All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] RFC: Drop support for libnuma API version < 2
@ 2017-08-28  8:39 Petr Vorel
  2017-08-28 11:54 ` Jan Stancek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2017-08-28  8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Hi,

I'm just about to rewrite mbind/mbind01 test to new API. This test (and some other tests)
still support libnuma API version < 2. Libnuma version 2 was released in 2008. Do we still want
to support older versions?


Kind regards,
Petr

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [LTP] RFC: Drop support for libnuma API version < 2
  2017-08-28  8:39 [LTP] RFC: Drop support for libnuma API version < 2 Petr Vorel
@ 2017-08-28 11:54 ` Jan Stancek
  2017-08-28 12:24   ` Petr Vorel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2017-08-28 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp


----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
> 
> I'm just about to rewrite mbind/mbind01 test to new API. This test (and some
> other tests)
> still support libnuma API version < 2. Libnuma version 2 was released in
> 2008. Do we still want
> to support older versions?

Hi,

I would go with "no" for writing new code against libnuma < 2. Looking at
LTP, I see only handful of tests that have specific code for old (< 2)
libnuma.

But I'd like to keep LTP compilable with these old distros,
since there are lot of tests that still can be used.

Regards,
Jan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [LTP] RFC: Drop support for libnuma API version < 2
  2017-08-28 11:54 ` Jan Stancek
@ 2017-08-28 12:24   ` Petr Vorel
  2017-08-28 12:30     ` Jan Stancek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2017-08-28 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Hi Jan,

> I would go with "no" for writing new code against libnuma < 2. Looking at
> LTP, I see only handful of tests that have specific code for old (< 2)
> libnuma.

> But I'd like to keep LTP compilable with these old distros,
> since there are lot of tests that still can be used.

Thanks for info.
OK, I'll keep legacy code in mbind/mbind01.


Kind regards,
Petr

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [LTP] RFC: Drop support for libnuma API version < 2
  2017-08-28 12:24   ` Petr Vorel
@ 2017-08-28 12:30     ` Jan Stancek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Stancek @ 2017-08-28 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp


----- Original Message -----
> Hi Jan,
> 
> > I would go with "no" for writing new code against libnuma < 2. Looking at
> > LTP, I see only handful of tests that have specific code for old (< 2)
> > libnuma.
> 
> > But I'd like to keep LTP compilable with these old distros,
> > since there are lot of tests that still can be used.
> 
> Thanks for info.
> OK, I'll keep legacy code in mbind/mbind01.

Just to  be clear, I wasn't asking to keep legacy code in mbind01,
I was only asking that new version can still be at least compiled
(and presumably run to exit with TCONF) on old distros.

Regards,
Jan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-28 12:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-08-28  8:39 [LTP] RFC: Drop support for libnuma API version < 2 Petr Vorel
2017-08-28 11:54 ` Jan Stancek
2017-08-28 12:24   ` Petr Vorel
2017-08-28 12:30     ` Jan Stancek

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.