All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier
	<mathieu.poirier-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Wei Xu <xuwei5-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Andy Gross <andy.gross-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	David Brown <david.brown-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] coresight: use const for device_node structures
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:13:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418231327.GA8524@leoy-linaro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170418152447.GB22806-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Hi Mathieu,

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:24:47AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:30:58PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Almost low level functions from open firmware have used const to
> > qualify device_node structures, so add const for device_node
> > parameters in of_coresight related functions.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> 
> I agree with these changes but the patch needs to be split up - please see
> below.
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/coresight.h                  | 8 ++++----
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > index 78d2399..46eec0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ of_coresight_get_endpoint_device(struct device_node *endpoint)
> >  			       endpoint, of_dev_node_match);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void of_coresight_get_ports(struct device_node *node,
> > +static void of_coresight_get_ports(const struct device_node *node,
> >  				   int *nr_inport, int *nr_outport)
> 
> Move this to a patch by itself as it is not related to this driver.
> 
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *ep = NULL;
> > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
> > +int of_coresight_get_cpu(const struct device_node *node)
> 
> Move this to the previous patch in this set.  There is not need to undo what you
> just did there.
> 
> >  {
> >  	int cpu;
> >  	bool found;
> > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_coresight_get_cpu);
> >  
> >  struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> > -				struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> > +			struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node)
> 
> Same here, move this to a new patch (the same one as of_coresight_get_ports()).

Yeah, this is better than my form. Will change.

Thanks,
Leo Yan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
	David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] coresight: use const for device_node structures
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:13:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418231327.GA8524@leoy-linaro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170418152447.GB22806@linaro.org>

Hi Mathieu,

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:24:47AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:30:58PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Almost low level functions from open firmware have used const to
> > qualify device_node structures, so add const for device_node
> > parameters in of_coresight related functions.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> 
> I agree with these changes but the patch needs to be split up - please see
> below.
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/coresight.h                  | 8 ++++----
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > index 78d2399..46eec0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ of_coresight_get_endpoint_device(struct device_node *endpoint)
> >  			       endpoint, of_dev_node_match);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void of_coresight_get_ports(struct device_node *node,
> > +static void of_coresight_get_ports(const struct device_node *node,
> >  				   int *nr_inport, int *nr_outport)
> 
> Move this to a patch by itself as it is not related to this driver.
> 
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *ep = NULL;
> > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
> > +int of_coresight_get_cpu(const struct device_node *node)
> 
> Move this to the previous patch in this set.  There is not need to undo what you
> just did there.
> 
> >  {
> >  	int cpu;
> >  	bool found;
> > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_coresight_get_cpu);
> >  
> >  struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> > -				struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> > +			struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node)
> 
> Same here, move this to a new patch (the same one as of_coresight_get_ports()).

Yeah, this is better than my form. Will change.

Thanks,
Leo Yan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: leo.yan@linaro.org (Leo Yan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 5/8] coresight: use const for device_node structures
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:13:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418231327.GA8524@leoy-linaro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170418152447.GB22806@linaro.org>

Hi Mathieu,

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:24:47AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:30:58PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Almost low level functions from open firmware have used const to
> > qualify device_node structures, so add const for device_node
> > parameters in of_coresight related functions.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> 
> I agree with these changes but the patch needs to be split up - please see
> below.
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c | 6 +++---
> >  include/linux/coresight.h                  | 8 ++++----
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > index 78d2399..46eec0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/of_coresight.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ of_coresight_get_endpoint_device(struct device_node *endpoint)
> >  			       endpoint, of_dev_node_match);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void of_coresight_get_ports(struct device_node *node,
> > +static void of_coresight_get_ports(const struct device_node *node,
> >  				   int *nr_inport, int *nr_outport)
> 
> Move this to a patch by itself as it is not related to this driver.
> 
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *ep = NULL;
> > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int of_coresight_alloc_memory(struct device *dev,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
> > +int of_coresight_get_cpu(const struct device_node *node)
> 
> Move this to the previous patch in this set.  There is not need to undo what you
> just did there.
> 
> >  {
> >  	int cpu;
> >  	bool found;
> > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ int of_coresight_get_cpu(struct device_node *node)
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_coresight_get_cpu);
> >  
> >  struct coresight_platform_data *of_get_coresight_platform_data(
> > -				struct device *dev, struct device_node *node)
> > +			struct device *dev, const struct device_node *node)
> 
> Same here, move this to a new patch (the same one as of_coresight_get_ports()).

Yeah, this is better than my form. Will change.

Thanks,
Leo Yan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-18 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-06 13:30 [PATCH v6 0/8] coresight: enable debug module Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30 ` Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30 ` Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] coresight: bindings for CPU " Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30   ` Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] doc: Add documentation for Coresight CPU debug Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30   ` Leo Yan
     [not found]   ` <1491485461-22800-3-git-send-email-leo.yan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-19 17:25     ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 17:25       ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 17:25       ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-06 13:30 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] coresight: of_get_coresight_platform_data: Add missing of_node_put Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30   ` Leo Yan
2017-04-18 15:09   ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-18 15:09     ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-06 13:30 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] coresight: refactor with function of_coresight_get_cpu Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30   ` Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] coresight: use const for device_node structures Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30   ` Leo Yan
     [not found]   ` <1491485461-22800-6-git-send-email-leo.yan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 15:24     ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-18 15:24       ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-18 15:24       ` Mathieu Poirier
     [not found]       ` <20170418152447.GB22806-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 23:13         ` Leo Yan [this message]
2017-04-18 23:13           ` Leo Yan
2017-04-18 23:13           ` Leo Yan
     [not found] ` <1491485461-22800-1-git-send-email-leo.yan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-06 13:30   ` [PATCH v6 6/8] coresight: add support for CPU debug module Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30     ` Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:30     ` Leo Yan
     [not found]     ` <1491485461-22800-7-git-send-email-leo.yan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-18 17:40       ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-18 17:40         ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-18 17:40         ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19  0:18         ` Leo Yan
2017-04-19  0:18           ` Leo Yan
2017-04-19 14:52           ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 14:52             ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 14:52             ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 15:30             ` Leo Yan
2017-04-19 15:30               ` Leo Yan
2017-04-19 15:30               ` Leo Yan
2017-04-19 16:50               ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 16:50                 ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 16:50                 ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 13:23     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-04-19 13:23       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-04-19 14:28       ` Leo Yan
2017-04-19 14:28         ` Leo Yan
2017-04-19 14:32         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-04-19 14:32           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-04-19 14:32           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-04-19 15:07           ` Leo Yan
2017-04-19 15:07             ` Leo Yan
2017-04-19 17:49     ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 17:49       ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-19 17:49       ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-04-06 13:31 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] arm64: dts: hi6220: register " Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:31   ` Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:31 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Add debug unit Leo Yan
2017-04-06 13:31   ` Leo Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170418231327.GA8524@leoy-linaro \
    --to=leo.yan-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=andy.gross-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=david.brown-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mike.leach-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=xuwei5-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.