All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 0/3] TPS68470 PMIC drivers
@ 2017-07-19 23:20 Rajmohan Mani
  2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470 Rajmohan Mani
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rajmohan Mani @ 2017-07-19 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Len Brown, sakari.ailus, Andy Shevchenko, Rajmohan Mani

This is the patch series for TPS68470 PMIC that works as a camera PMIC.

The patch series provide the following 3 drivers, to help configure the voltage regulators, clocks and GPIOs provided by the TPS68470 PMIC, to be able to use the camera sensors connected to this PMIC.

TPS68470 MFD driver:
This is the multi function driver that initializes the TPS68470 PMIC and supports the GPIO and Op Region functions.

TPS68470 GPIO driver:
This is the PMIC GPIO driver that will be used by the OS GPIO layer, when the BIOS / firmware triggered GPIO access is done.

TPS68470 Op Region driver:
This is the driver that will be invoked, when the BIOS / firmware configures the voltage / clock for the sensors / vcm devices connected to the PMIC.

---

Update on 2 GPIO chips implementation over 1:
	- Attempted to implement 2 GPIO chips, but ran into couple of
	  issues in the kernel, so we couldn't get it to work.
	- It was decided to postpone this change, since it is not
	  critical
	  
Changes in v4:
	- MFD driver:
	- Removed board specific code and FIXME comment
	- Moved i2c.h include from tps68470.h to tps68470.c
	- Moved the TPS68470 REVID read code after PMIC reset
	- Fixed typo in debug error message (on failure of
	  devm_mfd_add_devices() )
	- Enhanced dependency on I2C by changing it to I2C=y
	  (to fix build errors if I2C is built as module
	   e.g tps68470.c:71: undefined reference to `__devm_regmap_init_i2c'
	       tps68470.c:117: undefined reference to `i2c_register_driver')
	- Removed most of the unused header file definitions
	- Moved devm_mfd_add_devices() after PMIC resett
	- Used probe_new() and removed i2c_device_id table
	  
	  The following patch from Andy is needed for the driver to be
	  probed.
	  http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=150030081523885&w=2	
	  
	- GPIO driver:
	- Added newline at the end of Kconfig description
	- Updated commit message about the descriptive
	  names for the GPIOs and the typical usage model
	  of the GPIO driver

	- Opregion driver:
	- Added dependency on MFD_TPS68470
	- Converted 2 liner into one line code

Changes in v3:
	- MFD driver:
	- Removed GPIO lookup table
	- Reverted to probe() for consistency
	- Addressed other comments from Andy

	- GPIO driver:
	- Removed the code that initializes the default values
	  of GPIOs to zeros
	- Used gpiochip_get_data() to access data inside the gpio_chip
 
Changes in v2:
	- MFD driver:
	- Removed tps68470_* wrappers around regmap_* calls
	- Removed "struct tps68470"
	- used devm_mfd_add_devices and removed mutex in mfd driver
	- Added reasoning about the need of having mfd driver
	  as bool/builtin

	- Opregion driver:
	- renamed opregion driver file / internal symbol names
	  with tps68470_pmic*
	- Made opregion driver tables as const
	- Removed unused *handler_context in common handler
	- Replaced "int" with "unsigned int"
	- Changed to WARN macro to dev_warn()
	- Destroyed mutex on error
	- Added reasoning about the need of having Opregion driver
	  as bool/builtin
	
	- GPIO driver:
	- Implemented get_direction() in the GPIO driver
	- Setup gpio_chip.names
	- Moved the GPIO lookup table code inside mfd driver
	- Added reasoning about the need of having GPIO driver
	  as bool/builtin

---

Rajmohan Mani (3):
  mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  gpio: Add support for TPS68470 GPIOs
  ACPI / PMIC: Add TI PMIC TPS68470 operation region driver

 drivers/acpi/Kconfig              |  16 ++
 drivers/acpi/Makefile             |   2 +
 drivers/acpi/pmic/tps68470_pmic.c | 455 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpio/Kconfig              |  15 ++
 drivers/gpio/Makefile             |   1 +
 drivers/gpio/gpio-tps68470.c      | 174 +++++++++++++++
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig               |  18 ++
 drivers/mfd/Makefile              |   1 +
 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c            | 110 +++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h      |  97 ++++++++
 10 files changed, 889 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pmic/tps68470_pmic.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-tps68470.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h

-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-19 23:20 [PATCH v4 0/3] TPS68470 PMIC drivers Rajmohan Mani
@ 2017-07-19 23:20 ` Rajmohan Mani
  2017-07-20  9:03   ` Lee Jones
  2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] gpio: Add support for TPS68470 GPIOs Rajmohan Mani
  2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ACPI / PMIC: Add TI PMIC TPS68470 operation region driver Rajmohan Mani
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rajmohan Mani @ 2017-07-19 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Len Brown, sakari.ailus, Andy Shevchenko, Rajmohan Mani

The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management
unit that powers a Compact Camera Module (CCM),
generates clocks for image sensors, drives a dual
LED for Flash and incorporates two LED drivers for
general purpose indicators.

This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.

Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  18 +++++++
 drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c       | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h |  97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index 3eb5c93..960be43 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -1311,6 +1311,24 @@ config MFD_TPS65217
 	  This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
 	  will be called tps65217.
 
+config MFD_TPS68470
+	bool "TI TPS68470 Power Management / LED chips"
+	depends on ACPI && I2C=y
+	select MFD_CORE
+	select REGMAP_I2C
+	select I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
+	help
+	  If you say yes here you get support for the TPS68470 series of
+	  Power Management / LED chips.
+
+	  These include voltage regulators, led and other features
+	  that are often used in portable devices.
+
+	  This option is a bool as it provides an ACPI operation
+	  region, which must be available before any of the devices
+	  using this, are probed. This option also configures the
+	  designware-i2c driver to be builtin, for the same reason.
+
 config MFD_TI_LP873X
 	tristate "TI LP873X Power Management IC"
 	depends on I2C
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
index c16bf1e..6dd2b94 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65910)	+= tps65910.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912)	+= tps65912-core.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_I2C)	+= tps65912-i2c.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_SPI)  += tps65912-spi.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS68470)	+= tps68470.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS80031)	+= tps80031.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MENELAUS)		+= menelaus.o
 
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps68470.c b/drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a692af7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+/*
+ * TPS68470 chip family multi-function driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation
+ * Authors:
+ * Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
+ * Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>
+ * Jian Xu Zheng <jian.xu.zheng@intel.com>
+ * Yuning Pu <yuning.pu@intel.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
+ * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
+ * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/tps68470.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+static const struct mfd_cell tps68470s[] = {
+	{
+		.name = "tps68470-gpio",
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "tps68470_pmic_opregion",
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_config tps68470_regmap_config = {
+	.reg_bits = 8,
+	.val_bits = 8,
+	.max_register = TPS68470_REG_MAX,
+};
+
+static int tps68470_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
+{
+	unsigned int version;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Force software reset */
+	ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET, TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(regmap, TPS68470_REG_REVID, &version);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to read revision register: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	dev_info(dev, "TPS68470 REVID: 0x%x\n", version);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int tps68470_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+	struct regmap *regmap;
+	int ret;
+
+	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps68470_regmap_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "devm_regmap_init_i2c Error %ld\n",
+			PTR_ERR(regmap));
+		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
+	}
+
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
+
+	ret = tps68470_chip_init(dev, regmap);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "TPS68470 Init Error %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, tps68470s,
+			      ARRAY_SIZE(tps68470s), NULL, 0, NULL);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "devm_mfd_add_devices failed: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct acpi_device_id tps68470_acpi_ids[] = {
+	{"INT3472"},
+	{},
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tps68470_acpi_ids);
+
+static struct i2c_driver tps68470_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		   .name = "tps68470",
+		   .acpi_match_table = tps68470_acpi_ids,
+	},
+	.probe_new = tps68470_probe,
+};
+builtin_i2c_driver(tps68470_driver);
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..44f9d9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2017 Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * Functions to access TPS68470 power management chip.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
+ * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
+ * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __LINUX_MFD_TPS68470_H
+#define __LINUX_MFD_TPS68470_H
+
+/* Register addresses */
+#define TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV2		0x06
+#define TPS68470_REG_BOOSTDIV		0x07
+#define TPS68470_REG_BUCKDIV		0x08
+#define TPS68470_REG_PLLSWR		0x09
+#define TPS68470_REG_XTALDIV		0x0A
+#define TPS68470_REG_PLLDIV		0x0B
+#define TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV		0x0C
+#define TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL		0x0D
+#define TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL2		0x0E
+#define TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG1		0x0F
+#define TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG2		0x10
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0A		0x14
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0B		0x15
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL1A		0x16
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL1B		0x17
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL2A		0x18
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL2B		0x19
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL3A		0x1A
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL3B		0x1B
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL4A		0x1C
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL4B		0x1D
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL5A		0x1E
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL5B		0x1F
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL6A		0x20
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL6B		0x21
+#define TPS68470_REG_SGPO		0x22
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPDI		0x26
+#define TPS68470_REG_GPDO		0x27
+#define TPS68470_REG_VCMVAL		0x3C
+#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX1VAL		0x3D
+#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX2VAL		0x3E
+#define TPS68470_REG_VIOVAL		0x3F
+#define TPS68470_REG_VSIOVAL		0x40
+#define TPS68470_REG_VAVAL		0x41
+#define TPS68470_REG_VDVAL		0x42
+#define TPS68470_REG_S_I2C_CTL		0x43
+#define TPS68470_REG_VCMCTL		0x44
+#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX1CTL		0x45
+#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX2CTL		0x46
+#define TPS68470_REG_VACTL		0x47
+#define TPS68470_REG_VDCTL		0x48
+#define TPS68470_REG_RESET		0x50
+#define TPS68470_REG_REVID		0xFF
+
+#define TPS68470_REG_MAX		TPS68470_REG_REVID
+
+/* Register field definitions */
+
+#define TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VAVAL_AVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
+
+#define TPS68470_VDVAL_DVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(5, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VCMVAL_VCVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VIOVAL_IOVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VSIOVAL_IOVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VAUX1VAL_AUX1VOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VAUX2VAL_AUX2VOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
+
+#define TPS68470_VACTL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VDCTL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VCMCTL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
+#define TPS68470_S_I2C_CTL_EN_MASK	GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VAUX1CTL_EN_MASK	GENMASK(0, 0)
+#define TPS68470_VAUX2CTL_EN_MASK	GENMASK(0, 0)
+#define TPS68470_PLL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
+
+#define TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_A_MASK	GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_B_MASK	GENMASK(3, 2)
+
+#define TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_A(x)	(TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0A + (x) * 2)
+#define TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_B(x)	(TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0B + (x) * 2)
+#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_MASK		GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_IN		0
+#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_IN_PULLUP	1
+#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_OUT_CMOS	2
+#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_OUT_ODRAIN	3
+
+#endif /* __LINUX_MFD_TPS68470_H */
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/3] gpio: Add support for TPS68470 GPIOs
  2017-07-19 23:20 [PATCH v4 0/3] TPS68470 PMIC drivers Rajmohan Mani
  2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470 Rajmohan Mani
@ 2017-07-19 23:20 ` Rajmohan Mani
  2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ACPI / PMIC: Add TI PMIC TPS68470 operation region driver Rajmohan Mani
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rajmohan Mani @ 2017-07-19 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Len Brown, sakari.ailus, Andy Shevchenko, Rajmohan Mani

This patch adds support for TPS68470 GPIOs.
There are 7 GPIOs and a few sensor related GPIOs.
These GPIOs can be requested and configured as
appropriate.

The GPIOs are also provided with descriptive names.
However, the typical use case is that the OS GPIO
driver will interact with TPS68470 GPIO driver
to configure these GPIOs, as requested by the
platform firmware.

Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/Kconfig         |  15 ++++
 drivers/gpio/Makefile        |   1 +
 drivers/gpio/gpio-tps68470.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 190 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-tps68470.c

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
index 23ca51e..a8fb61c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
@@ -1041,6 +1041,21 @@ config GPIO_TPS65912
 	help
 	  This driver supports TPS65912 gpio chip
 
+config GPIO_TPS68470
+	bool "TPS68470 GPIO"
+	depends on MFD_TPS68470
+	help
+	  Select this option to enable GPIO driver for the TPS68470
+	  chip family.
+	  There are 7 GPIOs and few sensor related GPIOs supported
+	  by the TPS68470. While the 7 GPIOs can be configured as
+	  input or output as appropriate, the sensor related GPIOs
+	  are "output only" GPIOs.
+
+	  This driver config is bool, as the GPIO functionality
+	  of the TPS68470 must be available before dependent
+	  drivers are loaded.
+
 config GPIO_TWL4030
 	tristate "TWL4030, TWL5030, and TPS659x0 GPIOs"
 	depends on TWL4030_CORE
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
index 68b9627..a2659cb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_TPS65218)	+= gpio-tps65218.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_TPS6586X)	+= gpio-tps6586x.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_TPS65910)	+= gpio-tps65910.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_TPS65912)	+= gpio-tps65912.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_TPS68470)	+= gpio-tps68470.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_TS4800)	+= gpio-ts4800.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_TS4900)	+= gpio-ts4900.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_TS5500)	+= gpio-ts5500.o
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps68470.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps68470.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5a1dd56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tps68470.c
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+/*
+ * GPIO driver for TPS68470 PMIC
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation
+ * Authors:
+ * Antti Laakso <antti.laakso@intel.com>
+ * Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>
+ * Jian Xu Zheng <jian.xu.zheng@intel.com>
+ * Yuning Pu <yuning.pu@intel.com>
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
+ * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
+ * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/tps68470.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+#define TPS68470_N_LOGIC_OUTPUT	3
+#define TPS68470_N_REGULAR_GPIO	7
+#define TPS68470_N_GPIO	(TPS68470_N_LOGIC_OUTPUT + TPS68470_N_REGULAR_GPIO)
+
+struct tps68470_gpio_data {
+	struct regmap *tps68470_regmap;
+	struct gpio_chip gc;
+};
+
+static int tps68470_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct tps68470_gpio_data *tps68470_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	struct regmap *regmap = tps68470_gpio->tps68470_regmap;
+	unsigned int reg = TPS68470_REG_GPDO;
+	int val, ret;
+
+	if (offset >= TPS68470_N_REGULAR_GPIO) {
+		offset -= TPS68470_N_REGULAR_GPIO;
+		reg = TPS68470_REG_SGPO;
+	}
+
+	ret = regmap_read(regmap, reg, &val);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(tps68470_gpio->gc.parent, "reg 0x%x read failed\n",
+			TPS68470_REG_SGPO);
+		return ret;
+	}
+	return !!(val & BIT(offset));
+}
+
+/* Return 0 if output, 1 if input */
+static int tps68470_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+				       unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct tps68470_gpio_data *tps68470_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	struct regmap *regmap = tps68470_gpio->tps68470_regmap;
+	int val, ret;
+
+	/* rest are always outputs */
+	if (offset >= TPS68470_N_REGULAR_GPIO)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(regmap, TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_A(offset), &val);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(tps68470_gpio->gc.parent, "reg 0x%x read failed\n",
+			TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_A(offset));
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	val &= TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_MASK;
+	return val >= TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_OUT_CMOS ? 0 : 1;
+}
+
+static void tps68470_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
+				int value)
+{
+	struct tps68470_gpio_data *tps68470_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	struct regmap *regmap = tps68470_gpio->tps68470_regmap;
+	unsigned int reg = TPS68470_REG_GPDO;
+
+	if (offset >= TPS68470_N_REGULAR_GPIO) {
+		reg = TPS68470_REG_SGPO;
+		offset -= TPS68470_N_REGULAR_GPIO;
+	}
+
+	regmap_update_bits(regmap, reg, BIT(offset), value ? BIT(offset) : 0);
+}
+
+static int tps68470_gpio_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
+				int value)
+{
+	struct tps68470_gpio_data *tps68470_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	struct regmap *regmap = tps68470_gpio->tps68470_regmap;
+
+	/* rest are always outputs */
+	if (offset >= TPS68470_N_REGULAR_GPIO)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Set the initial value */
+	tps68470_gpio_set(gc, offset, value);
+
+	return regmap_update_bits(regmap, TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_A(offset),
+				 TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_MASK,
+				 TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_OUT_CMOS);
+}
+
+static int tps68470_gpio_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct tps68470_gpio_data *tps68470_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	struct regmap *regmap = tps68470_gpio->tps68470_regmap;
+
+	/* rest are always outputs */
+	if (offset >= TPS68470_N_REGULAR_GPIO)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return regmap_update_bits(regmap, TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_A(offset),
+				   TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_MASK, 0x00);
+}
+
+static const char *tps68470_names[TPS68470_N_GPIO] = {
+	"gpio.0", "gpio.1", "gpio.2", "gpio.3",
+	"gpio.4", "gpio.5", "gpio.6",
+	"s_enable", "s_idle", "s_resetn",
+};
+
+static int tps68470_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct tps68470_gpio_data *tps68470_gpio;
+	int ret;
+
+	tps68470_gpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*tps68470_gpio),
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!tps68470_gpio)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	tps68470_gpio->tps68470_regmap = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.label = "tps68470-gpio";
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.direction_input = tps68470_gpio_input;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.direction_output = tps68470_gpio_output;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.get = tps68470_gpio_get;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.get_direction = tps68470_gpio_get_direction;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.set = tps68470_gpio_set;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.can_sleep = true;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.names = tps68470_names;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.ngpio = TPS68470_N_GPIO;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.base = -1;
+	tps68470_gpio->gc.parent = &pdev->dev;
+
+	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tps68470_gpio->gc,
+				     tps68470_gpio);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register gpio_chip: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tps68470_gpio);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver tps68470_gpio_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		   .name = "tps68470-gpio",
+	},
+	.probe = tps68470_gpio_probe,
+};
+
+builtin_platform_driver(tps68470_gpio_driver)
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 3/3] ACPI / PMIC: Add TI PMIC TPS68470 operation region driver
  2017-07-19 23:20 [PATCH v4 0/3] TPS68470 PMIC drivers Rajmohan Mani
  2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470 Rajmohan Mani
  2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] gpio: Add support for TPS68470 GPIOs Rajmohan Mani
@ 2017-07-19 23:20 ` Rajmohan Mani
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rajmohan Mani @ 2017-07-19 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Len Brown, sakari.ailus, Andy Shevchenko, Rajmohan Mani

The Kabylake platform coreboot (Chrome OS equivalent of
BIOS) has defined 4 operation regions for the TI TPS68470 PMIC.
These operation regions are to enable/disable voltage
regulators, configure voltage regulators, enable/disable
clocks and to configure clocks.

This config adds ACPI operation region support for TI TPS68470 PMIC.
TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that powers
a Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for image sensors,
drives a dual LED for flash and incorporates two LED drivers for
general purpose indicators.
This driver enables ACPI operation region support to control voltage
regulators and clocks for the TPS68470 PMIC.

Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/Kconfig              |  16 ++
 drivers/acpi/Makefile             |   2 +
 drivers/acpi/pmic/tps68470_pmic.c | 455 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 473 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pmic/tps68470_pmic.c

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 1ce52f8..e124a82d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -535,4 +535,20 @@ if ARM64
 source "drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig"
 endif
 
+config TPS68470_PMIC_OPREGION
+	bool "ACPI operation region support for TPS68470 PMIC"
+	depends on MFD_TPS68470
+	help
+	  This config adds ACPI operation region support for TI TPS68470 PMIC.
+	  TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that powers
+	  a Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for image sensors,
+	  drives a dual LED for flash and incorporates two LED drivers for
+	  general purpose indicators.
+	  This driver enables ACPI operation region support control voltage
+	  regulators and clocks.
+
+	  This option is a bool as it provides an ACPI operation
+	  region, which must be available before any of the devices
+	  using this, are probed.
+
 endif	# ACPI
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
index b1aacfc..2d70a7f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
@@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CHT_WC_PMIC_OPREGION) += pmic/intel_pmic_chtwc.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CONFIGFS)	+= acpi_configfs.o
 
+obj-$(CONFIG_TPS68470_PMIC_OPREGION)	+= pmic/tps68470_pmic.o
+
 video-objs			+= acpi_video.o video_detect.o
 obj-y				+= dptf/
 
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/tps68470_pmic.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/tps68470_pmic.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f2626bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/tps68470_pmic.c
@@ -0,0 +1,455 @@
+/*
+ * TI TPS68470 PMIC operation region driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version
+ * 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * Based on drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic* drivers
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/tps68470.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+struct tps68470_pmic_table {
+	u32 address;		/* operation region address */
+	u32 reg;		/* corresponding register */
+	u32 bitmask;		/* bit mask for power, clock */
+};
+
+#define TI_PMIC_POWER_OPREGION_ID		0xB0
+#define TI_PMIC_VR_VAL_OPREGION_ID		0xB1
+#define TI_PMIC_CLOCK_OPREGION_ID		0xB2
+#define TI_PMIC_CLKFREQ_OPREGION_ID		0xB3
+
+struct tps68470_pmic_opregion {
+	struct mutex lock;
+	struct regmap *regmap;
+};
+
+#define S_IO_I2C_EN	(BIT(0) | BIT(1))
+
+static const struct tps68470_pmic_table power_table[] = {
+	{
+		.address = 0x00,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_S_I2C_CTL,
+		.bitmask = S_IO_I2C_EN,
+		/* S_I2C_CTL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x04,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VCMCTL,
+		.bitmask = BIT(0),
+		/* VCMCTL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x08,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VAUX1CTL,
+		.bitmask = BIT(0),
+		/* VAUX1_CTL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x0C,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VAUX2CTL,
+		.bitmask = BIT(0),
+		/* VAUX2CTL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x10,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VACTL,
+		.bitmask = BIT(0),
+		/* VACTL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x14,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VDCTL,
+		.bitmask = BIT(0),
+		/* VDCTL */
+	},
+};
+
+/* Table to set voltage regulator value */
+static const struct tps68470_pmic_table vr_val_table[] = {
+	{
+		.address = 0x00,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VSIOVAL,
+		.bitmask = TPS68470_VSIOVAL_IOVOLT_MASK,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_VSIOVAL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x04,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VIOVAL,
+		.bitmask = TPS68470_VIOVAL_IOVOLT_MASK,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_VIOVAL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x08,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VCMVAL,
+		.bitmask = TPS68470_VCMVAL_VCVOLT_MASK,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_VCMVAL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x0C,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VAUX1VAL,
+		.bitmask = TPS68470_VAUX1VAL_AUX1VOLT_MASK,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_VAUX1VAL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x10,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VAUX2VAL,
+		.bitmask = TPS68470_VAUX2VAL_AUX2VOLT_MASK,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_VAUX2VAL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x14,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VAVAL,
+		.bitmask = TPS68470_VAVAL_AVOLT_MASK,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_VAVAL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x18,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_VDVAL,
+		.bitmask = TPS68470_VDVAL_DVOLT_MASK,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_VDVAL */
+	},
+};
+
+/* Table to configure clock frequency */
+static const struct tps68470_pmic_table clk_freq_table[] = {
+	{
+		.address = 0x00,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV2,
+		.bitmask = BIT(0) | BIT(1),
+		/* TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV2 */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x04,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_BOOSTDIV,
+		.bitmask = 0x1F,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_BOOSTDIV */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x08,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_BUCKDIV,
+		.bitmask = 0x0F,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_BUCKDIV */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x0C,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_PLLSWR,
+		.bitmask = 0x13,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_PLLSWR */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x10,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_XTALDIV,
+		.bitmask = 0xFF,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_XTALDIV */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x14,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_PLLDIV,
+		.bitmask = 0xFF,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_PLLDIV */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x18,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV,
+		.bitmask = 0x83,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV */
+	},
+};
+
+/* Table to configure and enable clocks */
+static const struct tps68470_pmic_table clk_table[] = {
+	{
+		.address = 0x00,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL,
+		.bitmask = 0xF5,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x04,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL2,
+		.bitmask = BIT(0),
+		/* TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL2 */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x08,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG1,
+		.bitmask = TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_A_MASK |
+			TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_B_MASK,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG1 */
+	},
+	{
+		.address = 0x0C,
+		.reg = TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG2,
+		.bitmask = TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_A_MASK |
+			TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_B_MASK,
+		/* TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG2 */
+	},
+};
+
+static int pmic_get_reg_bit(u64 address,
+			    const struct tps68470_pmic_table *table,
+			    const unsigned int table_size, int *reg,
+			    int *bitmask)
+{
+	u64 i;
+
+	i = address / 4;
+	if (i >= table_size)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	if (!reg || !bitmask)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	*reg = table[i].reg;
+	*bitmask = table[i].bitmask;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int tps68470_pmic_get_power(struct regmap *regmap, int reg,
+				       int bitmask, u64 *value)
+{
+	unsigned int data;
+
+	if (regmap_read(regmap, reg, &data))
+		return -EIO;
+
+	*value = (data & bitmask) ? 1 : 0;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int tps68470_pmic_get_vr_val(struct regmap *regmap, int reg,
+				       int bitmask, u64 *value)
+{
+	unsigned int data;
+
+	if (regmap_read(regmap, reg, &data))
+		return -EIO;
+
+	*value = data & bitmask;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int tps68470_pmic_get_clk(struct regmap *regmap, int reg,
+				       int bitmask, u64 *value)
+{
+	unsigned int data;
+
+	if (regmap_read(regmap, reg, &data))
+		return -EIO;
+
+	*value = (data & bitmask) ? 1 : 0;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int tps68470_pmic_get_clk_freq(struct regmap *regmap, int reg,
+				       int bitmask, u64 *value)
+{
+	unsigned int data;
+
+	if (regmap_read(regmap, reg, &data))
+		return -EIO;
+
+	*value = data & bitmask;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ti_tps68470_regmap_update_bits(struct regmap *regmap, int reg,
+					int bitmask, u64 value)
+{
+	return regmap_update_bits(regmap, reg, bitmask, value);
+}
+
+static acpi_status tps68470_pmic_common_handler(u32 function,
+					  acpi_physical_address address,
+					  u32 bits, u64 *value,
+					  void *region_context,
+					  int (*get)(struct regmap *,
+						     int, int, u64 *),
+					  int (*update)(struct regmap *,
+							int, int, u64),
+					  const struct tps68470_pmic_table *tbl,
+					  unsigned int tbl_size)
+{
+	struct tps68470_pmic_opregion *opregion = region_context;
+	struct regmap *regmap = opregion->regmap;
+	int reg, ret, bitmask;
+
+	if (bits != 32)
+		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+
+	ret = pmic_get_reg_bit(address, tbl, tbl_size, &reg, &bitmask);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+
+	if (function == ACPI_WRITE && *value > bitmask)
+		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+
+	mutex_lock(&opregion->lock);
+
+	ret = (function == ACPI_READ) ?
+		get(regmap, reg, bitmask, value) :
+		update(regmap, reg, bitmask, *value);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&opregion->lock);
+
+	return ret ? AE_ERROR : AE_OK;
+}
+
+static acpi_status tps68470_pmic_cfreq_handler(u32 function,
+					    acpi_physical_address address,
+					    u32 bits, u64 *value,
+					    void *handler_context,
+					    void *region_context)
+{
+	return tps68470_pmic_common_handler(function, address, bits, value,
+				region_context,
+				tps68470_pmic_get_clk_freq,
+				ti_tps68470_regmap_update_bits,
+				clk_freq_table,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(clk_freq_table));
+}
+
+static acpi_status tps68470_pmic_clk_handler(u32 function,
+				       acpi_physical_address address, u32 bits,
+				       u64 *value, void *handler_context,
+				       void *region_context)
+{
+	return tps68470_pmic_common_handler(function, address, bits, value,
+				region_context,
+				tps68470_pmic_get_clk,
+				ti_tps68470_regmap_update_bits,
+				clk_table,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(clk_table));
+}
+
+static acpi_status tps68470_pmic_vrval_handler(u32 function,
+					  acpi_physical_address address,
+					  u32 bits, u64 *value,
+					  void *handler_context,
+					  void *region_context)
+{
+	return tps68470_pmic_common_handler(function, address, bits, value,
+				region_context,
+				tps68470_pmic_get_vr_val,
+				ti_tps68470_regmap_update_bits,
+				vr_val_table,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(vr_val_table));
+}
+
+static acpi_status tps68470_pmic_pwr_handler(u32 function,
+					 acpi_physical_address address,
+					 u32 bits, u64 *value,
+					 void *handler_context,
+					 void *region_context)
+{
+	if (bits != 32)
+		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+
+	/* set/clear for bit 0, bits 0 and 1 together */
+	if (function == ACPI_WRITE &&
+	    !(*value == 0 || *value == 1 || *value == 3)) {
+		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+	}
+
+	return tps68470_pmic_common_handler(function, address, bits, value,
+				region_context,
+				tps68470_pmic_get_power,
+				ti_tps68470_regmap_update_bits,
+				power_table,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(power_table));
+}
+
+static int tps68470_pmic_opregion_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct regmap *tps68470_regmap = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
+	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(pdev->dev.parent);
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct tps68470_pmic_opregion *opregion;
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	if (!dev || !tps68470_regmap) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "dev or regmap is NULL\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!handle) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "acpi handle is NULL\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	opregion = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*opregion), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!opregion)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	mutex_init(&opregion->lock);
+	opregion->regmap = tps68470_regmap;
+
+	status = acpi_install_address_space_handler(handle,
+						    TI_PMIC_POWER_OPREGION_ID,
+						    tps68470_pmic_pwr_handler,
+						    NULL, opregion);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		goto out_mutex_destroy;
+
+	status = acpi_install_address_space_handler(handle,
+						    TI_PMIC_VR_VAL_OPREGION_ID,
+						    tps68470_pmic_vrval_handler,
+						    NULL, opregion);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		goto out_remove_power_handler;
+
+	status = acpi_install_address_space_handler(handle,
+						    TI_PMIC_CLOCK_OPREGION_ID,
+						    tps68470_pmic_clk_handler,
+						    NULL, opregion);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		goto out_remove_vr_val_handler;
+
+	status = acpi_install_address_space_handler(handle,
+						    TI_PMIC_CLKFREQ_OPREGION_ID,
+						    tps68470_pmic_cfreq_handler,
+						    NULL, opregion);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		goto out_remove_clk_handler;
+
+	return 0;
+
+out_remove_clk_handler:
+	acpi_remove_address_space_handler(handle, TI_PMIC_CLOCK_OPREGION_ID,
+					  tps68470_pmic_clk_handler);
+out_remove_vr_val_handler:
+	acpi_remove_address_space_handler(handle, TI_PMIC_VR_VAL_OPREGION_ID,
+					  tps68470_pmic_vrval_handler);
+out_remove_power_handler:
+	acpi_remove_address_space_handler(handle, TI_PMIC_POWER_OPREGION_ID,
+					  tps68470_pmic_pwr_handler);
+out_mutex_destroy:
+	mutex_destroy(&opregion->lock);
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver tps68470_pmic_opregion_driver = {
+	.probe = tps68470_pmic_opregion_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "tps68470_pmic_opregion",
+	},
+};
+
+builtin_platform_driver(tps68470_pmic_opregion_driver)
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470 Rajmohan Mani
@ 2017-07-20  9:03   ` Lee Jones
  2017-07-21  0:57     ` Mani, Rajmohan
  2017-07-21 12:26     ` Mani, Rajmohan
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2017-07-20  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rajmohan Mani
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus,
	Andy Shevchenko

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Rajmohan Mani wrote:

> The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management
> unit that powers a Compact Camera Module (CCM),
> generates clocks for image sensors, drives a dual
> LED for Flash and incorporates two LED drivers for
> general purpose indicators.
> 
> This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  18 +++++++
>  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
>  drivers/mfd/tps68470.c       | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h |  97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> index 3eb5c93..960be43 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> @@ -1311,6 +1311,24 @@ config MFD_TPS65217
>  	  This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
>  	  will be called tps65217.
>  
> +config MFD_TPS68470
> +	bool "TI TPS68470 Power Management / LED chips"
> +	depends on ACPI && I2C=y
> +	select MFD_CORE
> +	select REGMAP_I2C
> +	select I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> +	help
> +	  If you say yes here you get support for the TPS68470 series of
> +	  Power Management / LED chips.
> +
> +	  These include voltage regulators, led and other features

LED(s)

> +	  that are often used in portable devices.
> +
> +	  This option is a bool as it provides an ACPI operation
> +	  region, which must be available before any of the devices
> +	  using this, are probed. This option also configures the

Remove the ','.

> +	  designware-i2c driver to be builtin, for the same reason.

built-in

> +
>  config MFD_TI_LP873X
>  	tristate "TI LP873X Power Management IC"
>  	depends on I2C
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> index c16bf1e..6dd2b94 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65910)	+= tps65910.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912)	+= tps65912-core.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_I2C)	+= tps65912-i2c.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_SPI)  += tps65912-spi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS68470)	+= tps68470.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS80031)	+= tps80031.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MENELAUS)		+= menelaus.o
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps68470.c b/drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a692af7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> +/*
> + * TPS68470 chip family multi-function driver

Does it really cover a family?  If so 'TPS68470' seems very specific.

"Multi-Function Driver" or even better "Core" or "Parent" driver.

> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation

'\n' here.

> + * Authors:
> + * Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> + * Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>
> + * Jian Xu Zheng <jian.xu.zheng@intel.com>
> + * Yuning Pu <yuning.pu@intel.com>

Tab these out:

 * Authors:
 *	Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
 *	Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>
 *	Jian Xu Zheng <jian.xu.zheng@intel.com>
 *	Yuning Pu <yuning.pu@intel.com>

> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.

Can you use the short version?

> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/tps68470.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +static const struct mfd_cell tps68470s[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name = "tps68470-gpio",
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "tps68470_pmic_opregion",
> +	},
> +};

Make these one line each:

 { .name = "tps68470-gpio" }

... and drop the ','

> +static const struct regmap_config tps68470_regmap_config = {
> +	.reg_bits = 8,
> +	.val_bits = 8,
> +	.max_register = TPS68470_REG_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +static int tps68470_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
> +{
> +	unsigned int version;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Force software reset */
> +	ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET, TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
> +	if (ret < 0)

Will 'if (!ret)' do?

> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(regmap, TPS68470_REG_REVID, &version);
> +	if (ret < 0) {

Same

> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to read revision register: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_info(dev, "TPS68470 REVID: 0x%x\n", version);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tps68470_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps68470_regmap_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "devm_regmap_init_i2c Error %ld\n",
> +			PTR_ERR(regmap));
> +		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> +	}
> +
> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
> +
> +	ret = tps68470_chip_init(dev, regmap);
> +	if (ret < 0) {

Same

> +		dev_err(dev, "TPS68470 Init Error %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, tps68470s,
> +			      ARRAY_SIZE(tps68470s), NULL, 0, NULL);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "devm_mfd_add_devices failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct acpi_device_id tps68470_acpi_ids[] = {
> +	{"INT3472"},
> +	{},
> +};
> +

Remove this line.

> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tps68470_acpi_ids);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver tps68470_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		   .name = "tps68470",
> +		   .acpi_match_table = tps68470_acpi_ids,
> +	},
> +	.probe_new = tps68470_probe,
> +};
> +builtin_i2c_driver(tps68470_driver);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..44f9d9f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Intel Corporation
> + *
> + * Functions to access TPS68470 power management chip.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.

Short version?

> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __LINUX_MFD_TPS68470_H
> +#define __LINUX_MFD_TPS68470_H
> +
> +/* Register addresses */
> +#define TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV2		0x06
> +#define TPS68470_REG_BOOSTDIV		0x07
> +#define TPS68470_REG_BUCKDIV		0x08
> +#define TPS68470_REG_PLLSWR		0x09
> +#define TPS68470_REG_XTALDIV		0x0A
> +#define TPS68470_REG_PLLDIV		0x0B
> +#define TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV		0x0C
> +#define TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL		0x0D
> +#define TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL2		0x0E
> +#define TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG1		0x0F
> +#define TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG2		0x10
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0A		0x14
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0B		0x15
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL1A		0x16
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL1B		0x17
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL2A		0x18
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL2B		0x19
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL3A		0x1A
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL3B		0x1B
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL4A		0x1C
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL4B		0x1D
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL5A		0x1E
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL5B		0x1F
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL6A		0x20
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL6B		0x21
> +#define TPS68470_REG_SGPO		0x22
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPDI		0x26
> +#define TPS68470_REG_GPDO		0x27
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VCMVAL		0x3C
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX1VAL		0x3D
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX2VAL		0x3E
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VIOVAL		0x3F
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VSIOVAL		0x40
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VAVAL		0x41
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VDVAL		0x42
> +#define TPS68470_REG_S_I2C_CTL		0x43
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VCMCTL		0x44
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX1CTL		0x45
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX2CTL		0x46
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VACTL		0x47
> +#define TPS68470_REG_VDCTL		0x48
> +#define TPS68470_REG_RESET		0x50
> +#define TPS68470_REG_REVID		0xFF
> +
> +#define TPS68470_REG_MAX		TPS68470_REG_REVID
> +
> +/* Register field definitions */
> +
> +#define TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VAVAL_AVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> +
> +#define TPS68470_VDVAL_DVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(5, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VCMVAL_VCVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VIOVAL_IOVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VSIOVAL_IOVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VAUX1VAL_AUX1VOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VAUX2VAL_AUX2VOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> +
> +#define TPS68470_VACTL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VDCTL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VCMCTL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_S_I2C_CTL_EN_MASK	GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VAUX1CTL_EN_MASK	GENMASK(0, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_VAUX2CTL_EN_MASK	GENMASK(0, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_PLL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
> +
> +#define TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_A_MASK	GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_B_MASK	GENMASK(3, 2)
> +
> +#define TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_A(x)	(TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0A + (x) * 2)
> +#define TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_B(x)	(TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0B + (x) * 2)
> +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_MASK		GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_IN		0
> +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_IN_PULLUP	1
> +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_OUT_CMOS	2
> +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_OUT_ODRAIN	3
> +
> +#endif /* __LINUX_MFD_TPS68470_H */

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-20  9:03   ` Lee Jones
@ 2017-07-21  0:57     ` Mani, Rajmohan
  2017-07-25  9:10       ` Lee Jones
  2017-07-21 12:26     ` Mani, Rajmohan
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mani, Rajmohan @ 2017-07-21  0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus,
	Andy Shevchenko

Hi Lee,

Thanks for the reviews.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Jones [mailto:lee.jones@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 2:03 AM
> To: Mani, Rajmohan <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> acpi@vger.kernel.org; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>; Alexandre
> Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>; Len
> Brown <lenb@kernel.org>; sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com; Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
> 
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Rajmohan Mani wrote:
> 
> > The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that powers
> a
> > Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for image sensors,
> > drives a dual LED for Flash and incorporates two LED drivers for
> > general purpose indicators.
> >
> > This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  18 +++++++
> >  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
> >  drivers/mfd/tps68470.c       | 110
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h |  97
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c  create mode 100644
> > include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig index
> > 3eb5c93..960be43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > @@ -1311,6 +1311,24 @@ config MFD_TPS65217
> >  	  This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
> >  	  will be called tps65217.
> >
> > +config MFD_TPS68470
> > +	bool "TI TPS68470 Power Management / LED chips"
> > +	depends on ACPI && I2C=y
> > +	select MFD_CORE
> > +	select REGMAP_I2C
> > +	select I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> > +	help
> > +	  If you say yes here you get support for the TPS68470 series of
> > +	  Power Management / LED chips.
> > +
> > +	  These include voltage regulators, led and other features
> 
> LED(s)
> 

Ack

> > +	  that are often used in portable devices.
> > +
> > +	  This option is a bool as it provides an ACPI operation
> > +	  region, which must be available before any of the devices
> > +	  using this, are probed. This option also configures the
> 
> Remove the ','.
> 

Ack

> > +	  designware-i2c driver to be builtin, for the same reason.
> 
> built-in
> 

Ack

> > +
> >  config MFD_TI_LP873X
> >  	tristate "TI LP873X Power Management IC"
> >  	depends on I2C
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile index
> > c16bf1e..6dd2b94 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65910)	+= tps65910.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912)	+= tps65912-core.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_I2C)	+= tps65912-i2c.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS65912_SPI)  += tps65912-spi.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS68470)	+= tps68470.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_TPS80031)	+= tps80031.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MENELAUS)		+= menelaus.o
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps68470.c b/drivers/mfd/tps68470.c new file
> > mode 100644 index 0000000..a692af7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps68470.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> > +/*
> > + * TPS68470 chip family multi-function driver
> 
> Does it really cover a family?  If so 'TPS68470' seems very specific.
> 
> "Multi-Function Driver" or even better "Core" or "Parent" driver.
> 

No. This is just for TPS68470.
I picked "Parent" driver

> > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation
> 
> '\n' here.
> 

Ack

> > + * Authors:
> > + * Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > + * Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>
> > + * Jian Xu Zheng <jian.xu.zheng@intel.com>
> > + * Yuning Pu <yuning.pu@intel.com>
> 
> Tab these out:
> 
>  * Authors:
>  *	Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
>  *	Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>
>  *	Jian Xu Zheng <jian.xu.zheng@intel.com>
>  *	Yuning Pu <yuning.pu@intel.com>
> 

Ack

> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
> > + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied
> > + warranty
> > + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> 
> Can you use the short version?
> 

Ack
I will update the other patches of this series too.

> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/tps68470.h>
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +
> > +static const struct mfd_cell tps68470s[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.name = "tps68470-gpio",
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.name = "tps68470_pmic_opregion",
> > +	},
> > +};
> 
> Make these one line each:
> 
>  { .name = "tps68470-gpio" }
> 
> ... and drop the ','
> 

Ack

> > +static const struct regmap_config tps68470_regmap_config = {
> > +	.reg_bits = 8,
> > +	.val_bits = 8,
> > +	.max_register = TPS68470_REG_MAX,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int tps68470_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap
> > +*regmap) {
> > +	unsigned int version;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Force software reset */
> > +	ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET,
> TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> 
> Will 'if (!ret)' do?
> 

We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.

> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = regmap_read(regmap, TPS68470_REG_REVID, &version);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> 
> Same
> 

We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.

> > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to read revision register: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	dev_info(dev, "TPS68470 REVID: 0x%x\n", version);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int tps68470_probe(struct i2c_client *client) {
> > +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > +	struct regmap *regmap;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps68470_regmap_config);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "devm_regmap_init_i2c Error %ld\n",
> > +			PTR_ERR(regmap));
> > +		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
> > +
> > +	ret = tps68470_chip_init(dev, regmap);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> 
> Same
> 

We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.

> > +		dev_err(dev, "TPS68470 Init Error %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> tps68470s,
> > +			      ARRAY_SIZE(tps68470s), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "devm_mfd_add_devices failed: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id tps68470_acpi_ids[] = {
> > +	{"INT3472"},
> > +	{},
> > +};
> > +
> 
> Remove this line.
> 

Ack

> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tps68470_acpi_ids);
> > +
> > +static struct i2c_driver tps68470_driver = {
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		   .name = "tps68470",
> > +		   .acpi_match_table = tps68470_acpi_ids,
> > +	},
> > +	.probe_new = tps68470_probe,
> > +};
> > +builtin_i2c_driver(tps68470_driver);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
> > b/include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h new file mode 100644 index
> > 0000000..44f9d9f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2017 Intel Corporation
> > + *
> > + * Functions to access TPS68470 power management chip.
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> > + * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
> > + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied
> > +warranty
> > + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> 
> Short version?
> 

Ack

> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __LINUX_MFD_TPS68470_H
> > +#define __LINUX_MFD_TPS68470_H
> > +
> > +/* Register addresses */
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV2		0x06
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_BOOSTDIV		0x07
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_BUCKDIV		0x08
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_PLLSWR		0x09
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_XTALDIV		0x0A
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_PLLDIV		0x0B
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_POSTDIV		0x0C
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL		0x0D
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_PLLCTL2		0x0E
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG1		0x0F
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_CLKCFG2		0x10
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0A		0x14
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0B		0x15
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL1A		0x16
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL1B		0x17
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL2A		0x18
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL2B		0x19
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL3A		0x1A
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL3B		0x1B
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL4A		0x1C
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL4B		0x1D
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL5A		0x1E
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL5B		0x1F
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL6A		0x20
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPCTL6B		0x21
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_SGPO		0x22
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPDI		0x26
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_GPDO		0x27
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VCMVAL		0x3C
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX1VAL		0x3D
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX2VAL		0x3E
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VIOVAL		0x3F
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VSIOVAL		0x40
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VAVAL		0x41
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VDVAL		0x42
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_S_I2C_CTL		0x43
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VCMCTL		0x44
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX1CTL		0x45
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VAUX2CTL		0x46
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VACTL		0x47
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_VDCTL		0x48
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_RESET		0x50
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_REVID		0xFF
> > +
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_MAX		TPS68470_REG_REVID
> > +
> > +/* Register field definitions */
> > +
> > +#define TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VAVAL_AVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> > +
> > +#define TPS68470_VDVAL_DVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(5, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VCMVAL_VCVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VIOVAL_IOVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VSIOVAL_IOVOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VAUX1VAL_AUX1VOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VAUX2VAL_AUX2VOLT_MASK	GENMASK(6, 0)
> > +
> > +#define TPS68470_VACTL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VDCTL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VCMCTL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_S_I2C_CTL_EN_MASK	GENMASK(1, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VAUX1CTL_EN_MASK	GENMASK(0, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_VAUX2CTL_EN_MASK	GENMASK(0, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_PLL_EN_MASK		GENMASK(0, 0)
> > +
> > +#define TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_A_MASK	GENMASK(1, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_CLKCFG1_MODE_B_MASK	GENMASK(3, 2)
> > +
> > +#define TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_A(x)	(TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0A +
> (x) * 2)
> > +#define TPS68470_GPIO_CTL_REG_B(x)	(TPS68470_REG_GPCTL0B +
> (x) * 2)
> > +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_MASK		GENMASK(1, 0)
> > +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_IN		0
> > +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_IN_PULLUP	1
> > +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_OUT_CMOS	2
> > +#define TPS68470_GPIO_MODE_OUT_ODRAIN	3
> > +
> > +#endif /* __LINUX_MFD_TPS68470_H */
> 
> --
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source
> software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-20  9:03   ` Lee Jones
  2017-07-21  0:57     ` Mani, Rajmohan
@ 2017-07-21 12:26     ` Mani, Rajmohan
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mani, Rajmohan @ 2017-07-21 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus,
	Andy Shevchenko

Hi Lee,

> > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> > > + * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
> > > + *
> > > + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
> > > + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied
> > > + warranty
> > > + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See
> the
> > > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> >
> > Can you use the short version?
> >
> 
> Ack
> I will update the other patches of this series too.
> 

I just confirmed that we are recommended to use the above long version of headers. So, these headers will stay as such.

Thanks
Raj

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-21  0:57     ` Mani, Rajmohan
@ 2017-07-25  9:10       ` Lee Jones
  2017-07-25 10:29         ` Andy Shevchenko
  2017-07-25 17:05         ` Mani, Rajmohan
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2017-07-25  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mani, Rajmohan
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus,
	Andy Shevchenko

On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Rajmohan Mani wrote:
> > 
> > > The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that powers
> > a
> > > Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for image sensors,
> > > drives a dual LED for Flash and incorporates two LED drivers for
> > > general purpose indicators.
> > >
> > > This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  18 +++++++
> > >  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
> > >  drivers/mfd/tps68470.c       | 110
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h |  97
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps68470.c  create mode 100644
> > > include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h

[...]

> > > +static const struct regmap_config tps68470_regmap_config = {
> > > +	.reg_bits = 8,
> > > +	.val_bits = 8,
> > > +	.max_register = TPS68470_REG_MAX,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int tps68470_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap
> > > +*regmap) {
> > > +	unsigned int version;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Force software reset */
> > > +	ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET,
> > TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
> > > +	if (ret < 0)
> > 
> > Will 'if (!ret)' do?
> > 
> 
> We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.

Yes, 'if (!ret)' does that too.

> > > +		return ret;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = regmap_read(regmap, TPS68470_REG_REVID, &version);
> > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > 
> > Same
> > 
> 
> We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.

As above.

> > > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to read revision register: %d\n", ret);
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	dev_info(dev, "TPS68470 REVID: 0x%x\n", version);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int tps68470_probe(struct i2c_client *client) {
> > > +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > > +	struct regmap *regmap;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps68470_regmap_config);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> > > +		dev_err(dev, "devm_regmap_init_i2c Error %ld\n",
> > > +			PTR_ERR(regmap));
> > > +		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
> > > +
> > > +	ret = tps68470_chip_init(dev, regmap);
> > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > 
> > Same
> > 
> 
> We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.

As above.

[...]

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-25  9:10       ` Lee Jones
@ 2017-07-25 10:29         ` Andy Shevchenko
  2017-07-26  8:23           ` Lee Jones
  2017-07-25 17:05         ` Mani, Rajmohan
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2017-07-25 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: Mani, Rajmohan, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi,
	Linus Walleij, Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
	sakari.ailus

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
>> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Rajmohan Mani wrote:

>> > > + /* Force software reset */
>> > > + ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET,
>> > TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
>> > > + if (ret < 0)
>> >
>> > Will 'if (!ret)' do?
>> >
>>
>> We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.
>
> Yes, 'if (!ret)' does that too.

Did you mean

if (ret)
 return ret;

?

I briefly checked few ->read() and ->write() implementations and
didn't find any evidence of positive numbers that can be returned.
Documentation (kernel doc) doesn't shed a light on that. So, to me it
sounds unspecified.

So, for now (until documentation will be fixed) I would rely on
if (ret < 0)


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-25  9:10       ` Lee Jones
  2017-07-25 10:29         ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2017-07-25 17:05         ` Mani, Rajmohan
  2017-07-26  8:20           ` Lee Jones
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mani, Rajmohan @ 2017-07-25 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus,
	Andy Shevchenko

Hi Lee,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
> 
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Rajmohan Mani wrote:
> > >
> > > > The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that
> > > > powers
> > > a
> > > > Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for image sensors,
> > > > drives a dual LED for Flash and incorporates two LED drivers for
> > > > general purpose indicators.
> > > >
> > > > This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  18 +++++++
> > > >  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
> > > >  drivers/mfd/tps68470.c       | 110
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h |  97
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  4 files changed, 226 insertions(+)  create mode 100644
> > > > drivers/mfd/tps68470.c  create mode 100644
> > > > include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > > +static const struct regmap_config tps68470_regmap_config = {
> > > > +	.reg_bits = 8,
> > > > +	.val_bits = 8,
> > > > +	.max_register = TPS68470_REG_MAX, };
> > > > +
> > > > +static int tps68470_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap
> > > > +*regmap) {
> > > > +	unsigned int version;
> > > > +	int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* Force software reset */
> > > > +	ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET,
> > > TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
> > > > +	if (ret < 0)
> > >
> > > Will 'if (!ret)' do?
> > >
> >
> > We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for
> this.
> 
> Yes, 'if (!ret)' does that too.
> 

regmap_write() and regmap_read() functions return 0 on success. Hence we can not use 'if (!ret)' here, since we check for error conditions.

> > > > +		return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = regmap_read(regmap, TPS68470_REG_REVID, &version);
> > > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > >
> > > Same
> > >
> >
> > We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for
> this.
> 
> As above.
> 

Same as above

> > > > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to read revision register: %d\n", ret);
> > > > +		return ret;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	dev_info(dev, "TPS68470 REVID: 0x%x\n", version);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int tps68470_probe(struct i2c_client *client) {
> > > > +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > > > +	struct regmap *regmap;
> > > > +	int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps68470_regmap_config);
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> > > > +		dev_err(dev, "devm_regmap_init_i2c Error %ld\n",
> > > > +			PTR_ERR(regmap));
> > > > +		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = tps68470_chip_init(dev, regmap);
> > > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > >
> > > Same
> > >
> >
> > We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for
> this.
> 
> As above.
> 

Same as above

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-25 17:05         ` Mani, Rajmohan
@ 2017-07-26  8:20           ` Lee Jones
  2017-07-28 23:49             ` Mani, Rajmohan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2017-07-26  8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mani, Rajmohan
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus,
	Andy Shevchenko

On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
> > 
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Rajmohan Mani wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that
> > > > > powers
> > > > a
> > > > > Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for image sensors,
> > > > > drives a dual LED for Flash and incorporates two LED drivers for
> > > > > general purpose indicators.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  18 +++++++
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/tps68470.c       | 110
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h |  97
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  4 files changed, 226 insertions(+)  create mode 100644
> > > > > drivers/mfd/tps68470.c  create mode 100644
> > > > > include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > > > +static const struct regmap_config tps68470_regmap_config = {
> > > > > +	.reg_bits = 8,
> > > > > +	.val_bits = 8,
> > > > > +	.max_register = TPS68470_REG_MAX, };
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static int tps68470_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct regmap
> > > > > +*regmap) {
> > > > > +	unsigned int version;
> > > > > +	int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	/* Force software reset */
> > > > > +	ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET,
> > > > TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
> > > > > +	if (ret < 0)
> > > >
> > > > Will 'if (!ret)' do?
> > > >
> > >
> > > We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for
> > this.
> > 
> > Yes, 'if (!ret)' does that too.
> > 
> 
> regmap_write() and regmap_read() functions return 0 on success. Hence we can not use 'if (!ret)' here, since we check for error conditions.

Sorry, this was a typo.

It should be 'if (ret)'.

What I'm trying to get at is the " < 0" is not required.

> > > > > +		return ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	ret = regmap_read(regmap, TPS68470_REG_REVID, &version);
> > > > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > > >
> > > > Same
> > > >
> > >
> > > We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for
> > this.
> > 
> > As above.
> > 
> 
> Same as above
> 
> > > > > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to read revision register: %d\n", ret);
> > > > > +		return ret;
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	dev_info(dev, "TPS68470 REVID: 0x%x\n", version);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static int tps68470_probe(struct i2c_client *client) {
> > > > > +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > > > > +	struct regmap *regmap;
> > > > > +	int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps68470_regmap_config);
> > > > > +	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> > > > > +		dev_err(dev, "devm_regmap_init_i2c Error %ld\n",
> > > > > +			PTR_ERR(regmap));
> > > > > +		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	ret = tps68470_chip_init(dev, regmap);
> > > > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > > >
> > > > Same
> > > >
> > >
> > > We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for
> > this.
> > 
> > As above.
> > 
> 
> Same as above

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-25 10:29         ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2017-07-26  8:23           ` Lee Jones
  2017-07-26 10:26             ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2017-07-26  8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Mani, Rajmohan, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi,
	Linus Walleij, Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
	sakari.ailus

On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Rajmohan Mani wrote:
> 
> >> > > + /* Force software reset */
> >> > > + ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET,
> >> > TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
> >> > > + if (ret < 0)
> >> >
> >> > Will 'if (!ret)' do?
> >> >
> >>
> >> We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0) works for this.
> >
> > Yes, 'if (!ret)' does that too.
> 
> Did you mean
> 
> if (ret)
>  return ret;
> 
> ?

Yes, I just noticed!

Apologies for the confusion.

> I briefly checked few ->read() and ->write() implementations and
> didn't find any evidence of positive numbers that can be returned.
> Documentation (kernel doc) doesn't shed a light on that. So, to me it
> sounds unspecified.
> 
> So, for now (until documentation will be fixed) I would rely on
> if (ret < 0)

It's not unspecified.  The regmap methods call into regcache_write(),
where the kerneldoc is clear.  Perhaps we can also change the regmap
kerneldoc headers too to match, which might lessen the disparity.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-26  8:23           ` Lee Jones
@ 2017-07-26 10:26             ` Andy Shevchenko
  2017-07-28  0:30               ` Mani, Rajmohan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2017-07-26 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: Mani, Rajmohan, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi,
	Linus Walleij, Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown,
	sakari.ailus

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:

>> I briefly checked few ->read() and ->write() implementations and
>> didn't find any evidence of positive numbers that can be returned.
>> Documentation (kernel doc) doesn't shed a light on that. So, to me it
>> sounds unspecified.
>>
>> So, for now (until documentation will be fixed) I would rely on
>> if (ret < 0)
>
> It's not unspecified.  The regmap methods call into regcache_write(),
> where the kerneldoc is clear.

drivers/base/regmap/regcache.c:266

" * Return a negative value on failure, 0 on success."

I can hardly find this any cleaner than "unspecified".

>  Perhaps we can also change the regmap
> kerneldoc headers too to match, which might lessen the disparity.

I'm not familiar with the guts of regmap API, so, I would stick with
if (ret < 0) for now until documentation specifies positive return values.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-26 10:26             ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2017-07-28  0:30               ` Mani, Rajmohan
  2017-07-28  9:16                 ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mani, Rajmohan @ 2017-07-28  0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko, Lee Jones
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus

Hi Lee, Andy,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
> 
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> >> I briefly checked few ->read() and ->write() implementations and
> >> didn't find any evidence of positive numbers that can be returned.
> >> Documentation (kernel doc) doesn't shed a light on that. So, to me it
> >> sounds unspecified.
> >>
> >> So, for now (until documentation will be fixed) I would rely on if
> >> (ret < 0)
> >
> > It's not unspecified.  The regmap methods call into regcache_write(),
> > where the kerneldoc is clear.
> 

Since, we are interested in the regmap for the I2C bus here, I looked into the implementation of
 __devm_regmap_init()
	__regmap_init()
		regcache_init()
for I2C bus.

At the end of __devm_regmap_init() call from devm_regmap_init_i2c() inside tps68470_probe(), I see that both cache_bypass and defer_caching flags of i2c regmap struct are set. So, it looks regcache_write/read calls do not come into play here.

So, regmap_write()
	_regmap_write()
		map->reg_write (drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c:1665) translates to
		regmap_i2c_write(drivers/base/regmap/regmap-i2c.c:128)

These checks in regmap_i2c_write() ensure all return values from i2c_master_send() other than the requested number of bytes to write, are converted into negative values.

        if (ret == count)
                return 0;
        else if (ret < 0)
                return ret;
        else
                return -EIO;

Similar argument goes for regmap_read() as well.
With that, for regmap over I2C bus, it sounds like 'if (ret < 0)' looks to be a better choice. Please see if I missed anything here.
		
> drivers/base/regmap/regcache.c:266
> 
> " * Return a negative value on failure, 0 on success."
> 
> I can hardly find this any cleaner than "unspecified".
> 
> >  Perhaps we can also change the regmap kerneldoc headers too to match,
> > which might lessen the disparity.
> 
> I'm not familiar with the guts of regmap API, so, I would stick with if (ret < 0)
> for now until documentation specifies positive return values.
> 

Ack

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-28  0:30               ` Mani, Rajmohan
@ 2017-07-28  9:16                 ` Andy Shevchenko
  2017-07-28 23:48                   ` Mani, Rajmohan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2017-07-28  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mani, Rajmohan
  Cc: Lee Jones, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Mani, Rajmohan <rajmohan.mani@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> >> I briefly checked few ->read() and ->write() implementations and
>> >> didn't find any evidence of positive numbers that can be returned.
>> >> Documentation (kernel doc) doesn't shed a light on that. So, to me it
>> >> sounds unspecified.
>> >>
>> >> So, for now (until documentation will be fixed) I would rely on if
>> >> (ret < 0)
>> >
>> > It's not unspecified.  The regmap methods call into regcache_write(),
>> > where the kerneldoc is clear.
>>
>
> Since, we are interested in the regmap for the I2C bus here, I looked into the implementation of
>  __devm_regmap_init()
>         __regmap_init()
>                 regcache_init()
> for I2C bus.
>
> At the end of __devm_regmap_init() call from devm_regmap_init_i2c() inside tps68470_probe(), I see that both cache_bypass and defer_caching flags of i2c regmap struct are set. So, it looks regcache_write/read calls do not come into play here.
>
> So, regmap_write()
>         _regmap_write()
>                 map->reg_write (drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c:1665) translates to
>                 regmap_i2c_write(drivers/base/regmap/regmap-i2c.c:128)
>
> These checks in regmap_i2c_write() ensure all return values from i2c_master_send() other than the requested number of bytes to write, are converted into negative values.
>
>         if (ret == count)
>                 return 0;
>         else if (ret < 0)
>                 return ret;
>         else
>                 return -EIO;
>
> Similar argument goes for regmap_read() as well.
> With that, for regmap over I2C bus, it sounds like 'if (ret < 0)' looks to be a better choice. Please see if I missed anything here.

It prooves exactly the Lee's point.

So, perhaps the best approach is to move to
if (ret)
 return ret;

...if it will be a problem in the future, fix it accordingly.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-28  9:16                 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2017-07-28 23:48                   ` Mani, Rajmohan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mani, Rajmohan @ 2017-07-28 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Lee Jones, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus

Hi Andy,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
> 
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Mani, Rajmohan
> <rajmohan.mani@intel.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> I briefly checked few ->read() and ->write() implementations and
> >> >> didn't find any evidence of positive numbers that can be returned.
> >> >> Documentation (kernel doc) doesn't shed a light on that. So, to me
> >> >> it sounds unspecified.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, for now (until documentation will be fixed) I would rely on if
> >> >> (ret < 0)
> >> >
> >> > It's not unspecified.  The regmap methods call into
> >> > regcache_write(), where the kerneldoc is clear.
> >>
> >
> > Since, we are interested in the regmap for the I2C bus here, I looked
> > into the implementation of
> >  __devm_regmap_init()
> >         __regmap_init()
> >                 regcache_init()
> > for I2C bus.
> >
> > At the end of __devm_regmap_init() call from devm_regmap_init_i2c()
> inside tps68470_probe(), I see that both cache_bypass and defer_caching
> flags of i2c regmap struct are set. So, it looks regcache_write/read calls do
> not come into play here.
> >
> > So, regmap_write()
> >         _regmap_write()
> >                 map->reg_write (drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c:1665) translates
> to
> >                 regmap_i2c_write(drivers/base/regmap/regmap-i2c.c:128)
> >
> > These checks in regmap_i2c_write() ensure all return values from
> i2c_master_send() other than the requested number of bytes to write, are
> converted into negative values.
> >
> >         if (ret == count)
> >                 return 0;
> >         else if (ret < 0)
> >                 return ret;
> >         else
> >                 return -EIO;
> >
> > Similar argument goes for regmap_read() as well.
> > With that, for regmap over I2C bus, it sounds like 'if (ret < 0)' looks to be a
> better choice. Please see if I missed anything here.
> 
> It prooves exactly the Lee's point.
> 
> So, perhaps the best approach is to move to if (ret)  return ret;
> 
> ...if it will be a problem in the future, fix it accordingly.
> 

Ack.
We have spent enough time on this already.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
  2017-07-26  8:20           ` Lee Jones
@ 2017-07-28 23:49             ` Mani, Rajmohan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mani, Rajmohan @ 2017-07-28 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-acpi, Linus Walleij,
	Alexandre Courbot, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, sakari.ailus,
	Andy Shevchenko

Hi Lee,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
> 
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> 
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
> > >
> > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Rajmohan Mani wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that
> > > > > > powers
> > > > > a
> > > > > > Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for image
> > > > > > sensors, drives a dual LED for Flash and incorporates two LED
> > > > > > drivers for general purpose indicators.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  18 +++++++
> > > > > >  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
> > > > > >  drivers/mfd/tps68470.c       | 110
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > >  include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h |  97
> > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > >  4 files changed, 226 insertions(+)  create mode 100644
> > > > > > drivers/mfd/tps68470.c  create mode 100644
> > > > > > include/linux/mfd/tps68470.h
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > > > +static const struct regmap_config tps68470_regmap_config = {
> > > > > > +	.reg_bits = 8,
> > > > > > +	.val_bits = 8,
> > > > > > +	.max_register = TPS68470_REG_MAX, };
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int tps68470_chip_init(struct device *dev, struct
> > > > > > +regmap
> > > > > > +*regmap) {
> > > > > > +	unsigned int version;
> > > > > > +	int ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	/* Force software reset */
> > > > > > +	ret = regmap_write(regmap, TPS68470_REG_RESET,
> > > > > TPS68470_REG_RESET_MASK);
> > > > > > +	if (ret < 0)
> > > > >
> > > > > Will 'if (!ret)' do?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0)
> > > > works for
> > > this.
> > >
> > > Yes, 'if (!ret)' does that too.
> > >
> >
> > regmap_write() and regmap_read() functions return 0 on success. Hence
> we can not use 'if (!ret)' here, since we check for error conditions.
> 
> Sorry, this was a typo.
> 
> It should be 'if (ret)'.
> 
> What I'm trying to get at is the " < 0" is not required.
> 

Ack

> > > > > > +		return ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	ret = regmap_read(regmap, TPS68470_REG_REVID,
> &version);
> > > > > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > > > >
> > > > > Same
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0)
> > > > works for
> > > this.
> > >
> > > As above.
> > >
> >
> > Same as above
> >
> > > > > > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to read revision register: %d\n",
> ret);
> > > > > > +		return ret;
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	dev_info(dev, "TPS68470 REVID: 0x%x\n", version);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int tps68470_probe(struct i2c_client *client) {
> > > > > > +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > > > > > +	struct regmap *regmap;
> > > > > > +	int ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client,
> &tps68470_regmap_config);
> > > > > > +	if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> > > > > > +		dev_err(dev, "devm_regmap_init_i2c Error %ld\n",
> > > > > > +			PTR_ERR(regmap));
> > > > > > +		return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	ret = tps68470_chip_init(dev, regmap);
> > > > > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > > > >
> > > > > Same
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > We intend to check error conditions and bail out. So, if (ret < 0)
> > > > works for
> > > this.
> > >
> > > As above.
> > >
> >
> > Same as above
> 
> --
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source
> software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-28 23:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-19 23:20 [PATCH v4 0/3] TPS68470 PMIC drivers Rajmohan Mani
2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470 Rajmohan Mani
2017-07-20  9:03   ` Lee Jones
2017-07-21  0:57     ` Mani, Rajmohan
2017-07-25  9:10       ` Lee Jones
2017-07-25 10:29         ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-07-26  8:23           ` Lee Jones
2017-07-26 10:26             ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-07-28  0:30               ` Mani, Rajmohan
2017-07-28  9:16                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-07-28 23:48                   ` Mani, Rajmohan
2017-07-25 17:05         ` Mani, Rajmohan
2017-07-26  8:20           ` Lee Jones
2017-07-28 23:49             ` Mani, Rajmohan
2017-07-21 12:26     ` Mani, Rajmohan
2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] gpio: Add support for TPS68470 GPIOs Rajmohan Mani
2017-07-19 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ACPI / PMIC: Add TI PMIC TPS68470 operation region driver Rajmohan Mani

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.