* [PATCH ] net: frag: print frag_mem_limit value in sockstat proc file
@ 2017-08-29 13:05 liujian56
2017-08-29 23:04 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: liujian56 @ 2017-08-29 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem; +Cc: kuznet, yoshfuji, brouer, fw, netdev, liujian56
From: liujian <liujian56@huawei.com>
>From 6d7b857d5( net: use lib/percpu_counter API for fragmentation mem
accounting),
frag_mem_limit and sum_frag_mem_limit have different value if there are
multiple NIC RX CPU.
Print frag_mem_limit value, then we can get more debug info.
Signed-off-by: liujian <liujian56@huawei.com>
---
net/ipv4/proc.c | 3 ++-
net/ipv6/proc.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/proc.c b/net/ipv4/proc.c
index 43eb6567..370cda1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/proc.c
@@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ static int sockstat_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
seq_printf(seq, "RAW: inuse %d\n",
sock_prot_inuse_get(net, &raw_prot));
frag_mem = ip_frag_mem(net);
- seq_printf(seq, "FRAG: inuse %u memory %u\n", !!frag_mem, frag_mem);
+ seq_printf(seq, "FRAG: inuse %u memory %u current mem_limit %d\n",
+ !!frag_mem, frag_mem, frag_mem_limit(&net->ipv4.frags));
return 0;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/proc.c b/net/ipv6/proc.c
index e88bcb8..00680bc 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/proc.c
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ static int sockstat6_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
sock_prot_inuse_get(net, &udplitev6_prot));
seq_printf(seq, "RAW6: inuse %d\n",
sock_prot_inuse_get(net, &rawv6_prot));
- seq_printf(seq, "FRAG6: inuse %u memory %u\n", !!frag_mem, frag_mem);
+ seq_printf(seq, "FRAG6: inuse %u memory %u current mem_limit %d\n",
+ !!frag_mem, frag_mem, frag_mem_limit(&net->ipv6.frags));
return 0;
}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH ] net: frag: print frag_mem_limit value in sockstat proc file
2017-08-29 13:05 [PATCH ] net: frag: print frag_mem_limit value in sockstat proc file liujian56
@ 2017-08-29 23:04 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2017-08-29 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: liujian56; +Cc: kuznet, yoshfuji, brouer, fw, netdev
From: <liujian56@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:05:34 +0800
> From: liujian <liujian56@huawei.com>
>
> From 6d7b857d5( net: use lib/percpu_counter API for fragmentation mem
> accounting),
> frag_mem_limit and sum_frag_mem_limit have different value if there are
> multiple NIC RX CPU.
> Print frag_mem_limit value, then we can get more debug info.
>
> Signed-off-by: liujian <liujian56@huawei.com>
Sorry, I don't think it is justified to change the deprecated procfs
output just for this.
Use tracepoints and other similar facilities to debug situations
like this if you like.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-29 23:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-08-29 13:05 [PATCH ] net: frag: print frag_mem_limit value in sockstat proc file liujian56
2017-08-29 23:04 ` David Miller
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.