All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* any YP machines or functionality that still require uImage creation?
@ 2017-03-16 10:58 Robert P. J. Day
  2017-03-16 21:01 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2017-03-16 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yocto discussion list


  i just noticed that the machine config file for mpc8315e-rdb still
lists "uImage" as the default image type:

KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage"
IMAGE_BOOT_FILES ?= "u-boot.bin uImage uImage-mpc8315erdb.dtb;dtb"

is there anything about that target that still *requires* uImage
creation, as opposed to zImage?

  given that uImage is considered u-boot's "legacy" format, is there
any drawback to making zImage the default image type, and letting
folks drop back to uImage if they choose?

  put another way, is there anything that currently *ever* requires
the creation/use of a uImage format?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: any YP machines or functionality that still require uImage creation?
  2017-03-16 10:58 any YP machines or functionality that still require uImage creation? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2017-03-16 21:01 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2017-03-16 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Yocto discussion list

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:58:17AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   i just noticed that the machine config file for mpc8315e-rdb still
> lists "uImage" as the default image type:
> 
> KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "uImage"
> IMAGE_BOOT_FILES ?= "u-boot.bin uImage uImage-mpc8315erdb.dtb;dtb"
> 
> is there anything about that target that still *requires* uImage
> creation, as opposed to zImage?
> 
>   given that uImage is considered u-boot's "legacy" format, is there
> any drawback to making zImage the default image type, and letting
> folks drop back to uImage if they choose?
> 
>   put another way, is there anything that currently *ever* requires
> the creation/use of a uImage format?

There are some boot methods/use-cases that only work with uImage. Not sure if 
that's the case with mpc8315e-rdb though...

-- 
Denys


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-16 21:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-16 10:58 any YP machines or functionality that still require uImage creation? Robert P. J. Day
2017-03-16 21:01 ` Denys Dmytriyenko

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.