All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 6/6] net: use kvmalloc with __GFP_REPEAT rather than open coded variant
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:37:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112153717.28943-7-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170112153717.28943-1-mhocko@kernel.org>

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

fq_alloc_node, alloc_netdev_mqs and netif_alloc* open code kmalloc
with vmalloc fallback. Use the kvmalloc variant instead. Keep the
__GFP_REPEAT flag based on explanation from Eric:
"
At the time, tests on the hardware I had in my labs showed that
vmalloc() could deliver pages spread all over the memory and that was a
small penalty (once memory is fragmented enough, not at boot time)
"

The way how the code is constructed means, however, that we prefer to go
and hit the OOM killer before we fall back to the vmalloc for requests
smaller than 64kB in the current code. This is rather disruptive for
something that can be achived with the fallback. On the other hand
__GFP_REPEAT doesn't have any useful semantic for these requests. So the
effect of this patch is that requests smaller than 64kB will fallback to
vmalloc esier now.

Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c     | 24 +++++++++---------------
 net/sched/sch_fq.c | 12 +-----------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 56818f7eab2b..5cf2762387aa 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -7111,12 +7111,10 @@ static int netif_alloc_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	BUG_ON(count < 1);
 
-	rx = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
-	if (!rx) {
-		rx = vzalloc(sz);
-		if (!rx)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	rx = kvzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);
+	if (!rx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	dev->_rx = rx;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
@@ -7153,12 +7151,10 @@ static int netif_alloc_netdev_queues(struct net_device *dev)
 	if (count < 1 || count > 0xffff)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	tx = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
-	if (!tx) {
-		tx = vzalloc(sz);
-		if (!tx)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	tx = kvzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);
+	if (!tx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	dev->_tx = tx;
 
 	netdev_for_each_tx_queue(dev, netdev_init_one_queue, NULL);
@@ -7691,9 +7687,7 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
 	/* ensure 32-byte alignment of whole construct */
 	alloc_size += NETDEV_ALIGN - 1;
 
-	p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
-	if (!p)
-		p = vzalloc(alloc_size);
+	p = kvzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);
 	if (!p)
 		return NULL;
 
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_fq.c b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
index a4f738ac7728..594f77d89f6c 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_fq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
@@ -624,16 +624,6 @@ static void fq_rehash(struct fq_sched_data *q,
 	q->stat_gc_flows += fcnt;
 }
 
-static void *fq_alloc_node(size_t sz, int node)
-{
-	void *ptr;
-
-	ptr = kmalloc_node(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT | __GFP_NOWARN, node);
-	if (!ptr)
-		ptr = vmalloc_node(sz, node);
-	return ptr;
-}
-
 static void fq_free(void *addr)
 {
 	kvfree(addr);
@@ -650,7 +640,7 @@ static int fq_resize(struct Qdisc *sch, u32 log)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* If XPS was setup, we can allocate memory on right NUMA node */
-	array = fq_alloc_node(sizeof(struct rb_root) << log,
+	array = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(struct rb_root) << log, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT,
 			      netdev_queue_numa_node_read(sch->dev_queue));
 	if (!array)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.11.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 6/6] net: use kvmalloc with __GFP_REPEAT rather than open coded variant
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:37:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112153717.28943-7-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170112153717.28943-1-mhocko@kernel.org>

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

fq_alloc_node, alloc_netdev_mqs and netif_alloc* open code kmalloc
with vmalloc fallback. Use the kvmalloc variant instead. Keep the
__GFP_REPEAT flag based on explanation from Eric:
"
At the time, tests on the hardware I had in my labs showed that
vmalloc() could deliver pages spread all over the memory and that was a
small penalty (once memory is fragmented enough, not at boot time)
"

The way how the code is constructed means, however, that we prefer to go
and hit the OOM killer before we fall back to the vmalloc for requests
smaller than 64kB in the current code. This is rather disruptive for
something that can be achived with the fallback. On the other hand
__GFP_REPEAT doesn't have any useful semantic for these requests. So the
effect of this patch is that requests smaller than 64kB will fallback to
vmalloc esier now.

Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c     | 24 +++++++++---------------
 net/sched/sch_fq.c | 12 +-----------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 56818f7eab2b..5cf2762387aa 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -7111,12 +7111,10 @@ static int netif_alloc_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	BUG_ON(count < 1);
 
-	rx = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
-	if (!rx) {
-		rx = vzalloc(sz);
-		if (!rx)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	rx = kvzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);
+	if (!rx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	dev->_rx = rx;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
@@ -7153,12 +7151,10 @@ static int netif_alloc_netdev_queues(struct net_device *dev)
 	if (count < 1 || count > 0xffff)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	tx = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
-	if (!tx) {
-		tx = vzalloc(sz);
-		if (!tx)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	tx = kvzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);
+	if (!tx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	dev->_tx = tx;
 
 	netdev_for_each_tx_queue(dev, netdev_init_one_queue, NULL);
@@ -7691,9 +7687,7 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
 	/* ensure 32-byte alignment of whole construct */
 	alloc_size += NETDEV_ALIGN - 1;
 
-	p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
-	if (!p)
-		p = vzalloc(alloc_size);
+	p = kvzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);
 	if (!p)
 		return NULL;
 
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_fq.c b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
index a4f738ac7728..594f77d89f6c 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_fq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
@@ -624,16 +624,6 @@ static void fq_rehash(struct fq_sched_data *q,
 	q->stat_gc_flows += fcnt;
 }
 
-static void *fq_alloc_node(size_t sz, int node)
-{
-	void *ptr;
-
-	ptr = kmalloc_node(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT | __GFP_NOWARN, node);
-	if (!ptr)
-		ptr = vmalloc_node(sz, node);
-	return ptr;
-}
-
 static void fq_free(void *addr)
 {
 	kvfree(addr);
@@ -650,7 +640,7 @@ static int fq_resize(struct Qdisc *sch, u32 log)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* If XPS was setup, we can allocate memory on right NUMA node */
-	array = fq_alloc_node(sizeof(struct rb_root) << log,
+	array = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(struct rb_root) << log, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT,
 			      netdev_queue_numa_node_read(sch->dev_queue));
 	if (!array)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 6/6] net: use kvmalloc with __GFP_REPEAT rather than open coded variant
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:37:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112153717.28943-7-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170112153717.28943-1-mhocko@kernel.org>

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

fq_alloc_node, alloc_netdev_mqs and netif_alloc* open code kmalloc
with vmalloc fallback. Use the kvmalloc variant instead. Keep the
__GFP_REPEAT flag based on explanation from Eric:
"
At the time, tests on the hardware I had in my labs showed that
vmalloc() could deliver pages spread all over the memory and that was a
small penalty (once memory is fragmented enough, not at boot time)
"

The way how the code is constructed means, however, that we prefer to go
and hit the OOM killer before we fall back to the vmalloc for requests
smaller than 64kB in the current code. This is rather disruptive for
something that can be achived with the fallback. On the other hand
__GFP_REPEAT doesn't have any useful semantic for these requests. So the
effect of this patch is that requests smaller than 64kB will fallback to
vmalloc esier now.

Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c     | 24 +++++++++---------------
 net/sched/sch_fq.c | 12 +-----------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 56818f7eab2b..5cf2762387aa 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -7111,12 +7111,10 @@ static int netif_alloc_rx_queues(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	BUG_ON(count < 1);
 
-	rx = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
-	if (!rx) {
-		rx = vzalloc(sz);
-		if (!rx)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	rx = kvzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);
+	if (!rx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	dev->_rx = rx;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
@@ -7153,12 +7151,10 @@ static int netif_alloc_netdev_queues(struct net_device *dev)
 	if (count < 1 || count > 0xffff)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	tx = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
-	if (!tx) {
-		tx = vzalloc(sz);
-		if (!tx)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	tx = kvzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);
+	if (!tx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	dev->_tx = tx;
 
 	netdev_for_each_tx_queue(dev, netdev_init_one_queue, NULL);
@@ -7691,9 +7687,7 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mqs(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
 	/* ensure 32-byte alignment of whole construct */
 	alloc_size += NETDEV_ALIGN - 1;
 
-	p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_REPEAT);
-	if (!p)
-		p = vzalloc(alloc_size);
+	p = kvzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT);
 	if (!p)
 		return NULL;
 
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_fq.c b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
index a4f738ac7728..594f77d89f6c 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_fq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_fq.c
@@ -624,16 +624,6 @@ static void fq_rehash(struct fq_sched_data *q,
 	q->stat_gc_flows += fcnt;
 }
 
-static void *fq_alloc_node(size_t sz, int node)
-{
-	void *ptr;
-
-	ptr = kmalloc_node(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT | __GFP_NOWARN, node);
-	if (!ptr)
-		ptr = vmalloc_node(sz, node);
-	return ptr;
-}
-
 static void fq_free(void *addr)
 {
 	kvfree(addr);
@@ -650,7 +640,7 @@ static int fq_resize(struct Qdisc *sch, u32 log)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* If XPS was setup, we can allocate memory on right NUMA node */
-	array = fq_alloc_node(sizeof(struct rb_root) << log,
+	array = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(struct rb_root) << log, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT,
 			      netdev_queue_numa_node_read(sch->dev_queue));
 	if (!array)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-12 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-12 15:37 [PATCH 0/6 v3] kvmalloc Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16  4:34   ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16  4:34     ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16  8:47     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16  8:47       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 19:09       ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16 19:09         ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16 19:40         ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 19:40           ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 21:15           ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16 21:15             ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16 21:48             ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 21:48               ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 21:57               ` John Hubbard
2017-01-16 21:57                 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-17  7:51                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-17  7:51                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18  5:59                   ` John Hubbard
2017-01-18  5:59                     ` John Hubbard
2017-01-18  8:21                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18  8:21                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19  8:37                       ` John Hubbard
2017-01-19  8:37                         ` John Hubbard
2017-01-19  8:45                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19  8:45                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19  9:09                           ` John Hubbard
2017-01-19  9:09                             ` John Hubbard
2017-01-19  9:56                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19  9:56                               ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-19 21:28                               ` John Hubbard
2017-01-19 21:28                                 ` John Hubbard
2017-01-26 12:09   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-26 12:09     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-30  8:42     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-30  8:42       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: support __GFP_REPEAT in kvmalloc_node for >=64kB Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 16:12   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-12 16:12     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-14  2:42   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-14  2:42     ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-14  8:45     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-14  8:45       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 15:40   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-24 15:40     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] rhashtable: simplify a strange allocation pattern Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] ila: " Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:57   ` David Sterba
2017-01-12 15:57     ` David Sterba
2017-01-12 15:57     ` David Sterba
2017-01-12 16:05   ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-12 16:05     ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-12 16:05     ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-01-12 16:54   ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-01-12 16:54     ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-01-12 16:54     ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-01-12 17:18     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 17:18       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 17:18       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 17:00   ` Dan Williams
2017-01-12 17:00     ` Dan Williams
2017-01-12 17:00     ` Dan Williams
2017-01-12 17:26   ` Kees Cook
2017-01-12 17:26     ` Kees Cook
2017-01-12 17:26     ` Kees Cook
2017-01-12 17:37     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 17:37       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 17:37       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-20 13:41       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-20 13:41         ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-20 13:41         ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-24 15:00         ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 15:00           ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 15:00           ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 11:15           ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-25 11:15             ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-25 11:15             ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-25 13:09             ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:09               ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:09               ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:40               ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-01-25 13:40                 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-01-25 13:40                 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-01-12 17:29   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 17:29     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 17:29     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-14  3:01     ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-14  3:01       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-01-14  8:49       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-14  8:49         ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 20:14   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-12 20:14     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-12 20:14     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-13  1:11   ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-01-13  1:11     ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-01-13  1:11     ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-01-14 10:56   ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-01-14 10:56     ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-01-16  7:33     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16  7:33       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16  7:33       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16  8:28       ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-01-16  8:28         ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-01-16  8:18   ` Tariq Toukan
2017-01-16  8:18     ` Tariq Toukan
2017-01-16  8:18     ` Tariq Toukan
2017-01-12 15:37 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-01-12 15:37   ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] net: use kvmalloc with __GFP_REPEAT rather than open coded variant Michal Hocko
2017-01-12 15:37   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 15:17 ` [PATCH 0/6 v3] kvmalloc Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 15:17   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 16:00   ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-24 16:00     ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-25 13:10     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:10       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 19:17   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-01-24 19:17     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-01-25 13:10     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:10       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:21       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 13:21         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170112153717.28943-7-mhocko@kernel.org \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.