* [PATCH 0/3] GLK plane/scaling fixes @ 2017-02-22 10:29 Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix watermark computations for third sprite plane Ander Conselvan de Oliveira ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira A few fixes to the plane and scaling code for Geminilake. Ander Conselvan de Oliveira (3): drm/i915/glk: Fix watermark computations for third sprite plane drm/i915/glk: Fix maximum scaling factor for Geminilake scalers drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c | 14 ++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- 2.9.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix watermark computations for third sprite plane 2017-02-22 10:29 [PATCH 0/3] GLK plane/scaling fixes Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 10:29 ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix maximum scaling factor for Geminilake scalers Ander Conselvan de Oliveira ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx Cc: Daniel Vetter, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira, drm-intel-fixes, Rodrigo Vivi Geminilake has a third sprite plane (or fourth universal plane) that is independent from the cursor. Make sure that for_each_plane_id_on_crtc() is aware of that extra plane so that the watermark code takes it into account. Fixes: e9c9882556fc ("drm/i915/glk: Configure number of sprite planes properly") Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index e346b2d..70892ea 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ enum plane_id { PLANE_PRIMARY, PLANE_SPRITE0, PLANE_SPRITE1, + PLANE_SPRITE2, PLANE_CURSOR, I915_MAX_PLANES, }; -- 2.9.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix maximum scaling factor for Geminilake scalers 2017-02-22 10:29 [PATCH 0/3] GLK plane/scaling fixes Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix watermark computations for third sprite plane Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 10:29 ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 14:39 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 12:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for GLK plane/scaling fixes Patchwork 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira, Rodrigo Vivi Geminilake can output two pixels per clock, and that affects the maximum scaling factor for its scalers. Take that into account and avoid the following warning: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 593 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:13223 skl_max_scale.part.129+0x78/0x80 [i915] WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk < crtc_clock) Modules linked in: x86_pkg_temp_thermal i915 coretemp kvm_intel kvm i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul prime_numbers crc32_pclmul drm ghash_clmulni_intel shpchp tpm_tis tpm_tis_core tpm nfsd authw CPU: 1 PID: 593 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc8ander+ #330 Hardware name: Intel Corp. Geminilake/GLK RVP1 DDR4 (05), BIOS GELKRVPA.X64.0035.B33.1702150552 02/15/2017 Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn Call Trace: dump_stack+0x86/0xc3 __warn+0xcb/0xf0 warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80 skl_max_scale.part.129+0x78/0x80 [i915] intel_check_primary_plane+0xa6/0xc0 [i915] intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state+0xd1/0x1a0 [i915] ? drm_printk+0xb5/0xc0 [drm] intel_plane_atomic_check+0x3d/0x80 [i915] drm_atomic_helper_check_planes+0x7c/0x200 [drm_kms_helper] intel_atomic_check+0xa5b/0x11a0 [i915] drm_atomic_check_only+0x353/0x600 [drm] ? drm_atomic_add_affected_connectors+0x10c/0x120 [drm] drm_atomic_commit+0x18/0x50 [drm] restore_fbdev_mode+0x14c/0x2a0 [drm_kms_helper] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x34/0x80 [drm_kms_helper] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x60 [drm_kms_helper] intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x70 [i915] fbcon_init+0x582/0x610 visual_init+0xd6/0x130 do_bind_con_driver+0x1da/0x3c0 do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180 do_fbcon_takeover+0x5c/0xb0 fbcon_event_notify+0x772/0x8a0 ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70 notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70 __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 register_framebuffer+0x278/0x360 drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x253/0x440 [drm_kms_helper] intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915] async_run_entry_fn+0x39/0x170 process_one_work+0x212/0x670 ? process_one_work+0x197/0x670 worker_thread+0x4e/0x490 kthread+0x101/0x140 ? process_one_work+0x670/0x670 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40 Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 957c62d..000fb31 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -13211,16 +13211,22 @@ intel_cleanup_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, int skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) { + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv; int max_scale; - int crtc_clock, cdclk; + int crtc_clock, max_pixclk; if (!intel_crtc || !crtc_state->base.enable) return DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; + dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev); + crtc_clock = crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock; - cdclk = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->base.state)->cdclk.logical.cdclk; + max_pixclk = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->base.state)->cdclk.logical.cdclk; + + if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) + max_pixclk *= 2; - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk < crtc_clock)) + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || max_pixclk < crtc_clock)) return DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; /* @@ -13229,7 +13235,8 @@ skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state * or * cdclk/crtc_clock */ - max_scale = min((1 << 16) * 3 - 1, (1 << 8) * ((cdclk << 8) / crtc_clock)); + max_scale = min((1 << 16) * 3 - 1, + (1 << 8) * ((max_pixclk << 8) / crtc_clock)); return max_scale; } -- 2.9.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix maximum scaling factor for Geminilake scalers 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix maximum scaling factor for Geminilake scalers Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 14:39 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-02-22 14:44 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-02-22 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira; +Cc: intel-gfx, Rodrigo Vivi On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:29:08PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > Geminilake can output two pixels per clock, and that affects the maximum > scaling factor for its scalers. Take that into account and avoid the > following warning: > > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 593 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:13223 skl_max_scale.part.129+0x78/0x80 [i915] > WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk < crtc_clock) > Modules linked in: x86_pkg_temp_thermal i915 coretemp kvm_intel kvm i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul prime_numbers crc32_pclmul drm ghash_clmulni_intel shpchp tpm_tis tpm_tis_core tpm nfsd authw > CPU: 1 PID: 593 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc8ander+ #330 > Hardware name: Intel Corp. Geminilake/GLK RVP1 DDR4 (05), BIOS GELKRVPA.X64.0035.B33.1702150552 02/15/2017 > Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn > Call Trace: > dump_stack+0x86/0xc3 > __warn+0xcb/0xf0 > warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80 > skl_max_scale.part.129+0x78/0x80 [i915] > intel_check_primary_plane+0xa6/0xc0 [i915] > intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state+0xd1/0x1a0 [i915] > ? drm_printk+0xb5/0xc0 [drm] > intel_plane_atomic_check+0x3d/0x80 [i915] > drm_atomic_helper_check_planes+0x7c/0x200 [drm_kms_helper] > intel_atomic_check+0xa5b/0x11a0 [i915] > drm_atomic_check_only+0x353/0x600 [drm] > ? drm_atomic_add_affected_connectors+0x10c/0x120 [drm] > drm_atomic_commit+0x18/0x50 [drm] > restore_fbdev_mode+0x14c/0x2a0 [drm_kms_helper] > drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x34/0x80 [drm_kms_helper] > drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x60 [drm_kms_helper] > intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x70 [i915] > fbcon_init+0x582/0x610 > visual_init+0xd6/0x130 > do_bind_con_driver+0x1da/0x3c0 > do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180 > do_fbcon_takeover+0x5c/0xb0 > fbcon_event_notify+0x772/0x8a0 > ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70 > notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70 > __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 > blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 > fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 > register_framebuffer+0x278/0x360 > drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x253/0x440 [drm_kms_helper] > intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915] > async_run_entry_fn+0x39/0x170 > process_one_work+0x212/0x670 > ? process_one_work+0x197/0x670 > worker_thread+0x4e/0x490 > kthread+0x101/0x140 > ? process_one_work+0x670/0x670 > ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60 > ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40 > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 957c62d..000fb31 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -13211,16 +13211,22 @@ intel_cleanup_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, > int > skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > { > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv; > int max_scale; > - int crtc_clock, cdclk; > + int crtc_clock, max_pixclk; > > if (!intel_crtc || !crtc_state->base.enable) > return DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; > > + dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev); > + > crtc_clock = crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock; > - cdclk = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->base.state)->cdclk.logical.cdclk; > + max_pixclk = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->base.state)->cdclk.logical.cdclk; > + > + if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) > + max_pixclk *= 2; max_dotclock perhaps? > > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk < crtc_clock)) > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || max_pixclk < crtc_clock)) > return DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; > > /* > @@ -13229,7 +13235,8 @@ skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state > * or > * cdclk/crtc_clock > */ > - max_scale = min((1 << 16) * 3 - 1, (1 << 8) * ((cdclk << 8) / crtc_clock)); > + max_scale = min((1 << 16) * 3 - 1, > + (1 << 8) * ((max_pixclk << 8) / crtc_clock)); > > return max_scale; > } > -- > 2.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix maximum scaling factor for Geminilake scalers 2017-02-22 14:39 ` Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-02-22 14:44 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx, Rodrigo Vivi On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 16:39 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:29:08PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > > Geminilake can output two pixels per clock, and that affects the maximum > > scaling factor for its scalers. Take that into account and avoid the > > following warning: > > > > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 593 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:13223 skl_max_scale.part.129+0x78/0x80 [i915] > > WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk < crtc_clock) > > Modules linked in: x86_pkg_temp_thermal i915 coretemp kvm_intel kvm i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul prime_numbers crc32_pclmul drm ghash_clmulni_intel shpchp tpm_tis tpm_tis_core tpm nfsd authw > > CPU: 1 PID: 593 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc8ander+ #330 > > Hardware name: Intel Corp. Geminilake/GLK RVP1 DDR4 (05), BIOS GELKRVPA.X64.0035.B33.1702150552 02/15/2017 > > Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn > > Call Trace: > > dump_stack+0x86/0xc3 > > __warn+0xcb/0xf0 > > warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80 > > skl_max_scale.part.129+0x78/0x80 [i915] > > intel_check_primary_plane+0xa6/0xc0 [i915] > > intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state+0xd1/0x1a0 [i915] > > ? drm_printk+0xb5/0xc0 [drm] > > intel_plane_atomic_check+0x3d/0x80 [i915] > > drm_atomic_helper_check_planes+0x7c/0x200 [drm_kms_helper] > > intel_atomic_check+0xa5b/0x11a0 [i915] > > drm_atomic_check_only+0x353/0x600 [drm] > > ? drm_atomic_add_affected_connectors+0x10c/0x120 [drm] > > drm_atomic_commit+0x18/0x50 [drm] > > restore_fbdev_mode+0x14c/0x2a0 [drm_kms_helper] > > drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x34/0x80 [drm_kms_helper] > > drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x60 [drm_kms_helper] > > intel_fbdev_set_par+0x1a/0x70 [i915] > > fbcon_init+0x582/0x610 > > visual_init+0xd6/0x130 > > do_bind_con_driver+0x1da/0x3c0 > > do_take_over_console+0x116/0x180 > > do_fbcon_takeover+0x5c/0xb0 > > fbcon_event_notify+0x772/0x8a0 > > ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x35/0x70 > > notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70 > > __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 > > blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 > > fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 > > register_framebuffer+0x278/0x360 > > drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x253/0x440 [drm_kms_helper] > > intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x18/0x30 [i915] > > async_run_entry_fn+0x39/0x170 > > process_one_work+0x212/0x670 > > ? process_one_work+0x197/0x670 > > worker_thread+0x4e/0x490 > > kthread+0x101/0x140 > > ? process_one_work+0x670/0x670 > > ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60 > > ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40 > > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index 957c62d..000fb31 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > @@ -13211,16 +13211,22 @@ intel_cleanup_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *plane, > > int > > skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > { > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv; > > int max_scale; > > - int crtc_clock, cdclk; > > + int crtc_clock, max_pixclk; > > > > if (!intel_crtc || !crtc_state->base.enable) > > return DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; > > > > + dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev); > > + > > crtc_clock = crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock; > > - cdclk = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->base.state)->cdclk.logical.cdclk; > > + max_pixclk = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->base.state)->cdclk.logical.cdclk; > > + > > + if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) > > + max_pixclk *= 2; > > max_dotclock perhaps? Yeah, that would be more consistent, will respin. Ander > > > > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || cdclk < crtc_clock)) > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!crtc_clock || max_pixclk < crtc_clock)) > > return DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING; > > > > /* > > @@ -13229,7 +13235,8 @@ skl_max_scale(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state > > * or > > * cdclk/crtc_clock > > */ > > - max_scale = min((1 << 16) * 3 - 1, (1 << 8) * ((cdclk << 8) / crtc_clock)); > > + max_scale = min((1 << 16) * 3 - 1, > > + (1 << 8) * ((max_pixclk << 8) / crtc_clock)); > > > > return max_scale; > > } > > -- > > 2.9.3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming 2017-02-22 10:29 [PATCH 0/3] GLK plane/scaling fixes Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix watermark computations for third sprite plane Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix maximum scaling factor for Geminilake scalers Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 10:29 ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 14:41 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-02-22 12:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for GLK plane/scaling fixes Patchwork 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira Geminilake scalers can do 7x7 filtering for all supported input sizes, so it doesn't need the "high quality" mode programming, which was actually removed from that platform. Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c | 14 ++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c index aa9160e..e65818e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ intel_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, /** * intel_atomic_setup_scalers() - setup scalers for crtc per staged requests - * @dev: DRM device + * @dev_priv: i915 device * @crtc: intel crtc * @crtc_state: incoming crtc_state to validate and setup scalers * @@ -136,9 +136,9 @@ intel_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, * 0 - scalers were setup succesfully * error code - otherwise */ -int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) +int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) { struct drm_plane *plane = NULL; struct intel_plane *intel_plane; @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, */ if (!plane) { struct drm_plane_state *state; - plane = drm_plane_from_index(dev, i); + plane = drm_plane_from_index(&dev_priv->drm, i); state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(drm_state, plane); if (IS_ERR(state)) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to add [PLANE:%d] to drm_state\n", @@ -247,7 +247,9 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, } /* set scaler mode */ - if (num_scalers_need == 1 && intel_crtc->pipe != PIPE_C) { + if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) { + scaler_state->scalers[*scaler_id].mode = 0; + } else if (num_scalers_need == 1 && intel_crtc->pipe != PIPE_C) { /* * when only 1 scaler is in use on either pipe A or B, * scaler 0 operates in high quality (HQ) mode. diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 000fb31..65e76d1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -10959,7 +10959,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, ret = skl_update_scaler_crtc(pipe_config); if (!ret) - ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev, intel_crtc, + ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev_priv, intel_crtc, pipe_config); } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index 0edc499..d9d96d6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -1910,9 +1910,9 @@ intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state, return to_intel_plane_state(plane_state); } -int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); +int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); /* intel_atomic_plane.c */ struct intel_plane_state *intel_create_plane_state(struct drm_plane *plane); -- 2.9.3 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 14:41 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-02-22 14:44 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-02-22 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira; +Cc: intel-gfx On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:29:09PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > Geminilake scalers can do 7x7 filtering for all supported input sizes, > so it doesn't need the "high quality" mode programming, which was > actually removed from that platform. > > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c | 14 ++++++++------ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++--- > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c > index aa9160e..e65818e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ intel_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > /** > * intel_atomic_setup_scalers() - setup scalers for crtc per staged requests > - * @dev: DRM device > + * @dev_priv: i915 device This change makes the diff quite messy for what's essentially a addition of two lines of code. > * @crtc: intel crtc > * @crtc_state: incoming crtc_state to validate and setup scalers > * > @@ -136,9 +136,9 @@ intel_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > * 0 - scalers were setup succesfully > * error code - otherwise > */ > -int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > +int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > { > struct drm_plane *plane = NULL; > struct intel_plane *intel_plane; > @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > */ > if (!plane) { > struct drm_plane_state *state; > - plane = drm_plane_from_index(dev, i); > + plane = drm_plane_from_index(&dev_priv->drm, i); > state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(drm_state, plane); > if (IS_ERR(state)) { > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to add [PLANE:%d] to drm_state\n", > @@ -247,7 +247,9 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > } > > /* set scaler mode */ > - if (num_scalers_need == 1 && intel_crtc->pipe != PIPE_C) { > + if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) { > + scaler_state->scalers[*scaler_id].mode = 0; > + } else if (num_scalers_need == 1 && intel_crtc->pipe != PIPE_C) { > /* > * when only 1 scaler is in use on either pipe A or B, > * scaler 0 operates in high quality (HQ) mode. > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 000fb31..65e76d1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -10959,7 +10959,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > ret = skl_update_scaler_crtc(pipe_config); > > if (!ret) > - ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev, intel_crtc, > + ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev_priv, intel_crtc, > pipe_config); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > index 0edc499..d9d96d6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > @@ -1910,9 +1910,9 @@ intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state, > return to_intel_plane_state(plane_state); > } > > -int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); > +int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); > > /* intel_atomic_plane.c */ > struct intel_plane_state *intel_create_plane_state(struct drm_plane *plane); > -- > 2.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming 2017-02-22 14:41 ` Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-02-22 14:44 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira 2017-02-22 14:53 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 16:41 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:29:09PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > > Geminilake scalers can do 7x7 filtering for all supported input sizes, > > so it doesn't need the "high quality" mode programming, which was > > actually removed from that platform. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c | 14 ++++++++------ > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++--- > > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c > > index aa9160e..e65818e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c > > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ intel_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > > > /** > > * intel_atomic_setup_scalers() - setup scalers for crtc per staged requests > > - * @dev: DRM device > > + * @dev_priv: i915 device > > This change makes the diff quite messy for what's essentially a > addition of two lines of code. There's no dev_priv in that function. While adding the dev_priv, it just seemed like pure laziness not to change the parameter. Didn't seem like a big deal since it has only one caller, but I'll split if you insist. Ander > > > * @crtc: intel crtc > > * @crtc_state: incoming crtc_state to validate and setup scalers > > * > > @@ -136,9 +136,9 @@ intel_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > * 0 - scalers were setup succesfully > > * error code - otherwise > > */ > > -int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > > - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > +int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > { > > struct drm_plane *plane = NULL; > > struct intel_plane *intel_plane; > > @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > > */ > > if (!plane) { > > struct drm_plane_state *state; > > - plane = drm_plane_from_index(dev, i); > > + plane = drm_plane_from_index(&dev_priv->drm, i); > > state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(drm_state, plane); > > if (IS_ERR(state)) { > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to add [PLANE:%d] to drm_state\n", > > @@ -247,7 +247,9 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > > } > > > > /* set scaler mode */ > > - if (num_scalers_need == 1 && intel_crtc->pipe != PIPE_C) { > > + if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) { > > + scaler_state->scalers[*scaler_id].mode = 0; > > + } else if (num_scalers_need == 1 && intel_crtc->pipe != PIPE_C) { > > /* > > * when only 1 scaler is in use on either pipe A or B, > > * scaler 0 operates in high quality (HQ) mode. > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index 000fb31..65e76d1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > @@ -10959,7 +10959,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > ret = skl_update_scaler_crtc(pipe_config); > > > > if (!ret) > > - ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev, intel_crtc, > > + ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev_priv, intel_crtc, > > pipe_config); > > } > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > > index 0edc499..d9d96d6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > > @@ -1910,9 +1910,9 @@ intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state, > > return to_intel_plane_state(plane_state); > > } > > > > -int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > > - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); > > +int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); > > > > /* intel_atomic_plane.c */ > > struct intel_plane_state *intel_create_plane_state(struct drm_plane *plane); > > -- > > 2.9.3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming 2017-02-22 14:44 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 14:53 ` Ville Syrjälä 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-02-22 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira; +Cc: intel-gfx On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:44:10PM +0200, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 16:41 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:29:09PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote: > > > Geminilake scalers can do 7x7 filtering for all supported input sizes, > > > so it doesn't need the "high quality" mode programming, which was > > > actually removed from that platform. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c | 14 ++++++++------ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++--- > > > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c > > > index aa9160e..e65818e 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c > > > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ intel_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > > > > > /** > > > * intel_atomic_setup_scalers() - setup scalers for crtc per staged requests > > > - * @dev: DRM device > > > + * @dev_priv: i915 device > > > > This change makes the diff quite messy for what's essentially a > > addition of two lines of code. > > There's no dev_priv in that function. While adding the dev_priv, it just seemed > like pure laziness not to change the parameter. Didn't seem like a big deal > since it has only one caller, but I'll split if you insist. to_i915(dev) still works, so there's no real need for changing the parameter at this time. I think sneaking in cosmetic changes should only be done if it's really just a few lines, whereas in this case the cosmetic change makes up most of the patch leading to a very low signal to noise ratio. > > Ander > > > > > > * @crtc: intel crtc > > > * @crtc_state: incoming crtc_state to validate and setup scalers > > > * > > > @@ -136,9 +136,9 @@ intel_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > > * 0 - scalers were setup succesfully > > > * error code - otherwise > > > */ > > > -int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > > > - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > > +int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > > + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > > { > > > struct drm_plane *plane = NULL; > > > struct intel_plane *intel_plane; > > > @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > > > */ > > > if (!plane) { > > > struct drm_plane_state *state; > > > - plane = drm_plane_from_index(dev, i); > > > + plane = drm_plane_from_index(&dev_priv->drm, i); > > > state = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(drm_state, plane); > > > if (IS_ERR(state)) { > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to add [PLANE:%d] to drm_state\n", > > > @@ -247,7 +247,9 @@ int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > > > } > > > > > > /* set scaler mode */ > > > - if (num_scalers_need == 1 && intel_crtc->pipe != PIPE_C) { > > > + if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) { > > > + scaler_state->scalers[*scaler_id].mode = 0; > > > + } else if (num_scalers_need == 1 && intel_crtc->pipe != PIPE_C) { > > > /* > > > * when only 1 scaler is in use on either pipe A or B, > > > * scaler 0 operates in high quality (HQ) mode. > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > index 000fb31..65e76d1 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > @@ -10959,7 +10959,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > > ret = skl_update_scaler_crtc(pipe_config); > > > > > > if (!ret) > > > - ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev, intel_crtc, > > > + ret = intel_atomic_setup_scalers(dev_priv, intel_crtc, > > > pipe_config); > > > } > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > > > index 0edc499..d9d96d6 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > > > @@ -1910,9 +1910,9 @@ intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state, > > > return to_intel_plane_state(plane_state); > > > } > > > > > > -int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_device *dev, > > > - struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); > > > +int intel_atomic_setup_scalers(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > > + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); > > > > > > /* intel_atomic_plane.c */ > > > struct intel_plane_state *intel_create_plane_state(struct drm_plane *plane); > > > -- > > > 2.9.3 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > > > -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for GLK plane/scaling fixes 2017-02-22 10:29 [PATCH 0/3] GLK plane/scaling fixes Ander Conselvan de Oliveira ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming Ander Conselvan de Oliveira @ 2017-02-22 12:22 ` Patchwork 3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2017-02-22 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: GLK plane/scaling fixes URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/20051/ State : success == Summary == Series 20051v1 GLK plane/scaling fixes https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/20051/revisions/1/mbox/ fi-bdw-5557u total:253 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11 fi-bsw-n3050 total:253 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 fi-bxt-j4205 total:253 pass:234 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 fi-bxt-t5700 total:83 pass:70 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12 fi-byt-j1900 total:253 pass:226 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 fi-byt-n2820 total:253 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31 fi-hsw-4770 total:253 pass:237 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 fi-hsw-4770r total:253 pass:237 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 fi-ilk-650 total:253 pass:203 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:50 fi-ivb-3520m total:253 pass:235 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 fi-ivb-3770 total:253 pass:235 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 fi-kbl-7500u total:253 pass:235 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 fi-skl-6260u total:253 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 fi-skl-6700hq total:253 pass:236 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:17 fi-skl-6700k total:253 pass:231 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 fi-skl-6770hq total:253 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 fi-snb-2520m total:253 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 fi-snb-2600 total:253 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 2362c155a028031f2686044863203d4825ace1e7 drm-tip: 2017y-02m-22d-10h-33m-14s UTC integration manifest 64dd29d drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming 7d3c55c drm/i915/glk: Fix maximum scaling factor for Geminilake scalers bcef97e drm/i915/glk: Fix watermark computations for third sprite plane == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3925/ _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-22 14:53 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-02-22 10:29 [PATCH 0/3] GLK plane/scaling fixes Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix watermark computations for third sprite plane Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix maximum scaling factor for Geminilake scalers Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 14:39 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-02-22 14:44 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira 2017-02-22 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/glk: Fix Geminilake scalers mode programming Ander Conselvan de Oliveira 2017-02-22 14:41 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-02-22 14:44 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira 2017-02-22 14:53 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-02-22 12:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for GLK plane/scaling fixes Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.