From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Cc: Patchwork <patchwork@linuxtv.org>,
sakari.ailus@iki.fi, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org,
pali.rohar@gmail.com, sre@kernel.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org,
aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com,
patrikbachan@gmail.com, serge@hallyn.com, abcloriens@gmail.com
Subject: Re: patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 3 patches updated
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:43:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622194306.GA25853@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622123504.0015c78b@vento.lan>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1311 bytes --]
Hi!
> > > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork:
> > >
> > > * linux-media: [RFC,07/13] v4l2: device_register_subdev_nodes: allow calling multiple times
> > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/39403/
> > > - for: Linux Media kernel patches
> > > was: New
> > > now: Accepted
> >
> > Dear patchwork, I'm not sure on who's behalf you are mailing me. (And
> > that would be really nice to fix.)
>
> Sorry, but patchwork is not smart enough to read and reply
> e-mails yet :-) It is just a dumb robot.
Well, fortunately he's got human helpers :-).
> > If you are writing on Sakari's behalf, all is well.
>
> > If you are writing on someone else's behalf, you may tell that
> > someone to coordinate with Sakari, because he likely has it in his
> > tree already.
>
> From the delatate to: field, it seems that Sakari was the one
> that did the change...
Aha, thanks for the pointer.
> However, patchwork is also dumb enough to not store any info
> about who changed a status (or even to log it)...
Hopefully, patchwork will get smarter one day...
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Cc: Patchwork <patchwork@linuxtv.org>,
sakari.ailus@iki.fi, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org,
pali.rohar@gmail.com, sre@kernel.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org,
aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com,
patrikbachan@gmail.com, serge@hallyn.com, abcloriens@gmail.com
Subject: Re: patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was Re: Patch notification: 3 patches updated
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:43:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622194306.GA25853@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622123504.0015c78b@vento.lan>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1311 bytes --]
Hi!
> > > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork:
> > >
> > > * linux-media: [RFC,07/13] v4l2: device_register_subdev_nodes: allow calling multiple times
> > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/39403/
> > > - for: Linux Media kernel patches
> > > was: New
> > > now: Accepted
> >
> > Dear patchwork, I'm not sure on who's behalf you are mailing me. (And
> > that would be really nice to fix.)
>
> Sorry, but patchwork is not smart enough to read and reply
> e-mails yet :-) It is just a dumb robot.
Well, fortunately he's got human helpers :-).
> > If you are writing on Sakari's behalf, all is well.
>
> > If you are writing on someone else's behalf, you may tell that
> > someone to coordinate with Sakari, because he likely has it in his
> > tree already.
>
> From the delatate to: field, it seems that Sakari was the one
> that did the change...
Aha, thanks for the pointer.
> However, patchwork is also dumb enough to not store any info
> about who changed a status (or even to log it)...
Hopefully, patchwork will get smarter one day...
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 3 patches updated
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:43:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622194306.GA25853@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622123504.0015c78b@vento.lan>
Hi!
> > > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork:
> > >
> > > * linux-media: [RFC,07/13] v4l2: device_register_subdev_nodes: allow calling multiple times
> > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/39403/
> > > - for: Linux Media kernel patches
> > > was: New
> > > now: Accepted
> >
> > Dear patchwork, I'm not sure on who's behalf you are mailing me. (And
> > that would be really nice to fix.)
>
> Sorry, but patchwork is not smart enough to read and reply
> e-mails yet :-) It is just a dumb robot.
Well, fortunately he's got human helpers :-).
> > If you are writing on Sakari's behalf, all is well.
>
> > If you are writing on someone else's behalf, you may tell that
> > someone to coordinate with Sakari, because he likely has it in his
> > tree already.
>
> From the delatate to: field, it seems that Sakari was the one
> that did the change...
Aha, thanks for the pointer.
> However, patchwork is also dumb enough to not store any info
> about who changed a status (or even to log it)...
Hopefully, patchwork will get smarter one day...
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170622/ce26a679/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-22 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170622150601.4956.51414@www.linuxtv.org>
2017-06-22 15:19 ` patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 3 patches updated Pavel Machek
2017-06-22 15:19 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-22 15:34 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-06-22 15:34 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-06-22 15:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-06-22 15:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-06-22 19:43 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2017-06-22 19:43 ` Pavel Machek
2017-06-22 19:43 ` patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was " Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170622194306.GA25853@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=abcloriens@gmail.com \
--cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=patchwork@linuxtv.org \
--cc=patrikbachan@gmail.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.