* [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
@ 2017-05-12 0:45 Byungchul Park
2017-05-30 5:29 ` Byungchul Park
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Byungchul Park @ 2017-05-12 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fweisbec; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-team
Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
kernel/irq_work.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index bcf107c..e2ebe8c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -138,11 +138,7 @@ static void irq_work_run_list(struct llist_head *list)
return;
llnode = llist_del_all(list);
- while (llnode != NULL) {
- work = llist_entry(llnode, struct irq_work, llnode);
-
- llnode = llist_next(llnode);
-
+ llist_for_each_entry(work, llnode, llnode) {
/*
* Clear the PENDING bit, after this point the @work
* can be re-used.
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
2017-05-12 0:45 [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API Byungchul Park
@ 2017-05-30 5:29 ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-31 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Byungchul Park @ 2017-05-30 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fweisbec, peterz, mingo, rostedt; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-team
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
+to peterz@infradead.org
+to mingo@kernel.org
+to rostedt@goodmis.org
I am not sure whom should I send this patch to..
Could you check this if you are right person?
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq_work.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
> index bcf107c..e2ebe8c 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
> @@ -138,11 +138,7 @@ static void irq_work_run_list(struct llist_head *list)
> return;
>
> llnode = llist_del_all(list);
> - while (llnode != NULL) {
> - work = llist_entry(llnode, struct irq_work, llnode);
> -
> - llnode = llist_next(llnode);
> -
> + llist_for_each_entry(work, llnode, llnode) {
> /*
> * Clear the PENDING bit, after this point the @work
> * can be re-used.
> --
> 1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
2017-05-30 5:29 ` Byungchul Park
@ 2017-05-31 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-06-01 7:29 ` Byungchul Park
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2017-05-31 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Byungchul Park; +Cc: peterz, mingo, rostedt, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
>
> +to peterz@infradead.org
> +to mingo@kernel.org
> +to rostedt@goodmis.org
>
> I am not sure whom should I send this patch to..
> Could you check this if you are right person?
I'll take it.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
2017-05-31 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2017-06-01 7:29 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-05 2:38 ` Byungchul Park
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Byungchul Park @ 2017-06-01 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker; +Cc: peterz, mingo, rostedt, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
> >
> > +to peterz@infradead.org
> > +to mingo@kernel.org
> > +to rostedt@goodmis.org
> >
> > I am not sure whom should I send this patch to..
> > Could you check this if you are right person?
>
> I'll take it.
Hi, Frederic,
Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
2017-05-31 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-06-01 7:29 ` Byungchul Park
@ 2017-09-05 2:38 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-27 0:00 ` Byungchul Park
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Byungchul Park @ 2017-09-05 2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker; +Cc: peterz, mingo, rostedt, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
> >
> > +to peterz@infradead.org
> > +to mingo@kernel.org
> > +to rostedt@goodmis.org
> >
> > I am not sure whom should I send this patch to..
> > Could you check this if you are right person?
>
> I'll take it.
I would be appriciated if you take this at this window :)
>
> Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
2017-05-31 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-06-01 7:29 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-05 2:38 ` Byungchul Park
@ 2017-09-27 0:00 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-18 5:11 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 5:51 ` Byungchul Park
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Byungchul Park @ 2017-09-27 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker; +Cc: peterz, mingo, rostedt, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
> >
> > +to peterz@infradead.org
> > +to mingo@kernel.org
> > +to rostedt@goodmis.org
> >
> > I am not sure whom should I send this patch to..
> > Could you check this if you are right person?
>
> I'll take it.
Hello,
You seem to have forgotten this. Could you check this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
2017-05-31 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-09-27 0:00 ` Byungchul Park
@ 2017-10-18 5:11 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 5:51 ` Byungchul Park
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Byungchul Park @ 2017-10-18 5:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker; +Cc: peterz, mingo, rostedt, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
> >
> > +to peterz@infradead.org
> > +to mingo@kernel.org
> > +to rostedt@goodmis.org
> >
> > I am not sure whom should I send this patch to..
> > Could you check this if you are right person?
>
> I'll take it.
Hello Frederic,
Any problem to take this?
Thanks,
Byungchul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
2017-05-31 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-10-18 5:11 ` Byungchul Park
@ 2017-10-25 5:51 ` Byungchul Park
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Byungchul Park @ 2017-10-25 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker; +Cc: peterz, mingo, rostedt, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
> >
> > +to peterz@infradead.org
> > +to mingo@kernel.org
> > +to rostedt@goodmis.org
> >
> > I am not sure whom should I send this patch to..
> > Could you check this if you are right person?
>
> I'll take it.
Hello Frederic,
Please let me know if there are some problems with this.
If so, I will request it to others.
Thanks.
> Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-25 5:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-12 0:45 [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API Byungchul Park
2017-05-30 5:29 ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-31 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-06-01 7:29 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-05 2:38 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-27 0:00 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-18 5:11 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 5:51 ` Byungchul Park
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.