes, we are doing the testing in an isolation chamber (no attenuators used), antennas
> are connected to RF card via SMA cable. Tx power is 5dBm. we are not suspecting Lanforge
> as it gives required throughput in different WiFi setup.
>    here Device Under test is T2014 based card.
>
> Regards,
> Sridhar
>
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:33:03 -0700, Ben Greear wrote
>> LANforge is going to be running a modified driver and firmware, though likely
>> it is no worse at performance in this case than stock code.
>>
>> What is the device under test?
>>
>> And, are you in an isolation chamber, using SMA cables, attenuation, etc?
>>
>> There are lots of things that can impact wifi throughput so you have to provide
>> lots more details in order for anyone to understand why the throughput might be
>> less than expected.
>>
>> And if it is specific to LANforge, please send email to support@candelatech.com
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
>> On 09/19/2016 08:46 PM, Sridhar Konabathini wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>       I didnt try with ath9k drivers on the same setup.
>>>
>>>       we are using  WiFi capacity test tool on Lanforge to test the performance, this
> will
>>> generate the traffic. we are selecting the UDP protocol (packet - 1472 Bytes).
>>>
>>>       As per TEC spec. required data rates are given below.
>>>
>>>       Mode         Asso. rate         Throughput
>>>
>>> 802.11a            54 Mbps             28 Mbps
>>>
>>> 802.11g            54 Mbps             28 Mbps
>>>
>>>       But we are getting only 26-27Mbps, how to improve this throughput ?
>>>
>>>       [TEC(Telecommunication Engineering Centre, Govt. India) is a technical body,
>>> prepares specification of common Telecom standards.]
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sridhar
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:26 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote
>>>> .... and what's "TEC specification" ?
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> a
>>>>
>>>> On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>>>> Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar
>>>>> setup?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol?  How are you generating the
>>>>> traffic?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ben
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>        When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on
>>>>>> T1024RDB ( we used
>>>>>> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC
>>>>>> support), then we
>>>>>> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC
>>>>>> specification (which is
>>>>>> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Can you please help on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sridhar Kondabathini,
>>>>>> Research engineer,
>>>>>> PSG lab,
>>>>>> Center for Development Of Telematics
>>>>>> 9480484821.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Disclaimer:
>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
>>>>>> solely
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you
>>>>>> are not the
>>>>>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
>>>>>> or taking
>>>>>> any
>>>>>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
>>>>>> prohibited. The
>>>>>> sender does not a
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> ath10k mailing list
>>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>>>>> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ath10k mailing list
>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ath10k mailing list
>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Sridhar Kondabathini,
>>> Research engineer,
>>> PSG lab,
>>> Center for Development Of Telematics
>>> 9480484821.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Disclaimer:
>>> ----------
>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely
>>> for
>>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not the
>>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking
>>> any
>>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The
>>> sender does not a
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath10k mailing list
>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sridhar Kondabathini,
> Research engineer,
> PSG lab,
> Center for Development Of Telematics
> 9480484821.
>
>
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> ----------
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely
> for
> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you are not the
> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking
> any
> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The
> sender does not a
>

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k