* [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
@ 2016-11-20 17:50 sunil.kamath
2016-11-20 18:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-11-21 11:46 ` [PATCH] " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sunil.kamath @ 2016-11-20 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: ander.conselvan.de.oliveira
From: "A.Sunil Kamath" <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
Better to use num_scaler itself while printing scaler_info.
This fixes a bug of printing information for the missing
second scaler on pipe C for SKL platform.
Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 1cc971c..6c39881 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -3081,7 +3081,7 @@ static void intel_scaler_info(struct seq_file *m, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_users,
pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_id);
- for (i = 0; i < SKL_NUM_SCALERS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num_scalers; i++) {
struct intel_scaler *sc =
&pipe_config->scaler_state.scalers[i];
--
2.8.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
2016-11-20 17:50 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs sunil.kamath
@ 2016-11-20 18:16 ` Patchwork
2016-11-21 11:59 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-11-21 11:46 ` [PATCH] " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-11-20 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kamath, Sunil; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/15621/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 15621v1 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/15621/revisions/1/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:244 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
fi-bsw-n3050 total:244 pass:204 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40
fi-byt-j1900 total:244 pass:216 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
fi-byt-n2820 total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
fi-hsw-4770 total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-hsw-4770r total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-ilk-650 total:244 pass:191 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:53
fi-ivb-3520m total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-ivb-3770 total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-kbl-7200u total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-skl-6260u total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-skl-6700hq total:244 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6700k total:244 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6770hq total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-snb-2520m total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
fi-snb-2600 total:244 pass:211 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
accd56d36a298219042d84ba9ee1b7bd66d1936c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-11m-18d-22h-35m-31s UTC integration manifest
da14388 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3064/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
2016-11-20 17:50 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs sunil.kamath
2016-11-20 18:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2016-11-21 11:46 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2016-11-21 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sunil.kamath, intel-gfx
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 23:20 +0530, sunil.kamath@intel.com wrote:
> From: "A.Sunil Kamath" <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
>
> Better to use num_scaler itself while printing scaler_info.
> This fixes a bug of printing information for the missing
> second scaler on pipe C for SKL platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 1cc971c..6c39881 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -3081,7 +3081,7 @@ static void intel_scaler_info(struct seq_file *m, struct
> intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
> pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_users,
> pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_id);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < SKL_NUM_SCALERS; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < num_scalers; i++) {
> struct intel_scaler *sc =
> &pipe_config-
> >scaler_state.scalers[i];
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
2016-11-20 18:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2016-11-21 11:59 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2016-11-21 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Kamath, Sunil
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 18:16 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/15621/
> State : success
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 15621v1 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/15621/revisions/1/mbox/
>
>
> fi-bdw-5557u total:244 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
> fi-bsw-n3050 total:244 pass:204 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40
> fi-byt-j1900 total:244 pass:216 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
> fi-byt-n2820 total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> fi-hsw-4770 total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-hsw-4770r total:244 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-ilk-650 total:244 pass:191 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:53
> fi-ivb-3520m total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-ivb-3770 total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-kbl-7200u total:244 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-skl-6260u total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> fi-skl-6700hq total:244 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> fi-skl-6700k total:244 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
> fi-skl-6770hq total:244 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
> fi-snb-2520m total:244 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> fi-snb-2600 total:244 pass:211 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
>
> accd56d36a298219042d84ba9ee1b7bd66d1936c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-11m-18d-22h-
> 35m-31s UTC integration manifest
> da14388 drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3064/
Pushed. Thankd for the patch.
Ander
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-21 11:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-20 17:50 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs sunil.kamath
2016-11-20 18:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-11-21 11:59 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-11-21 11:46 ` [PATCH] " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.