All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	x86@kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synops
Subject: [PATCH 28/28] Kbuild: bring back -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:19:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017222000.1934898-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161017220342.1627073-1-arnd@arndb.de>

Traditionally, we have always had warnings about uninitialized variables
enabled, as this is part of -Wall, and generally a good idea [1], but it
also always produced false positives, mainly because this is a variation
of the halting problem and provably impossible to get right in all cases
[2].

Various people have identified cases that are particularly bad for false
positives, and in commit e74fc973b6e5 ("Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized
when building with -Os"), I turned off the warning for any build that
was done with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.  This drastically reduced the number
of false positive warnings in the default build but unfortunately had
the side effect of turning the warning off completely in 'allmodconfig'
builds, which in turn led to a lot of warnings (both actual bugs, and
remaining false positives) to go in unnoticed.

With commit 877417e6ffb9 ("Kbuild: change CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
definition") enabled the warning again for allmodconfig builds in v4.7
and in v4.8-rc1, I had finally managed to address all warnings I get in
an ARM allmodconfig build and most other maybe-uninitialized warnings
for ARM randconfig builds.

However, commit 6e8d666e9253 ("Disable "maybe-uninitialized" warning
globally") was merged at the same time and disabled it completely for
all configurations, because of false-positive warnings on x86 that
I had not addressed until then. This caused a lot of actual bugs to
get merged into mainline, and I sent several dozen patches for these
during the v4.9 development cycle. Most of these are actual bugs,
some are for correct code that is safe because it is only called
under external constraints that make it impossible to run into
the case that gcc sees, and in a few cases gcc is just stupid and
finds something that can obviously never happen.

I have now done a few thousand randconfig builds on x86 and collected
all patches that I needed to address every single warning I got
(I can provide the combined patch for the other warnings if anyone
is interested), so I hope we can get the warning back and let people
catch the actual bugs earlier.

Note that the majority of the patches I created are for the third kind
of problem (stupid false-positives), for one of two reasons:
- some of them only get triggered in certain combinations of config
  options, so we don't always run into them, and
- the actual bugs tend to get addressed much quicker as they also
  lead to incorrect runtime behavior.

These 27 patches address the warnings that either occur in one of the more
common configurations (defconfig, allmodconfig, or something built by the
kbuild robot or kernelci.org), or they are about a real bug. It would be
good to get these all into v4.9 if we want to turn on the warning again.
I have tested these extensively with gcc-4.9 and gcc-6 and done a bit
of testing with gcc-5, and all of these should now be fine. gcc-4.8
is much worse about the false-positive warnings and is also fairly old
now, so I'm leaving the warning disabled with that version. gcc-4.7 and
older don't understand the -Wno-maybe-uninitialized option and are not
affected by this patch either way.

I have another (smaller) series of patches for warnings that are both
harmless and not as easy to trigger, and I will send them for inclusion
in v4.10.

Link: https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=232 [1]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings [2]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 Makefile               | 10 ++++++----
 arch/arc/Makefile      |  4 +++-
 scripts/Makefile.ubsan |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 512e47a..43cd3d9 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ LDFLAGS_MODULE  =
 CFLAGS_KERNEL	=
 AFLAGS_KERNEL	=
 LDFLAGS_vmlinux =
-CFLAGS_GCOV	= -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im
+CFLAGS_GCOV	= -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im  -Wno-maybe-uninitialized
 CFLAGS_KCOV	:= $(call cc-option,-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,)
 
 
@@ -620,7 +620,6 @@ ARCH_CFLAGS :=
 include arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
 
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks,)
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning,frame-address,)
 
 ifdef CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
@@ -629,15 +628,18 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,-fdata-sections,)
 endif
 
 ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -Os
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
 ifdef CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -O2
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -O2 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
 KBUILD_CFLAGS   += -O2
 endif
 endif
 
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0409, \
+			$(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))
+
 # Tell gcc to never replace conditional load with a non-conditional one
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,--param=allow-store-data-races=0)
 
diff --git a/arch/arc/Makefile b/arch/arc/Makefile
index aa82d13..19cce22 100644
--- a/arch/arc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arc/Makefile
@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_DW2_UNWIND)		+= -fasynchronous-unwind-tables $(cfi)
 ifndef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
 # Generic build system uses -O2, we want -O3
 # Note: No need to add to cflags-y as that happens anyways
-ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3
+#
+# Disable the false maybe-uninitialized warings gcc spits out at -O3
+ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 endif
 
 # small data is default for elf32 tool-chain. If not usable, disable it
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
index dd779c4..3b1b138 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
@@ -17,4 +17,8 @@ endif
 ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN_NULL
       CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=null)
 endif
+
+      # -fsanitize=* options makes GCC less smart than usual and
+      # increase number of 'maybe-uninitialized false-positives
+      CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -Wno-maybe-uninitialized)
 endif
-- 
2.9.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 28/28] Kbuild: bring back -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:19:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017222000.1934898-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161017220342.1627073-1-arnd@arndb.de>

Traditionally, we have always had warnings about uninitialized variables
enabled, as this is part of -Wall, and generally a good idea [1], but it
also always produced false positives, mainly because this is a variation
of the halting problem and provably impossible to get right in all cases
[2].

Various people have identified cases that are particularly bad for false
positives, and in commit e74fc973b6e5 ("Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized
when building with -Os"), I turned off the warning for any build that
was done with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.  This drastically reduced the number
of false positive warnings in the default build but unfortunately had
the side effect of turning the warning off completely in 'allmodconfig'
builds, which in turn led to a lot of warnings (both actual bugs, and
remaining false positives) to go in unnoticed.

With commit 877417e6ffb9 ("Kbuild: change CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
definition") enabled the warning again for allmodconfig builds in v4.7
and in v4.8-rc1, I had finally managed to address all warnings I get in
an ARM allmodconfig build and most other maybe-uninitialized warnings
for ARM randconfig builds.

However, commit 6e8d666e9253 ("Disable "maybe-uninitialized" warning
globally") was merged at the same time and disabled it completely for
all configurations, because of false-positive warnings on x86 that
I had not addressed until then. This caused a lot of actual bugs to
get merged into mainline, and I sent several dozen patches for these
during the v4.9 development cycle. Most of these are actual bugs,
some are for correct code that is safe because it is only called
under external constraints that make it impossible to run into
the case that gcc sees, and in a few cases gcc is just stupid and
finds something that can obviously never happen.

I have now done a few thousand randconfig builds on x86 and collected
all patches that I needed to address every single warning I got
(I can provide the combined patch for the other warnings if anyone
is interested), so I hope we can get the warning back and let people
catch the actual bugs earlier.

Note that the majority of the patches I created are for the third kind
of problem (stupid false-positives), for one of two reasons:
- some of them only get triggered in certain combinations of config
  options, so we don't always run into them, and
- the actual bugs tend to get addressed much quicker as they also
  lead to incorrect runtime behavior.

These 27 patches address the warnings that either occur in one of the more
common configurations (defconfig, allmodconfig, or something built by the
kbuild robot or kernelci.org), or they are about a real bug. It would be
good to get these all into v4.9 if we want to turn on the warning again.
I have tested these extensively with gcc-4.9 and gcc-6 and done a bit
of testing with gcc-5, and all of these should now be fine. gcc-4.8
is much worse about the false-positive warnings and is also fairly old
now, so I'm leaving the warning disabled with that version. gcc-4.7 and
older don't understand the -Wno-maybe-uninitialized option and are not
affected by this patch either way.

I have another (smaller) series of patches for warnings that are both
harmless and not as easy to trigger, and I will send them for inclusion
in v4.10.

Link: https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=232 [1]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings [2]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 Makefile               | 10 ++++++----
 arch/arc/Makefile      |  4 +++-
 scripts/Makefile.ubsan |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 512e47a..43cd3d9 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ LDFLAGS_MODULE  =
 CFLAGS_KERNEL	=
 AFLAGS_KERNEL	=
 LDFLAGS_vmlinux =
-CFLAGS_GCOV	= -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im
+CFLAGS_GCOV	= -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im  -Wno-maybe-uninitialized
 CFLAGS_KCOV	:= $(call cc-option,-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,)
 
 
@@ -620,7 +620,6 @@ ARCH_CFLAGS :=
 include arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
 
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks,)
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning,frame-address,)
 
 ifdef CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
@@ -629,15 +628,18 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,-fdata-sections,)
 endif
 
 ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -Os
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
 ifdef CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -O2
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -O2 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
 KBUILD_CFLAGS   += -O2
 endif
 endif
 
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0409, \
+			$(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))
+
 # Tell gcc to never replace conditional load with a non-conditional one
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,--param=allow-store-data-races=0)
 
diff --git a/arch/arc/Makefile b/arch/arc/Makefile
index aa82d13..19cce22 100644
--- a/arch/arc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arc/Makefile
@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_DW2_UNWIND)		+= -fasynchronous-unwind-tables $(cfi)
 ifndef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
 # Generic build system uses -O2, we want -O3
 # Note: No need to add to cflags-y as that happens anyways
-ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3
+#
+# Disable the false maybe-uninitialized warings gcc spits out at -O3
+ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 endif
 
 # small data is default for elf32 tool-chain. If not usable, disable it
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
index dd779c4..3b1b138 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
@@ -17,4 +17,8 @@ endif
 ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN_NULL
       CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=null)
 endif
+
+      # -fsanitize=* options makes GCC less smart than usual and
+      # increase number of 'maybe-uninitialized false-positives
+      CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -Wno-maybe-uninitialized)
 endif
-- 
2.9.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	x86@kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synops>
Subject: [PATCH 28/28] Kbuild: bring back -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:19:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017222000.1934898-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161017220342.1627073-1-arnd@arndb.de>

Traditionally, we have always had warnings about uninitialized variables
enabled, as this is part of -Wall, and generally a good idea [1], but it
also always produced false positives, mainly because this is a variation
of the halting problem and provably impossible to get right in all cases
[2].

Various people have identified cases that are particularly bad for false
positives, and in commit e74fc973b6e5 ("Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized
when building with -Os"), I turned off the warning for any build that
was done with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.  This drastically reduced the number
of false positive warnings in the default build but unfortunately had
the side effect of turning the warning off completely in 'allmodconfig'
builds, which in turn led to a lot of warnings (both actual bugs, and
remaining false positives) to go in unnoticed.

With commit 877417e6ffb9 ("Kbuild: change CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
definition") enabled the warning again for allmodconfig builds in v4.7
and in v4.8-rc1, I had finally managed to address all warnings I get in
an ARM allmodconfig build and most other maybe-uninitialized warnings
for ARM randconfig builds.

However, commit 6e8d666e9253 ("Disable "maybe-uninitialized" warning
globally") was merged at the same time and disabled it completely for
all configurations, because of false-positive warnings on x86 that
I had not addressed until then. This caused a lot of actual bugs to
get merged into mainline, and I sent several dozen patches for these
during the v4.9 development cycle. Most of these are actual bugs,
some are for correct code that is safe because it is only called
under external constraints that make it impossible to run into
the case that gcc sees, and in a few cases gcc is just stupid and
finds something that can obviously never happen.

I have now done a few thousand randconfig builds on x86 and collected
all patches that I needed to address every single warning I got
(I can provide the combined patch for the other warnings if anyone
is interested), so I hope we can get the warning back and let people
catch the actual bugs earlier.

Note that the majority of the patches I created are for the third kind
of problem (stupid false-positives), for one of two reasons:
- some of them only get triggered in certain combinations of config
  options, so we don't always run into them, and
- the actual bugs tend to get addressed much quicker as they also
  lead to incorrect runtime behavior.

These 27 patches address the warnings that either occur in one of the more
common configurations (defconfig, allmodconfig, or something built by the
kbuild robot or kernelci.org), or they are about a real bug. It would be
good to get these all into v4.9 if we want to turn on the warning again.
I have tested these extensively with gcc-4.9 and gcc-6 and done a bit
of testing with gcc-5, and all of these should now be fine. gcc-4.8
is much worse about the false-positive warnings and is also fairly old
now, so I'm leaving the warning disabled with that version. gcc-4.7 and
older don't understand the -Wno-maybe-uninitialized option and are not
affected by this patch either way.

I have another (smaller) series of patches for warnings that are both
harmless and not as easy to trigger, and I will send them for inclusion
in v4.10.

Link: https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=232 [1]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings [2]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 Makefile               | 10 ++++++----
 arch/arc/Makefile      |  4 +++-
 scripts/Makefile.ubsan |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 512e47a..43cd3d9 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ LDFLAGS_MODULE  =
 CFLAGS_KERNEL	=
 AFLAGS_KERNEL	=
 LDFLAGS_vmlinux =
-CFLAGS_GCOV	= -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im
+CFLAGS_GCOV	= -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im  -Wno-maybe-uninitialized
 CFLAGS_KCOV	:= $(call cc-option,-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,)
 
 
@@ -620,7 +620,6 @@ ARCH_CFLAGS :=
 include arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
 
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks,)
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning,frame-address,)
 
 ifdef CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
@@ -629,15 +628,18 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,-fdata-sections,)
 endif
 
 ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -Os
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
 ifdef CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -O2
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -O2 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
 KBUILD_CFLAGS   += -O2
 endif
 endif
 
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0409, \
+			$(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))
+
 # Tell gcc to never replace conditional load with a non-conditional one
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,--param=allow-store-data-races=0)
 
diff --git a/arch/arc/Makefile b/arch/arc/Makefile
index aa82d13..19cce22 100644
--- a/arch/arc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arc/Makefile
@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_DW2_UNWIND)		+= -fasynchronous-unwind-tables $(cfi)
 ifndef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
 # Generic build system uses -O2, we want -O3
 # Note: No need to add to cflags-y as that happens anyways
-ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3
+#
+# Disable the false maybe-uninitialized warings gcc spits out at -O3
+ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 endif
 
 # small data is default for elf32 tool-chain. If not usable, disable it
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
index dd779c4..3b1b138 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
@@ -17,4 +17,8 @@ endif
 ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN_NULL
       CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=null)
 endif
+
+      # -fsanitize=* options makes GCC less smart than usual and
+      # increase number of 'maybe-uninitialized false-positives
+      CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -Wno-maybe-uninitialized)
 endif
-- 
2.9.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 28/28] Kbuild: bring back -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:19:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017222000.1934898-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161017220342.1627073-1-arnd@arndb.de>

Traditionally, we have always had warnings about uninitialized variables
enabled, as this is part of -Wall, and generally a good idea [1], but it
also always produced false positives, mainly because this is a variation
of the halting problem and provably impossible to get right in all cases
[2].

Various people have identified cases that are particularly bad for false
positives, and in commit e74fc973b6e5 ("Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized
when building with -Os"), I turned off the warning for any build that
was done with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.  This drastically reduced the number
of false positive warnings in the default build but unfortunately had
the side effect of turning the warning off completely in 'allmodconfig'
builds, which in turn led to a lot of warnings (both actual bugs, and
remaining false positives) to go in unnoticed.

With commit 877417e6ffb9 ("Kbuild: change CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
definition") enabled the warning again for allmodconfig builds in v4.7
and in v4.8-rc1, I had finally managed to address all warnings I get in
an ARM allmodconfig build and most other maybe-uninitialized warnings
for ARM randconfig builds.

However, commit 6e8d666e9253 ("Disable "maybe-uninitialized" warning
globally") was merged at the same time and disabled it completely for
all configurations, because of false-positive warnings on x86 that
I had not addressed until then. This caused a lot of actual bugs to
get merged into mainline, and I sent several dozen patches for these
during the v4.9 development cycle. Most of these are actual bugs,
some are for correct code that is safe because it is only called
under external constraints that make it impossible to run into
the case that gcc sees, and in a few cases gcc is just stupid and
finds something that can obviously never happen.

I have now done a few thousand randconfig builds on x86 and collected
all patches that I needed to address every single warning I got
(I can provide the combined patch for the other warnings if anyone
is interested), so I hope we can get the warning back and let people
catch the actual bugs earlier.

Note that the majority of the patches I created are for the third kind
of problem (stupid false-positives), for one of two reasons:
- some of them only get triggered in certain combinations of config
  options, so we don't always run into them, and
- the actual bugs tend to get addressed much quicker as they also
  lead to incorrect runtime behavior.

These 27 patches address the warnings that either occur in one of the more
common configurations (defconfig, allmodconfig, or something built by the
kbuild robot or kernelci.org), or they are about a real bug. It would be
good to get these all into v4.9 if we want to turn on the warning again.
I have tested these extensively with gcc-4.9 and gcc-6 and done a bit
of testing with gcc-5, and all of these should now be fine. gcc-4.8
is much worse about the false-positive warnings and is also fairly old
now, so I'm leaving the warning disabled with that version. gcc-4.7 and
older don't understand the -Wno-maybe-uninitialized option and are not
affected by this patch either way.

I have another (smaller) series of patches for warnings that are both
harmless and not as easy to trigger, and I will send them for inclusion
in v4.10.

Link: https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=232 [1]
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings [2]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
---
 Makefile               | 10 ++++++----
 arch/arc/Makefile      |  4 +++-
 scripts/Makefile.ubsan |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Cc: x86 at kernel.org
Cc: linux-media at vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab at kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky at de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390 at vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov at gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto at vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: ceph-devel at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-ext4 at vger.kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel at vger.kernel.org

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 512e47a..43cd3d9 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ LDFLAGS_MODULE  =
 CFLAGS_KERNEL	=
 AFLAGS_KERNEL	=
 LDFLAGS_vmlinux =
-CFLAGS_GCOV	= -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im
+CFLAGS_GCOV	= -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-tree-loop-im  -Wno-maybe-uninitialized
 CFLAGS_KCOV	:= $(call cc-option,-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,)
 
 
@@ -620,7 +620,6 @@ ARCH_CFLAGS :=
 include arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile
 
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks,)
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning,frame-address,)
 
 ifdef CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
@@ -629,15 +628,18 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,-fdata-sections,)
 endif
 
 ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -Os
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
 ifdef CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
-KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -O2
+KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -O2 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
 KBUILD_CFLAGS   += -O2
 endif
 endif
 
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0409, \
+			$(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,))
+
 # Tell gcc to never replace conditional load with a non-conditional one
 KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-option,--param=allow-store-data-races=0)
 
diff --git a/arch/arc/Makefile b/arch/arc/Makefile
index aa82d13..19cce22 100644
--- a/arch/arc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arc/Makefile
@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_ARC_DW2_UNWIND)		+= -fasynchronous-unwind-tables $(cfi)
 ifndef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
 # Generic build system uses -O2, we want -O3
 # Note: No need to add to cflags-y as that happens anyways
-ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3
+#
+# Disable the false maybe-uninitialized warings gcc spits out at -O3
+ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 endif
 
 # small data is default for elf32 tool-chain. If not usable, disable it
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
index dd779c4..3b1b138 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.ubsan
@@ -17,4 +17,8 @@ endif
 ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN_NULL
       CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -fsanitize=null)
 endif
+
+      # -fsanitize=* options makes GCC less smart than usual and
+      # increase number of 'maybe-uninitialized false-positives
+      CFLAGS_UBSAN += $(call cc-option, -Wno-maybe-uninitialized)
 endif
-- 
2.9.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-17 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-17 22:03 [PATCH 00/28] Reenable maybe-uninitialized warnings Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 01/28] [v2] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid uninitialized variable warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 15:23   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 02/28] [v2] mtd: mtk: avoid warning in mtk_ecc_encode Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:05   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:05   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18  5:19   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-18  5:19     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-18 10:12     ` RogerCC.Lin
2016-10-18 10:12       ` RogerCC.Lin
2016-10-18 10:12       ` RogerCC.Lin
2016-10-18 19:45       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-18 19:45         ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-18 19:45         ` Boris Brezillon
     [not found] ` <20161017220342.1627073-1-arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-17 22:05   ` [PATCH 03/28] [v2] infiniband: shut up a maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:05     ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]     ` <20161017220557.1688282-3-arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-18  6:47       ` Haggai Eran
2016-10-18  6:47         ` Haggai Eran
     [not found]         ` <33302790-0a4c-e2b3-868d-3e7dadbd3c07-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-18 10:18           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 10:18             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 10:32             ` Haggai Eran
2016-10-18 10:32               ` Haggai Eran
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 04/28] f2fs: replace a build-time warning with runtime WARN_ON Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:05   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26 14:05   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-10-26 14:57     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-27 11:41       ` Chao Yu
2016-10-27 11:41         ` Chao Yu
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 05/28] ext2: avoid bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18  5:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-18  9:30     ` Jan Kara
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 06/28] NFSv4.1: work around " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:08 ` [PATCH 07/28] ceph: avoid false positive maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18  2:07   ` Yan, Zheng
2016-10-17 22:08 ` [PATCH 08/28] staging: lustre: restore initialization of return code Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:08   ` [lustre-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:23   ` Patrick Farrell
2016-10-17 22:29     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:37       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-17 22:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-17 23:00         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 23:00           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:42   ` [PATCH 08/28 v2] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:42     ` [lustre-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:08 ` [PATCH 09/28] staging: lustre: remove broken dead code in cfs_cpt_table_create_pattern Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:08   ` [lustre-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 10/28] UBI: fix uninitialized access of vid_hdr pointer Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18  5:17   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 11/28] block: rdb: false-postive gcc-4.9 -Wmaybe-uninitialized Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18  9:57   ` Ilya Dryomov
2016-10-18 10:04     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:12 ` [PATCH 12/28] [media] rc: print correct variable for z8f0811 Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 13/28] [media] dib0700: fix uninitialized data on 'repeat' event Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 14/28] iio: accel: sca3000_core: avoid potentially uninitialized variable Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:13   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-23 21:25   ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 15/28] crypto: aesni: avoid -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 16/28] pcmcia: fix return value of soc_pcmcia_regulator_set Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18  9:42   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 17/28] spi: fsl-espi: avoid processing uninitalized data on error Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-24 17:27   ` Mark Brown
2016-10-24 17:27     ` Mark Brown
2016-10-24 18:36     ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-10-24 18:36       ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-10-24 18:45       ` Mark Brown
2016-10-24 20:37         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 19:13           ` Mark Brown
2016-10-25 19:13             ` Mark Brown
2016-10-25 20:57             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26 10:15   ` Applied "spi: fsl-espi: avoid processing uninitalized data on error" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2016-10-26 18:11     ` Merge problem: " Heiner Kallweit
2016-10-26 21:59       ` Mark Brown
2016-10-26 21:59         ` Mark Brown
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 18/28] drm: avoid uninitialized timestamp use in wait_vblank Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:13   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 23:47   ` Mario Kleiner
2016-10-17 23:47     ` Mario Kleiner
2016-10-18  7:46     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-18  7:46       ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 19/28] brcmfmac: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning in brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26  6:49   ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-26  6:49     ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-26  9:57     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26 11:11       ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-26 11:11         ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-26 11:11         ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-27 15:05   ` [19/28] " Kalle Valo
2016-10-27 15:05     ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 20/28] net: bcm63xx: avoid referencing uninitialized variable Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 18:21   ` David Miller
2016-10-18 18:21     ` David Miller
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 21/28] net/hyperv: avoid " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 18:21   ` David Miller
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 22/28] x86: apm: avoid uninitialized data Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 13:05   ` Jiri Kosina
2016-10-18 21:35   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 23/28] x86: mark target address as output in 'insb' asm Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 24/28] x86: math-emu: possible uninitialized variable use Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 25/28] s390: pci: don't print uninitialized data for debugging Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18  6:48   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2016-10-18  8:53     ` Sebastian Ott
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 26/28] nios2: fix timer initcall return value Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-24  0:54   ` Ley Foon Tan
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 27/28] rocker: fix maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 18:21   ` David Miller
2016-10-17 22:19 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-10-17 22:19   ` [PATCH 28/28] Kbuild: bring back -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18  5:08 ` [PATCH 00/28] Reenable maybe-uninitialized warnings Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161017222000.1934898-1-arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgupta@synops \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.