From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mm: deadlock between get_online_cpus/pcpu_alloc
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:21:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170208122154.GJ5686@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702081253590.3536@nanos>
On Wed 08-02-17 13:02:07, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170207201950.20482-1-mhocko@kernel.org
>
> Well, yes. It's simple, but from an RT point of view I really don't like
> it as we have to fix it up again.
I thought that preempt_disable would turn into migrate_disable or
something like that which shouldn't cause too much trouble. Or am I
missing something? Which part of the patch is so RT unfriendly?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mm: deadlock between get_online_cpus/pcpu_alloc
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:21:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170208122154.GJ5686@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702081253590.3536@nanos>
On Wed 08-02-17 13:02:07, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170207201950.20482-1-mhocko@kernel.org
>
> Well, yes. It's simple, but from an RT point of view I really don't like
> it as we have to fix it up again.
I thought that preempt_disable would turn into migrate_disable or
something like that which shouldn't cause too much trouble. Or am I
missing something? Which part of the patch is so RT unfriendly?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-08 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-29 12:44 mm: deadlock between get_online_cpus/pcpu_alloc Dmitry Vyukov
2017-01-29 12:44 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-01-29 17:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-29 17:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-30 15:48 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-01-30 15:48 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-02-06 19:13 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-02-06 19:13 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-02-06 22:05 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-06 22:05 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 9:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 9:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 9:46 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 9:46 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 9:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 9:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 10:42 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 10:42 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 11:13 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 11:13 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 9:43 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 9:43 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 9:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 9:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 10:05 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 10:05 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 10:28 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 10:28 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 10:35 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 10:35 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 11:34 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 11:34 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 11:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 11:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 11:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 11:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 12:08 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 12:08 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 12:37 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 12:37 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 12:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 12:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 12:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 12:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 13:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 13:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-02-07 13:58 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 13:58 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 14:19 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 14:19 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 15:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 15:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 16:22 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 16:22 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 16:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 16:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-07 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-07 22:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-07 22:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-08 7:35 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-08 7:35 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-08 12:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-08 12:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-08 12:21 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-02-08 12:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-08 12:26 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-08 12:26 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-08 13:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-08 13:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-08 14:03 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-08 14:03 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-08 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-08 15:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-08 15:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-08 15:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-08 15:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-08 16:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-08 16:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-08 17:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-08 17:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-09 3:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-09 3:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-09 11:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-09 11:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-09 14:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-09 14:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-09 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-09 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-09 15:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-09 15:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-09 16:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-09 16:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-09 17:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-09 17:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-09 17:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-09 17:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-09 19:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-09 19:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-10 17:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-10 17:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-08 15:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-08 15:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-02-07 17:03 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-07 17:03 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-07 20:16 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 20:16 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 13:03 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 13:03 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-07 13:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 13:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 11:24 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-07 11:24 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-02-07 8:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 8:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-07 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-07 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170208122154.GJ5686@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.