From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@intel.com>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>, Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>Lin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Implement generic regulator constraints parsing for ACPI and OF Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:25:36 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170125182536.4egdvfn5v65e6dok@sirena.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAEGmHFG1d24k3+qT_aoqRmPFzciAbNObCnzY1d8pQWjEW+3HxA@mail.gmail.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --] On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:56:42AM -0800, Furquan Shaikh wrote: > I understand that ACPI provides its own bindings to allow firmware to > control power management and thus regulators have been a part of the > firmware control. However, there are use cases where the kernel driver > wishes to control the regulator to manage power to the device > irrespective of the way regulator is passed in (ACPI/OF). You're missing the point here. What we're saying is that if you want to do this using ACPI you should extend ACPI to support this directly so where regulators need to be controlled by the OS there's a clear understanding of how this interacts with the rest of the ACPI power management. > We need to support existing drivers and use cases for power management > in both OF and ACPI environments (keeping in mind that suspend to idle > bypasses parts of firmware) without needing to change all the drivers. > How can we achieve this? Consumers already don't know they're using DT, there's no reason they should have any impact from ACPI either except possibly a bit of name translation for ACPI's idiomatic naming conventions. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@intel.com>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>, Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>, dlaurie@chromium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Implement generic regulator constraints parsing for ACPI and OF Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:25:36 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20170125182536.4egdvfn5v65e6dok@sirena.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAEGmHFG1d24k3+qT_aoqRmPFzciAbNObCnzY1d8pQWjEW+3HxA@mail.gmail.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --] On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:56:42AM -0800, Furquan Shaikh wrote: > I understand that ACPI provides its own bindings to allow firmware to > control power management and thus regulators have been a part of the > firmware control. However, there are use cases where the kernel driver > wishes to control the regulator to manage power to the device > irrespective of the way regulator is passed in (ACPI/OF). You're missing the point here. What we're saying is that if you want to do this using ACPI you should extend ACPI to support this directly so where regulators need to be controlled by the OS there's a clear understanding of how this interacts with the rest of the ACPI power management. > We need to support existing drivers and use cases for power management > in both OF and ACPI environments (keeping in mind that suspend to idle > bypasses parts of firmware) without needing to change all the drivers. > How can we achieve this? Consumers already don't know they're using DT, there's no reason they should have any impact from ACPI either except possibly a bit of name translation for ACPI's idiomatic naming conventions. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-25 18:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-01-25 0:06 [PATCH 0/7] Implement generic regulator constraints parsing for ACPI and OF Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 0:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] drivers/regulator: Rename of_map_mode to map_mode in regulator desc Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 0:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] ACPI / property: have acpi_get_next_subnode take fwnode_handle Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 0:06 ` Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 11:00 ` kbuild test robot 2017-01-25 11:00 ` kbuild test robot 2017-01-25 0:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] device property: introduce fwnode_for_each_child() Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 0:06 ` Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 0:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] device property: introduce fwnode_get_named_child_node() Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 0:06 ` Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 0:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] device property: Export dev_fwnode Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 0:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] drivers/gpio: Add and export gpiod_lookup[_index] Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 0:06 ` Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 11:18 ` kbuild test robot 2017-01-25 11:18 ` kbuild test robot 2017-01-26 15:24 ` Linus Walleij 2017-01-26 15:24 ` Linus Walleij 2017-01-25 0:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] drivers/regulator: Initialize regulator init data for ACPI regulators Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 12:29 ` [PATCH 0/7] Implement generic regulator constraints parsing for ACPI and OF Lorenzo Pieralisi 2017-01-25 12:49 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 12:49 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2017-01-25 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2017-01-25 16:56 ` Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 16:56 ` Furquan Shaikh 2017-01-25 18:23 ` Mark Rutland 2017-01-25 18:23 ` Mark Rutland 2017-01-25 18:29 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 18:29 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 18:34 ` Mark Rutland 2017-01-25 18:34 ` Mark Rutland 2017-01-25 18:49 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 18:49 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 19:39 ` Mark Rutland 2017-01-25 19:39 ` Mark Rutland 2017-01-25 18:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-25 18:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-25 19:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-25 19:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-25 20:39 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 20:39 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 21:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-25 21:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-25 21:30 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 21:30 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 22:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-25 22:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-25 22:25 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 22:25 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 21:44 ` Al Stone 2017-01-25 21:44 ` Al Stone 2017-01-25 23:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-25 23:27 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-26 0:15 ` Al Stone 2017-01-26 0:15 ` Al Stone 2017-01-26 0:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-26 0:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov 2017-01-26 10:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2017-01-26 10:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2017-02-04 16:08 ` Mark Brown 2017-02-04 16:08 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 19:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2017-01-25 19:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2017-01-25 20:40 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 20:40 ` Mark Brown 2017-01-25 18:25 ` Mark Brown [this message] 2017-01-25 18:25 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20170125182536.4egdvfn5v65e6dok@sirena.org.uk \ --to=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com \ --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \ --cc=furquan@chromium.org \ --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \ --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \ --cc=lenb@kernel.org \ --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \ --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=sathyanarayana.nujella@intel.com \ --cc=tony@atomide.com \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.