All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>, <john@phrozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Lantiq: Fix cascaded IRQ setup
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:19:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170211231906.GI24226@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170119112822.59445-1-nbd@nbd.name>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2948 bytes --]

Hi Felix,

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:28:22PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> With the IRQ stack changes integrated, the XRX200 devices started
> emitting a constant stream of kernel messages like this:
> 
> [  565.415310] Spurious IRQ: CAUSE=0x1100c300
> 
> This appears to be caused by IP0 firing for some reason without being
> handled. Fix this by setting up IP2-6 as a proper chained IRQ handler and
> calling do_IRQ for all MIPS CPU interrupts.
> 
> Cc: john@phrozen.org
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>

Is this still applicable after Matt's fix is applied?
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15110/

Cheers
James

> ---
>  arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c b/arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c
> index 8ac0e5994ed2..0ddf3698b85d 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c
> @@ -269,6 +269,11 @@ static void ltq_hw5_irqdispatch(void)
>  DEFINE_HWx_IRQDISPATCH(5)
>  #endif
>  
> +static void ltq_hw_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	ltq_hw_irqdispatch(irq_desc_get_irq(desc) - 2);
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP
>  void __init arch_init_ipiirq(int irq, struct irqaction *action)
>  {
> @@ -313,23 +318,19 @@ static struct irqaction irq_call = {
>  asmlinkage void plat_irq_dispatch(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int pending = read_c0_status() & read_c0_cause() & ST0_IM;
> -	unsigned int i;
> -
> -	if ((MIPS_CPU_TIMER_IRQ == 7) && (pending & CAUSEF_IP7)) {
> -		do_IRQ(MIPS_CPU_TIMER_IRQ);
> -		goto out;
> -	} else {
> -		for (i = 0; i < MAX_IM; i++) {
> -			if (pending & (CAUSEF_IP2 << i)) {
> -				ltq_hw_irqdispatch(i);
> -				goto out;
> -			}
> -		}
> +	int irq;
> +
> +	if (!pending) {
> +		spurious_interrupt();
> +		return;
>  	}
> -	pr_alert("Spurious IRQ: CAUSE=0x%08x\n", read_c0_status());
>  
> -out:
> -	return;
> +	pending >>= CAUSEB_IP;
> +	while (pending) {
> +		irq = fls(pending) - 1;
> +		do_IRQ(MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + irq);
> +		pending &= ~BIT(irq);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int icu_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hw)
> @@ -354,11 +355,6 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops irq_domain_ops = {
>  	.map = icu_map,
>  };
>  
> -static struct irqaction cascade = {
> -	.handler = no_action,
> -	.name = "cascade",
> -};
> -
>  int __init icu_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *eiu_node;
> @@ -390,7 +386,7 @@ int __init icu_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>  	mips_cpu_irq_init();
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_IM; i++)
> -		setup_irq(i + 2, &cascade);
> +		irq_set_chained_handler(i + 2, ltq_hw_irq_handler);
>  
>  	if (cpu_has_vint) {
>  		pr_info("Setting up vectored interrupts\n");
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, john@phrozen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Lantiq: Fix cascaded IRQ setup
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 23:19:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170211231906.GI24226@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20170211231906.OiTWRycv-7LHrFcPWmZNyJmOZsZmoc8WwNYWiI0CnIY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170119112822.59445-1-nbd@nbd.name>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2948 bytes --]

Hi Felix,

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:28:22PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> With the IRQ stack changes integrated, the XRX200 devices started
> emitting a constant stream of kernel messages like this:
> 
> [  565.415310] Spurious IRQ: CAUSE=0x1100c300
> 
> This appears to be caused by IP0 firing for some reason without being
> handled. Fix this by setting up IP2-6 as a proper chained IRQ handler and
> calling do_IRQ for all MIPS CPU interrupts.
> 
> Cc: john@phrozen.org
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>

Is this still applicable after Matt's fix is applied?
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15110/

Cheers
James

> ---
>  arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c b/arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c
> index 8ac0e5994ed2..0ddf3698b85d 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c
> @@ -269,6 +269,11 @@ static void ltq_hw5_irqdispatch(void)
>  DEFINE_HWx_IRQDISPATCH(5)
>  #endif
>  
> +static void ltq_hw_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	ltq_hw_irqdispatch(irq_desc_get_irq(desc) - 2);
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP
>  void __init arch_init_ipiirq(int irq, struct irqaction *action)
>  {
> @@ -313,23 +318,19 @@ static struct irqaction irq_call = {
>  asmlinkage void plat_irq_dispatch(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int pending = read_c0_status() & read_c0_cause() & ST0_IM;
> -	unsigned int i;
> -
> -	if ((MIPS_CPU_TIMER_IRQ == 7) && (pending & CAUSEF_IP7)) {
> -		do_IRQ(MIPS_CPU_TIMER_IRQ);
> -		goto out;
> -	} else {
> -		for (i = 0; i < MAX_IM; i++) {
> -			if (pending & (CAUSEF_IP2 << i)) {
> -				ltq_hw_irqdispatch(i);
> -				goto out;
> -			}
> -		}
> +	int irq;
> +
> +	if (!pending) {
> +		spurious_interrupt();
> +		return;
>  	}
> -	pr_alert("Spurious IRQ: CAUSE=0x%08x\n", read_c0_status());
>  
> -out:
> -	return;
> +	pending >>= CAUSEB_IP;
> +	while (pending) {
> +		irq = fls(pending) - 1;
> +		do_IRQ(MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + irq);
> +		pending &= ~BIT(irq);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int icu_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hw)
> @@ -354,11 +355,6 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops irq_domain_ops = {
>  	.map = icu_map,
>  };
>  
> -static struct irqaction cascade = {
> -	.handler = no_action,
> -	.name = "cascade",
> -};
> -
>  int __init icu_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *eiu_node;
> @@ -390,7 +386,7 @@ int __init icu_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
>  	mips_cpu_irq_init();
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_IM; i++)
> -		setup_irq(i + 2, &cascade);
> +		irq_set_chained_handler(i + 2, ltq_hw_irq_handler);
>  
>  	if (cpu_has_vint) {
>  		pr_info("Setting up vectored interrupts\n");
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-11 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-19 11:28 [PATCH] MIPS: Lantiq: Fix cascaded IRQ setup Felix Fietkau
2017-01-19 11:54 ` John Crispin
2017-02-11 23:19 ` James Hogan [this message]
2017-02-11 23:19   ` James Hogan
2017-02-11 23:50   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2017-02-12 11:05     ` Felix Fietkau
2017-02-13 11:12       ` James Hogan
2017-02-13 11:12         ` James Hogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170211231906.GI24226@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org \
    --to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.