[PATCH RESEND 1/4] mfd: arizona: Remove duplicate set of ret variable

[PATCH RESEND 1/4] mfd: arizona: Remove duplicate set of ret variable

[Charles Keepax]

arizona_poll_reg already returns ETIMEDOUT if we don't see the expected
register changes before the time out, so remove pointless local setting of
ETIMEDOUT.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
index b6d4bc6..e00f577 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
@@ -342,10 +342,8 @@ static int arizona_enable_freerun_sysclk(struct arizona *arizona,
 	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS);
-	if (ret) {
-		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+	if (ret)
 		goto err_fll;
-	}
 
 	ret = regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_SYSTEM_CLOCK_1, 0x0144);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -407,11 +405,9 @@ static int wm5102_apply_hardware_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
 
 	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
 			       ARIZONA_WSEQ_BUSY, 0);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret)
 		regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_0,
 			     ARIZONA_WSEQ_ABORT);
-		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
-	}
 
 err:
 	err = arizona_disable_freerun_sysclk(arizona, &state);
-- 
2.1.4

[PATCH RESEND 2/4] mfd: arizona: Display register addresses in hex

[Charles Keepax]

Register addresses are normally displayed in hex throughout the Arizona
driver. Update the arizona_poll_reg function to follow this convention.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
index e00f577..4cb34c3 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
 	for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
 		ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
 		if (ret != 0) {
-			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg %u: %d\n",
+			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
 				reg, ret);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
 		usleep_range(1000, 5000);
 	}
 
-	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg %u timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
+	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
 	return -ETIMEDOUT;
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/4] mfd: arizona: Display register addresses in hex

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:

> Register addresses are normally displayed in hex throughout the Arizona
> driver. Update the arizona_poll_reg function to follow this convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

For my own reference:
  Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
  
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> index e00f577..4cb34c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
>  	for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
>  		ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
>  		if (ret != 0) {
> -			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg %u: %d\n",
> +			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
>  				reg, ret);
>  			continue;
>  		}
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
>  		usleep_range(1000, 5000);
>  	}
>  
> -	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg %u timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
> +	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
>  	return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  }
>  

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/4] mfd: arizona: Display register addresses in hex

[Charles Keepax]

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:20:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:
> 
> > Register addresses are normally displayed in hex throughout the Arizona
> > driver. Update the arizona_poll_reg function to follow this convention.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> For my own reference:
>   Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>   

Apologies but I am not sure do you want me to add these tags to
new versions of the patches? I would with a regular Acked-by, but
didn't with your last version of these.

Thanks,
Charles

Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/4] mfd: arizona: Display register addresses in hex

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:20:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > 
> > > Register addresses are normally displayed in hex throughout the Arizona
> > > driver. Update the arizona_poll_reg function to follow this convention.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > For my own reference:
> >   Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >   
> 
> Apologies but I am not sure do you want me to add these tags to
> new versions of the patches? I would with a regular Acked-by, but
> didn't with your last version of these.

That tag is to let people (including myself) know that I have reviewed
the patch, it looks fine and I will be taking it in via the MFD tree
once all other Acks have been collected.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[PATCH RESEND 3/4] mfd: arizona: Update arizona_poll_reg to take a timeout in milliseconds

[Charles Keepax]

Currently, we specify the timeout in terms of the number of polls but it
is more clear from a user of the functions perspective to specify the
timeout directly in milliseconds, as such update the function to these new
semantics.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
index 4cb34c3..ae4cdc4 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
@@ -235,14 +235,18 @@ static irqreturn_t arizona_overclocked(int irq, void *data)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS 5
+
 static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
-			    int timeout, unsigned int reg,
+			    int timeout_ms, unsigned int reg,
 			    unsigned int mask, unsigned int target)
 {
+	unsigned int npolls = (timeout_ms + ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS - 1) /
+			      ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS;
 	unsigned int val = 0;
 	int ret, i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < npolls; i++) {
 		ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
 		if (ret != 0) {
 			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
@@ -253,7 +257,8 @@ static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
 		if ((val & mask) == target)
 			return 0;
 
-		usleep_range(1000, 5000);
+		usleep_range((ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000) / 2,
+			     ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000);
 	}
 
 	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
@@ -269,7 +274,7 @@ static int arizona_wait_for_boot(struct arizona *arizona)
 	 * we won't race with the interrupt handler as it'll be blocked on
 	 * runtime resume.
 	 */
-	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
+	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
 			       ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS, ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS);
 
 	if (!ret)
@@ -339,7 +344,7 @@ static int arizona_enable_freerun_sysclk(struct arizona *arizona,
 			ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
-	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
+	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 125, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS);
 	if (ret)
@@ -403,7 +408,7 @@ static int wm5102_apply_hardware_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
+	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
 			       ARIZONA_WSEQ_BUSY, 0);
 	if (ret)
 		regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_0,
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] mfd: arizona: Update arizona_poll_reg to take a timeout in milliseconds

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:

> Currently, we specify the timeout in terms of the number of polls but it
> is more clear from a user of the functions perspective to specify the
> timeout directly in milliseconds, as such update the function to these new
> semantics.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> index 4cb34c3..ae4cdc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> @@ -235,14 +235,18 @@ static irqreturn_t arizona_overclocked(int irq, void *data)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS 5
> +
>  static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
> -			    int timeout, unsigned int reg,
> +			    int timeout_ms, unsigned int reg,
>  			    unsigned int mask, unsigned int target)
>  {
> +	unsigned int npolls = (timeout_ms + ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS - 1) /
> +			      ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS;

Why the over-complication?

Shouldn't this just be "timeout_ms / ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS"?

>  	unsigned int val = 0;
>  	int ret, i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < npolls; i++) {
>  		ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
>  		if (ret != 0) {
>  			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> @@ -253,7 +257,8 @@ static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
>  		if ((val & mask) == target)
>  			return 0;
>  
> -		usleep_range(1000, 5000);
> +		usleep_range((ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000) / 2,
> +			     ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000);

I'm sure there is a macro for conversion from ms to us.

By using such a wide range, you are now not honouring the timeout set
by the caller by as much as 50%.

>  	}
>  
>  	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
> @@ -269,7 +274,7 @@ static int arizona_wait_for_boot(struct arizona *arizona)
>  	 * we won't race with the interrupt handler as it'll be blocked on
>  	 * runtime resume.
>  	 */
> -	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
> +	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
>  			       ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS, ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS);
>  
>  	if (!ret)
> @@ -339,7 +344,7 @@ static int arizona_enable_freerun_sysclk(struct arizona *arizona,
>  			ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> -	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
> +	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 125, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
>  			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS,
>  			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -403,7 +408,7 @@ static int wm5102_apply_hardware_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
> +	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
>  			       ARIZONA_WSEQ_BUSY, 0);
>  	if (ret)
>  		regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_0,

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] mfd: arizona: Update arizona_poll_reg to take a timeout in milliseconds

[Charles Keepax]

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:04:58AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:
> 
> > Currently, we specify the timeout in terms of the number of polls but it
> > is more clear from a user of the functions perspective to specify the
> > timeout directly in milliseconds, as such update the function to these new
> > semantics.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> > index 4cb34c3..ae4cdc4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> > @@ -235,14 +235,18 @@ static irqreturn_t arizona_overclocked(int irq, void *data)
> >  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS 5
> > +
> >  static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
> > -			    int timeout, unsigned int reg,
> > +			    int timeout_ms, unsigned int reg,
> >  			    unsigned int mask, unsigned int target)
> >  {
> > +	unsigned int npolls = (timeout_ms + ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS - 1) /
> > +			      ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS;
> 
> Why the over-complication?
> 
> Shouldn't this just be "timeout_ms / ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS"?

This will often give you less than the requested timeout if the
requested timeout is not an exact multiple of
ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS. We should never give less timeout than
requested although more is always going to be fine.

> 
> >  	unsigned int val = 0;
> >  	int ret, i;
> >  
> > -	for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
> > +	for (i = 0; i < npolls; i++) {
> >  		ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
> >  		if (ret != 0) {
> >  			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> > @@ -253,7 +257,8 @@ static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
> >  		if ((val & mask) == target)
> >  			return 0;
> >  
> > -		usleep_range(1000, 5000);
> > +		usleep_range((ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000) / 2,
> > +			     ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000);
> 
> I'm sure there is a macro for conversion from ms to us.
> 

I will have a look see if I can find it.

> By using such a wide range, you are now not honouring the timeout set
> by the caller by as much as 50%.
> 

Yes apologies my fault here, we really should be applying the
adjustment to the maximum not the minimum here. I don't see a
problem with the wide range, getting more timeout than we asked
for is never going to be a problem but less is. I will respin.

Thanks,
Charles

[PATCH RESEND 4/4] mfd: arizona: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout instead of hard coding it

[Charles Keepax]

arizona_poll_reg essentially hard-codes regmap_read_poll_timeout, this
patch updates the implementation to use regmap_read_poll_timeout. We
still keep arizona_poll_reg around as regmap_read_poll_timeout is a
macro so rather than expand this for each caller keep it wrapped in
arizona_poll_reg.

Whilst we are doing this make the timeouts a little more generous as the
previous system had a bit more slack as it was done as a delay per
iteration of the loop whereas regmap_read_poll_timeout compares ktime's.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 37 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
index ae4cdc4..75488e6 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
@@ -235,34 +235,25 @@ static irqreturn_t arizona_overclocked(int irq, void *data)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS 5
+#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US 7500
 
 static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
 			    int timeout_ms, unsigned int reg,
 			    unsigned int mask, unsigned int target)
 {
-	unsigned int npolls = (timeout_ms + ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS - 1) /
-			      ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS;
 	unsigned int val = 0;
-	int ret, i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < npolls; i++) {
-		ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
-		if (ret != 0) {
-			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
-				reg, ret);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		if ((val & mask) == target)
-			return 0;
+	int ret;
 
-		usleep_range((ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000) / 2,
-			     ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000);
-	}
+	ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(arizona->regmap,
+				       ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5, val,
+				       ((val & mask) == target),
+				       ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US,
+				       timeout_ms * 1000);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n",
+			reg, val);
 
-	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
-	return -ETIMEDOUT;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int arizona_wait_for_boot(struct arizona *arizona)
@@ -274,7 +265,7 @@ static int arizona_wait_for_boot(struct arizona *arizona)
 	 * we won't race with the interrupt handler as it'll be blocked on
 	 * runtime resume.
 	 */
-	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
+	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 30, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
 			       ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS, ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS);
 
 	if (!ret)
@@ -344,7 +335,7 @@ static int arizona_enable_freerun_sysclk(struct arizona *arizona,
 			ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
-	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 125, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
+	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 180, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS);
 	if (ret)
@@ -408,7 +399,7 @@ static int wm5102_apply_hardware_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
+	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 30, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
 			       ARIZONA_WSEQ_BUSY, 0);
 	if (ret)
 		regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_0,
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH RESEND 4/4] mfd: arizona: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout instead of hard coding it

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:

> arizona_poll_reg essentially hard-codes regmap_read_poll_timeout, this
> patch updates the implementation to use regmap_read_poll_timeout. We
> still keep arizona_poll_reg around as regmap_read_poll_timeout is a
> macro so rather than expand this for each caller keep it wrapped in
> arizona_poll_reg.
> 
> Whilst we are doing this make the timeouts a little more generous as the
> previous system had a bit more slack as it was done as a delay per
> iteration of the loop whereas regmap_read_poll_timeout compares ktime's.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 37 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Roll this up into 3/4.

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> index ae4cdc4..75488e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> @@ -235,34 +235,25 @@ static irqreturn_t arizona_overclocked(int irq, void *data)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS 5
> +#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US 7500
>  
>  static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
>  			    int timeout_ms, unsigned int reg,
>  			    unsigned int mask, unsigned int target)
>  {
> -	unsigned int npolls = (timeout_ms + ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS - 1) /
> -			      ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS;
>  	unsigned int val = 0;
> -	int ret, i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < npolls; i++) {
> -		ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
> -		if (ret != 0) {
> -			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> -				reg, ret);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -
> -		if ((val & mask) == target)
> -			return 0;
> +	int ret;
>  
> -		usleep_range((ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000) / 2,
> -			     ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000);
> -	}
> +	ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(arizona->regmap,
> +				       ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5, val,
> +				       ((val & mask) == target),
> +				       ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US,
> +				       timeout_ms * 1000);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n",
> +			reg, val);
>  
> -	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
> -	return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int arizona_wait_for_boot(struct arizona *arizona)
> @@ -274,7 +265,7 @@ static int arizona_wait_for_boot(struct arizona *arizona)
>  	 * we won't race with the interrupt handler as it'll be blocked on
>  	 * runtime resume.
>  	 */
> -	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
> +	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 30, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
>  			       ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS, ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS);
>  
>  	if (!ret)
> @@ -344,7 +335,7 @@ static int arizona_enable_freerun_sysclk(struct arizona *arizona,
>  			ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> -	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 125, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
> +	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 180, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
>  			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS,
>  			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -408,7 +399,7 @@ static int wm5102_apply_hardware_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
> +	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 30, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
>  			       ARIZONA_WSEQ_BUSY, 0);
>  	if (ret)
>  		regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_0,

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH RESEND 4/4] mfd: arizona: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout instead of hard coding it

[Charles Keepax]

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:22:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:
> 
> > arizona_poll_reg essentially hard-codes regmap_read_poll_timeout, this
> > patch updates the implementation to use regmap_read_poll_timeout. We
> > still keep arizona_poll_reg around as regmap_read_poll_timeout is a
> > macro so rather than expand this for each caller keep it wrapped in
> > arizona_poll_reg.
> > 
> > Whilst we are doing this make the timeouts a little more generous as the
> > previous system had a bit more slack as it was done as a delay per
> > iteration of the loop whereas regmap_read_poll_timeout compares ktime's.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 37 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> Roll this up into 3/4.
> 

I can if you feel strongly about it but it seems much cleaner to
separate the change in interface for the function and the
refactoring the implementation.

Thanks,
Charles

Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/4] mfd: arizona: Remove duplicate set of ret variable

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:

> arizona_poll_reg already returns ETIMEDOUT if we don't see the expected
> register changes before the time out, so remove pointless local setting of
> ETIMEDOUT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

For my own reference:
  Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
  
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> index b6d4bc6..e00f577 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> @@ -342,10 +342,8 @@ static int arizona_enable_freerun_sysclk(struct arizona *arizona,
>  	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
>  			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS,
>  			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	if (ret)
>  		goto err_fll;
> -	}
>  
>  	ret = regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_SYSTEM_CLOCK_1, 0x0144);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -407,11 +405,9 @@ static int wm5102_apply_hardware_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
>  
>  	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
>  			       ARIZONA_WSEQ_BUSY, 0);
> -	if (ret) {
> +	if (ret)
>  		regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_0,
>  			     ARIZONA_WSEQ_ABORT);
> -		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> -	}
>  
>  err:
>  	err = arizona_disable_freerun_sysclk(arizona, &state);

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[PATCH RESEND 1/4] mfd: arizona: Remove duplicate set of ret variable

[Charles Keepax]

arizona_poll_reg already returns ETIMEDOUT if we don't see the expected
register changes before the time out, so remove pointless local setting of
ETIMEDOUT.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
index b6d4bc6..e00f577 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
@@ -342,10 +342,8 @@ static int arizona_enable_freerun_sysclk(struct arizona *arizona,
 	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS);
-	if (ret) {
-		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+	if (ret)
 		goto err_fll;
-	}
 
 	ret = regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_SYSTEM_CLOCK_1, 0x0144);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -407,11 +405,9 @@ static int wm5102_apply_hardware_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
 
 	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
 			       ARIZONA_WSEQ_BUSY, 0);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret)
 		regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_0,
 			     ARIZONA_WSEQ_ABORT);
-		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
-	}
 
 err:
 	err = arizona_disable_freerun_sysclk(arizona, &state);
-- 
2.1.4

[PATCH RESEND 3/4] mfd: arizona: Update arizona_poll_reg to take a timeout in milliseconds

[Charles Keepax]

Currently, we specify the timeout in terms of the number of polls but it
is more clear from a user of the functions perspective to specify the
timeout directly in milliseconds, as such update the function to these new
semantics.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
index 4cb34c3..09d48ed 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
@@ -235,14 +235,19 @@ static irqreturn_t arizona_overclocked(int irq, void *data)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS 5
+#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US (ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000)
+
 static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
-			    int timeout, unsigned int reg,
+			    int timeout_ms, unsigned int reg,
 			    unsigned int mask, unsigned int target)
 {
+	unsigned int npolls = (timeout_ms + ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS - 1) /
+			      ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS;
 	unsigned int val = 0;
 	int ret, i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < npolls; i++) {
 		ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
 		if (ret != 0) {
 			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
@@ -253,7 +258,8 @@ static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
 		if ((val & mask) == target)
 			return 0;
 
-		usleep_range(1000, 5000);
+		usleep_range(ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US,
+			     ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US * 2);
 	}
 
 	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
@@ -269,7 +275,7 @@ static int arizona_wait_for_boot(struct arizona *arizona)
 	 * we won't race with the interrupt handler as it'll be blocked on
 	 * runtime resume.
 	 */
-	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
+	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
 			       ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS, ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS);
 
 	if (!ret)
@@ -339,7 +345,7 @@ static int arizona_enable_freerun_sysclk(struct arizona *arizona,
 			ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
-	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
+	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 125, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS,
 			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS);
 	if (ret)
@@ -403,7 +409,7 @@ static int wm5102_apply_hardware_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
+	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
 			       ARIZONA_WSEQ_BUSY, 0);
 	if (ret)
 		regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_0,
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] mfd: arizona: Update arizona_poll_reg to take a timeout in milliseconds

[Lee Jones]

On Thu, 09 Mar 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:

> Currently, we specify the timeout in terms of the number of polls but it
> is more clear from a user of the functions perspective to specify the
> timeout directly in milliseconds, as such update the function to these new
> semantics.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

For my own reference:
  Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
  
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> index 4cb34c3..09d48ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> @@ -235,14 +235,19 @@ static irqreturn_t arizona_overclocked(int irq, void *data)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS 5
> +#define ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US (ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS * 1000)
> +
>  static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
> -			    int timeout, unsigned int reg,
> +			    int timeout_ms, unsigned int reg,
>  			    unsigned int mask, unsigned int target)
>  {
> +	unsigned int npolls = (timeout_ms + ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS - 1) /
> +			      ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_MS;
>  	unsigned int val = 0;
>  	int ret, i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < npolls; i++) {
>  		ret = regmap_read(arizona->regmap, reg, &val);
>  		if (ret != 0) {
>  			dev_err(arizona->dev, "Failed to read reg 0x%x: %d\n",
> @@ -253,7 +258,8 @@ static int arizona_poll_reg(struct arizona *arizona,
>  		if ((val & mask) == target)
>  			return 0;
>  
> -		usleep_range(1000, 5000);
> +		usleep_range(ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US,
> +			     ARIZONA_REG_POLL_DELAY_US * 2);
>  	}
>  
>  	dev_err(arizona->dev, "Polling reg 0x%x timed out: %x\n", reg, val);
> @@ -269,7 +275,7 @@ static int arizona_wait_for_boot(struct arizona *arizona)
>  	 * we won't race with the interrupt handler as it'll be blocked on
>  	 * runtime resume.
>  	 */
> -	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
> +	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
>  			       ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS, ARIZONA_BOOT_DONE_STS);
>  
>  	if (!ret)
> @@ -339,7 +345,7 @@ static int arizona_enable_freerun_sysclk(struct arizona *arizona,
>  			ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> -	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
> +	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 125, ARIZONA_INTERRUPT_RAW_STATUS_5,
>  			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS,
>  			       ARIZONA_FLL1_CLOCK_OK_STS);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -403,7 +409,7 @@ static int wm5102_apply_hardware_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 5, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
> +	ret = arizona_poll_reg(arizona, 25, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_1,
>  			       ARIZONA_WSEQ_BUSY, 0);
>  	if (ret)
>  		regmap_write(arizona->regmap, ARIZONA_WRITE_SEQUENCER_CTRL_0,

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog