All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* split the reflink remap from the block allocation path
@ 2017-04-03 12:11 Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2017-04-03 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

We've run into various problems due to the fact that the reflink remap
code reuses the xfs_bmapi_write codepath for setting up the extent list
entries and abuses the firstblock field for that purpose.

This series fixes this by creating an entirely separate xfs_bmapi_remap
path that is much simpler than xfs_bmapi_write and does not need to
overload the firstblock field.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: split the reflink remap from the block allocation path
  2017-04-03 12:18 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2017-04-10  7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2017-04-10  7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

Any chance to get some reviews on this series?

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:18:27PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We've run into various problems due to the fact that the reflink remap
> code reuses the xfs_bmapi_write codepath for setting up the extent list
> entries and abuses the firstblock field for that purpose.
> 
> This series fixes this by creating an entirely separate xfs_bmapi_remap
> path that is much simpler than xfs_bmapi_write and does not need to
> overload the firstblock field.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
---end quoted text---

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* split the reflink remap from the block allocation path
@ 2017-04-03 12:18 Christoph Hellwig
  2017-04-10  7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2017-04-03 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

We've run into various problems due to the fact that the reflink remap
code reuses the xfs_bmapi_write codepath for setting up the extent list
entries and abuses the firstblock field for that purpose.

This series fixes this by creating an entirely separate xfs_bmapi_remap
path that is much simpler than xfs_bmapi_write and does not need to
overload the firstblock field.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* split the reflink remap from the block allocation path
@ 2017-04-03 12:10 Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2017-04-03 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-xfs

We've run into various problems due to the fact that the reflink remap
code reuses the xfs_bmapi_write codepath for setting up the extent list
entries and abuses the firstblock field for that purpose.

This series fixes this by creating an entirely separate xfs_bmapi_remap
path that is much simpler than xfs_bmapi_write and does not need to
overload the firstblock field.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-10  7:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-03 12:11 split the reflink remap from the block allocation path Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-03 12:18 Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10  7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 12:10 Christoph Hellwig

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.