All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* DRM range manger test failures
@ 2017-01-10 12:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-01-10 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: DRI Development, Linux-Renesas

Hi Chris, Laurent,

On R-Car Gen2 (Koelsch) and Gen3 (Salvator-X), the new DRM range
manager selftests fail with:

    drm_mm: Testing DRM range manger (struct drm_mm), with
random_seed=0x83a9b910 max_iterations=8192 max_prime=128
    drm_mm: igt_sanitycheck - ok!
    drm_mm: node has wrong color, found 0, expected 1
    drm_mm: default insert failed, size 1 step 1

I have no idea what this means.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* DRM range manger test failures
@ 2017-01-10 12:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-01-10 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, Laurent Pinchart; +Cc: Linux-Renesas, DRI Development

Hi Chris, Laurent,

On R-Car Gen2 (Koelsch) and Gen3 (Salvator-X), the new DRM range
manager selftests fail with:

    drm_mm: Testing DRM range manger (struct drm_mm), with
random_seed=0x83a9b910 max_iterations=8192 max_prime=128
    drm_mm: igt_sanitycheck - ok!
    drm_mm: node has wrong color, found 0, expected 1
    drm_mm: default insert failed, size 1 step 1

I have no idea what this means.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: DRM range manger test failures
  2017-01-10 12:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2017-01-10 12:45   ` Chris Wilson
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-10 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Laurent Pinchart, DRI Development, Linux-Renesas

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:41:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Chris, Laurent,
> 
> On R-Car Gen2 (Koelsch) and Gen3 (Salvator-X), the new DRM range
> manager selftests fail with:
> 
>     drm_mm: Testing DRM range manger (struct drm_mm), with
> random_seed=0x83a9b910 max_iterations=8192 max_prime=128
>     drm_mm: igt_sanitycheck - ok!
>     drm_mm: node has wrong color, found 0, expected 1
>     drm_mm: default insert failed, size 1 step 1
> 
> I have no idea what this means.

The existing code has bugs. We got as far as applying the testcases to
demonstrate the bugs, the actual fix is still queued.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: DRM range manger test failures
@ 2017-01-10 12:45   ` Chris Wilson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-10 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Linux-Renesas, Laurent Pinchart, DRI Development

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:41:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Chris, Laurent,
> 
> On R-Car Gen2 (Koelsch) and Gen3 (Salvator-X), the new DRM range
> manager selftests fail with:
> 
>     drm_mm: Testing DRM range manger (struct drm_mm), with
> random_seed=0x83a9b910 max_iterations=8192 max_prime=128
>     drm_mm: igt_sanitycheck - ok!
>     drm_mm: node has wrong color, found 0, expected 1
>     drm_mm: default insert failed, size 1 step 1
> 
> I have no idea what this means.

The existing code has bugs. We got as far as applying the testcases to
demonstrate the bugs, the actual fix is still queued.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: DRM range manger test failures
  2017-01-10 12:45   ` Chris Wilson
@ 2017-01-10 13:51     ` Daniel Vetter
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2017-01-10 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, Geert Uytterhoeven, Laurent Pinchart,
	DRI Development, Linux-Renesas

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:45:04PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:41:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Chris, Laurent,
> > 
> > On R-Car Gen2 (Koelsch) and Gen3 (Salvator-X), the new DRM range
> > manager selftests fail with:
> > 
> >     drm_mm: Testing DRM range manger (struct drm_mm), with
> > random_seed=0x83a9b910 max_iterations=8192 max_prime=128
> >     drm_mm: igt_sanitycheck - ok!
> >     drm_mm: node has wrong color, found 0, expected 1
> >     drm_mm: default insert failed, size 1 step 1
> > 
> > I have no idea what this means.
> 
> The existing code has bugs. We got as far as applying the testcases to
> demonstrate the bugs, the actual fix is still queued.

Hm, I thought I merged them all. What's missing?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: DRM range manger test failures
@ 2017-01-10 13:51     ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2017-01-10 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, Geert Uytterhoeven, Laurent Pinchart,
	DRI Development, Linux-Renesas

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:45:04PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:41:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Chris, Laurent,
> > 
> > On R-Car Gen2 (Koelsch) and Gen3 (Salvator-X), the new DRM range
> > manager selftests fail with:
> > 
> >     drm_mm: Testing DRM range manger (struct drm_mm), with
> > random_seed=0x83a9b910 max_iterations=8192 max_prime=128
> >     drm_mm: igt_sanitycheck - ok!
> >     drm_mm: node has wrong color, found 0, expected 1
> >     drm_mm: default insert failed, size 1 step 1
> > 
> > I have no idea what this means.
> 
> The existing code has bugs. We got as far as applying the testcases to
> demonstrate the bugs, the actual fix is still queued.

Hm, I thought I merged them all. What's missing?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: DRM range manger test failures
  2017-01-10 13:51     ` Daniel Vetter
  (?)
@ 2017-01-10 14:04     ` Chris Wilson
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-10 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter
  Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Laurent Pinchart, DRI Development, Linux-Renesas

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:51:17PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:45:04PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:41:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Hi Chris, Laurent,
> > > 
> > > On R-Car Gen2 (Koelsch) and Gen3 (Salvator-X), the new DRM range
> > > manager selftests fail with:
> > > 
> > >     drm_mm: Testing DRM range manger (struct drm_mm), with
> > > random_seed=0x83a9b910 max_iterations=8192 max_prime=128
> > >     drm_mm: igt_sanitycheck - ok!
> > >     drm_mm: node has wrong color, found 0, expected 1
> > >     drm_mm: default insert failed, size 1 step 1
> > > 
> > > I have no idea what this means.
> > 
> > The existing code has bugs. We got as far as applying the testcases to
> > demonstrate the bugs, the actual fix is still queued.
> 
> Hm, I thought I merged them all. What's missing?

The actual fix required some coordination between drm-misc and i915
trees, so was delayed. (Only because I wanted to remove repetition of
the bug from i915 first.)
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-10 14:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-10 12:41 DRM range manger test failures Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-01-10 12:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-01-10 12:45 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-10 12:45   ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-10 13:51   ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-10 13:51     ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-10 14:04     ` Chris Wilson

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.