Re: Possible regression between 4.9 and 4.13

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 08:36:23AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:51:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:34:56PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:47:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > Is 0xffffffff not a valid value to be stored in and read from mmio space?
> > 
> > For a specific register, doubtful
> 
> Well, "doubtful" means you don't know for sure.
> 
> It's fine to check for "all ones" as a heuristic if that's not a valid
> value for the register read, however a hotplug notification is a
> *definitive* indication the hardware is gone.
> 
> I you seem to prefer forgoing a *definitive* indication for a mere
> heuristic, that doesn't make sense from my point of view.

I still don't know what you are arguing about here.  The _driver_ knows
if a specific read allows all ones as a valid return value.  If it
isn't, then the driver knows the device is now gone.  It's that simple,
don't do that type of check if all ones is a valid read.

And that's not what is happening here anyway, so again, what is this
discussion about?

Unless there's something specific we can do here for the xhci driver, I
think this thread is dead until someone determines what is going wrong
with the hardware the original reporter posted about.

greg k-h