Re: [PATCH v2] xattr: Enable security.capability in user namespaces

["Serge E. Hallyn" <serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org):
> James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >
> >> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org):
> >> > Stefan Berger <"Stefan Bergerstefanb"@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >> > > Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge-A9i7LUbDfNHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >> > 
> >> > It doesn't look like this is coming through Serge so I don't see how
> >> > the Signed-off-by tag is legtimate.
> >> 
> >> This is mostly explained by the fact that there have been a *lot* of
> >> changes, many of them discussed in private emails.

I wasn't clear here.  There were a lot of changes between the first
mention of the approach and the posting of v1.

My point was that I did in fact agree to Reviewed-by, and the fact that
I've found a few more things to point out only reflects my missing them
before.  I don't think my name is being mis-used.

> > Please try and keep technical discussions public or at least document them 
> > when reposting the patches.
> 
> Yes please.
> 
> A public discussion helps to understand what the challenges are.

Yes, all discussion (that I can find in my mbox) since v1 has been public.

-serge