All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@163.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf V2] netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix a race when walk the nf_ct_helper_hash table
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:37:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324113749.GA2264@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490279819-31239-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com>

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:36:59PM +0800, Liping Zhang wrote:
> From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
> 
> The nf_ct_helper_hash table is protected by nf_ct_helper_mutex, while
> nfct_helper operation is protected by nfnl_lock(NFNL_SUBSYS_CTHELPER).
> So it's possible that one CPU is walking the nf_ct_helper_hash for
> cthelper add/get/del, another cpu is doing nf_conntrack_helpers_unregister
> at the same time. This is dangrous, and may cause use after free error.
> 
> Note, delete operation will flush all cthelpers added via nfnetlink, so
> using rcu to do protect is not easy.
> 
> Now introduce a dummy list to record all the cthelpers added via
> nfnetlink, then we can walk the dummy list instead of walking the
> nf_ct_helper_hash. Also, keep nfnl_cthelper_dump_table unchanged, it
> may be invoked without nfnl_lock(NFNL_SUBSYS_CTHELPER) held.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
> ---
>  V2: rebase on the latest nf tree
> 
>  net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c
> index 2b987d2..304aab8 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cthelper.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,13 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>");
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("nfnl_cthelper: User-space connection tracking helpers");
>  
> +struct nfnl_cthelper {
> +	struct list_head		list;
> +	struct nf_conntrack_helper	*helper;
> +};

I overlook this. Any reason for not using this declaration instead?

struct nfnl_cthelper {
	struct list_head		list;
	struct nf_conntrack_helper	helper;
};

We would simplify this a bit as the helper would be embedded into the
new nfnl_cthelper structure.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-24 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 14:36 [PATCH nf V2] netfilter: nfnl_cthelper: fix a race when walk the nf_ct_helper_hash table Liping Zhang
2017-03-24 11:37 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-03-24 11:56   ` Liping Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170324113749.GA2264@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlpnobody@163.com \
    --cc=zlpnobody@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.