Re: [PATCH 0/6 v3] Add ASoC support for AMD Stoney APUs

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	rajeev kumar <rajeevkumar.linux@gmail.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v3] Add ASoC support for AMD Stoney APUs
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 22:10:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170830211003.3qyilnuylzwjeium@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h8wo28o1.fsf@anholt.net>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 796 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:49:02AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes:

> > You need to get someone from the DRM side to pay attention to the second
> > patch and you need to stop resending the first patch since as has been
> > pointed out a few times now you need to stop sending the first patch
> > which is already in Linus' tree.

> Alex *is* from the DRM side and has reviewed that patch.

*sigh*  Right, OK in that case it would have been really helpful to see
either some mention of this either in text or via a pull request (which
would show the patch having been applied).  It's difficult to keep track
of all the different people who might be DRM maintainers especially when
there's process things like the resend of the patch from Linus' tree
going on.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]