All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>, Moni Shoua <monis@mellanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] add the option of fortified string.h functions
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:07:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170602140743.274b9babba6118bfd12c7a26@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170526095404.20439-1-danielmicay@gmail.com>

On Fri, 26 May 2017 05:54:04 -0400 Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> wrote:

> This adds support for compiling with a rough equivalent to the glibc
> _FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 feature, providing compile-time and runtime buffer
> overflow checks for string.h functions when the compiler determines the
> size of the source or destination buffer at compile-time. Unlike glibc,
> it covers buffer reads in addition to writes.

Did we find a bug in drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c?

i386 allmodconfig:

In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:8:0,
                 from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
                 from ./include/linux/mm_types_task.h:13,
                 from ./include/linux/mm_types.h:4,
                 from ./include/linux/kmemcheck.h:4,
                 from ./include/linux/skbuff.h:18,
                 from drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:34:
In function 'memcpy',
    inlined from 'send_atomic_ack.constprop' at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:998:2,
    inlined from 'acknowledge' at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:1026:3,
    inlined from 'rxe_responder' at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:1286:10:
./include/linux/string.h:309:4: error: call to '__read_overflow2' declared with attribute error: detected read beyond size of object passed as 2nd parameter
    __read_overflow2();


If so, can you please interpret this for the infiniband developers?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>, Moni Shoua <monis@mellanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] add the option of fortified string.h functions
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:07:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170602140743.274b9babba6118bfd12c7a26@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170526095404.20439-1-danielmicay@gmail.com>

On Fri, 26 May 2017 05:54:04 -0400 Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> wrote:

> This adds support for compiling with a rough equivalent to the glibc
> _FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 feature, providing compile-time and runtime buffer
> overflow checks for string.h functions when the compiler determines the
> size of the source or destination buffer at compile-time. Unlike glibc,
> it covers buffer reads in addition to writes.

Did we find a bug in drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c?

i386 allmodconfig:

In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:8:0,
                 from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
                 from ./include/linux/mm_types_task.h:13,
                 from ./include/linux/mm_types.h:4,
                 from ./include/linux/kmemcheck.h:4,
                 from ./include/linux/skbuff.h:18,
                 from drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:34:
In function 'memcpy',
    inlined from 'send_atomic_ack.constprop' at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:998:2,
    inlined from 'acknowledge' at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:1026:3,
    inlined from 'rxe_responder' at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:1286:10:
./include/linux/string.h:309:4: error: call to '__read_overflow2' declared with attribute error: detected read beyond size of object passed as 2nd parameter
    __read_overflow2();


If so, can you please interpret this for the infiniband developers?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>, Moni Shoua <monis@mellanox.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v4] add the option of fortified string.h functions
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 14:07:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170602140743.274b9babba6118bfd12c7a26@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170526095404.20439-1-danielmicay@gmail.com>

On Fri, 26 May 2017 05:54:04 -0400 Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> wrote:

> This adds support for compiling with a rough equivalent to the glibc
> _FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 feature, providing compile-time and runtime buffer
> overflow checks for string.h functions when the compiler determines the
> size of the source or destination buffer at compile-time. Unlike glibc,
> it covers buffer reads in addition to writes.

Did we find a bug in drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c?

i386 allmodconfig:

In file included from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:8:0,
                 from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
                 from ./include/linux/mm_types_task.h:13,
                 from ./include/linux/mm_types.h:4,
                 from ./include/linux/kmemcheck.h:4,
                 from ./include/linux/skbuff.h:18,
                 from drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:34:
In function 'memcpy',
    inlined from 'send_atomic_ack.constprop' at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:998:2,
    inlined from 'acknowledge' at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:1026:3,
    inlined from 'rxe_responder' at drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c:1286:10:
./include/linux/string.h:309:4: error: call to '__read_overflow2' declared with attribute error: detected read beyond size of object passed as 2nd parameter
    __read_overflow2();


If so, can you please interpret this for the infiniband developers?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-02 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-26  9:54 [PATCH v4] add the option of fortified string.h functions Daniel Micay
2017-05-26  9:54 ` [kernel-hardening] " Daniel Micay
2017-05-26  9:54 ` Daniel Micay
2017-06-02 21:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-06-02 21:07   ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Morton
2017-06-02 21:07   ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]   ` <20170602140743.274b9babba6118bfd12c7a26-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-02 21:32     ` Daniel Micay
2017-06-02 21:32       ` [kernel-hardening] " Daniel Micay
2017-06-02 21:32       ` Daniel Micay
2017-06-02 21:32       ` Daniel Micay
     [not found]       ` <1496439121.13303.1.camel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-03  5:07         ` Kees Cook
2017-06-03  5:07           ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2017-06-03  5:07           ` Kees Cook
2017-06-03  5:07           ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170602140743.274b9babba6118bfd12c7a26@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=monis@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.