[Buildroot] [Patch v2] [PATCH 1/2] xenomai: bump version to 3.0.3

[Buildroot] [Patch v2] [PATCH 1/2] xenomai: bump version to 3.0.3

[Pawel Sikora]

change in v2:
Squashing commits regarding removing patch for version 2.6.4
and bumping version to 3.0.3. Corrected commit message.

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] xenomai: bump version to 3.0.3

[Pawel Sikora]

Bump Xenomai version to 3.0.3,
Remove patch 0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch for version 2.6.4,
as it is already included in upstream

Signed-off-by: Pawel Sikora <sikor6@gmail.com>
---
 .../xenomai/0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch  | 62 ----------------------
 package/xenomai/xenomai.hash                       |  2 +-
 package/xenomai/xenomai.mk                         |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 package/xenomai/0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch

diff --git a/package/xenomai/0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch b/package/xenomai/0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 376bd21c3..000000000
--- a/package/xenomai/0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-From 2a96c8bbe19a193d9ae6d0780fc274abc4df03e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
-Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 19:09:00 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] bfin: remove inline keyword
-
-Xenomai user space tools fail to build for bfin target since it's
-provide it's own pthread_atfork(), shm_open() and shm_unlink()
-definition using the inline keyword and weak attribute.
-
-With gcc 5+ the weak attribute is discarded by the inline keyword,
-so each symbol are global and are redefined several time while
-linking.
-
-Fixes:
-http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/0c2/0c2e5eb4edd4f9427f61d3c9b67a12a7a0e24140
-
-Patch status: upstream,
-https://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-2.6.git/commit/?id=917dcebb26ec492f276cdc3b55867aa90e01fa12
-
-Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>
----
- include/asm-blackfin/syscall.h | 10 +++++-----
- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/include/asm-blackfin/syscall.h b/include/asm-blackfin/syscall.h
-index 9eda8b9..b5728b5 100644
---- a/include/asm-blackfin/syscall.h
-+++ b/include/asm-blackfin/syscall.h
-@@ -132,9 +132,9 @@ static inline int __xn_interrupted_p(struct pt_regs *regs)
- #define XENOMAI_SKINCALL5(id,op,a1,a2,a3,a4,a5) XENOMAI_DO_SYSCALL(5,id,op,a1,a2,a3,a4,a5)
- 
- /* uClibc does not provide pthread_atfork() for this arch; provide it
--   here. Note: let the compiler decides whether it wants to actually
--   inline this routine, i.e. do not force always_inline. */
--inline __attribute__((weak)) int pthread_atfork(void (*prepare)(void),
-+   here.
-+*/
-+__attribute__((weak)) int pthread_atfork(void (*prepare)(void),
- 						void (*parent)(void),
- 						void (*child)(void))
- {
-@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ inline __attribute__((weak)) int pthread_atfork(void (*prepare)(void),
- 
- #include <errno.h>
- 
--inline __attribute__((weak)) int shm_open(const char *name,
-+__attribute__((weak)) int shm_open(const char *name,
- 					  int oflag,
- 					  mode_t mode)
- {
-@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ inline __attribute__((weak)) int shm_open(const char *name,
- 	return -1;
- }
- 
--inline __attribute__((weak)) int shm_unlink(const char *name)
-+__attribute__((weak)) int shm_unlink(const char *name)
- {
- 	errno = ENOSYS;
- 	return -1;
--- 
-2.5.5
-
diff --git a/package/xenomai/xenomai.hash b/package/xenomai/xenomai.hash
index 4d74472ee..e41859343 100644
--- a/package/xenomai/xenomai.hash
+++ b/package/xenomai/xenomai.hash
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 # Locally computed;
-sha256  b6ff723cb0f3b1c2c4e15bccfd114b248dea1b4164a0ac0e612815379ce7caf8  xenomai-2.6.4.tar.bz2
+sha256  4c396b4d447efd414c4d7c0894f97ef52b4ec45c87f512c14adee981a45f0e3b  xenomai-3.0.3.tar.bz2
diff --git a/package/xenomai/xenomai.mk b/package/xenomai/xenomai.mk
index 6e0e44163..28875b944 100644
--- a/package/xenomai/xenomai.mk
+++ b/package/xenomai/xenomai.mk
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 XENOMAI_VERSION = $(call qstrip,$(BR2_PACKAGE_XENOMAI_VERSION))
 ifeq ($(XENOMAI_VERSION),)
-XENOMAI_VERSION = 2.6.4
+XENOMAI_VERSION = 3.0.3
 else
 BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR += $(XENOMAI_SOURCE)
 endif
-- 
2.12.0

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] xenomai: bump version to 3.0.3

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:51:37 +0100, Pawel Sikora wrote:
> Bump Xenomai version to 3.0.3,
> Remove patch 0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch for version 2.6.4,
> as it is already included in upstream
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Sikora <sikor6@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../xenomai/0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch  | 62 ----------------------
>  package/xenomai/xenomai.hash                       |  2 +-
>  package/xenomai/xenomai.mk                         |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 package/xenomai/0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch

This wasn't building properly with gcc 6.x, so I've added a patch to
fix this, and then applied.

At some point, it would be nice to support the "Mercury" variant of
Xenomai 3, but that can be done through additional patches.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] xenomai: bump version to 3.0.3

[Pawel Sikora]

Hi,


> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:51:37 +0100, Pawel Sikora wrote:
> > Bump Xenomai version to 3.0.3,
> > Remove patch 0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch for version 2.6.4,
> > as it is already included in upstream
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pawel Sikora <sikor6@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  .../xenomai/0001-bfin-remove-inline-keyword.patch  | 62
> ----------------------
> >  package/xenomai/xenomai.hash                       |  2 +-
> >  package/xenomai/xenomai.mk                         |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 package/xenomai/0001-bfin-
> remove-inline-keyword.patch
>
> This wasn't building properly with gcc 6.x, so I've added a patch to
> fix this, and then applied.
>
> At some point, it would be nice to support the "Mercury" variant of
> Xenomai 3, but that can be done through additional patches.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
>


Ok, thanks ;-)

I am thinking right now about some good solution about configs regarding
choosing
Xenomai core. I will present a patch when it is ready and invite you for
the discussion ;-)

Kind Regards,
Pawel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20170328/69de4548/attachment.html>