* [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
@ 2017-06-13 13:47 ` Colin King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2017-06-13 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warning:
"symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
be static?"
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
return true;
}
-bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
- struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
+static bool
+cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
+ struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
{
uint32_t cfgcr0;
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
@ 2017-06-13 13:47 ` Colin King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2017-06-13 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warning:
"symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
be static?"
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
return true;
}
-bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
- struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
+static bool
+cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
+ struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
{
uint32_t cfgcr0;
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
@ 2017-06-13 13:47 ` Colin King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2017-06-13 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, David Airlie, intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warning:
"symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
be static?"
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
return true;
}
-bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
- struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
+static bool
+cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
+ struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
{
uint32_t cfgcr0;
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
2017-06-13 13:47 ` Colin King
(?)
(?)
@ 2017-06-13 14:07 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-06-13 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin King; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/25716/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 25716v1 drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/25716/revisions/1/mbox/
Test gem_exec_suspend:
Subgroup basic-s4-devices:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#100125 +1
Test kms_busy:
Subgroup basic-flip-default-b:
dmesg-warn -> FAIL (fi-skl-6700hq) fdo#101144
fdo#100125 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100125
fdo#101144 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101144
fi-bdw-5557u total:278 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11 time:448s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:278 pass:256 dwarn:8 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14 time:437s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:278 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:36 time:577s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:278 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:513s
fi-byt-j1900 total:278 pass:254 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:482s
fi-byt-n2820 total:278 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:480s
fi-glk-2a total:278 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:582s
fi-hsw-4770 total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time:431s
fi-hsw-4770r total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time:413s
fi-ilk-650 total:278 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:50 time:420s
fi-ivb-3520m total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time:484s
fi-ivb-3770 total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time:470s
fi-kbl-7500u total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time:467s
fi-kbl-7560u total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time:575s
fi-kbl-r total:278 pass:259 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time:575s
fi-skl-6260u total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time:459s
fi-skl-6700hq total:278 pass:228 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:27 skip:22 time:408s
fi-skl-6700k total:278 pass:256 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time:479s
fi-skl-6770hq total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time:475s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:278 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13 time:438s
fi-snb-2520m total:278 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:534s
fi-snb-2600 total:278 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:401s
63f3be17429f13293c42de2c6e8ed6f0fc425145 drm-tip: 2017y-06m-13d-08h-33m-44s UTC integration manifest
c1f1fc3 drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4941/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
2017-06-13 13:47 ` Colin King
(?)
@ 2017-06-14 13:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2017-06-14 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin King, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, David Airlie, intel-gfx,
dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> scope, so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> be static?"
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> return true;
> }
>
> -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> - struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static bool
> +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> + struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> {
> uint32_t cfgcr0;
>
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
@ 2017-06-14 13:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2017-06-14 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin King, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, David Airlie, intel-gfx,
dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> scope, so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> be static?"
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> return true;
> }
>
> -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> - struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static bool
> +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> + struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> {
> uint32_t cfgcr0;
>
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
@ 2017-06-14 13:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tvrtko Ursulin @ 2017-06-14 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin King, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, David Airlie, intel-gfx,
dri-devel
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> scope, so make it static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warning:
> "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> be static?"
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> return true;
> }
>
> -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> - struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static bool
> +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> + struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> {
> uint32_t cfgcr0;
>
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
2017-06-14 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
(?)
@ 2017-06-15 13:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-06-15 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: Colin King, Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, David Airlie, intel-gfx,
dri-devel, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> >
> > The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> > scope, so make it static.
> >
> > Cleans up sparse warning:
> > "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> > be static?"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > - struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > +static bool
> > +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > + struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > {
> > uint32_t cfgcr0;
> >
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Thanks for the patch and review. Pushed to dinq.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
@ 2017-06-15 13:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-06-15 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
Daniel Vetter, Colin King
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> >
> > The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> > scope, so make it static.
> >
> > Cleans up sparse warning:
> > "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> > be static?"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > - struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > +static bool
> > +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > + struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > {
> > uint32_t cfgcr0;
> >
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Thanks for the patch and review. Pushed to dinq.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static
@ 2017-06-15 13:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-06-15 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: intel-gfx, kernel-janitors, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
Daniel Vetter, Colin King
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> >
> > The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> > scope, so make it static.
> >
> > Cleans up sparse warning:
> > "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> > be static?"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > - struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > +static bool
> > +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > + struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > {
> > uint32_t cfgcr0;
> >
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Thanks for the patch and review. Pushed to dinq.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-15 13:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-13 13:47 [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static Colin King
2017-06-13 13:47 ` Colin King
2017-06-13 13:47 ` Colin King
2017-06-13 14:07 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-06-14 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-06-14 13:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-06-14 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-06-15 13:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-15 13:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-15 13:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.