From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 23:49:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170203074901.GA19808@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486040452.2812.6.camel@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 08:00:52AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Yeah, that might work. You could kmalloc the buffer array according to
> the maxsize value. For small ones we could even consider using an on-
> stack buffer.
For the block direct I/O code we defintively want to avoid any
allocations for small I/O a that shows up in the performance numbers.
And we'd like to reuse the on-stack bio_vec so that the defintion of
a small I/O can be as big as possible without blowing up the stack.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Chris Wilson
<chris-Y6uKTt2uX1cEflXRtASbqLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
v9fs-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Linus Torvalds
<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov"
<kirill.shutemov-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
lustre-devel-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 23:49:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170203074901.GA19808@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486040452.2812.6.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 08:00:52AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Yeah, that might work. You could kmalloc the buffer array according to
> the maxsize value. For small ones we could even consider using an on-
> stack buffer.
For the block direct I/O code we defintively want to avoid any
allocations for small I/O a that shows up in the performance numbers.
And we'd like to reuse the on-stack bio_vec so that the defintion of
a small I/O can be as big as possible without blowing up the stack.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Chris Wilson
<chris-Y6uKTt2uX1cEflXRtASbqLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
v9fs-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Linus Torvalds
<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov"
<kirill.shutemov-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
lustre-devel-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 23:49:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170203074901.GA19808@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486040452.2812.6.camel@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 08:00:52AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Yeah, that might work. You could kmalloc the buffer array according to
> the maxsize value. For small ones we could even consider using an on-
> stack buffer.
For the block direct I/O code we defintively want to avoid any
allocations for small I/O a that shows up in the performance numbers.
And we'd like to reuse the on-stack bio_vec so that the defintion of
a small I/O can be as big as possible without blowing up the stack.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-03 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-24 21:23 [PATCH] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call Jeff Layton
2017-01-25 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-25 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-26 12:35 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-27 13:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-27 13:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-27 13:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ceph: switch DIO code to use iov_iter_get_pages_alloc Jeff Layton
2017-01-30 15:40 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-30 15:40 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-25 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 " Jeff Layton
2017-02-02 9:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call Al Viro
2017-02-02 9:51 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-02 9:51 ` Al Viro
2017-02-02 10:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 10:56 ` [lustre-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 10:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 11:16 ` Al Viro
2017-02-02 11:16 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-02 11:16 ` Al Viro
2017-02-02 13:00 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-02 13:00 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-03 7:29 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 7:29 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-03 7:29 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03 18:29 ` [lustre-devel] " Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03 19:08 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 19:08 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-03 19:08 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03 19:28 ` [lustre-devel] " Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-13 9:56 ` Steve Capper
2017-02-13 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-13 21:40 ` [lustre-devel] " Linus Torvalds
2017-02-13 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-02-03 7:49 ` [lustre-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-03 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-03 8:54 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 8:54 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-03 8:54 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 11:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-03 11:09 ` [lustre-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-03 11:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 14:48 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-02 14:48 ` [lustre-devel] " Jan Kara
2017-02-02 14:48 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-02 18:28 ` Al Viro
2017-02-02 18:28 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-02 18:28 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 14:47 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-03 14:47 ` [lustre-devel] " Jan Kara
2017-02-03 14:47 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-04 3:08 ` Al Viro
2017-02-04 3:08 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-04 3:08 ` Al Viro
2017-02-04 19:26 ` Al Viro
2017-02-04 19:26 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-04 19:26 ` Al Viro
2017-02-04 22:12 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-04 22:12 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-04 22:11 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-04 22:11 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 1:51 ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 1:51 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-05 1:51 ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 20:15 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 20:15 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 21:01 ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 21:01 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-05 21:01 ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 21:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 21:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 22:04 ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 22:04 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-05 22:04 ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 22:04 ` Al Viro
2017-02-06 3:05 ` Al Viro
2017-02-06 3:05 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-06 3:05 ` Al Viro
2017-02-06 9:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-06 9:57 ` Al Viro
2017-02-06 9:57 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-06 9:57 ` Al Viro
2017-02-06 14:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-07 7:19 ` Al Viro
2017-02-07 7:19 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-07 7:19 ` Al Viro
2017-02-07 11:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-07 11:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-08 5:54 ` Al Viro
2017-02-08 5:54 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-08 5:54 ` Al Viro
2017-02-08 9:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-06 8:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 20:56 ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 20:56 ` [lustre-devel] " Al Viro
2017-02-05 20:56 ` Al Viro
2017-02-16 13:10 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170203074901.GA19808@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.