All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:26:07 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170721112607.63ac1237@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

between commit:

  9cc5bb18bd0a ("drm/i915: Fix bad comparison in skl_compute_plane_wm")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  eac2cb81fb87 ("drm/i915: cleanup fixed-point wrappers naming")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 40b224b44d1b,ee2a349cfe68..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@@ -4463,11 -4459,11 +4459,11 @@@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const s
  		if ((cpp * cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal / 512 < 1) &&
  		    (plane_bytes_per_line / 512 < 1))
  			selected_result = method2;
 -		else if ((ddb_allocation && ddb_allocation /
 -			fixed16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line)) >= 1)
 +		else if (ddb_allocation >=
- 			 fixed_16_16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line))
- 			selected_result = min_fixed_16_16(method1, method2);
++			 fixed16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line))
+ 			selected_result = min_fixed16(method1, method2);
  		else if (latency >= linetime_us)
- 			selected_result = min_fixed_16_16(method1, method2);
+ 			selected_result = min_fixed16(method1, method2);
  		else
  			selected_result = method1;
  	}

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:26:07 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170721112607.63ac1237@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

between commit:

  9cc5bb18bd0a ("drm/i915: Fix bad comparison in skl_compute_plane_wm")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  eac2cb81fb87 ("drm/i915: cleanup fixed-point wrappers naming")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 40b224b44d1b,ee2a349cfe68..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@@ -4463,11 -4459,11 +4459,11 @@@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const s
  		if ((cpp * cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal / 512 < 1) &&
  		    (plane_bytes_per_line / 512 < 1))
  			selected_result = method2;
 -		else if ((ddb_allocation && ddb_allocation /
 -			fixed16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line)) >= 1)
 +		else if (ddb_allocation >=
- 			 fixed_16_16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line))
- 			selected_result = min_fixed_16_16(method1, method2);
++			 fixed16_to_u32_round_up(plane_blocks_per_line))
+ 			selected_result = min_fixed16(method1, method2);
  		else if (latency >= linetime_us)
- 			selected_result = min_fixed_16_16(method1, method2);
+ 			selected_result = min_fixed16(method1, method2);
  		else
  			selected_result = method1;
  	}
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2017-07-21  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-21  1:26 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2017-07-21  1:26 ` linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-07  2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-07  8:27 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2023-04-17 14:39 broonie
2023-04-17 14:39 ` broonie
2022-05-17  1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-17  1:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-25 16:14 broonie
2022-02-25 16:14 ` broonie
2022-02-22 17:03 broonie
2022-02-22 17:03 ` broonie
2020-05-08  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-08  3:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-07  2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-07  2:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-22  0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-22  0:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  2:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  2:28   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-31  0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-31  0:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-08  0:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-08  0:42   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-08  0:42   ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-05  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-05  1:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-14  0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-14  0:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-14  0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-09  2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-08  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-08  2:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-30  1:14 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-30  1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-30  1:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-22  0:00 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-22  0:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-27 17:14 ` Paul McKenney
2017-03-21 23:57 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-21 23:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-21  0:28 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-21  0:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-14  2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-14  2:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-22 23:06 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-22 23:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-09  2:35 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-09  2:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-03 14:51 Mark Brown
2015-12-03 15:49 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-03 15:49   ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-03 14:47 Mark Brown
2015-12-03 14:52 ` Imre Deak
2015-08-17  3:23 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-17  3:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-05  5:46 mpe@ellerman.id.au
2015-06-05  8:03 ` Jani Nikula
2015-06-05  8:03   ` Jani Nikula
2015-06-09  1:58   ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-09  1:58     ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-16  2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-16  2:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-16 13:43 ` Xi Ruoyao
2015-03-16 15:04   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-03  2:27 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-03  2:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-03  8:24 ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-03  8:24   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-03  8:28   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-17  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-17  3:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  2:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-09  4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-22  5:44 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-22  5:40 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-07  3:24 Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  5:46 Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  5:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  6:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  6:12   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170721112607.63ac1237@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.