All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>,
	Ralf-Peter Rohbeck <Ralf-Peter.Rohbeck@quantum.com>,
	Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] followups to reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:20:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160926162025.21555-1-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)

Reviews of series "reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions" [1]
resulted in some followup patches and Michal suggested posting them in a new
threads, so here it goes.

Patch 1 is meant to be squashed into the following patch in mmotm:
mm-compaction-more-reliably-increase-direct-compaction-priority.patch

Patch 2 is a cleanup for consistency. Patches 3 and 4 deal with the last
(hopefully) remaining heuristic in the reclaim/compaction-vs-OOM scenario,
which is the fragmentation index.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg113133.html

Vlastimil Babka (4):
  mm, compaction: more reliably increase direct compaction priority-fix
  mm, page_alloc: pull no_progress_loops update to
    should_reclaim_retry()
  mm, compaction: ignore fragindex from compaction_zonelist_suitable()
  mm, compaction: restrict fragindex to costly orders

 mm/compaction.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 mm/page_alloc.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

-- 
2.10.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>,
	Ralf-Peter Rohbeck <Ralf-Peter.Rohbeck@quantum.com>,
	Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] followups to reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:20:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160926162025.21555-1-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)

Reviews of series "reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions" [1]
resulted in some followup patches and Michal suggested posting them in a new
threads, so here it goes.

Patch 1 is meant to be squashed into the following patch in mmotm:
mm-compaction-more-reliably-increase-direct-compaction-priority.patch

Patch 2 is a cleanup for consistency. Patches 3 and 4 deal with the last
(hopefully) remaining heuristic in the reclaim/compaction-vs-OOM scenario,
which is the fragmentation index.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg113133.html

Vlastimil Babka (4):
  mm, compaction: more reliably increase direct compaction priority-fix
  mm, page_alloc: pull no_progress_loops update to
    should_reclaim_retry()
  mm, compaction: ignore fragindex from compaction_zonelist_suitable()
  mm, compaction: restrict fragindex to costly orders

 mm/compaction.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 mm/page_alloc.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

-- 
2.10.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2016-09-26 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-26 16:20 Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-09-26 16:20 ` [PATCH 0/4] followups to reintroduce compaction feedback for OOM decisions Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-26 16:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, compaction: more reliably increase direct compaction priority-fix Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-26 16:20   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-27  3:25   ` Hillf Danton
2016-09-27  3:25     ` Hillf Danton
2016-09-26 16:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm, page_alloc: pull no_progress_loops update to should_reclaim_retry() Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-26 16:20   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-26 16:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, compaction: ignore fragindex from compaction_zonelist_suitable() Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-26 16:20   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-26 20:15   ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-26 20:15     ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-29  9:57   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-29  9:57     ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-26 16:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm, compaction: restrict fragindex to costly orders Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-26 16:20   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-09-26 20:29   ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-26 20:29     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160926162025.21555-1-vbabka@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=Ralf-Peter.Rohbeck@quantum.com \
    --cc=a.miskiewicz@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.