All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: xpang@redhat.com, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Atsushi Kumagai <ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] kexec: Move vmcoreinfo out of the kernel's .bss section
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:46:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170323184631.1cd671ba@TP-holzheu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58D39429.9020200@redhat.com>

Am Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:23:53 +0800
schrieb Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>:

> On 03/23/2017 at 04:48 AM, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > Am Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:30:04 +0800
> > schrieb Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>:
> >
> >> On 03/21/17 at 10:18pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>> Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> writes:
> >>>
> > [snip]
> >
> >>>> I think makedumpfile is using it, but I also vote to remove the
> >>>> CRASHTIME. It is better not to do this while crashing and a makedumpfile
> >>>> userspace patch is needed to drop the use of it.
> >>>>
> >>>>> As we are looking at reliability concerns removing CRASHTIME should make
> >>>>> everything in vmcoreinfo a boot time constant.  Which should simplify
> >>>>> everything considerably.
> >>>> It is a nice improvement..
> >>> We also need to take a close look at what s390 is doing with vmcoreinfo.
> >>> As apparently it is reading it in a different kind of crashdump process.
> >> Yes, need careful review from s390 and maybe ppc64 especially about
> >> patch 2/3, better to have comments from IBM about s390 dump tool and ppc
> >> fadump. Added more cc.
> > On s390 we have at least an issue with patch 1/3. For stand-alone dump
> > and also because we create the ELF header for kdump in the new
> > kernel we save the pointer to the vmcoreinfo note in the old kernel on a
> > defined memory address in our absolute zero lowcore.
> >
> > This is done in arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:
> >
> > static void __init setup_vmcoreinfo(void)
> > {
> >         mem_assign_absolute(S390_lowcore.vmcore_info, paddr_vmcoreinfo_note());
> > }
> >
> > Since with patch 1/3 paddr_vmcoreinfo_note() returns NULL at this point in
> > time we have a problem here.
> >
> > To solve this - I think - we could move the initialization to
> > arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec.c:
> >
> > void arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void)
> > {
> >         VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(lowcore_ptr);
> >         VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(high_memory);
> >         VMCOREINFO_LENGTH(lowcore_ptr, NR_CPUS);
> >         mem_assign_absolute(S390_lowcore.vmcore_info, paddr_vmcoreinfo_note());
> > }
> >
> > Probably related to this is my observation that patch 3/3 leads to
> > an empty VMCOREINFO note for kdump on s390. The note is there ...
> >
> > # readelf -n /var/crash/127.0.0.1-2017-03-22-21:14:39/vmcore | grep VMCORE
> >   VMCOREINFO           0x0000068e       Unknown note type: (0x00000000)
> >
> > But it contains only zeros.
> 
> Yes, this is a good catch, I will do more tests.

Hello Xunlei,

After spending some time on this, I now understood the problem:

In patch 3/3 you copy vmcoreinfo into the control page before
machine_kexec_prepare() is called. For s390 we give back all the
crashkernel memory to the hypervisor before the new crashkernel
is loaded:

/*
 * Give back memory to hypervisor before new kdump is loaded
 */
static int machine_kexec_prepare_kdump(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
        if (MACHINE_IS_VM)
                diag10_range(PFN_DOWN(crashk_res.start),
                             PFN_DOWN(crashk_res.end - crashk_res.start + 1));
        return 0;
#else
        return -EINVAL;
#endif
}

So after machine_kexec_prepare_kdump() the contents of your control page
is gone and therefore the vmcorinfo ELF note contains only zeros.

If you call kimage_crash_copy_vmcoreinfo() after
machine_kexec_prepare_kdump() the problem should be solved for s390.

Regards
Michael

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	xpang@redhat.com, Atsushi Kumagai <ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] kexec: Move vmcoreinfo out of the kernel's .bss section
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:46:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170323184631.1cd671ba@TP-holzheu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58D39429.9020200@redhat.com>

Am Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:23:53 +0800
schrieb Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>:

> On 03/23/2017 at 04:48 AM, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > Am Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:30:04 +0800
> > schrieb Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>:
> >
> >> On 03/21/17 at 10:18pm, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>> Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> writes:
> >>>
> > [snip]
> >
> >>>> I think makedumpfile is using it, but I also vote to remove the
> >>>> CRASHTIME. It is better not to do this while crashing and a makedumpfile
> >>>> userspace patch is needed to drop the use of it.
> >>>>
> >>>>> As we are looking at reliability concerns removing CRASHTIME should make
> >>>>> everything in vmcoreinfo a boot time constant.  Which should simplify
> >>>>> everything considerably.
> >>>> It is a nice improvement..
> >>> We also need to take a close look at what s390 is doing with vmcoreinfo.
> >>> As apparently it is reading it in a different kind of crashdump process.
> >> Yes, need careful review from s390 and maybe ppc64 especially about
> >> patch 2/3, better to have comments from IBM about s390 dump tool and ppc
> >> fadump. Added more cc.
> > On s390 we have at least an issue with patch 1/3. For stand-alone dump
> > and also because we create the ELF header for kdump in the new
> > kernel we save the pointer to the vmcoreinfo note in the old kernel on a
> > defined memory address in our absolute zero lowcore.
> >
> > This is done in arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:
> >
> > static void __init setup_vmcoreinfo(void)
> > {
> >         mem_assign_absolute(S390_lowcore.vmcore_info, paddr_vmcoreinfo_note());
> > }
> >
> > Since with patch 1/3 paddr_vmcoreinfo_note() returns NULL at this point in
> > time we have a problem here.
> >
> > To solve this - I think - we could move the initialization to
> > arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec.c:
> >
> > void arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo(void)
> > {
> >         VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(lowcore_ptr);
> >         VMCOREINFO_SYMBOL(high_memory);
> >         VMCOREINFO_LENGTH(lowcore_ptr, NR_CPUS);
> >         mem_assign_absolute(S390_lowcore.vmcore_info, paddr_vmcoreinfo_note());
> > }
> >
> > Probably related to this is my observation that patch 3/3 leads to
> > an empty VMCOREINFO note for kdump on s390. The note is there ...
> >
> > # readelf -n /var/crash/127.0.0.1-2017-03-22-21:14:39/vmcore | grep VMCORE
> >   VMCOREINFO           0x0000068e       Unknown note type: (0x00000000)
> >
> > But it contains only zeros.
> 
> Yes, this is a good catch, I will do more tests.

Hello Xunlei,

After spending some time on this, I now understood the problem:

In patch 3/3 you copy vmcoreinfo into the control page before
machine_kexec_prepare() is called. For s390 we give back all the
crashkernel memory to the hypervisor before the new crashkernel
is loaded:

/*
 * Give back memory to hypervisor before new kdump is loaded
 */
static int machine_kexec_prepare_kdump(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
        if (MACHINE_IS_VM)
                diag10_range(PFN_DOWN(crashk_res.start),
                             PFN_DOWN(crashk_res.end - crashk_res.start + 1));
        return 0;
#else
        return -EINVAL;
#endif
}

So after machine_kexec_prepare_kdump() the contents of your control page
is gone and therefore the vmcorinfo ELF note contains only zeros.

If you call kimage_crash_copy_vmcoreinfo() after
machine_kexec_prepare_kdump() the problem should be solved for s390.

Regards
Michael


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-23 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-20  5:50 [PATCH v3 1/3] kexec: Move vmcoreinfo out of the kernel's .bss section Xunlei Pang
2017-03-20  5:50 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-20  5:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/fadump: Use the correct VMCOREINFO_NOTE_SIZE for phdr Xunlei Pang
2017-03-20  5:50   ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-20  5:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] kdump: Relocate vmcoreinfo to the crash memory range Xunlei Pang
2017-03-20  5:50   ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-21  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] kexec: Move vmcoreinfo out of the kernel's .bss section Eric W. Biederman
2017-03-21  3:33   ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-03-22  2:55   ` Dave Young
2017-03-22  2:55     ` Dave Young
2017-03-22  3:18     ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-03-22  3:18       ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-03-22  4:30       ` Dave Young
2017-03-22  4:30         ` Dave Young
2017-03-22  9:34         ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-22  9:34           ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-22 12:15           ` Hari Bathini
2017-03-22 12:15             ` Hari Bathini
2017-03-22 11:46         ` Hari Bathini
2017-03-22 11:46           ` Hari Bathini
2017-03-22 20:48         ` Michael Holzheu
2017-03-22 20:48           ` Michael Holzheu
2017-03-23  9:23           ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-23  9:23             ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-23 17:46             ` Michael Holzheu [this message]
2017-03-23 17:46               ` Michael Holzheu
2017-03-24 11:03               ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-24 11:03                 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-22  8:55   ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-22  8:55     ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-22  9:16     ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-22  9:16       ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-22  9:17     ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-22  9:17       ` Xunlei Pang
2017-03-21  9:27 ` Petr Tesarik
2017-03-21  9:27   ` Petr Tesarik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170323184631.1cd671ba@TP-holzheu \
    --to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ats-kumagai@wm.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    --cc=xpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.