* Re: [PATCH] xfstests-bld: add kernel configs for 4.9
[not found] <1477081648-86880-1-git-send-email-ebiggers@google.com>
@ 2016-10-25 16:51 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-28 16:45 ` Eric Biggers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2016-10-25 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Biggers; +Cc: fstests
I ended up checking in a slightly different set of kernel configs.
The main differences were (a) enable more kernel debugging config
options, which improve testing, and (b) removed some unneeded hardware
support which aren't needed for running the 32-bit kernel under KVM.
Cheers,
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests-bld: add kernel configs for 4.9
2016-10-25 16:51 ` [PATCH] xfstests-bld: add kernel configs for 4.9 Theodore Ts'o
@ 2016-10-28 16:45 ` Eric Biggers
2016-10-28 18:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2016-10-28 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Theodore Ts'o; +Cc: fstests
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:51:16PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I ended up checking in a slightly different set of kernel configs.
> The main differences were (a) enable more kernel debugging config
> options, which improve testing, and (b) removed some unneeded hardware
> support which aren't needed for running the 32-bit kernel under KVM.
Thanks! Right now I only see the commit in the github repository
(https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld), not in the kernel.org repository
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/xfstests-bld.git). Can these be kept in
sync, and which one (if either) is supposed to be authoritative?
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests-bld: add kernel configs for 4.9
2016-10-28 16:45 ` Eric Biggers
@ 2016-10-28 18:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2016-10-28 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Biggers; +Cc: fstests
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:45:38AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> Thanks! Right now I only see the commit in the github repository
> (https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld), not in the kernel.org repository
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/xfstests-bld.git). Can these be kept in
> sync, and which one (if either) is supposed to be authoritative?
Done. I do try to keep both in sync, but sometimes I screw up
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-28 18:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1477081648-86880-1-git-send-email-ebiggers@google.com>
2016-10-25 16:51 ` [PATCH] xfstests-bld: add kernel configs for 4.9 Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-28 16:45 ` Eric Biggers
2016-10-28 18:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.