[PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce devm_of_platform_populate() helper

[PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce devm_of_platform_populate() helper

[Benjamin Gaignard]

version 2:
- simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
- rebased on v4.10

Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
bind/unbind.
    
In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
from the bus. This also could make drivers more robust in case that
probe failed after calling of_platform_populate().

Benjamin Gaignard (2):
  of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate
  drm: sti: make driver use devm_of_platform_populate()

 drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c |  3 +-
 drivers/of/platform.c         | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/of_platform.h   | 11 +++++++
 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce devm_of_platform_populate() helper

[Benjamin Gaignard]

version 2:
- simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
- rebased on v4.10

Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
bind/unbind.
    
In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
from the bus. This also could make drivers more robust in case that
probe failed after calling of_platform_populate().

Benjamin Gaignard (2):
  of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate
  drm: sti: make driver use devm_of_platform_populate()

 drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c |  3 +-
 drivers/of/platform.c         | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/of_platform.h   | 11 +++++++
 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Benjamin Gaignard]

Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
bind/unbind.

In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
from the bus.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
---
version 2:
- simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter

 drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index b8064bc..f5bbb50 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -571,6 +571,77 @@ void of_platform_depopulate(struct device *parent)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_platform_depopulate);
 
+static void devm_of_platform_populate_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
+{
+	of_platform_depopulate(*(struct device **)res);
+}
+
+/**
+ * devm_of_platform_populate() - Populate platform_devices from device tree data
+ * @dev: device that requested to populate from device tree data
+ *
+ * Similar to of_platform_populate(), but will automatically call
+ * of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound from the bus.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success, < 0 on failure.
+ */
+int devm_of_platform_populate(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct device **ptr;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!dev)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ptr = devres_alloc(devm_of_platform_populate_release,
+			   sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ptr)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = of_platform_populate(dev->of_node, NULL, NULL, dev);
+	if (ret) {
+		devres_free(ptr);
+	} else {
+		*ptr = dev;
+		devres_add(dev, ptr);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_platform_populate);
+
+static int devm_of_platform_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data)
+{
+	struct device **ptr = res;
+
+	if (!ptr) {
+		WARN_ON(!ptr);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return *ptr == data;
+}
+
+/**
+ * devm_of_platform_depopulate() - Remove devices populated from device tree
+ * @dev: device that requested to depopulate from device tree data
+ *
+ * Complementary to devm_of_platform_populate(), this function removes children
+ * of the given device (and, recurrently, their children) that have been
+ * created from their respective device tree nodes (and only those,
+ * leaving others - eg. manually created - unharmed).
+ */
+void devm_of_platform_depopulate(struct device *dev)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = devres_release(dev, devm_of_platform_populate_release,
+			     devm_of_platform_match, dev);
+
+	WARN_ON(ret);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_platform_depopulate);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC
 static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 				unsigned long action, void *arg)
diff --git a/include/linux/of_platform.h b/include/linux/of_platform.h
index 956a100..dc8224a 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_platform.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_platform.h
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ extern int of_platform_default_populate(struct device_node *root,
 					const struct of_dev_auxdata *lookup,
 					struct device *parent);
 extern void of_platform_depopulate(struct device *parent);
+
+extern int devm_of_platform_populate(struct device *dev);
+
+extern void devm_of_platform_depopulate(struct device *dev);
 #else
 static inline int of_platform_populate(struct device_node *root,
 					const struct of_device_id *matches,
@@ -91,6 +95,13 @@ static inline int of_platform_default_populate(struct device_node *root,
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
 static inline void of_platform_depopulate(struct device *parent) { }
+
+static inline int devm_of_platform_populate(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+static inline void devm_of_platform_depopulate(struct device *dev) { }
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) && defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS)
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Benjamin Gaignard]

Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
bind/unbind.

In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
from the bus.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
---
version 2:
- simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter

 drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index b8064bc..f5bbb50 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -571,6 +571,77 @@ void of_platform_depopulate(struct device *parent)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_platform_depopulate);
 
+static void devm_of_platform_populate_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
+{
+	of_platform_depopulate(*(struct device **)res);
+}
+
+/**
+ * devm_of_platform_populate() - Populate platform_devices from device tree data
+ * @dev: device that requested to populate from device tree data
+ *
+ * Similar to of_platform_populate(), but will automatically call
+ * of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound from the bus.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success, < 0 on failure.
+ */
+int devm_of_platform_populate(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct device **ptr;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!dev)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ptr = devres_alloc(devm_of_platform_populate_release,
+			   sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ptr)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = of_platform_populate(dev->of_node, NULL, NULL, dev);
+	if (ret) {
+		devres_free(ptr);
+	} else {
+		*ptr = dev;
+		devres_add(dev, ptr);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_platform_populate);
+
+static int devm_of_platform_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data)
+{
+	struct device **ptr = res;
+
+	if (!ptr) {
+		WARN_ON(!ptr);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return *ptr == data;
+}
+
+/**
+ * devm_of_platform_depopulate() - Remove devices populated from device tree
+ * @dev: device that requested to depopulate from device tree data
+ *
+ * Complementary to devm_of_platform_populate(), this function removes children
+ * of the given device (and, recurrently, their children) that have been
+ * created from their respective device tree nodes (and only those,
+ * leaving others - eg. manually created - unharmed).
+ */
+void devm_of_platform_depopulate(struct device *dev)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = devres_release(dev, devm_of_platform_populate_release,
+			     devm_of_platform_match, dev);
+
+	WARN_ON(ret);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_platform_depopulate);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC
 static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 				unsigned long action, void *arg)
diff --git a/include/linux/of_platform.h b/include/linux/of_platform.h
index 956a100..dc8224a 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_platform.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_platform.h
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ extern int of_platform_default_populate(struct device_node *root,
 					const struct of_dev_auxdata *lookup,
 					struct device *parent);
 extern void of_platform_depopulate(struct device *parent);
+
+extern int devm_of_platform_populate(struct device *dev);
+
+extern void devm_of_platform_depopulate(struct device *dev);
 #else
 static inline int of_platform_populate(struct device_node *root,
 					const struct of_device_id *matches,
@@ -91,6 +95,13 @@ static inline int of_platform_default_populate(struct device_node *root,
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
 static inline void of_platform_depopulate(struct device *parent) { }
+
+static inline int devm_of_platform_populate(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+static inline void devm_of_platform_depopulate(struct device *dev) { }
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) && defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS)
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[PATCH v2 2/2] drm: sti: make driver use devm_of_platform_populate()

[Benjamin Gaignard]

This make sure that of_platform_depopulate() is called if an error
occur in probe after populating the date from the device tree.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
---
version 2:
- use simplified devm_of_platform_populate function prototype

 drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
index ff71e25..b26b1bc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static int sti_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
 
-	of_platform_populate(node, NULL, NULL, dev);
+	devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
 
 	child_np = of_get_next_available_child(node, NULL);
 
@@ -454,7 +454,6 @@ static int sti_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static int sti_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	component_master_del(&pdev->dev, &sti_ops);
-	of_platform_depopulate(&pdev->dev);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH v2 2/2] drm: sti: make driver use devm_of_platform_populate()

[Benjamin Gaignard]

This make sure that of_platform_depopulate() is called if an error
occur in probe after populating the date from the device tree.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
---
version 2:
- use simplified devm_of_platform_populate function prototype

 drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
index ff71e25..b26b1bc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static int sti_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
 
-	of_platform_populate(node, NULL, NULL, dev);
+	devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
 
 	child_np = of_get_next_available_child(node, NULL);
 
@@ -454,7 +454,6 @@ static int sti_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static int sti_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	component_master_del(&pdev->dev, &sti_ops);
-	of_platform_depopulate(&pdev->dev);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Benjamin Gaignard
<benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> wrote:
> Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
> to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
> bind/unbind.
>
> In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
> which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
> from the bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
> ---
> version 2:
> - simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
>
>  drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)

For this and patch 2:

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Rob

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Rob Herring]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Benjamin Gaignard
<benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> wrote:
> Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
> to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
> bind/unbind.
>
> In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
> which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
> from the bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
> ---
> version 2:
> - simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
>
>  drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)

For this and patch 2:

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Rob
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:31:25AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Benjamin Gaignard
> <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
> > to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
> > bind/unbind.
> >
> > In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
> > which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
> > from the bus.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > version 2:
> > - simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
> >
> >  drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
> >  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
> 
> For this and patch 2:
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Is this an ack for merging both through drm-misc, or should we do a
topic-branch dance here?

/me not sure anymore what we discussed here already

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:31:25AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Benjamin Gaignard
> <benjamin.gaignard-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
> > to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
> > bind/unbind.
> >
> > In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
> > which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
> > from the bus.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > version 2:
> > - simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
> >
> >  drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
> >  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
> 
> For this and patch 2:
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Is this an ack for merging both through drm-misc, or should we do a
topic-branch dance here?

/me not sure anymore what we discussed here already

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Rob Herring]

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:31:25AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Benjamin Gaignard
>> <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
>> > to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
>> > bind/unbind.
>> >
>> > In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
>> > which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
>> > from the bus.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
>> > ---
>> > version 2:
>> > - simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
>> >
>> >  drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
>> >  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
>>
>> For this and patch 2:
>>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>
> Is this an ack for merging both through drm-misc, or should we do a
> topic-branch dance here?

You can apply it directly.

Rob

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Rob Herring]

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:31:25AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Benjamin Gaignard
>> <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
>> > to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
>> > bind/unbind.
>> >
>> > In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
>> > which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
>> > from the bus.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
>> > ---
>> > version 2:
>> > - simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
>> >
>> >  drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
>> >  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
>>
>> For this and patch 2:
>>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>
> Is this an ack for merging both through drm-misc, or should we do a
> topic-branch dance here?

You can apply it directly.

Rob
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 07:30:24AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:31:25AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Benjamin Gaignard
> >> <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> > Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
> >> > to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
> >> > bind/unbind.
> >> >
> >> > In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
> >> > which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
> >> > from the bus.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
> >> > ---
> >> > version 2:
> >> > - simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
> >> >
> >> >  drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
> >> >  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> For this and patch 2:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >
> > Is this an ack for merging both through drm-misc, or should we do a
> > topic-branch dance here?
> 
> You can apply it directly.

Ok, this seems like a pretty cool idea, so applied both to drm-misc for
4.12.

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: add devm_ functions for populate and depopulate

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 07:30:24AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:31:25AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Benjamin Gaignard
> >> <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> > Lots of calls to of_platform_populate() are not unbalanced by a call
> >> > to of_platform_depopulate(). This create issues while drivers are
> >> > bind/unbind.
> >> >
> >> > In way to solve those issues is to add devm_of_platform_populate()
> >> > which will call of_platform_depopulate() when the device is unbound
> >> > from the bus.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
> >> > ---
> >> > version 2:
> >> > - simplify function prototype to only keep device as parameter
> >> >
> >> >  drivers/of/platform.c       | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  include/linux/of_platform.h | 11 +++++++
> >> >  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> For this and patch 2:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >
> > Is this an ack for merging both through drm-misc, or should we do a
> > topic-branch dance here?
> 
> You can apply it directly.

Ok, this seems like a pretty cool idea, so applied both to drm-misc for
4.12.

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel