From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block pull request for- 4.11-rc1
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:35:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170220073539.GA17687@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <633d226d-cec3-a01f-a069-ffff307e9715@kernel.dk>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 06:15:41PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I don't think that's a regression in this series, it just triggers more easily
> with this series. The BLOCK_PC removal fixes aren't touching device life times
> at all.
Yes.
> That said, we will look into this again, of course. Christoph, any idea?
No idea really - this seems so far away from the code touched, and there
are no obvious signs for a memory scamble from another object touched
that I think if it really bisects down to that issue it must be a timing
issue.
But reading Bart's message again: Did you actually bisect it down
to the is commit? Or just test the whole tree? Between the 4.10-rc5
merge and all the block tree there might a few more likely suspects
like the scsi bdi lifetime fixes that James mentioned.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-20 0:10 [GIT PULL] Block pull request for- 4.11-rc1 Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 1:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-20 1:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-20 1:15 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 2:12 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-20 2:12 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-20 2:59 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 3:02 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-20 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-02-20 16:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-20 16:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-20 16:32 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 1:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-21 1:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-24 17:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-24 17:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-24 17:51 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-24 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-24 20:00 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-24 20:22 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-24 21:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-24 21:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-02-25 18:17 ` hch
2017-02-25 18:22 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-21 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-21 23:15 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-21 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:14 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:41 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:52 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 21:29 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-22 18:44 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-22 21:50 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-02-22 21:55 ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-23 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170220073539.GA17687@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.