Jewel + nfs-ganesha v2.4

Jewel + nfs-ganesha v2.4

[Karol Mroz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 529 bytes --]

Hi Folks,

Building nfs-ganesha v2.4 against Ceph 10.2.3 (effectively upstream/jewel), it
would appear that the RGW FSAL does not build due to missing:

+#define LIBRGW_FILE_VER_MAJOR 1
+#define LIBRGW_FILE_VER_MINOR 1
+#define LIBRGW_FILE_VER_EXTRA 0

in /usr/include/rados/{librgw.h, rgw_file.h}.

These were added via:

commit 355ccc5ded7f0b459bca24bc8b504b41807c583d
    librgw: add API version defines for librgw and rgw_file

Any plans to backport this to the jewel release branch?

-- 
Regards,
Karol

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

Re: Jewel + nfs-ganesha v2.4

[Matt Benjamin]

Hi Karol,

Yes, jewel backports are in progress.

Matt

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karol Mroz" <kmroz@suse.de>
> To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 3:37:45 PM
> Subject: Jewel + nfs-ganesha v2.4
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> Building nfs-ganesha v2.4 against Ceph 10.2.3 (effectively upstream/jewel),
> it
> would appear that the RGW FSAL does not build due to missing:
> 
> +#define LIBRGW_FILE_VER_MAJOR 1
> +#define LIBRGW_FILE_VER_MINOR 1
> +#define LIBRGW_FILE_VER_EXTRA 0
> 
> in /usr/include/rados/{librgw.h, rgw_file.h}.
> 
> These were added via:
> 
> commit 355ccc5ded7f0b459bca24bc8b504b41807c583d
>     librgw: add API version defines for librgw and rgw_file
> 
> Any plans to backport this to the jewel release branch?
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Karol
> 

-- 
Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-707-0660
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309