* [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q
Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A, David Ahern
The netdev adjacency tracking is failing to create proper dependencies
for some topologies. For example this topology
+--------+
| myvrf |
+--------+
| |
| +---------+
| | macvlan |
| +---------+
| |
+----------+
| bridge |
+----------+
|
+--------+
| bond0 |
+--------+
|
+--------+
| eth3 |
+--------+
hits 1 of 2 problems depending on the order of enslavement. The base set of
commands for both cases:
ip link add bond1 type bond
ip link set bond1 up
ip link set eth3 down
ip link set eth3 master bond1
ip link set eth3 up
ip link add bridge type bridge
ip link set bridge up
ip link add macvlan link bridge type macvlan
ip link set macvlan up
ip link add myvrf type vrf table 1234
ip link set myvrf up
ip link set bridge master myvrf
Case 1 enslave macvlan to the vrf before enslaving the bond to the bridge:
ip link set macvlan master myvrf
ip link set bond1 master bridge
Attempts to delete the VRF:
ip link delete myvrf
trigger the BUG in __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove:
[ 587.405260] tried to remove device eth3 from myvrf
[ 587.407269] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 587.408918] kernel BUG at /home/dsa/kernel.git/net/core/dev.c:5661!
[ 587.411113] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 587.412454] Modules linked in: macvlan bridge stp llc bonding vrf
[ 587.414765] CPU: 0 PID: 726 Comm: ip Not tainted 4.8.0+ #109
[ 587.416766] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140531_083030-gandalf 04/01/2014
[ 587.420241] task: ffff88013ab6eec0 task.stack: ffffc90000628000
[ 587.422163] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813cef03>] [<ffffffff813cef03>] __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove+0x40/0x12c
...
[ 587.446053] Call Trace:
[ 587.446424] [<ffffffff813d1542>] __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink+0x20/0x3c
[ 587.447390] [<ffffffff813d16a3>] netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0xfa/0x15e
[ 587.448297] [<ffffffffa00003a3>] vrf_del_slave+0x13/0x2a [vrf]
[ 587.449153] [<ffffffffa00004a4>] vrf_dev_uninit+0xea/0x114 [vrf]
[ 587.450036] [<ffffffff813d19b0>] rollback_registered_many+0x22b/0x2da
[ 587.450974] [<ffffffff813d1aac>] unregister_netdevice_many+0x17/0x48
[ 587.451903] [<ffffffff813de444>] rtnl_delete_link+0x3c/0x43
[ 587.452719] [<ffffffff813dedcd>] rtnl_dellink+0x180/0x194
When the BUG is converted to a WARN_ON it shows 4 missing adjacencies:
eth3 - myvrf, mvrf - eth3, bond1 - myvrf and myvrf - bond1
All of those are because the __netdev_upper_dev_link function does not
properly link macvlan lower devices to myvrf when it is enslaved.
The second case just flips the ordering of the enslavements:
ip link set bond1 master bridge
ip link set macvlan master myvrf
Then run:
ip link delete bond1
ip link delete myvrf
The vrf delete command hangs because myvrf has a reference that has not
been released. In this case the removal code does not account for 2 paths
between eth3 and myvrf - one from bridge to vrf and the other through the
macvlan.
Rather than try to maintain a linked list of all upper and lower devices
per netdevice, only track the direct neighbors. The remaining stack can
be determined by recursively walking the neighbors.
The existing netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu,
netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev and netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev_rcu macros
are replaced with APIs that walk the upper and lower device lists. The
new APIs take a callback function and a data arg that is passed to the
callback for each device in the list. Drivers using the old macros are
converted in separate patches to make it easier on reviewers. It is an
API conversion only; no functional change is intended.
DaveM: Given the impact of this bug (both cases requiring a reboot) I
would like to get this backported to at least the 4.8 tree which as I
understand it has been targeted as the next LTS.
David Ahern (11):
net: Remove refnr arg when inserting link adjacencies
net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
net: bonding: Flip to the new dev walk API
IB/core: Flip to the new dev walk API
IB/ipoib: Flip to new dev walk API
ixgbe: Flip to the new dev walk API
mlxsw: Flip to the new dev walk API
rocker: Flip to the new dev walk API
net: Remove all_adj_list and its references
net: Add warning if any lower device is still in adjacency list
net: dev: Improve debug statements for adjacency tracking
drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h | 9 +-
drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c | 42 +--
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c | 37 ++-
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 82 +++---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 21 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 132 ++++++----
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 37 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 31 ++-
include/linux/netdevice.h | 38 ++-
net/core/dev.c | 349 ++++++++++++-------------
10 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 350 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
The netdev adjacency tracking is failing to create proper dependencies
for some topologies. For example this topology
+--------+
| myvrf |
+--------+
| |
| +---------+
| | macvlan |
| +---------+
| |
+----------+
| bridge |
+----------+
|
+--------+
| bond0 |
+--------+
|
+--------+
| eth3 |
+--------+
hits 1 of 2 problems depending on the order of enslavement. The base set of
commands for both cases:
ip link add bond1 type bond
ip link set bond1 up
ip link set eth3 down
ip link set eth3 master bond1
ip link set eth3 up
ip link add bridge type bridge
ip link set bridge up
ip link add macvlan link bridge type macvlan
ip link set macvlan up
ip link add myvrf type vrf table 1234
ip link set myvrf up
ip link set bridge master myvrf
Case 1 enslave macvlan to the vrf before enslaving the bond to the bridge:
ip link set macvlan master myvrf
ip link set bond1 master bridge
Attempts to delete the VRF:
ip link delete myvrf
trigger the BUG in __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove:
[ 587.405260] tried to remove device eth3 from myvrf
[ 587.407269] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 587.408918] kernel BUG at /home/dsa/kernel.git/net/core/dev.c:5661!
[ 587.411113] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[ 587.412454] Modules linked in: macvlan bridge stp llc bonding vrf
[ 587.414765] CPU: 0 PID: 726 Comm: ip Not tainted 4.8.0+ #109
[ 587.416766] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140531_083030-gandalf 04/01/2014
[ 587.420241] task: ffff88013ab6eec0 task.stack: ffffc90000628000
[ 587.422163] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813cef03>] [<ffffffff813cef03>] __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove+0x40/0x12c
...
[ 587.446053] Call Trace:
[ 587.446424] [<ffffffff813d1542>] __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink+0x20/0x3c
[ 587.447390] [<ffffffff813d16a3>] netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0xfa/0x15e
[ 587.448297] [<ffffffffa00003a3>] vrf_del_slave+0x13/0x2a [vrf]
[ 587.449153] [<ffffffffa00004a4>] vrf_dev_uninit+0xea/0x114 [vrf]
[ 587.450036] [<ffffffff813d19b0>] rollback_registered_many+0x22b/0x2da
[ 587.450974] [<ffffffff813d1aac>] unregister_netdevice_many+0x17/0x48
[ 587.451903] [<ffffffff813de444>] rtnl_delete_link+0x3c/0x43
[ 587.452719] [<ffffffff813dedcd>] rtnl_dellink+0x180/0x194
When the BUG is converted to a WARN_ON it shows 4 missing adjacencies:
eth3 - myvrf, mvrf - eth3, bond1 - myvrf and myvrf - bond1
All of those are because the __netdev_upper_dev_link function does not
properly link macvlan lower devices to myvrf when it is enslaved.
The second case just flips the ordering of the enslavements:
ip link set bond1 master bridge
ip link set macvlan master myvrf
Then run:
ip link delete bond1
ip link delete myvrf
The vrf delete command hangs because myvrf has a reference that has not
been released. In this case the removal code does not account for 2 paths
between eth3 and myvrf - one from bridge to vrf and the other through the
macvlan.
Rather than try to maintain a linked list of all upper and lower devices
per netdevice, only track the direct neighbors. The remaining stack can
be determined by recursively walking the neighbors.
The existing netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu,
netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev and netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev_rcu macros
are replaced with APIs that walk the upper and lower device lists. The
new APIs take a callback function and a data arg that is passed to the
callback for each device in the list. Drivers using the old macros are
converted in separate patches to make it easier on reviewers. It is an
API conversion only; no functional change is intended.
DaveM: Given the impact of this bug (both cases requiring a reboot) I
would like to get this backported to at least the 4.8 tree which as I
understand it has been targeted as the next LTS.
David Ahern (11):
net: Remove refnr arg when inserting link adjacencies
net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
net: bonding: Flip to the new dev walk API
IB/core: Flip to the new dev walk API
IB/ipoib: Flip to new dev walk API
ixgbe: Flip to the new dev walk API
mlxsw: Flip to the new dev walk API
rocker: Flip to the new dev walk API
net: Remove all_adj_list and its references
net: Add warning if any lower device is still in adjacency list
net: dev: Improve debug statements for adjacency tracking
drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h | 9 +-
drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c | 42 +--
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c | 37 ++-
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 82 +++---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 21 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 132 ++++++----
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 37 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 31 ++-
include/linux/netdevice.h | 38 ++-
net/core/dev.c | 349 ++++++++++++-------------
10 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 350 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: Remove refnr arg when inserting link adjacencies
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q
Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A, David Ahern
Commit 93409033ae65 ("net: Add netdev all_adj_list refcnt propagation to
fix panic") propagated the refnr to insert and remove functions tracking
the netdev adjacency graph. However, for the insert path the refnr can
only be 1. Accordingly, remove the refnr argument to make that clear.
ie., the refnr arg in 93409033ae65 was only needed for the remove path.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
---
net/core/dev.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index f1fe26f66458..5aaa12a9e369 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5589,7 +5589,6 @@ static inline bool netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(struct net_device *dev,
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *adj_dev,
- u16 ref_nr,
struct list_head *dev_list,
void *private, bool master)
{
@@ -5599,7 +5598,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
adj = __netdev_find_adj(adj_dev, dev_list);
if (adj) {
- adj->ref_nr += ref_nr;
+ adj->ref_nr += 1;
return 0;
}
@@ -5609,7 +5608,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
adj->dev = adj_dev;
adj->master = master;
- adj->ref_nr = ref_nr;
+ adj->ref_nr = 1;
adj->private = private;
dev_hold(adj_dev);
@@ -5683,22 +5682,21 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
- u16 ref_nr,
struct list_head *up_list,
struct list_head *down_list,
void *private, bool master)
{
int ret;
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr, up_list,
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, upper_dev, up_list,
private, master);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, ref_nr, down_list,
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, down_list,
private, false);
if (ret) {
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr, up_list);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, 1, up_list);
return ret;
}
@@ -5706,10 +5704,9 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(struct net_device *dev,
}
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *upper_dev,
- u16 ref_nr)
+ struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr,
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
&dev->all_adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->all_adj_list.lower,
NULL, false);
@@ -5738,12 +5735,12 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
void *private, bool master)
{
- int ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, upper_dev, 1);
+ int ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, upper_dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev, 1,
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
&dev->adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->adj_list.lower,
private, master);
@@ -5812,7 +5809,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
pr_debug("Interlinking %s with %s, non-neighbour\n",
i->dev->name, j->dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev);
if (ret)
goto rollback_mesh;
}
@@ -5822,7 +5819,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
pr_debug("linking %s's upper device %s with %s\n",
upper_dev->name, i->dev->name, dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev);
if (ret)
goto rollback_upper_mesh;
}
@@ -5831,7 +5828,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
pr_debug("linking %s's lower device %s with %s\n", dev->name,
i->dev->name, upper_dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev);
if (ret)
goto rollback_lower_mesh;
}
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: Remove refnr arg when inserting link adjacencies
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Commit 93409033ae65 ("net: Add netdev all_adj_list refcnt propagation to
fix panic") propagated the refnr to insert and remove functions tracking
the netdev adjacency graph. However, for the insert path the refnr can
only be 1. Accordingly, remove the refnr argument to make that clear.
ie., the refnr arg in 93409033ae65 was only needed for the remove path.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index f1fe26f66458..5aaa12a9e369 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5589,7 +5589,6 @@ static inline bool netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(struct net_device *dev,
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *adj_dev,
- u16 ref_nr,
struct list_head *dev_list,
void *private, bool master)
{
@@ -5599,7 +5598,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
adj = __netdev_find_adj(adj_dev, dev_list);
if (adj) {
- adj->ref_nr += ref_nr;
+ adj->ref_nr += 1;
return 0;
}
@@ -5609,7 +5608,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
adj->dev = adj_dev;
adj->master = master;
- adj->ref_nr = ref_nr;
+ adj->ref_nr = 1;
adj->private = private;
dev_hold(adj_dev);
@@ -5683,22 +5682,21 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
- u16 ref_nr,
struct list_head *up_list,
struct list_head *down_list,
void *private, bool master)
{
int ret;
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr, up_list,
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(dev, upper_dev, up_list,
private, master);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, ref_nr, down_list,
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(upper_dev, dev, down_list,
private, false);
if (ret) {
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr, up_list);
+ __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, upper_dev, 1, up_list);
return ret;
}
@@ -5706,10 +5704,9 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(struct net_device *dev,
}
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *upper_dev,
- u16 ref_nr)
+ struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr,
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
&dev->all_adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->all_adj_list.lower,
NULL, false);
@@ -5738,12 +5735,12 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
void *private, bool master)
{
- int ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, upper_dev, 1);
+ int ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, upper_dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev, 1,
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
&dev->adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->adj_list.lower,
private, master);
@@ -5812,7 +5809,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
pr_debug("Interlinking %s with %s, non-neighbour\n",
i->dev->name, j->dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev);
if (ret)
goto rollback_mesh;
}
@@ -5822,7 +5819,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
pr_debug("linking %s's upper device %s with %s\n",
upper_dev->name, i->dev->name, dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev);
if (ret)
goto rollback_upper_mesh;
}
@@ -5831,7 +5828,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
pr_debug("linking %s's lower device %s with %s\n", dev->name,
i->dev->name, upper_dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
+ ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev);
if (ret)
goto rollback_lower_mesh;
}
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri, netdev, davem
Cc: dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock, linux-rdma, j.vosburgh,
vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher, intel-wired-lan, David Ahern
This patch introduces netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu,
netdev_walk_all_lower_dev and netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu. These
functions recursively walk the adj_list of devices to determine all upper
and lower devices.
The functions take a callback function that is invoked for each device
in the list. If the callback returns non-0, the walk is terminated and
the functions return that code back to callers.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 17 +++++
net/core/dev.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 175 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 136ae6bbe81e..053f6f75f26a 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3839,6 +3839,14 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
updev; \
updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct net_device *upper_dev);
+
void *netdev_lower_get_next_private(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter);
void *netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -3882,6 +3890,15 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
ldev; \
ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+
void *netdev_adjacent_get_private(struct list_head *adj_list);
void *netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev);
struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 5aaa12a9e369..fcf3641db783 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5292,6 +5292,37 @@ bool netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev);
/**
+ * netdev_has_upper_dev_all - Check if device is linked to an upper device
+ * @dev: device
+ * @upper_dev: upper device to check
+ *
+ * Find out if a device is linked to specified upper device and return true
+ * in case it is. Note that this checks the entire upper device chain.
+ * The caller must hold rcu lock.
+ */
+
+static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
+
+ if (upper_dev == dev)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct net_device *upper_dev)
+{
+ if (netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, __netdev_has_upper_dev,
+ upper_dev))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu);
+
+/**
* netdev_has_any_upper_dev - Check if device is linked to some device
* @dev: device
*
@@ -5391,6 +5422,51 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *upper;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
+
+ upper = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ if (&upper->list == &dev->adj_list.upper)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = &upper->list;
+
+ return upper->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct net_device *udev;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.upper,
+ udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter));
+ udev;
+ udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter))) {
+ /* first is the upper device itself */
+ ret = fn(udev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its upper devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(udev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu);
+
/**
* netdev_lower_get_next_private - Get the next ->private from the
* lower neighbour list
@@ -5497,6 +5573,49 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+ lower = list_entry(*iter, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ if (&lower->list == &dev->adj_list.lower)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = lower->list.next;
+
+ return lower->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct net_device *ldev;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.lower,
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter));
+ ldev;
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter))) {
+ /* first is the lower device itself */
+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(ldev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev);
+
/**
* netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu - Get the next device from all
* lower neighbour list, RCU variant
@@ -5518,6 +5637,45 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+ lower = list_first_or_null_rcu(&dev->adj_list.lower,
+ struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ return lower ? lower->dev : NULL;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct net_device *ldev;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.lower,
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter));
+ ldev;
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter))) {
+ /* first is the lower device itself */
+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(ldev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu);
+
/**
* netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu - Get the first ->private from the
* lower neighbour list, RCU
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
This patch introduces netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu,
netdev_walk_all_lower_dev and netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu. These
functions recursively walk the adj_list of devices to determine all upper
and lower devices.
The functions take a callback function that is invoked for each device
in the list. If the callback returns non-0, the walk is terminated and
the functions return that code back to callers.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 17 +++++
net/core/dev.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 175 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 136ae6bbe81e..053f6f75f26a 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3839,6 +3839,14 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
updev; \
updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct net_device *upper_dev);
+
void *netdev_lower_get_next_private(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter);
void *netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -3882,6 +3890,15 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
ldev; \
ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+
void *netdev_adjacent_get_private(struct list_head *adj_list);
void *netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev);
struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 5aaa12a9e369..fcf3641db783 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5292,6 +5292,37 @@ bool netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev);
/**
+ * netdev_has_upper_dev_all - Check if device is linked to an upper device
+ * @dev: device
+ * @upper_dev: upper device to check
+ *
+ * Find out if a device is linked to specified upper device and return true
+ * in case it is. Note that this checks the entire upper device chain.
+ * The caller must hold rcu lock.
+ */
+
+static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
+
+ if (upper_dev == dev)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct net_device *upper_dev)
+{
+ if (netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, __netdev_has_upper_dev,
+ upper_dev))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu);
+
+/**
* netdev_has_any_upper_dev - Check if device is linked to some device
* @dev: device
*
@@ -5391,6 +5422,51 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *upper;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
+
+ upper = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ if (&upper->list == &dev->adj_list.upper)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = &upper->list;
+
+ return upper->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct net_device *udev;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.upper,
+ udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter));
+ udev;
+ udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter))) {
+ /* first is the upper device itself */
+ ret = fn(udev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its upper devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(udev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu);
+
/**
* netdev_lower_get_next_private - Get the next ->private from the
* lower neighbour list
@@ -5497,6 +5573,49 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+ lower = list_entry(*iter, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ if (&lower->list == &dev->adj_list.lower)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = lower->list.next;
+
+ return lower->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct net_device *ldev;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.lower,
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter));
+ ldev;
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter))) {
+ /* first is the lower device itself */
+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(ldev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev);
+
/**
* netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu - Get the next device from all
* lower neighbour list, RCU variant
@@ -5518,6 +5637,45 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+ lower = list_first_or_null_rcu(&dev->adj_list.lower,
+ struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ return lower ? lower->dev : NULL;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ struct net_device *ldev;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.lower,
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter));
+ ldev;
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter))) {
+ /* first is the lower device itself */
+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(ldev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu);
+
/**
* netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu - Get the first ->private from the
* lower neighbour list, RCU
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: bonding: Flip to the new dev walk API
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri, netdev, davem
Cc: dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock, linux-rdma, j.vosburgh,
vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher, intel-wired-lan, David Ahern
Convert alb_send_learning_packets and bond_has_this_ip to use the new
netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu API. In both cases this is just a move
to the new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 21 +++++++----
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index 551f0f8dead3..1ddedec61900 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -950,13 +950,61 @@ static void alb_send_lp_vid(struct slave *slave, u8 mac_addr[],
dev_queue_xmit(skb);
}
+struct alb_walk_data {
+ struct bonding *bond;
+ struct slave *slave;
+ u8 *mac_addr;
+ bool strict_match;
+};
+
+static int alb_upper_dev_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ struct alb_walk_data *_data = (struct alb_walk_data *)data;
+ bool strict_match = _data->strict_match;
+ struct bonding *bond = _data->bond;
+ struct slave *slave = _data->slave;
+ u8 *mac_addr = _data->mac_addr;
+ struct bond_vlan_tag *tags;
+
+ if (is_vlan_dev(upper) && vlan_get_encap_level(upper) == 0) {
+ if (strict_match &&
+ ether_addr_equal_64bits(mac_addr,
+ upper->dev_addr)) {
+ alb_send_lp_vid(slave, mac_addr,
+ vlan_dev_vlan_proto(upper),
+ vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper));
+ } else if (!strict_match) {
+ alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
+ vlan_dev_vlan_proto(upper),
+ vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper));
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* If this is a macvlan device, then only send updates
+ * when strict_match is turned off.
+ */
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper) && !strict_match) {
+ tags = bond_verify_device_path(bond->dev, upper, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags))
+ BUG();
+ alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
+ tags[0].vlan_proto, tags[0].vlan_id);
+ kfree(tags);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void alb_send_learning_packets(struct slave *slave, u8 mac_addr[],
bool strict_match)
{
struct bonding *bond = bond_get_bond_by_slave(slave);
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
- struct bond_vlan_tag *tags;
+ struct alb_walk_data data = {
+ .strict_match = strict_match,
+ .mac_addr = mac_addr,
+ .slave = slave,
+ .bond = bond,
+ };
/* send untagged */
alb_send_lp_vid(slave, mac_addr, 0, 0);
@@ -965,33 +1013,7 @@ static void alb_send_learning_packets(struct slave *slave, u8 mac_addr[],
* for that device.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
- if (is_vlan_dev(upper) && vlan_get_encap_level(upper) == 0) {
- if (strict_match &&
- ether_addr_equal_64bits(mac_addr,
- upper->dev_addr)) {
- alb_send_lp_vid(slave, mac_addr,
- vlan_dev_vlan_proto(upper),
- vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper));
- } else if (!strict_match) {
- alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
- vlan_dev_vlan_proto(upper),
- vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper));
- }
- }
-
- /* If this is a macvlan device, then only send updates
- * when strict_match is turned off.
- */
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper) && !strict_match) {
- tags = bond_verify_device_path(bond->dev, upper, 0);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags))
- BUG();
- alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
- tags[0].vlan_proto, tags[0].vlan_id);
- kfree(tags);
- }
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, alb_upper_dev_walk, &data);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 3f31ca32f52b..2b4134d5e081 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2270,22 +2270,27 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
}
}
+static int bond_upper_dev_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ __be32 ip = *((__be32 *)data);
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (ip == bond_confirm_addr(upper, 0, ip))
+ ret = 1;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static bool bond_has_this_ip(struct bonding *bond, __be32 ip)
{
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
bool ret = false;
if (ip == bond_confirm_addr(bond->dev, 0, ip))
return true;
rcu_read_lock();
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
- if (ip == bond_confirm_addr(upper, 0, ip)) {
- ret = true;
- break;
- }
- }
+ if (netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, bond_upper_dev_walk, &ip))
+ ret = true;
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: bonding: Flip to the new dev walk API
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Convert alb_send_learning_packets and bond_has_this_ip to use the new
netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu API. In both cases this is just a move
to the new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 21 +++++++----
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index 551f0f8dead3..1ddedec61900 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -950,13 +950,61 @@ static void alb_send_lp_vid(struct slave *slave, u8 mac_addr[],
dev_queue_xmit(skb);
}
+struct alb_walk_data {
+ struct bonding *bond;
+ struct slave *slave;
+ u8 *mac_addr;
+ bool strict_match;
+};
+
+static int alb_upper_dev_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ struct alb_walk_data *_data = (struct alb_walk_data *)data;
+ bool strict_match = _data->strict_match;
+ struct bonding *bond = _data->bond;
+ struct slave *slave = _data->slave;
+ u8 *mac_addr = _data->mac_addr;
+ struct bond_vlan_tag *tags;
+
+ if (is_vlan_dev(upper) && vlan_get_encap_level(upper) == 0) {
+ if (strict_match &&
+ ether_addr_equal_64bits(mac_addr,
+ upper->dev_addr)) {
+ alb_send_lp_vid(slave, mac_addr,
+ vlan_dev_vlan_proto(upper),
+ vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper));
+ } else if (!strict_match) {
+ alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
+ vlan_dev_vlan_proto(upper),
+ vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper));
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* If this is a macvlan device, then only send updates
+ * when strict_match is turned off.
+ */
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper) && !strict_match) {
+ tags = bond_verify_device_path(bond->dev, upper, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags))
+ BUG();
+ alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
+ tags[0].vlan_proto, tags[0].vlan_id);
+ kfree(tags);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void alb_send_learning_packets(struct slave *slave, u8 mac_addr[],
bool strict_match)
{
struct bonding *bond = bond_get_bond_by_slave(slave);
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
- struct bond_vlan_tag *tags;
+ struct alb_walk_data data = {
+ .strict_match = strict_match,
+ .mac_addr = mac_addr,
+ .slave = slave,
+ .bond = bond,
+ };
/* send untagged */
alb_send_lp_vid(slave, mac_addr, 0, 0);
@@ -965,33 +1013,7 @@ static void alb_send_learning_packets(struct slave *slave, u8 mac_addr[],
* for that device.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
- if (is_vlan_dev(upper) && vlan_get_encap_level(upper) == 0) {
- if (strict_match &&
- ether_addr_equal_64bits(mac_addr,
- upper->dev_addr)) {
- alb_send_lp_vid(slave, mac_addr,
- vlan_dev_vlan_proto(upper),
- vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper));
- } else if (!strict_match) {
- alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
- vlan_dev_vlan_proto(upper),
- vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper));
- }
- }
-
- /* If this is a macvlan device, then only send updates
- * when strict_match is turned off.
- */
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper) && !strict_match) {
- tags = bond_verify_device_path(bond->dev, upper, 0);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tags))
- BUG();
- alb_send_lp_vid(slave, upper->dev_addr,
- tags[0].vlan_proto, tags[0].vlan_id);
- kfree(tags);
- }
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, alb_upper_dev_walk, &data);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 3f31ca32f52b..2b4134d5e081 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2270,22 +2270,27 @@ static void bond_mii_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
}
}
+static int bond_upper_dev_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ __be32 ip = *((__be32 *)data);
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (ip == bond_confirm_addr(upper, 0, ip))
+ ret = 1;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static bool bond_has_this_ip(struct bonding *bond, __be32 ip)
{
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
bool ret = false;
if (ip == bond_confirm_addr(bond->dev, 0, ip))
return true;
rcu_read_lock();
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
- if (ip == bond_confirm_addr(upper, 0, ip)) {
- ret = true;
- break;
- }
- }
+ if (netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, bond_upper_dev_walk, &ip))
+ ret = true;
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 04/11] IB/core: Flip to the new dev walk API
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri, netdev, davem
Cc: dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock, linux-rdma, j.vosburgh,
vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher, intel-wired-lan, David Ahern
Convert rdma_is_upper_dev_rcu, handle_netdev_upper and
ipoib_get_net_dev_match_addr to the new upper device walk API.
This is just a move to the new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h | 9 +------
drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h b/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
index 19d499dcab76..0c0bea091de8 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
@@ -127,14 +127,7 @@ void ib_cache_release_one(struct ib_device *device);
static inline bool rdma_is_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper)
{
- struct net_device *_upper = NULL;
- struct list_head *iter;
-
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, _upper, iter)
- if (_upper == upper)
- break;
-
- return _upper == upper;
+ return netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(dev, upper);
}
int addr_init(void);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
index 06556c34606d..db759a68d948 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
@@ -437,6 +437,28 @@ static void callback_for_addr_gid_device_scan(struct ib_device *device,
&parsed->gid_attr);
}
+struct upper_list {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct net_device *upper;
+};
+
+static int netdev_upper_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ struct upper_list *entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ struct list_head *upper_list = (struct list_head *)data;
+
+ if (!entry) {
+ pr_info("roce_gid_mgmt: couldn't allocate entry to delete ndev\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ list_add_tail(&entry->list, upper_list);
+ dev_hold(upper);
+ entry->upper = upper;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void handle_netdev_upper(struct ib_device *ib_dev, u8 port,
void *cookie,
void (*handle_netdev)(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
@@ -444,30 +466,12 @@ static void handle_netdev_upper(struct ib_device *ib_dev, u8 port,
struct net_device *ndev))
{
struct net_device *ndev = (struct net_device *)cookie;
- struct upper_list {
- struct list_head list;
- struct net_device *upper;
- };
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
struct upper_list *upper_iter;
struct upper_list *upper_temp;
LIST_HEAD(upper_list);
rcu_read_lock();
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(ndev, upper, iter) {
- struct upper_list *entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry),
- GFP_ATOMIC);
-
- if (!entry) {
- pr_info("roce_gid_mgmt: couldn't allocate entry to delete ndev\n");
- continue;
- }
-
- list_add_tail(&entry->list, &upper_list);
- dev_hold(upper);
- entry->upper = upper;
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(ndev, netdev_upper_walk, &upper_list);
rcu_read_unlock();
handle_netdev(ib_dev, port, ndev);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 04/11] IB/core: Flip to the new dev walk API
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Convert rdma_is_upper_dev_rcu, handle_netdev_upper and
ipoib_get_net_dev_match_addr to the new upper device walk API.
This is just a move to the new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h | 9 +------
drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h b/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
index 19d499dcab76..0c0bea091de8 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
@@ -127,14 +127,7 @@ void ib_cache_release_one(struct ib_device *device);
static inline bool rdma_is_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper)
{
- struct net_device *_upper = NULL;
- struct list_head *iter;
-
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, _upper, iter)
- if (_upper == upper)
- break;
-
- return _upper == upper;
+ return netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(dev, upper);
}
int addr_init(void);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
index 06556c34606d..db759a68d948 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c
@@ -437,6 +437,28 @@ static void callback_for_addr_gid_device_scan(struct ib_device *device,
&parsed->gid_attr);
}
+struct upper_list {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct net_device *upper;
+};
+
+static int netdev_upper_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ struct upper_list *entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ struct list_head *upper_list = (struct list_head *)data;
+
+ if (!entry) {
+ pr_info("roce_gid_mgmt: couldn't allocate entry to delete ndev\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ list_add_tail(&entry->list, upper_list);
+ dev_hold(upper);
+ entry->upper = upper;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void handle_netdev_upper(struct ib_device *ib_dev, u8 port,
void *cookie,
void (*handle_netdev)(struct ib_device *ib_dev,
@@ -444,30 +466,12 @@ static void handle_netdev_upper(struct ib_device *ib_dev, u8 port,
struct net_device *ndev))
{
struct net_device *ndev = (struct net_device *)cookie;
- struct upper_list {
- struct list_head list;
- struct net_device *upper;
- };
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
struct upper_list *upper_iter;
struct upper_list *upper_temp;
LIST_HEAD(upper_list);
rcu_read_lock();
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(ndev, upper, iter) {
- struct upper_list *entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry),
- GFP_ATOMIC);
-
- if (!entry) {
- pr_info("roce_gid_mgmt: couldn't allocate entry to delete ndev\n");
- continue;
- }
-
- list_add_tail(&entry->list, &upper_list);
- dev_hold(upper);
- entry->upper = upper;
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(ndev, netdev_upper_walk, &upper_list);
rcu_read_unlock();
handle_netdev(ib_dev, port, ndev);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 05/11] IB/ipoib: Flip to new dev walk API
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q
Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A, David Ahern
Convert ipoib_get_net_dev_match_addr to the new upper device walk API.
This is just a move to the new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
index 5636fc3da6b8..624855ab7205 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
@@ -292,6 +292,25 @@ static struct net_device *ipoib_get_master_net_dev(struct net_device *dev)
return dev;
}
+struct ipoib_walk_data {
+ const struct sockaddr *addr;
+ struct net_device *result;
+};
+
+static int ipoib_upper_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *_data)
+{
+ struct ipoib_walk_data *data = (struct ipoib_walk_data *)_data;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (ipoib_is_dev_match_addr_rcu(data->addr, upper)) {
+ dev_hold(upper);
+ data->result = upper;
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/**
* Find a net_device matching the given address, which is an upper device of
* the given net_device.
@@ -304,27 +323,21 @@ static struct net_device *ipoib_get_master_net_dev(struct net_device *dev)
static struct net_device *ipoib_get_net_dev_match_addr(
const struct sockaddr *addr, struct net_device *dev)
{
- struct net_device *upper,
- *result = NULL;
- struct list_head *iter;
+ struct ipoib_walk_data data = {
+ .addr = addr,
+ };
rcu_read_lock();
if (ipoib_is_dev_match_addr_rcu(addr, dev)) {
dev_hold(dev);
- result = dev;
+ data.result = dev;
goto out;
}
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, upper, iter) {
- if (ipoib_is_dev_match_addr_rcu(addr, upper)) {
- dev_hold(upper);
- result = upper;
- break;
- }
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, ipoib_upper_walk, &data);
out:
rcu_read_unlock();
- return result;
+ return data.result;
}
/* returns the number of IPoIB netdevs on top a given ipoib device matching a
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 05/11] IB/ipoib: Flip to new dev walk API
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Convert ipoib_get_net_dev_match_addr to the new upper device walk API.
This is just a move to the new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
index 5636fc3da6b8..624855ab7205 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
@@ -292,6 +292,25 @@ static struct net_device *ipoib_get_master_net_dev(struct net_device *dev)
return dev;
}
+struct ipoib_walk_data {
+ const struct sockaddr *addr;
+ struct net_device *result;
+};
+
+static int ipoib_upper_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *_data)
+{
+ struct ipoib_walk_data *data = (struct ipoib_walk_data *)_data;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (ipoib_is_dev_match_addr_rcu(data->addr, upper)) {
+ dev_hold(upper);
+ data->result = upper;
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/**
* Find a net_device matching the given address, which is an upper device of
* the given net_device.
@@ -304,27 +323,21 @@ static struct net_device *ipoib_get_master_net_dev(struct net_device *dev)
static struct net_device *ipoib_get_net_dev_match_addr(
const struct sockaddr *addr, struct net_device *dev)
{
- struct net_device *upper,
- *result = NULL;
- struct list_head *iter;
+ struct ipoib_walk_data data = {
+ .addr = addr,
+ };
rcu_read_lock();
if (ipoib_is_dev_match_addr_rcu(addr, dev)) {
dev_hold(dev);
- result = dev;
+ data.result = dev;
goto out;
}
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, upper, iter) {
- if (ipoib_is_dev_match_addr_rcu(addr, upper)) {
- dev_hold(upper);
- result = upper;
- break;
- }
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, ipoib_upper_walk, &data);
out:
rcu_read_unlock();
- return result;
+ return data.result;
}
/* returns the number of IPoIB netdevs on top a given ipoib device matching a
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 06/11] ixgbe: Flip to the new dev walk API
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri, netdev, davem
Cc: dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock, linux-rdma, j.vosburgh,
vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher, intel-wired-lan, David Ahern
Convert ixgbe users of the old macros to new dev walk API.
This is just a move to the new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index a244d9a67264..aae5e0349d93 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -5012,24 +5012,23 @@ static int ixgbe_fwd_ring_up(struct net_device *vdev,
return err;
}
-static void ixgbe_configure_dfwd(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
+static int ixgbe_upper_dev_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
{
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
- int err;
-
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
- struct macvlan_dev *dfwd = netdev_priv(upper);
- struct ixgbe_fwd_adapter *vadapter = dfwd->fwd_priv;
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
+ struct macvlan_dev *dfwd = netdev_priv(upper);
+ struct ixgbe_fwd_adapter *vadapter = dfwd->fwd_priv;
- if (dfwd->fwd_priv) {
- err = ixgbe_fwd_ring_up(upper, vadapter);
- if (err)
- continue;
- }
- }
+ if (dfwd->fwd_priv)
+ ixgbe_fwd_ring_up(upper, vadapter);
}
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void ixgbe_configure_dfwd(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
+{
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev,
+ ixgbe_upper_dev_walk, NULL);
}
static void ixgbe_configure(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
@@ -5448,12 +5447,25 @@ static void ixgbe_fdir_filter_exit(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
spin_unlock(&adapter->fdir_perfect_lock);
}
+static int ixgbe_disable_macvlan(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
+ struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
+
+ if (vlan->fwd_priv) {
+ netif_tx_stop_all_queues(upper);
+ netif_carrier_off(upper);
+ netif_tx_disable(upper);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
void ixgbe_down(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
{
struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
int i;
/* signal that we are down to the interrupt handler */
@@ -5477,17 +5489,8 @@ void ixgbe_down(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
netif_tx_disable(netdev);
/* disable any upper devices */
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
- struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
-
- if (vlan->fwd_priv) {
- netif_tx_stop_all_queues(upper);
- netif_carrier_off(upper);
- netif_tx_disable(upper);
- }
- }
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev,
+ ixgbe_disable_macvlan, NULL);
ixgbe_irq_disable(adapter);
@@ -6728,6 +6731,18 @@ static void ixgbe_update_default_up(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
#endif
}
+static int ixgbe_enable_macvlan(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
+ struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
+
+ if (vlan->fwd_priv)
+ netif_tx_wake_all_queues(upper);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* ixgbe_watchdog_link_is_up - update netif_carrier status and
* print link up message
@@ -6737,8 +6752,6 @@ static void ixgbe_watchdog_link_is_up(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
{
struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
u32 link_speed = adapter->link_speed;
const char *speed_str;
bool flow_rx, flow_tx;
@@ -6809,14 +6822,8 @@ static void ixgbe_watchdog_link_is_up(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
/* enable any upper devices */
rtnl_lock();
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
- struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
-
- if (vlan->fwd_priv)
- netif_tx_wake_all_queues(upper);
- }
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev,
+ ixgbe_enable_macvlan, NULL);
rtnl_unlock();
/* update the default user priority for VFs */
@@ -8350,12 +8357,38 @@ static int ixgbe_configure_clsu32_del_hnode(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
+struct upper_walk_data {
+ struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter;
+ int ifindex;
+ u64 action;
+ u8 queue;
+};
+
+static int get_macvlan_queue(struct net_device *upper, void *_data)
+{
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
+ struct macvlan_dev *dfwd = netdev_priv(upper);
+ struct ixgbe_fwd_adapter *vadapter = dfwd->fwd_priv;
+ struct upper_walk_data *data = _data;
+ struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = data->adapter;
+ int ifindex = data->ifindex;
+
+ if (vadapter && vadapter->netdev->ifindex == ifindex) {
+ data->queue = adapter->rx_ring[vadapter->rx_base_queue]->reg_idx;
+ data->action = data->queue;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int handle_redirect_action(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, int ifindex,
u8 *queue, u64 *action)
{
unsigned int num_vfs = adapter->num_vfs, vf;
+ struct upper_walk_data data;
struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
/* redirect to a SRIOV VF */
for (vf = 0; vf < num_vfs; ++vf) {
@@ -8373,17 +8406,16 @@ static int handle_redirect_action(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, int ifindex,
}
/* redirect to a offloaded macvlan netdev */
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
- struct macvlan_dev *dfwd = netdev_priv(upper);
- struct ixgbe_fwd_adapter *vadapter = dfwd->fwd_priv;
-
- if (vadapter && vadapter->netdev->ifindex == ifindex) {
- *queue = adapter->rx_ring[vadapter->rx_base_queue]->reg_idx;
- *action = *queue;
- return 0;
- }
- }
+ data.adapter = adapter;
+ data.ifindex = ifindex;
+ data.action = 0;
+ data.queue = 0;
+ if (netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev,
+ get_macvlan_queue, &data)) {
+ *action = data.action;
+ *queue = data.queue;
+
+ return 0;
}
return -EINVAL;
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 06/11] ixgbe: Flip to the new dev walk API
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Convert ixgbe users of the old macros to new dev walk API.
This is just a move to the new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index a244d9a67264..aae5e0349d93 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -5012,24 +5012,23 @@ static int ixgbe_fwd_ring_up(struct net_device *vdev,
return err;
}
-static void ixgbe_configure_dfwd(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
+static int ixgbe_upper_dev_walk(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
{
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
- int err;
-
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
- struct macvlan_dev *dfwd = netdev_priv(upper);
- struct ixgbe_fwd_adapter *vadapter = dfwd->fwd_priv;
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
+ struct macvlan_dev *dfwd = netdev_priv(upper);
+ struct ixgbe_fwd_adapter *vadapter = dfwd->fwd_priv;
- if (dfwd->fwd_priv) {
- err = ixgbe_fwd_ring_up(upper, vadapter);
- if (err)
- continue;
- }
- }
+ if (dfwd->fwd_priv)
+ ixgbe_fwd_ring_up(upper, vadapter);
}
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void ixgbe_configure_dfwd(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
+{
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev,
+ ixgbe_upper_dev_walk, NULL);
}
static void ixgbe_configure(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
@@ -5448,12 +5447,25 @@ static void ixgbe_fdir_filter_exit(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
spin_unlock(&adapter->fdir_perfect_lock);
}
+static int ixgbe_disable_macvlan(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
+ struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
+
+ if (vlan->fwd_priv) {
+ netif_tx_stop_all_queues(upper);
+ netif_carrier_off(upper);
+ netif_tx_disable(upper);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
void ixgbe_down(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
{
struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
int i;
/* signal that we are down to the interrupt handler */
@@ -5477,17 +5489,8 @@ void ixgbe_down(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
netif_tx_disable(netdev);
/* disable any upper devices */
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
- struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
-
- if (vlan->fwd_priv) {
- netif_tx_stop_all_queues(upper);
- netif_carrier_off(upper);
- netif_tx_disable(upper);
- }
- }
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev,
+ ixgbe_disable_macvlan, NULL);
ixgbe_irq_disable(adapter);
@@ -6728,6 +6731,18 @@ static void ixgbe_update_default_up(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
#endif
}
+static int ixgbe_enable_macvlan(struct net_device *upper, void *data)
+{
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
+ struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
+
+ if (vlan->fwd_priv)
+ netif_tx_wake_all_queues(upper);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* ixgbe_watchdog_link_is_up - update netif_carrier status and
* print link up message
@@ -6737,8 +6752,6 @@ static void ixgbe_watchdog_link_is_up(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
{
struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev;
struct ixgbe_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
- struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
u32 link_speed = adapter->link_speed;
const char *speed_str;
bool flow_rx, flow_tx;
@@ -6809,14 +6822,8 @@ static void ixgbe_watchdog_link_is_up(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
/* enable any upper devices */
rtnl_lock();
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
- struct macvlan_dev *vlan = netdev_priv(upper);
-
- if (vlan->fwd_priv)
- netif_tx_wake_all_queues(upper);
- }
- }
+ netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev,
+ ixgbe_enable_macvlan, NULL);
rtnl_unlock();
/* update the default user priority for VFs */
@@ -8350,12 +8357,38 @@ static int ixgbe_configure_clsu32_del_hnode(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
+struct upper_walk_data {
+ struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter;
+ int ifindex;
+ u64 action;
+ u8 queue;
+};
+
+static int get_macvlan_queue(struct net_device *upper, void *_data)
+{
+ if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
+ struct macvlan_dev *dfwd = netdev_priv(upper);
+ struct ixgbe_fwd_adapter *vadapter = dfwd->fwd_priv;
+ struct upper_walk_data *data = _data;
+ struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = data->adapter;
+ int ifindex = data->ifindex;
+
+ if (vadapter && vadapter->netdev->ifindex == ifindex) {
+ data->queue = adapter->rx_ring[vadapter->rx_base_queue]->reg_idx;
+ data->action = data->queue;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int handle_redirect_action(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, int ifindex,
u8 *queue, u64 *action)
{
unsigned int num_vfs = adapter->num_vfs, vf;
+ struct upper_walk_data data;
struct net_device *upper;
- struct list_head *iter;
/* redirect to a SRIOV VF */
for (vf = 0; vf < num_vfs; ++vf) {
@@ -8373,17 +8406,16 @@ static int handle_redirect_action(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter, int ifindex,
}
/* redirect to a offloaded macvlan netdev */
- netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev, upper, iter) {
- if (netif_is_macvlan(upper)) {
- struct macvlan_dev *dfwd = netdev_priv(upper);
- struct ixgbe_fwd_adapter *vadapter = dfwd->fwd_priv;
-
- if (vadapter && vadapter->netdev->ifindex == ifindex) {
- *queue = adapter->rx_ring[vadapter->rx_base_queue]->reg_idx;
- *action = *queue;
- return 0;
- }
- }
+ data.adapter = adapter;
+ data.ifindex = ifindex;
+ data.action = 0;
+ data.queue = 0;
+ if (netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(adapter->netdev,
+ get_macvlan_queue, &data)) {
+ *action = data.action;
+ *queue = data.queue;
+
+ return 0;
}
return -EINVAL;
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 07/11] mlxsw: Flip to the new dev walk API
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri, netdev, davem
Cc: dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock, linux-rdma, j.vosburgh,
vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher, intel-wired-lan, David Ahern
Convert mlxsw users to new dev walk API. This is just a move to the
new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
index 1ec0a4ce3c46..1d5434ff02bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
@@ -3090,19 +3090,30 @@ static bool mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(const struct net_device *dev)
return dev->netdev_ops == &mlxsw_sp_port_netdev_ops;
}
+static int mlxsw_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *lower_dev, void *data)
+{
+ struct mlxsw_sp_port **port = data;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(lower_dev)) {
+ *port = netdev_priv(lower_dev);
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port_dev_lower_find(struct net_device *dev)
{
- struct net_device *lower_dev;
- struct list_head *iter;
+ struct mlxsw_sp_port *port;
if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(dev))
return netdev_priv(dev);
- netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
- if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(lower_dev))
- return netdev_priv(lower_dev);
- }
- return NULL;
+ port = NULL;
+ netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, mlxsw_lower_dev_walk, &port);
+
+ return port;
}
static struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp_lower_get(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -3115,17 +3126,15 @@ static struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp_lower_get(struct net_device *dev)
static struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port_dev_lower_find_rcu(struct net_device *dev)
{
- struct net_device *lower_dev;
- struct list_head *iter;
+ struct mlxsw_sp_port *port;
if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(dev))
return netdev_priv(dev);
- netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev_rcu(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
- if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(lower_dev))
- return netdev_priv(lower_dev);
- }
- return NULL;
+ port = NULL;
+ netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(dev, mlxsw_lower_dev_walk, &port);
+
+ return port;
}
struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port_lower_dev_hold(struct net_device *dev)
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 07/11] mlxsw: Flip to the new dev walk API
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Convert mlxsw users to new dev walk API. This is just a move to the
new API; no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
index 1ec0a4ce3c46..1d5434ff02bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
@@ -3090,19 +3090,30 @@ static bool mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(const struct net_device *dev)
return dev->netdev_ops == &mlxsw_sp_port_netdev_ops;
}
+static int mlxsw_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *lower_dev, void *data)
+{
+ struct mlxsw_sp_port **port = data;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(lower_dev)) {
+ *port = netdev_priv(lower_dev);
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port_dev_lower_find(struct net_device *dev)
{
- struct net_device *lower_dev;
- struct list_head *iter;
+ struct mlxsw_sp_port *port;
if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(dev))
return netdev_priv(dev);
- netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
- if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(lower_dev))
- return netdev_priv(lower_dev);
- }
- return NULL;
+ port = NULL;
+ netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, mlxsw_lower_dev_walk, &port);
+
+ return port;
}
static struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp_lower_get(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -3115,17 +3126,15 @@ static struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp_lower_get(struct net_device *dev)
static struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port_dev_lower_find_rcu(struct net_device *dev)
{
- struct net_device *lower_dev;
- struct list_head *iter;
+ struct mlxsw_sp_port *port;
if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(dev))
return netdev_priv(dev);
- netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev_rcu(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
- if (mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check(lower_dev))
- return netdev_priv(lower_dev);
- }
- return NULL;
+ port = NULL;
+ netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(dev, mlxsw_lower_dev_walk, &port);
+
+ return port;
}
struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port_lower_dev_hold(struct net_device *dev)
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 08/11] rocker: Flip to the new dev walk API
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q
Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A, David Ahern
Convert rocker to the new dev walk API. This is just a code conversion;
no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
index 5424fb341613..9310adc0bcbb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
@@ -2839,20 +2839,37 @@ static bool rocker_port_dev_check_under(const struct net_device *dev,
return true;
}
+struct rocker_walk_data {
+ struct rocker *rocker;
+ struct rocker_port *port;
+};
+
+static int rocker_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *lower_dev, void *_data)
+{
+ struct rocker_walk_data *data = (struct rocker_walk_data *)_data;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (rocker_port_dev_check_under(lower_dev, data->rocker)) {
+ data->port = netdev_priv(lower_dev);
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
struct rocker_port *rocker_port_dev_lower_find(struct net_device *dev,
struct rocker *rocker)
{
- struct net_device *lower_dev;
- struct list_head *iter;
+ struct rocker_walk_data data;
if (rocker_port_dev_check_under(dev, rocker))
return netdev_priv(dev);
- netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
- if (rocker_port_dev_check_under(lower_dev, rocker))
- return netdev_priv(lower_dev);
- }
- return NULL;
+ data.rocker = rocker;
+ data.port = NULL;
+ netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, rocker_lower_dev_walk, &data);
+
+ return data.port;
}
static int rocker_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 08/11] rocker: Flip to the new dev walk API
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Convert rocker to the new dev walk API. This is just a code conversion;
no functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
index 5424fb341613..9310adc0bcbb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
@@ -2839,20 +2839,37 @@ static bool rocker_port_dev_check_under(const struct net_device *dev,
return true;
}
+struct rocker_walk_data {
+ struct rocker *rocker;
+ struct rocker_port *port;
+};
+
+static int rocker_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *lower_dev, void *_data)
+{
+ struct rocker_walk_data *data = (struct rocker_walk_data *)_data;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (rocker_port_dev_check_under(lower_dev, data->rocker)) {
+ data->port = netdev_priv(lower_dev);
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
struct rocker_port *rocker_port_dev_lower_find(struct net_device *dev,
struct rocker *rocker)
{
- struct net_device *lower_dev;
- struct list_head *iter;
+ struct rocker_walk_data data;
if (rocker_port_dev_check_under(dev, rocker))
return netdev_priv(dev);
- netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev(dev, lower_dev, iter) {
- if (rocker_port_dev_check_under(lower_dev, rocker))
- return netdev_priv(lower_dev);
- }
- return NULL;
+ data.rocker = rocker;
+ data.port = NULL;
+ netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, rocker_lower_dev_walk, &data);
+
+ return data.port;
}
static int rocker_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: Remove all_adj_list and its references
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri, netdev, davem
Cc: dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock, linux-rdma, j.vosburgh,
vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher, intel-wired-lan, David Ahern
Only direct adjacencies are maintained. All upper or lower devices can
be learned via the new walk API which recursively walks the adj_list for
upper devices or lower devices.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 25 -----
net/core/dev.c | 229 +++++-----------------------------------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 233 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 053f6f75f26a..8215908556ec 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1456,7 +1456,6 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
* @ptype_specific: Device-specific, protocol-specific packet handlers
*
* @adj_list: Directly linked devices, like slaves for bonding
- * @all_adj_list: All linked devices, *including* neighbours
* @features: Currently active device features
* @hw_features: User-changeable features
*
@@ -1673,11 +1672,6 @@ struct net_device {
struct list_head lower;
} adj_list;
- struct {
- struct list_head upper;
- struct list_head lower;
- } all_adj_list;
-
netdev_features_t features;
netdev_features_t hw_features;
netdev_features_t wanted_features;
@@ -3832,13 +3826,6 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
updev; \
updev = netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
-/* iterate through upper list, must be called under RCU read lock */
-#define netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, updev, iter) \
- for (iter = &(dev)->all_adj_list.upper, \
- updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)); \
- updev; \
- updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
-
int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
void *data),
@@ -3878,18 +3865,6 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter);
-#define netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev(dev, ldev, iter) \
- for (iter = (dev)->all_adj_list.lower.next, \
- ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next(dev, &(iter)); \
- ldev; \
- ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next(dev, &(iter)))
-
-#define netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev_rcu(dev, ldev, iter) \
- for (iter = (dev)->all_adj_list.lower.next, \
- ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)); \
- ldev; \
- ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
-
int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
void *data),
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index fcf3641db783..0f9b0985a84c 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5273,6 +5273,16 @@ static struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_adj(struct net_device *adj_dev,
return NULL;
}
+static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
+
+ if (upper_dev == dev)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* netdev_has_upper_dev - Check if device is linked to an upper device
* @dev: device
@@ -5287,7 +5297,8 @@ bool netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev,
{
ASSERT_RTNL();
- return __netdev_find_adj(upper_dev, &dev->all_adj_list.upper);
+ return netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, __netdev_has_upper_dev,
+ upper_dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev);
@@ -5301,16 +5312,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev);
* The caller must hold rcu lock.
*/
-static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
-{
- struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
-
- if (upper_dev == dev)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
@@ -5333,7 +5334,7 @@ static bool netdev_has_any_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev)
{
ASSERT_RTNL();
- return !list_empty(&dev->all_adj_list.upper);
+ return !list_empty(&dev->adj_list.upper);
}
/**
@@ -5396,32 +5397,6 @@ struct net_device *netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
-/**
- * netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu - Get the next dev from upper list
- * @dev: device
- * @iter: list_head ** of the current position
- *
- * Gets the next device from the dev's upper list, starting from iter
- * position. The caller must hold RCU read lock.
- */
-struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
- struct list_head **iter)
-{
- struct netdev_adjacent *upper;
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
-
- upper = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
-
- if (&upper->list == &dev->all_adj_list.upper)
- return NULL;
-
- *iter = &upper->list;
-
- return upper->dev;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
-
static struct net_device *netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter)
{
@@ -5548,31 +5523,6 @@ void *netdev_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head **iter)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_lower_get_next);
-/**
- * netdev_all_lower_get_next - Get the next device from all lower neighbour list
- * @dev: device
- * @iter: list_head ** of the current position
- *
- * Gets the next netdev_adjacent from the dev's all lower neighbour
- * list, starting from iter position. The caller must hold RTNL lock or
- * its own locking that guarantees that the neighbour all lower
- * list will remain unchanged.
- */
-struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head **iter)
-{
- struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
-
- lower = list_entry(*iter, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
-
- if (&lower->list == &dev->all_adj_list.lower)
- return NULL;
-
- *iter = lower->list.next;
-
- return lower->dev;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next);
-
static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter)
{
@@ -5616,27 +5566,6 @@ int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev);
-/**
- * netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu - Get the next device from all
- * lower neighbour list, RCU variant
- * @dev: device
- * @iter: list_head ** of the current position
- *
- * Gets the next netdev_adjacent from the dev's all lower neighbour
- * list, starting from iter position. The caller must hold RCU read lock.
- */
-struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
- struct list_head **iter)
-{
- struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
-
- lower = list_first_or_null_rcu(&dev->all_adj_list.lower,
- struct netdev_adjacent, list);
-
- return lower ? lower->dev : NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu);
-
static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter)
{
@@ -5861,15 +5790,6 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(struct net_device *dev,
return 0;
}
-static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *upper_dev)
-{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
- &dev->all_adj_list.upper,
- &upper_dev->all_adj_list.lower,
- NULL, false);
-}
-
static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
u16 ref_nr,
@@ -5880,40 +5800,19 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(struct net_device *dev,
__netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(upper_dev, dev, ref_nr, down_list);
}
-static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *upper_dev,
- u16 ref_nr)
-{
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr,
- &dev->all_adj_list.upper,
- &upper_dev->all_adj_list.lower);
-}
-
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
void *private, bool master)
{
- int ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, upper_dev);
-
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
- &dev->adj_list.upper,
- &upper_dev->adj_list.lower,
- private, master);
- if (ret) {
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev, 1);
- return ret;
- }
-
- return 0;
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
+ &dev->adj_list.upper,
+ &upper_dev->adj_list.lower,
+ private, master);
}
static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev, 1);
__netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(dev, upper_dev, 1,
&dev->adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->adj_list.lower);
@@ -5924,7 +5823,6 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
void *upper_priv, void *upper_info)
{
struct netdev_notifier_changeupper_info changeupper_info;
- struct netdev_adjacent *i, *j, *to_i, *to_j;
int ret = 0;
ASSERT_RTNL();
@@ -5933,10 +5831,10 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
return -EBUSY;
/* To prevent loops, check if dev is not upper device to upper_dev. */
- if (__netdev_find_adj(dev, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper))
+ if (netdev_has_upper_dev(upper_dev, dev))
return -EBUSY;
- if (__netdev_find_adj(upper_dev, &dev->adj_list.upper))
+ if (netdev_has_upper_dev(dev, upper_dev))
return -EEXIST;
if (master && netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev))
@@ -5958,80 +5856,15 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
if (ret)
return ret;
- /* Now that we linked these devs, make all the upper_dev's
- * all_adj_list.upper visible to every dev's all_adj_list.lower an
- * versa, and don't forget the devices itself. All of these
- * links are non-neighbours.
- */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
- list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
- pr_debug("Interlinking %s with %s, non-neighbour\n",
- i->dev->name, j->dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev);
- if (ret)
- goto rollback_mesh;
- }
- }
-
- /* add dev to every upper_dev's upper device */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
- pr_debug("linking %s's upper device %s with %s\n",
- upper_dev->name, i->dev->name, dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev);
- if (ret)
- goto rollback_upper_mesh;
- }
-
- /* add upper_dev to every dev's lower device */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
- pr_debug("linking %s's lower device %s with %s\n", dev->name,
- i->dev->name, upper_dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev);
- if (ret)
- goto rollback_lower_mesh;
- }
-
ret = call_netdevice_notifiers_info(NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER, dev,
&changeupper_info.info);
ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
if (ret)
- goto rollback_lower_mesh;
+ goto rollback;
return 0;
-rollback_lower_mesh:
- to_i = i;
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
- if (i == to_i)
- break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
- }
-
- i = NULL;
-
-rollback_upper_mesh:
- to_i = i;
- list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
- if (i == to_i)
- break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
- }
-
- i = j = NULL;
-
-rollback_mesh:
- to_i = i;
- to_j = j;
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
- list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
- if (i == to_i && j == to_j)
- break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
- }
- if (i == to_i)
- break;
- }
-
+rollback:
__netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour(dev, upper_dev);
return ret;
@@ -6088,7 +5921,6 @@ void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
struct netdev_notifier_changeupper_info changeupper_info;
- struct netdev_adjacent *i, *j;
ASSERT_RTNL();
changeupper_info.upper_dev = upper_dev;
@@ -6100,23 +5932,6 @@ void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
__netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour(dev, upper_dev);
- /* Here is the tricky part. We must remove all dev's lower
- * devices from all upper_dev's upper devices and vice
- * versa, to maintain the graph relationship.
- */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list)
- list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
-
- /* remove also the devices itself from lower/upper device
- * list
- */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
-
- list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
-
call_netdevice_notifiers_info(NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER, dev,
&changeupper_info.info);
}
@@ -7809,8 +7624,6 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->link_watch_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->adj_list.upper);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->adj_list.lower);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->all_adj_list.upper);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->all_adj_list.lower);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->ptype_all);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->ptype_specific);
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SCHED
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: Remove all_adj_list and its references
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Only direct adjacencies are maintained. All upper or lower devices can
be learned via the new walk API which recursively walks the adj_list for
upper devices or lower devices.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 25 -----
net/core/dev.c | 229 +++++-----------------------------------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 233 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 053f6f75f26a..8215908556ec 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1456,7 +1456,6 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
* @ptype_specific: Device-specific, protocol-specific packet handlers
*
* @adj_list: Directly linked devices, like slaves for bonding
- * @all_adj_list: All linked devices, *including* neighbours
* @features: Currently active device features
* @hw_features: User-changeable features
*
@@ -1673,11 +1672,6 @@ struct net_device {
struct list_head lower;
} adj_list;
- struct {
- struct list_head upper;
- struct list_head lower;
- } all_adj_list;
-
netdev_features_t features;
netdev_features_t hw_features;
netdev_features_t wanted_features;
@@ -3832,13 +3826,6 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
updev; \
updev = netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
-/* iterate through upper list, must be called under RCU read lock */
-#define netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, updev, iter) \
- for (iter = &(dev)->all_adj_list.upper, \
- updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)); \
- updev; \
- updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
-
int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
void *data),
@@ -3878,18 +3865,6 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter);
-#define netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev(dev, ldev, iter) \
- for (iter = (dev)->all_adj_list.lower.next, \
- ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next(dev, &(iter)); \
- ldev; \
- ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next(dev, &(iter)))
-
-#define netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev_rcu(dev, ldev, iter) \
- for (iter = (dev)->all_adj_list.lower.next, \
- ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)); \
- ldev; \
- ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
-
int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
void *data),
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index fcf3641db783..0f9b0985a84c 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5273,6 +5273,16 @@ static struct netdev_adjacent *__netdev_find_adj(struct net_device *adj_dev,
return NULL;
}
+static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
+
+ if (upper_dev == dev)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* netdev_has_upper_dev - Check if device is linked to an upper device
* @dev: device
@@ -5287,7 +5297,8 @@ bool netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev,
{
ASSERT_RTNL();
- return __netdev_find_adj(upper_dev, &dev->all_adj_list.upper);
+ return netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, __netdev_has_upper_dev,
+ upper_dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev);
@@ -5301,16 +5312,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev);
* The caller must hold rcu lock.
*/
-static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
-{
- struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
-
- if (upper_dev == dev)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
@@ -5333,7 +5334,7 @@ static bool netdev_has_any_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev)
{
ASSERT_RTNL();
- return !list_empty(&dev->all_adj_list.upper);
+ return !list_empty(&dev->adj_list.upper);
}
/**
@@ -5396,32 +5397,6 @@ struct net_device *netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
-/**
- * netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu - Get the next dev from upper list
- * @dev: device
- * @iter: list_head ** of the current position
- *
- * Gets the next device from the dev's upper list, starting from iter
- * position. The caller must hold RCU read lock.
- */
-struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
- struct list_head **iter)
-{
- struct netdev_adjacent *upper;
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
-
- upper = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
-
- if (&upper->list == &dev->all_adj_list.upper)
- return NULL;
-
- *iter = &upper->list;
-
- return upper->dev;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
-
static struct net_device *netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter)
{
@@ -5548,31 +5523,6 @@ void *netdev_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head **iter)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_lower_get_next);
-/**
- * netdev_all_lower_get_next - Get the next device from all lower neighbour list
- * @dev: device
- * @iter: list_head ** of the current position
- *
- * Gets the next netdev_adjacent from the dev's all lower neighbour
- * list, starting from iter position. The caller must hold RTNL lock or
- * its own locking that guarantees that the neighbour all lower
- * list will remain unchanged.
- */
-struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head **iter)
-{
- struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
-
- lower = list_entry(*iter, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
-
- if (&lower->list == &dev->all_adj_list.lower)
- return NULL;
-
- *iter = lower->list.next;
-
- return lower->dev;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next);
-
static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter)
{
@@ -5616,27 +5566,6 @@ int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev);
-/**
- * netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu - Get the next device from all
- * lower neighbour list, RCU variant
- * @dev: device
- * @iter: list_head ** of the current position
- *
- * Gets the next netdev_adjacent from the dev's all lower neighbour
- * list, starting from iter position. The caller must hold RCU read lock.
- */
-struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
- struct list_head **iter)
-{
- struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
-
- lower = list_first_or_null_rcu(&dev->all_adj_list.lower,
- struct netdev_adjacent, list);
-
- return lower ? lower->dev : NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu);
-
static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter)
{
@@ -5861,15 +5790,6 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(struct net_device *dev,
return 0;
}
-static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *upper_dev)
-{
- return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
- &dev->all_adj_list.upper,
- &upper_dev->all_adj_list.lower,
- NULL, false);
-}
-
static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
u16 ref_nr,
@@ -5880,40 +5800,19 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(struct net_device *dev,
__netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(upper_dev, dev, ref_nr, down_list);
}
-static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
- struct net_device *upper_dev,
- u16 ref_nr)
-{
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(dev, upper_dev, ref_nr,
- &dev->all_adj_list.upper,
- &upper_dev->all_adj_list.lower);
-}
-
static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev,
void *private, bool master)
{
- int ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, upper_dev);
-
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
- &dev->adj_list.upper,
- &upper_dev->adj_list.lower,
- private, master);
- if (ret) {
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev, 1);
- return ret;
- }
-
- return 0;
+ return __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_lists(dev, upper_dev,
+ &dev->adj_list.upper,
+ &upper_dev->adj_list.lower,
+ private, master);
}
static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, upper_dev, 1);
__netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_lists(dev, upper_dev, 1,
&dev->adj_list.upper,
&upper_dev->adj_list.lower);
@@ -5924,7 +5823,6 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
void *upper_priv, void *upper_info)
{
struct netdev_notifier_changeupper_info changeupper_info;
- struct netdev_adjacent *i, *j, *to_i, *to_j;
int ret = 0;
ASSERT_RTNL();
@@ -5933,10 +5831,10 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
return -EBUSY;
/* To prevent loops, check if dev is not upper device to upper_dev. */
- if (__netdev_find_adj(dev, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper))
+ if (netdev_has_upper_dev(upper_dev, dev))
return -EBUSY;
- if (__netdev_find_adj(upper_dev, &dev->adj_list.upper))
+ if (netdev_has_upper_dev(dev, upper_dev))
return -EEXIST;
if (master && netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev))
@@ -5958,80 +5856,15 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
if (ret)
return ret;
- /* Now that we linked these devs, make all the upper_dev's
- * all_adj_list.upper visible to every dev's all_adj_list.lower an
- * versa, and don't forget the devices itself. All of these
- * links are non-neighbours.
- */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
- list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
- pr_debug("Interlinking %s with %s, non-neighbour\n",
- i->dev->name, j->dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, j->dev);
- if (ret)
- goto rollback_mesh;
- }
- }
-
- /* add dev to every upper_dev's upper device */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
- pr_debug("linking %s's upper device %s with %s\n",
- upper_dev->name, i->dev->name, dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(dev, i->dev);
- if (ret)
- goto rollback_upper_mesh;
- }
-
- /* add upper_dev to every dev's lower device */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
- pr_debug("linking %s's lower device %s with %s\n", dev->name,
- i->dev->name, upper_dev->name);
- ret = __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(i->dev, upper_dev);
- if (ret)
- goto rollback_lower_mesh;
- }
-
ret = call_netdevice_notifiers_info(NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER, dev,
&changeupper_info.info);
ret = notifier_to_errno(ret);
if (ret)
- goto rollback_lower_mesh;
+ goto rollback;
return 0;
-rollback_lower_mesh:
- to_i = i;
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
- if (i == to_i)
- break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
- }
-
- i = NULL;
-
-rollback_upper_mesh:
- to_i = i;
- list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
- if (i == to_i)
- break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
- }
-
- i = j = NULL;
-
-rollback_mesh:
- to_i = i;
- to_j = j;
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list) {
- list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list) {
- if (i == to_i && j == to_j)
- break;
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
- }
- if (i == to_i)
- break;
- }
-
+rollback:
__netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour(dev, upper_dev);
return ret;
@@ -6088,7 +5921,6 @@ void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
struct netdev_notifier_changeupper_info changeupper_info;
- struct netdev_adjacent *i, *j;
ASSERT_RTNL();
changeupper_info.upper_dev = upper_dev;
@@ -6100,23 +5932,6 @@ void netdev_upper_dev_unlink(struct net_device *dev,
__netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink_neighbour(dev, upper_dev);
- /* Here is the tricky part. We must remove all dev's lower
- * devices from all upper_dev's upper devices and vice
- * versa, to maintain the graph relationship.
- */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list)
- list_for_each_entry(j, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, j->dev, i->ref_nr);
-
- /* remove also the devices itself from lower/upper device
- * list
- */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &dev->all_adj_list.lower, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(i->dev, upper_dev, i->ref_nr);
-
- list_for_each_entry(i, &upper_dev->all_adj_list.upper, list)
- __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink(dev, i->dev, i->ref_nr);
-
call_netdevice_notifiers_info(NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER, dev,
&changeupper_info.info);
}
@@ -7809,8 +7624,6 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->link_watch_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->adj_list.upper);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->adj_list.lower);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->all_adj_list.upper);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->all_adj_list.lower);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->ptype_all);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->ptype_specific);
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SCHED
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: Add warning if any lower device is still in adjacency list
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri, netdev, davem
Cc: dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock, linux-rdma, j.vosburgh,
vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher, intel-wired-lan, David Ahern
Lower list should be empty just like upper.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 0f9b0985a84c..52e70a3d61a4 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5361,6 +5361,20 @@ struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_get);
+/**
+ * netdev_has_any_lower_dev - Check if device is linked to some device
+ * @dev: device
+ *
+ * Find out if a device is linked to a lower device and return true in case
+ * it is. The caller must hold the RTNL lock.
+ */
+static bool netdev_has_any_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+ return !list_empty(&dev->adj_list.lower);
+}
+
void *netdev_adjacent_get_private(struct list_head *adj_list)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
@@ -6746,6 +6760,7 @@ static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head)
/* Notifier chain MUST detach us all upper devices. */
WARN_ON(netdev_has_any_upper_dev(dev));
+ WARN_ON(netdev_has_any_lower_dev(dev));
/* Remove entries from kobject tree */
netdev_unregister_kobject(dev);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: Add warning if any lower device is still in adjacency list
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Lower list should be empty just like upper.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 0f9b0985a84c..52e70a3d61a4 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5361,6 +5361,20 @@ struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_master_upper_dev_get);
+/**
+ * netdev_has_any_lower_dev - Check if device is linked to some device
+ * @dev: device
+ *
+ * Find out if a device is linked to a lower device and return true in case
+ * it is. The caller must hold the RTNL lock.
+ */
+static bool netdev_has_any_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+ return !list_empty(&dev->adj_list.lower);
+}
+
void *netdev_adjacent_get_private(struct list_head *adj_list)
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
@@ -6746,6 +6760,7 @@ static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head)
/* Notifier chain MUST detach us all upper devices. */
WARN_ON(netdev_has_any_upper_dev(dev));
+ WARN_ON(netdev_has_any_lower_dev(dev));
/* Remove entries from kobject tree */
netdev_unregister_kobject(dev);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 11/11] net: dev: Improve debug statements for adjacency tracking
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q
Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A, David Ahern
Adjacency code only has debugs for the insert case. Add debugs for
the remove path and make both consistently worded to make it easier
to follow the insert and removal with reference counts.
In addition, change the BUG to a WARN_ON. A missing adjacency at
removal time is not cause for a panic.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
---
net/core/dev.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 52e70a3d61a4..ad5e7bfda403 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5700,6 +5700,9 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
if (adj) {
adj->ref_nr += 1;
+ pr_debug("Insert adjacency: dev %s adj_dev %s adj->ref_nr %d\n",
+ dev->name, adj_dev->name, adj->ref_nr);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -5713,8 +5716,8 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
adj->private = private;
dev_hold(adj_dev);
- pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of link added from %s to %s\n",
- adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name);
+ pr_debug("Insert adjacency: dev %s adj_dev %s adj->ref_nr %d; dev_hold on %s\n",
+ dev->name, adj_dev->name, adj->ref_nr, adj_dev->name);
if (netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, adj_dev, dev_list)) {
ret = netdev_adjacent_sysfs_add(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
@@ -5753,17 +5756,22 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
+ pr_debug("Remove adjacency: dev %s adj_dev %s ref_nr %d\n",
+ dev->name, adj_dev->name, ref_nr);
+
adj = __netdev_find_adj(adj_dev, dev_list);
if (!adj) {
- pr_err("tried to remove device %s from %s\n",
+ pr_err("Adjacency does not exist for device %s from %s\n",
dev->name, adj_dev->name);
- BUG();
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ return;
}
if (adj->ref_nr > ref_nr) {
- pr_debug("%s to %s ref_nr-%d = %d\n", dev->name, adj_dev->name,
- ref_nr, adj->ref_nr-ref_nr);
+ pr_debug("adjacency: %s to %s ref_nr - %d = %d\n",
+ dev->name, adj_dev->name, ref_nr,
+ adj->ref_nr - ref_nr);
adj->ref_nr -= ref_nr;
return;
}
@@ -5775,7 +5783,7 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(dev, adj_dev->name, dev_list);
list_del_rcu(&adj->list);
- pr_debug("dev_put for %s, because link removed from %s to %s\n",
+ pr_debug("adjacency: dev_put for %s, because link removed from %s to %s\n",
adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name);
dev_put(adj_dev);
kfree_rcu(adj, rcu);
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 11/11] net: dev: Improve debug statements for adjacency tracking
@ 2016-10-12 20:51 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-12 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Adjacency code only has debugs for the insert case. Add debugs for
the remove path and make both consistently worded to make it easier
to follow the insert and removal with reference counts.
In addition, change the BUG to a WARN_ON. A missing adjacency at
removal time is not cause for a panic.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 52e70a3d61a4..ad5e7bfda403 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5700,6 +5700,9 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
if (adj) {
adj->ref_nr += 1;
+ pr_debug("Insert adjacency: dev %s adj_dev %s adj->ref_nr %d\n",
+ dev->name, adj_dev->name, adj->ref_nr);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -5713,8 +5716,8 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
adj->private = private;
dev_hold(adj_dev);
- pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of link added from %s to %s\n",
- adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name);
+ pr_debug("Insert adjacency: dev %s adj_dev %s adj->ref_nr %d; dev_hold on %s\n",
+ dev->name, adj_dev->name, adj->ref_nr, adj_dev->name);
if (netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, adj_dev, dev_list)) {
ret = netdev_adjacent_sysfs_add(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
@@ -5753,17 +5756,22 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
{
struct netdev_adjacent *adj;
+ pr_debug("Remove adjacency: dev %s adj_dev %s ref_nr %d\n",
+ dev->name, adj_dev->name, ref_nr);
+
adj = __netdev_find_adj(adj_dev, dev_list);
if (!adj) {
- pr_err("tried to remove device %s from %s\n",
+ pr_err("Adjacency does not exist for device %s from %s\n",
dev->name, adj_dev->name);
- BUG();
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ return;
}
if (adj->ref_nr > ref_nr) {
- pr_debug("%s to %s ref_nr-%d = %d\n", dev->name, adj_dev->name,
- ref_nr, adj->ref_nr-ref_nr);
+ pr_debug("adjacency: %s to %s ref_nr - %d = %d\n",
+ dev->name, adj_dev->name, ref_nr,
+ adj->ref_nr - ref_nr);
adj->ref_nr -= ref_nr;
return;
}
@@ -5775,7 +5783,7 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(dev, adj_dev->name, dev_list);
list_del_rcu(&adj->list);
- pr_debug("dev_put for %s, because link removed from %s to %s\n",
+ pr_debug("adjacency: dev_put for %s, because link removed from %s to %s\n",
adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name);
dev_put(adj_dev);
kfree_rcu(adj, rcu);
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-13 7:30 ` Jiri Pirko
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2016-10-13 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ahern
Cc: jiri, netdev, davem, dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock,
linux-rdma, j.vosburgh, vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher,
intel-wired-lan
Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:51:50PM CEST, dsa@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>This patch introduces netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu,
>netdev_walk_all_lower_dev and netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu. These
>functions recursively walk the adj_list of devices to determine all upper
>and lower devices.
>
>The functions take a callback function that is invoked for each device
>in the list. If the callback returns non-0, the walk is terminated and
>the functions return that code back to callers.
>
>Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
[...]
>+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
>+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
>+ void *data),
>+ void *data)
>+{
>+ struct list_head *iter;
>+ struct net_device *ldev;
>+ int ret;
>+
>+ for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.lower,
>+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter));
>+ ldev;
>+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter))) {
>+ /* first is the lower device itself */
>+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
>+ if (ret)
>+ return ret;
>+
>+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
>+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(ldev, fn, data);
I believe that Veaceslav's reason to collapse the upper/lower trees was
to avoid this recursivity. I also believe that the recursivity was a big
issue for DaveM and BenH. Something changed?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
@ 2016-10-13 7:30 ` Jiri Pirko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2016-10-13 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:51:50PM CEST, dsa at cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>This patch introduces netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu,
>netdev_walk_all_lower_dev and netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu. These
>functions recursively walk the adj_list of devices to determine all upper
>and lower devices.
>
>The functions take a callback function that is invoked for each device
>in the list. If the callback returns non-0, the walk is terminated and
>the functions return that code back to callers.
>
>Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
[...]
>+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
>+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
>+ void *data),
>+ void *data)
>+{
>+ struct list_head *iter;
>+ struct net_device *ldev;
>+ int ret;
>+
>+ for (iter = &(dev)->adj_list.lower,
>+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter));
>+ ldev;
>+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &(iter))) {
>+ /* first is the lower device itself */
>+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
>+ if (ret)
>+ return ret;
>+
>+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
>+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(ldev, fn, data);
I believe that Veaceslav's reason to collapse the upper/lower trees was
to avoid this recursivity. I also believe that the recursivity was a big
issue for DaveM and BenH. Something changed?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-13 7:34 ` Jiri Pirko
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2016-10-13 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ahern
Cc: jiri, netdev, davem, dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock,
linux-rdma, j.vosburgh, vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher,
intel-wired-lan
Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:51:48PM CEST, dsa@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>The netdev adjacency tracking is failing to create proper dependencies
>for some topologies. For example this topology
>
> +--------+
> | myvrf |
> +--------+
> | |
> | +---------+
> | | macvlan |
> | +---------+
> | |
> +----------+
> | bridge |
> +----------+
> |
> +--------+
> | bond0 |
> +--------+
> |
> +--------+
> | eth3 |
> +--------+
>
>hits 1 of 2 problems depending on the order of enslavement. The base set of
>commands for both cases:
>
> ip link add bond1 type bond
> ip link set bond1 up
> ip link set eth3 down
> ip link set eth3 master bond1
> ip link set eth3 up
>
> ip link add bridge type bridge
> ip link set bridge up
> ip link add macvlan link bridge type macvlan
> ip link set macvlan up
>
> ip link add myvrf type vrf table 1234
> ip link set myvrf up
>
> ip link set bridge master myvrf
>
>Case 1 enslave macvlan to the vrf before enslaving the bond to the bridge:
>
> ip link set macvlan master myvrf
> ip link set bond1 master bridge
>
>Attempts to delete the VRF:
> ip link delete myvrf
>
>trigger the BUG in __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove:
>
>[ 587.405260] tried to remove device eth3 from myvrf
>[ 587.407269] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>[ 587.408918] kernel BUG at /home/dsa/kernel.git/net/core/dev.c:5661!
>[ 587.411113] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>[ 587.412454] Modules linked in: macvlan bridge stp llc bonding vrf
>[ 587.414765] CPU: 0 PID: 726 Comm: ip Not tainted 4.8.0+ #109
>[ 587.416766] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140531_083030-gandalf 04/01/2014
>[ 587.420241] task: ffff88013ab6eec0 task.stack: ffffc90000628000
>[ 587.422163] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813cef03>] [<ffffffff813cef03>] __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove+0x40/0x12c
>...
>[ 587.446053] Call Trace:
>[ 587.446424] [<ffffffff813d1542>] __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink+0x20/0x3c
>[ 587.447390] [<ffffffff813d16a3>] netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0xfa/0x15e
>[ 587.448297] [<ffffffffa00003a3>] vrf_del_slave+0x13/0x2a [vrf]
>[ 587.449153] [<ffffffffa00004a4>] vrf_dev_uninit+0xea/0x114 [vrf]
>[ 587.450036] [<ffffffff813d19b0>] rollback_registered_many+0x22b/0x2da
>[ 587.450974] [<ffffffff813d1aac>] unregister_netdevice_many+0x17/0x48
>[ 587.451903] [<ffffffff813de444>] rtnl_delete_link+0x3c/0x43
>[ 587.452719] [<ffffffff813dedcd>] rtnl_dellink+0x180/0x194
>
>When the BUG is converted to a WARN_ON it shows 4 missing adjacencies:
> eth3 - myvrf, mvrf - eth3, bond1 - myvrf and myvrf - bond1
>
>All of those are because the __netdev_upper_dev_link function does not
>properly link macvlan lower devices to myvrf when it is enslaved.
>
>The second case just flips the ordering of the enslavements:
> ip link set bond1 master bridge
> ip link set macvlan master myvrf
>
>Then run:
> ip link delete bond1
> ip link delete myvrf
>
>The vrf delete command hangs because myvrf has a reference that has not
>been released. In this case the removal code does not account for 2 paths
>between eth3 and myvrf - one from bridge to vrf and the other through the
>macvlan.
>
>Rather than try to maintain a linked list of all upper and lower devices
>per netdevice, only track the direct neighbors. The remaining stack can
>be determined by recursively walking the neighbors.
Although I didn't like the "all-list" idea when Veaceslav pushed it
because it looked to me like a big hammer, it turned out to be very handy
and quick for traversing neighbours. Why it cannot be fixed?
The walks with possibly hundreds of function calls instead of a single
list traverse worries me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking
@ 2016-10-13 7:34 ` Jiri Pirko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2016-10-13 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:51:48PM CEST, dsa at cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>The netdev adjacency tracking is failing to create proper dependencies
>for some topologies. For example this topology
>
> +--------+
> | myvrf |
> +--------+
> | |
> | +---------+
> | | macvlan |
> | +---------+
> | |
> +----------+
> | bridge |
> +----------+
> |
> +--------+
> | bond0 |
> +--------+
> |
> +--------+
> | eth3 |
> +--------+
>
>hits 1 of 2 problems depending on the order of enslavement. The base set of
>commands for both cases:
>
> ip link add bond1 type bond
> ip link set bond1 up
> ip link set eth3 down
> ip link set eth3 master bond1
> ip link set eth3 up
>
> ip link add bridge type bridge
> ip link set bridge up
> ip link add macvlan link bridge type macvlan
> ip link set macvlan up
>
> ip link add myvrf type vrf table 1234
> ip link set myvrf up
>
> ip link set bridge master myvrf
>
>Case 1 enslave macvlan to the vrf before enslaving the bond to the bridge:
>
> ip link set macvlan master myvrf
> ip link set bond1 master bridge
>
>Attempts to delete the VRF:
> ip link delete myvrf
>
>trigger the BUG in __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove:
>
>[ 587.405260] tried to remove device eth3 from myvrf
>[ 587.407269] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>[ 587.408918] kernel BUG at /home/dsa/kernel.git/net/core/dev.c:5661!
>[ 587.411113] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>[ 587.412454] Modules linked in: macvlan bridge stp llc bonding vrf
>[ 587.414765] CPU: 0 PID: 726 Comm: ip Not tainted 4.8.0+ #109
>[ 587.416766] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140531_083030-gandalf 04/01/2014
>[ 587.420241] task: ffff88013ab6eec0 task.stack: ffffc90000628000
>[ 587.422163] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813cef03>] [<ffffffff813cef03>] __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove+0x40/0x12c
>...
>[ 587.446053] Call Trace:
>[ 587.446424] [<ffffffff813d1542>] __netdev_adjacent_dev_unlink+0x20/0x3c
>[ 587.447390] [<ffffffff813d16a3>] netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0xfa/0x15e
>[ 587.448297] [<ffffffffa00003a3>] vrf_del_slave+0x13/0x2a [vrf]
>[ 587.449153] [<ffffffffa00004a4>] vrf_dev_uninit+0xea/0x114 [vrf]
>[ 587.450036] [<ffffffff813d19b0>] rollback_registered_many+0x22b/0x2da
>[ 587.450974] [<ffffffff813d1aac>] unregister_netdevice_many+0x17/0x48
>[ 587.451903] [<ffffffff813de444>] rtnl_delete_link+0x3c/0x43
>[ 587.452719] [<ffffffff813dedcd>] rtnl_dellink+0x180/0x194
>
>When the BUG is converted to a WARN_ON it shows 4 missing adjacencies:
> eth3 - myvrf, mvrf - eth3, bond1 - myvrf and myvrf - bond1
>
>All of those are because the __netdev_upper_dev_link function does not
>properly link macvlan lower devices to myvrf when it is enslaved.
>
>The second case just flips the ordering of the enslavements:
> ip link set bond1 master bridge
> ip link set macvlan master myvrf
>
>Then run:
> ip link delete bond1
> ip link delete myvrf
>
>The vrf delete command hangs because myvrf has a reference that has not
>been released. In this case the removal code does not account for 2 paths
>between eth3 and myvrf - one from bridge to vrf and the other through the
>macvlan.
>
>Rather than try to maintain a linked list of all upper and lower devices
>per netdevice, only track the direct neighbors. The remaining stack can
>be determined by recursively walking the neighbors.
Although I didn't like the "all-list" idea when Veaceslav pushed it
because it looked to me like a big hammer, it turned out to be very handy
and quick for traversing neighbours. Why it cannot be fixed?
The walks with possibly hundreds of function calls instead of a single
list traverse worries me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking
2016-10-13 7:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
@ 2016-10-13 14:32 ` David Ahern
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-13 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Pirko
Cc: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A
On 10/13/16 1:34 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
> Although I didn't like the "all-list" idea when Veaceslav pushed it
> because it looked to me like a big hammer, it turned out to be very handy
> and quick for traversing neighbours. Why it cannot be fixed?
>
> The walks with possibly hundreds of function calls instead of a single
> list traverse worries me.
>
I have been looking at this code for a week now. Every solution I came up with that solved the original problems introduced new ones -- usually with adjacency remove expecting an adjacency that did not exist. In the end I came to the conclusion it is not possible to maintain an all_adj_list when the upper tree can have multiple paths to the top device. If someone thinks otherwise I am happy to test a patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking
@ 2016-10-13 14:32 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-13 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
On 10/13/16 1:34 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
> Although I didn't like the "all-list" idea when Veaceslav pushed it
> because it looked to me like a big hammer, it turned out to be very handy
> and quick for traversing neighbours. Why it cannot be fixed?
>
> The walks with possibly hundreds of function calls instead of a single
> list traverse worries me.
>
I have been looking at this code for a week now. Every solution I came up with that solved the original problems introduced new ones -- usually with adjacency remove expecting an adjacency that did not exist. In the end I came to the conclusion it is not possible to maintain an all_adj_list when the upper tree can have multiple paths to the top device. If someone thinks otherwise I am happy to test a patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
@ 2016-10-14 14:17 ` David Miller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2016-10-14 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR
Cc: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A
From: David Ahern <dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:51:48 -0700
> The netdev adjacency tracking is failing to create proper dependencies
> for some topologies. For example this topology
>
> +--------+
> | myvrf |
> +--------+
> | |
> | +---------+
> | | macvlan |
> | +---------+
> | |
> +----------+
> | bridge |
> +----------+
> |
> +--------+
> | bond0 |
> +--------+
> |
> +--------+
> | eth3 |
> +--------+
>
> hits 1 of 2 problems depending on the order of enslavement. The base set of
> commands for both cases:
>
> ip link add bond1 type bond
> ip link set bond1 up
Your diagram uses the device name "bond0" but all of your command examples
use "bond1". Please fix this up, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking
@ 2016-10-14 14:17 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2016-10-14 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
From: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:51:48 -0700
> The netdev adjacency tracking is failing to create proper dependencies
> for some topologies. For example this topology
>
> +--------+
> | myvrf |
> +--------+
> | |
> | +---------+
> | | macvlan |
> | +---------+
> | |
> +----------+
> | bridge |
> +----------+
> |
> +--------+
> | bond0 |
> +--------+
> |
> +--------+
> | eth3 |
> +--------+
>
> hits 1 of 2 problems depending on the order of enslavement. The base set of
> commands for both cases:
>
> ip link add bond1 type bond
> ip link set bond1 up
Your diagram uses the device name "bond0" but all of your command examples
use "bond1". Please fix this up, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
2016-10-18 2:15 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking David Ahern
@ 2016-10-18 2:15 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-18 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri, netdev, davem
Cc: dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock, linux-rdma, j.vosburgh,
vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher, intel-wired-lan, David Ahern
This patch introduces netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu,
netdev_walk_all_lower_dev and netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu. These
functions recursively walk the adj_list of devices to determine all upper
and lower devices.
The functions take a callback function that is invoked for each device
in the list. If the callback returns non-0, the walk is terminated and
the functions return that code back to callers.
v3
- simplified netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu and __netdev_has_upper_dev and
removed typecast as suggested by Stephen
v2
- fixed definition of netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu to mirror the upper_dev
version.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 17 +++++
net/core/dev.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 172 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index bf341b65ca5e..a5902d995907 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3778,6 +3778,14 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
updev; \
updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *upper_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct net_device *upper_dev);
+
void *netdev_lower_get_next_private(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter);
void *netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -3821,6 +3829,15 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
ldev; \
ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+
void *netdev_adjacent_get_private(struct list_head *adj_list);
void *netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev);
struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index f67fd16615bb..fc48337cfab8 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5156,6 +5156,31 @@ bool netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev);
/**
+ * netdev_has_upper_dev_all - Check if device is linked to an upper device
+ * @dev: device
+ * @upper_dev: upper device to check
+ *
+ * Find out if a device is linked to specified upper device and return true
+ * in case it is. Note that this checks the entire upper device chain.
+ * The caller must hold rcu lock.
+ */
+
+static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = data;
+
+ return upper_dev == dev;
+}
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct net_device *upper_dev)
+{
+ return !!netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, __netdev_has_upper_dev,
+ upper_dev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu);
+
+/**
* netdev_has_any_upper_dev - Check if device is linked to some device
* @dev: device
*
@@ -5255,6 +5280,51 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *upper;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
+
+ upper = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ if (&upper->list == &dev->adj_list.upper)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = &upper->list;
+
+ return upper->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *udev;
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &dev->adj_list.upper,
+ udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &iter);
+ udev;
+ udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &iter)) {
+ /* first is the upper device itself */
+ ret = fn(udev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its upper devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(udev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu);
+
/**
* netdev_lower_get_next_private - Get the next ->private from the
* lower neighbour list
@@ -5361,6 +5431,49 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+ lower = list_entry(*iter, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ if (&lower->list == &dev->adj_list.lower)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = lower->list.next;
+
+ return lower->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *ldev;
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &dev->adj_list.lower,
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &iter);
+ ldev;
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &iter)) {
+ /* first is the lower device itself */
+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(ldev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev);
+
/**
* netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu - Get the next device from all
* lower neighbour list, RCU variant
@@ -5382,6 +5495,48 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+ lower = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+ if (&lower->list == &dev->adj_list.lower)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = &lower->list;
+
+ return lower->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *ldev;
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &dev->adj_list.lower,
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &iter);
+ ldev;
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &iter)) {
+ /* first is the lower device itself */
+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(ldev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu);
+
/**
* netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu - Get the first ->private from the
* lower neighbour list, RCU
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
2016-10-17 12:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-10-17 14:42 ` David Miller
@ 2016-10-18 0:42 ` David Ahern
1 sibling, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-18 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger
Cc: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A
On 10/17/16 6:21 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> No if/else needed. No cast of void * ptr need. Use const if possible?
>
so much of the stack does not use const and trying to add it for this API does not work -- the upper or lower device is passed to the callbacks and those callbacks invoke other apis. e.g., the bond patch calls vlan_get_encap_level, bond_verify_device_path and bond_confirm_addr and none of those accept a const dev.
v3 coming up with the more succinct versions, but const is not possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
2016-10-17 12:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2016-10-17 14:42 ` David Miller
2016-10-18 0:42 ` David Ahern
1 sibling, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2016-10-17 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stephen
Cc: dsa, jiri, netdev, dledford, sean.hefty, hal.rosenstock,
linux-rdma, j.vosburgh, vfalico, andy, jeffrey.t.kirsher,
intel-wired-lan
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:21:21 -0700
> You should write this more succinctly as:
>
> static bool __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
> {
> struct net_device *dev = data;
>
> return upper_dev == dev;
> }
>
> bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
> struct net_device *upper_dev)
> {
> return netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev,
> __netdev_has_upper_dev, upper_dev);
> }
>
> No if/else needed. No cast of void * ptr need. Use const if possible?
Agreed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
[not found] ` <1476494931-31813-3-git-send-email-dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
@ 2016-10-17 12:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-10-17 14:42 ` David Miller
2016-10-18 0:42 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 2 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2016-10-17 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ahern
Cc: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q, dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:28:42 -0700
David Ahern <dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> /**
> + * netdev_has_upper_dev_all - Check if device is linked to an upper device
> + * @dev: device
> + * @upper_dev: upper device to check
> + *
> + * Find out if a device is linked to specified upper device and return true
> + * in case it is. Note that this checks the entire upper device chain.
> + * The caller must hold rcu lock.
> + */
> +
> +static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
> +
> + if (upper_dev == dev)
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct net_device *upper_dev)
> +{
> + if (netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, __netdev_has_upper_dev,
> + upper_dev))
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu);
You should write this more succinctly as:
static bool __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
{
struct net_device *dev = data;
return upper_dev == dev;
}
bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev)
{
return netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev,
__netdev_has_upper_dev, upper_dev);
}
No if/else needed. No cast of void * ptr need. Use const if possible?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices
[not found] ` <1476494931-31813-1-git-send-email-dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
@ 2016-10-15 1:28 ` David Ahern
[not found] ` <1476494931-31813-3-git-send-email-dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 37+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2016-10-15 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jiri-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q
Cc: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
j.vosburgh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
vfalico-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, andy-QlMahl40kYEqcZcGjlUOXw,
jeffrey.t.kirsher-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
intel-wired-lan-qjLDD68F18P21nG7glBr7A, David Ahern
This patch introduces netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu,
netdev_walk_all_lower_dev and netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu. These
functions recursively walk the adj_list of devices to determine all upper
and lower devices.
The functions take a callback function that is invoked for each device
in the list. If the callback returns non-0, the walk is terminated and
the functions return that code back to callers.
v2
- fixed definition of netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu to mirror the upper_dev
version.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 17 +++++
net/core/dev.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 178 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index bf341b65ca5e..a5902d995907 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3778,6 +3778,14 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
updev; \
updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *upper_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct net_device *upper_dev);
+
void *netdev_lower_get_next_private(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter);
void *netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -3821,6 +3829,15 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
ldev; \
ldev = netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data);
+
void *netdev_adjacent_get_private(struct list_head *adj_list);
void *netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu(struct net_device *dev);
struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 5399af8fdac0..1780f94ed25f 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5156,6 +5156,37 @@ bool netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev);
/**
+ * netdev_has_upper_dev_all - Check if device is linked to an upper device
+ * @dev: device
+ * @upper_dev: upper device to check
+ *
+ * Find out if a device is linked to specified upper device and return true
+ * in case it is. Note that this checks the entire upper device chain.
+ * The caller must hold rcu lock.
+ */
+
+static int __netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *upper_dev, void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)data;
+
+ if (upper_dev == dev)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+bool netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct net_device *upper_dev)
+{
+ if (netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, __netdev_has_upper_dev,
+ upper_dev))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_has_upper_dev_all_rcu);
+
+/**
* netdev_has_any_upper_dev - Check if device is linked to some device
* @dev: device
*
@@ -5255,6 +5286,51 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *upper;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
+
+ upper = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ if (&upper->list == &dev->adj_list.upper)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = &upper->list;
+
+ return upper->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *udev;
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &dev->adj_list.upper,
+ udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &iter);
+ udev;
+ udev = netdev_next_upper_dev_rcu(dev, &iter)) {
+ /* first is the upper device itself */
+ ret = fn(udev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its upper devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu(udev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_upper_dev_rcu);
+
/**
* netdev_lower_get_next_private - Get the next ->private from the
* lower neighbour list
@@ -5361,6 +5437,49 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+ lower = list_entry(*iter, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+
+ if (&lower->list == &dev->adj_list.lower)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = lower->list.next;
+
+ return lower->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *ldev;
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &dev->adj_list.lower,
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &iter);
+ ldev;
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev(dev, &iter)) {
+ /* first is the lower device itself */
+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(ldev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev);
+
/**
* netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu - Get the next device from all
* lower neighbour list, RCU variant
@@ -5382,6 +5501,48 @@ struct net_device *netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu);
+static struct net_device *netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ struct list_head **iter)
+{
+ struct netdev_adjacent *lower;
+
+ lower = list_entry_rcu((*iter)->next, struct netdev_adjacent, list);
+ if (&lower->list == &dev->adj_list.lower)
+ return NULL;
+
+ *iter = &lower->list;
+
+ return lower->dev;
+}
+
+int netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
+ int (*fn)(struct net_device *dev,
+ void *data),
+ void *data)
+{
+ struct net_device *ldev;
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (iter = &dev->adj_list.lower,
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &iter);
+ ldev;
+ ldev = netdev_next_lower_dev_rcu(dev, &iter)) {
+ /* first is the lower device itself */
+ ret = fn(ldev, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* then look at all of its lower devices */
+ ret = netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(ldev, fn, data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu);
+
/**
* netdev_lower_get_first_private_rcu - Get the first ->private from the
* lower neighbour list, RCU
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-18 2:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-12 20:51 [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-13 7:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2016-10-13 7:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: bonding: Flip to the new dev walk API David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] IB/core: " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] ixgbe: " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] mlxsw: " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
[not found] ` <1476305519-28833-1-git-send-email-dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: Remove refnr arg when inserting link adjacencies David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] IB/ipoib: Flip to new dev walk API David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] rocker: Flip to the " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] net: dev: Improve debug statements for adjacency tracking David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-14 14:17 ` [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev " David Miller
2016-10-14 14:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Miller
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: Remove all_adj_list and its references David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: Add warning if any lower device is still in adjacency list David Ahern
2016-10-12 20:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-13 7:34 ` [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking Jiri Pirko
2016-10-13 7:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko
[not found] ` <20161013073424.GB1816-6KJVSR23iU488b5SBfVpbw@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-13 14:32 ` David Ahern
2016-10-13 14:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Ahern
2016-10-15 1:28 [PATCH v2 " David Ahern
[not found] ` <1476494931-31813-1-git-send-email-dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-15 1:28 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices David Ahern
[not found] ` <1476494931-31813-3-git-send-email-dsa-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-17 12:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-10-17 14:42 ` David Miller
2016-10-18 0:42 ` David Ahern
2016-10-18 2:15 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/11] net: Fix netdev adjacency tracking David Ahern
2016-10-18 2:15 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices David Ahern
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.