From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch linux-next] userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: unmap the correct pointer Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 08:16:10 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170113081610.GC4188@mwanda> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170112193327.GB8558@dhcp22.suse.cz> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:33:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 12-01-17 22:20:52, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > kunmap_atomic() and kunmap() take different pointers. People often get > > these mixed up. > > > > Fixes: 16374db2e9a0 ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: fix __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb retry/error processing") > > This looks like a linux-next sha1. This is not stable and will change... > Yeah. But probably Andrew is just going to fold it into the original anyway. Probably most of linux-next trees don't rebase so the hash is good and the people who rebase fold it in so it doesn't show up in the released code. It basically never hurts to have the Fixes tag. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > > > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > > index 6012a05..dfd3604 100644 > > --- a/mm/memory.c > > +++ b/mm/memory.c > > @@ -4172,7 +4172,7 @@ long copy_huge_page_from_user(struct page *dst_page, > > (const void __user *)(src + i * PAGE_SIZE), > > PAGE_SIZE); > > if (allow_pagefault) > > - kunmap(page_kaddr); > > + kunmap(dst_page + 1); > > I guess you meant dst_page + i Huh. I would have sworn I copy and pasted this. Anyway, thanks for catching this. I will resend. regards, dan carpenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch linux-next] userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: unmap the correct pointer Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:16:10 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170113081610.GC4188@mwanda> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170112193327.GB8558@dhcp22.suse.cz> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:33:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 12-01-17 22:20:52, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > kunmap_atomic() and kunmap() take different pointers. People often get > > these mixed up. > > > > Fixes: 16374db2e9a0 ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: fix __mcopy_atomic_hugetlb retry/error processing") > > This looks like a linux-next sha1. This is not stable and will change... > Yeah. But probably Andrew is just going to fold it into the original anyway. Probably most of linux-next trees don't rebase so the hash is good and the people who rebase fold it in so it doesn't show up in the released code. It basically never hurts to have the Fixes tag. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> > > > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > > index 6012a05..dfd3604 100644 > > --- a/mm/memory.c > > +++ b/mm/memory.c > > @@ -4172,7 +4172,7 @@ long copy_huge_page_from_user(struct page *dst_page, > > (const void __user *)(src + i * PAGE_SIZE), > > PAGE_SIZE); > > if (allow_pagefault) > > - kunmap(page_kaddr); > > + kunmap(dst_page + 1); > > I guess you meant dst_page + i Huh. I would have sworn I copy and pasted this. Anyway, thanks for catching this. I will resend. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-13 8:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-01-12 19:20 [patch linux-next] userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: unmap the correct pointer Dan Carpenter 2017-01-12 19:20 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-12 19:33 ` Michal Hocko 2017-01-12 19:33 ` Michal Hocko 2017-01-13 8:16 ` Dan Carpenter [this message] 2017-01-13 8:16 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-13 8:26 ` Michal Hocko 2017-01-13 8:26 ` Michal Hocko 2017-01-13 8:40 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-13 8:40 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-13 8:26 ` [patch v2 " Dan Carpenter 2017-01-13 8:26 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-13 8:40 ` Michal Hocko 2017-01-13 8:40 ` Michal Hocko 2017-01-13 16:29 ` Mike Kravetz 2017-01-13 16:29 ` Mike Kravetz 2017-01-14 0:02 ` Hugh Dickins 2017-01-14 0:02 ` Hugh Dickins 2017-01-14 0:13 ` Andrew Morton 2017-01-14 0:13 ` Andrew Morton 2017-01-14 6:56 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-14 6:56 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-14 6:55 ` Dan Carpenter 2017-01-14 6:55 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20170113081610.GC4188@mwanda \ --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \ --cc=jack@suse.cz \ --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \ --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \ --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \ --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.