All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm
@ 2017-02-18 15:00 Chris Wilson
  2017-02-18 15:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2017-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH] " Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-02-18 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

We don't need struct_mutex for acquiring an rpm wakeref, and do not need
to serialise those register read (it's the wrong mutex for those
registers in any case). Begone!

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index c0bc922fe497..9f0d8abe1e99 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1107,7 +1107,6 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_next_seqno_fops,
 static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
-	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
@@ -1170,10 +1169,6 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 		}
 
 		/* RPSTAT1 is in the GT power well */
-		ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
-		if (ret)
-			goto out;
-
 		intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
 
 		reqf = I915_READ(GEN6_RPNSWREQ);
@@ -1208,7 +1203,6 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 		cagf = intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, cagf);
 
 		intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
-		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
 		if (IS_GEN6(dev_priv) || IS_GEN7(dev_priv)) {
 			pm_ier = I915_READ(GEN6_PMIER);
@@ -1298,7 +1292,6 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	seq_printf(m, "Max CD clock frequency: %d kHz\n", dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq);
 	seq_printf(m, "Max pixel clock frequency: %d kHz\n", dev_priv->max_dotclk_freq);
 
-out:
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm
  2017-02-18 15:00 [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm Chris Wilson
@ 2017-02-18 15:52 ` Patchwork
  2017-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH] " Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-02-18 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/19890/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 19890v1 drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/19890/revisions/1/mbox/

fi-bdw-5557u     total:252  pass:241  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:11 
fi-bsw-n3050     total:252  pass:213  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39 
fi-bxt-j4205     total:252  pass:233  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19 
fi-bxt-t5700     total:83   pass:70   dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12 
fi-byt-j1900     total:252  pass:225  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27 
fi-byt-n2820     total:252  pass:221  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:31 
fi-hsw-4770      total:252  pass:236  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16 
fi-hsw-4770r     total:252  pass:236  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16 
fi-ilk-650       total:252  pass:202  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:50 
fi-ivb-3520m     total:252  pass:234  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18 
fi-ivb-3770      total:252  pass:234  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18 
fi-kbl-7500u     total:252  pass:234  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18 
fi-skl-6260u     total:252  pass:242  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10 
fi-skl-6700hq    total:252  pass:235  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:17 
fi-skl-6700k     total:252  pass:230  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18 
fi-skl-6770hq    total:252  pass:242  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10 
fi-snb-2520m     total:252  pass:224  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28 
fi-snb-2600      total:252  pass:223  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29 

d13370a042e9d05329bcac34eb43c64e4f6704e0 drm-tip: 2017y-02m-17d-21h-23m-28s UTC integration manifest
5405783 drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3894/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm
  2017-02-18 15:00 [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm Chris Wilson
  2017-02-18 15:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-02-20  8:36 ` Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
  2017-02-20 10:22   ` chris
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw @ 2017-02-20  8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, chris

On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 15:00 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We don't need struct_mutex for acquiring an rpm wakeref, and do not need
> to serialise those register read (it's the wrong mutex for those
> registers in any case). Begone!
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm
  2017-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH] " Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
@ 2017-02-20 10:22   ` chris
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: chris @ 2017-02-20 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 08:36:31AM +0000, Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 15:00 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > We don't need struct_mutex for acquiring an rpm wakeref, and do not need
> > to serialise those register read (it's the wrong mutex for those
> > registers in any case). Begone!
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>

Applied, thanks.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-20 10:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-18 15:00 [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unneeded struct_mutex around rpm Chris Wilson
2017-02-18 15:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-02-20  8:36 ` [PATCH] " Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
2017-02-20 10:22   ` chris

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.