* [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix phys pwrite for struct_mutex-less operation
@ 2016-12-30 10:25 Chris Wilson
2016-12-30 11:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2016-12-30 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: drm-intel-fixes
Since commit fe115628d567 ("drm/i915: Implement pwrite without
struct-mutex") the lowlevel pwrite calls are now called without the
protection of struct_mutex, but pwrite_phys was still asserting that it
held the struct_mutex and later tried to drop and relock it.
Fixes: fe115628d567 ("drm/i915: Implement pwrite without struct-mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 34 ++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 2c3649b29069..636e388e19de 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -597,47 +597,21 @@ i915_gem_phys_pwrite(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct drm_i915_gem_pwrite *args,
struct drm_file *file)
{
- struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
void *vaddr = obj->phys_handle->vaddr + args->offset;
char __user *user_data = u64_to_user_ptr(args->data_ptr);
- int ret;
/* We manually control the domain here and pretend that it
* remains coherent i.e. in the GTT domain, like shmem_pwrite.
*/
- lockdep_assert_held(&obj->base.dev->struct_mutex);
- ret = i915_gem_object_wait(obj,
- I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE |
- I915_WAIT_LOCKED |
- I915_WAIT_ALL,
- MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT,
- to_rps_client(file));
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
intel_fb_obj_invalidate(obj, ORIGIN_CPU);
- if (__copy_from_user_inatomic_nocache(vaddr, user_data, args->size)) {
- unsigned long unwritten;
-
- /* The physical object once assigned is fixed for the lifetime
- * of the obj, so we can safely drop the lock and continue
- * to access vaddr.
- */
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- unwritten = copy_from_user(vaddr, user_data, args->size);
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- if (unwritten) {
- ret = -EFAULT;
- goto out;
- }
- }
+ if (copy_from_user(vaddr, user_data, args->size))
+ return -EFAULT;
drm_clflush_virt_range(vaddr, args->size);
- i915_gem_chipset_flush(to_i915(dev));
+ i915_gem_chipset_flush(to_i915(obj->base.dev));
-out:
intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_CPU);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
void *i915_gem_object_alloc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Fix phys pwrite for struct_mutex-less operation
2016-12-30 10:25 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix phys pwrite for struct_mutex-less operation Chris Wilson
@ 2016-12-30 11:33 ` Patchwork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-12-30 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Fix phys pwrite for struct_mutex-less operation
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/17310/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 17310v1 drm/i915: Fix phys pwrite for struct_mutex-less operation
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/17310/revisions/1/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:246 pass:232 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-bsw-n3050 total:246 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39
fi-bxt-j4205 total:246 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-bxt-t5700 total:82 pass:69 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12
fi-byt-j1900 total:246 pass:219 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27
fi-byt-n2820 total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-hsw-4770 total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-hsw-4770r total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-ivb-3520m total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-ivb-3770 total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-kbl-7500u total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6260u total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-skl-6700hq total:246 pass:226 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-skl-6700k total:246 pass:222 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6770hq total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-snb-2520m total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-snb-2600 total:246 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
6e668687e5d05a21479a16bbe342eb88fc034899 drm-tip: 2016y-12m-30d-10h-22m-50s UTC integration manifest
bce38e9 drm/i915: Fix phys pwrite for struct_mutex-less operation
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3410/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-12-30 11:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-30 10:25 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix phys pwrite for struct_mutex-less operation Chris Wilson
2016-12-30 11:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.