linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the s390 tree

linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the s390 tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  arch/s390/Kconfig

between commit:

  59cea29a34eb ("s390: remove HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID select statement")

from the s390 tree and commit:

  37df4b8ce129 ("HAVE_ARCH_HARDENED_USERCOPY is unconditional now")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/s390/Kconfig
index 249c2771be0e,b8b143432381..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@@ -124,7 -123,7 +124,6 @@@ config S39
  	select GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL
  	select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE if SLUB
  	select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
- 	select HAVE_ARCH_HARDENED_USERCOPY
 -	select HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
  	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
  	select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS if !HAVE_MARCH_Z9_109_FEATURES
  	select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER

linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the s390 tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1382 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  arch/s390/include/asm/checksum.h

between commit:

  98ad45fb58c1 ("s390/checksum: coding style changes")

from the s390 tree and commit:

  6e41c585e38f ("unify generic instances of csum_partial_copy_nocheck()")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/s390/include/asm/checksum.h
index c401a5fd3ad2,6813bfa1eeb7..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/checksum.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/checksum.h
@@@ -39,15 -39,8 +39,8 @@@ static inline __wsum csum_partial(cons
  	return sum;
  }
  
- static inline __wsum csum_partial_copy_nocheck(const void *src, void *dst,
- 					       int len, __wsum sum)
- {
- 	memcpy(dst, src, len);
- 	return csum_partial(dst, len, sum);
- }
- 
  /*
 - *      Fold a partial checksum without adding pseudo headers
 + * Fold a partial checksum without adding pseudo headers.
   */
  static inline __sum16 csum_fold(__wsum sum)
  {

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the s390 tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/s390/char/zcore.c

between commit:

  ffa52d02c50e ("s390/zcore: remove /sys/kernel/debug/zcore/mem")

from the s390 tree and commit:

  41fb31e4f962 ("new helper: no_seek_end_llseek()")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (the former removed the code modifie by the latter, so I
did that) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au