All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jroedel@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/s390: Add support for iommu_device handling
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:27:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629152716.1c888f20@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170627152806.GZ30388@8bytes.org>

On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:28:06 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 05:02:19PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:11:52 +0200
> > Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
> > > +	rc = zpci_init_iommu(zdev);
> > > +	if (rc)
> > > +		goto out_free;
> > > +
> > 
> > After this point, there are two options for failure (zpci_enable_device +
> > zpci_scan_bus), but missing error handling with an appropriate call to
> > zpci_destroy_iommu().
> 
> Right, I'll fix that in the next version.
> 
> > I must admit that I do not understand what these sysfs attributes are
> > used for, and by whom and when. Is it really necessary/correct to register
> > them (including the s390_iommu_ops) _before_ the zpci_dev is registered
> > to the bus (zpci_scan_bus -> pci_scan_root_bus/pci_bus_add_devices)?
> > 
> > What is the expected life cycle for the attributes, and are they already
> > needed when a device is still under DMA API access, or even before it is
> > added to the PCI bus?
> 
> The sysfs attributes are used by user-space for topology detection. A
> user-space program using VFIO needs to know which PCI-devices it needs
> to assign to the VFIO driver in order to gain access.
> 
> On s390 this probably doesn't matter much, as the real PCI topology is
> not exposed, but it matters on other architectures. The purpose of this
> patch is not so much the sysfs attributes. Its a step to convert all
> IOMMU drivers to use the iommu_device_register() interface. Goal is that
> the iommu core code knows about individual hardware iommus and the
> devices behind it.
> 
> When this is implemented in all iommu drivers, we can start moving more
> code out of the drivers into the iommu core. This also probably doesn't
> matter much for s390, but all iommu drivers need to use this interface
> before we can move on. The sysfs-stuff is just a by-product of that.
> 
> So to move on with that, it would be good to get an Acked-by on this
> patch from you guys once you think I fixed everything :)

Ok, thanks for the explanation. So it should not be a problem if the
attributes are registered in zpci_create_device() before the device is
registered to the bus, especially since they do not provide any manipulation
function but only topology information.

BTW, I get the following new attributes with this patch:
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/iommu
/sys/devices/virtual/iommu
/sys/devices/virtual/iommu/s390-iommu.00000012
/sys/class/iommu/s390-iommu.00000012

Regards,
Gerald

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	jroedel-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
	Sebastian Ott
	<sebott-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/s390: Add support for iommu_device handling
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:27:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629152716.1c888f20@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170627152806.GZ30388-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:28:06 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 05:02:19PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:11:52 +0200
> > Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > +	rc = zpci_init_iommu(zdev);
> > > +	if (rc)
> > > +		goto out_free;
> > > +
> > 
> > After this point, there are two options for failure (zpci_enable_device +
> > zpci_scan_bus), but missing error handling with an appropriate call to
> > zpci_destroy_iommu().
> 
> Right, I'll fix that in the next version.
> 
> > I must admit that I do not understand what these sysfs attributes are
> > used for, and by whom and when. Is it really necessary/correct to register
> > them (including the s390_iommu_ops) _before_ the zpci_dev is registered
> > to the bus (zpci_scan_bus -> pci_scan_root_bus/pci_bus_add_devices)?
> > 
> > What is the expected life cycle for the attributes, and are they already
> > needed when a device is still under DMA API access, or even before it is
> > added to the PCI bus?
> 
> The sysfs attributes are used by user-space for topology detection. A
> user-space program using VFIO needs to know which PCI-devices it needs
> to assign to the VFIO driver in order to gain access.
> 
> On s390 this probably doesn't matter much, as the real PCI topology is
> not exposed, but it matters on other architectures. The purpose of this
> patch is not so much the sysfs attributes. Its a step to convert all
> IOMMU drivers to use the iommu_device_register() interface. Goal is that
> the iommu core code knows about individual hardware iommus and the
> devices behind it.
> 
> When this is implemented in all iommu drivers, we can start moving more
> code out of the drivers into the iommu core. This also probably doesn't
> matter much for s390, but all iommu drivers need to use this interface
> before we can move on. The sysfs-stuff is just a by-product of that.
> 
> So to move on with that, it would be good to get an Acked-by on this
> patch from you guys once you think I fixed everything :)

Ok, thanks for the explanation. So it should not be a problem if the
attributes are registered in zpci_create_device() before the device is
registered to the bus, especially since they do not provide any manipulation
function but only topology information.

BTW, I get the following new attributes with this patch:
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/iommu
/sys/devices/virtual/iommu
/sys/devices/virtual/iommu/s390-iommu.00000012
/sys/class/iommu/s390-iommu.00000012

Regards,
Gerald

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-29 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-15 13:11 [PATCH 0/2 v2] iommu/s390: Improve iommu-groups and add sysfs support Joerg Roedel
2017-06-15 13:11 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-06-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/s390: Use iommu_group_get_for_dev() in s390_iommu_add_device() Joerg Roedel
2017-06-15 13:11   ` Joerg Roedel
2017-06-16 17:33   ` Gerald Schaefer
2017-06-27 15:16     ` Joerg Roedel
2017-06-27 15:16       ` Joerg Roedel
2017-06-15 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/s390: Add support for iommu_device handling Joerg Roedel
2017-06-15 13:11   ` Joerg Roedel
2017-06-19 15:02   ` Gerald Schaefer
2017-06-19 15:02     ` Gerald Schaefer
2017-06-27 15:28     ` Joerg Roedel
2017-06-27 15:28       ` Joerg Roedel
2017-06-29 13:27       ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2017-06-29 13:27         ` Gerald Schaefer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-27 15:28 [RFC PATCH 0/2] iommu/s390: Fix iommu-groups and add sysfs support Joerg Roedel
2017-04-27 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/s390: Add support for iommu_device handling Joerg Roedel
2017-04-27 15:28   ` Joerg Roedel
2017-04-28 23:02   ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-28 23:02     ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170629152716.1c888f20@thinkpad \
    --to=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.