* [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
@ 2017-09-08 9:37 Marta Lofstedt
2017-09-08 10:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marta Lofstedt @ 2017-09-08 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
During IGT testing it has been shown that the specification
defined polling time of 1 us for FCLK_DONE, is sometimes not
enough. This is most probably due to a firmware flaw. As a
workaround, it is better to wait a little bit longer for the
FCLK_DONE to come around, than to leave with an DRM_ERROR and
having FCLK_DONE at a randome time after.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102243
Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index d32911816fc2..f89232e0f6fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -669,8 +669,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
+ /* According to the spec, it should be enough to poll for this 1 us.
+ * However, extensive testing shows that this can take longer.
+ */
if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
- LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
+ LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 100))
DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
2017-09-08 9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
@ 2017-09-08 10:32 ` Patchwork
2017-09-08 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-08 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 30006v1 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/1/mbox/
Test gem_ringfill:
Subgroup basic-default-hang:
none -> INCOMPLETE (fi-pnv-d510) fdo#101600
Test kms_cursor_legacy:
Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100215
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
pass -> SKIP (fi-skl-x1585l) fdo#101781
fdo#101600 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101600
fdo#100215 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100215
fdo#101781 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101781
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:458s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:446s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:224 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:361s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:559s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:184 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:254s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:510s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:254 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34 time:523s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:515s
fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:250 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:465s
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:59 time:439s
fi-glk-2a total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:604s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:443s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:425s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:423s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:515s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:473s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:514s
fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:600s
fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:593s
fi-pnv-d510 total:156 pass:113 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:42
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:470s
fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:536s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:517s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:447s
fi-skl-x1585l total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:484s
fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:557s
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:39 time:403s
16fef66706a3fcdd1d87009beab7e09de1f32807 drm-tip: 2017y-09m-08d-08h-41m-49s UTC integration manifest
00cfa502223f drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5616/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
2017-09-08 9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
2017-09-08 10:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-08 12:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-09-08 13:16 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-09-08 12:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2017-09-08 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 12:37:12PM +0300, Marta Lofstedt wrote:
> During IGT testing it has been shown that the specification
> defined polling time of 1 us for FCLK_DONE, is sometimes not
> enough. This is most probably due to a firmware flaw. As a
> workaround, it is better to wait a little bit longer for the
> FCLK_DONE to come around, than to leave with an DRM_ERROR and
> having FCLK_DONE at a randome time after.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102243
> Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
I think it'd be good to add a summary of the alternate approaches you've
tested (preempt_disable, pm_qos, ...), just for the record to indicate
that there's quite a story hiding behind this patch.
With that fixed, plus ofc assuming full igt doesn't spot any issues:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Neat piece of hw r/eing here :-)
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> index d32911816fc2..f89232e0f6fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -669,8 +669,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
> I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
>
> + /* According to the spec, it should be enough to poll for this 1 us.
> + * However, extensive testing shows that this can take longer.
> + */
> if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
> - LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
> + LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 100))
> DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
>
> val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
2017-09-08 9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
2017-09-08 10:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-09-08 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
@ 2017-09-08 12:19 ` Patchwork
2017-09-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Marta Lofstedt
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-08 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : success
== Summary ==
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible:
fail -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#100368
Test perf:
Subgroup blocking:
pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw) fdo#102252 +1
fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
fdo#102252 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102252
shard-hsw total:2302 pass:1239 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:11 skip:1052 time:9507s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5616/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
2017-09-08 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
@ 2017-09-08 13:16 ` Lofstedt, Marta
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lofstedt, Marta @ 2017-09-08 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: intel-gfx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Vetter
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 3:10 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW
> FCLK_DONE
>
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 12:37:12PM +0300, Marta Lofstedt wrote:
> > During IGT testing it has been shown that the specification defined
> > polling time of 1 us for FCLK_DONE, is sometimes not enough. This is
> > most probably due to a firmware flaw. As a workaround, it is better to
> > wait a little bit longer for the FCLK_DONE to come around, than to
> > leave with an DRM_ERROR and having FCLK_DONE at a randome time
> after.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102243
> > Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
>
> I think it'd be good to add a summary of the alternate approaches you've
> tested (preempt_disable, pm_qos, ...), just for the record to indicate that
> there's quite a story hiding behind this patch.
>
> With that fixed, plus ofc assuming full igt doesn't spot any issues:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>
> Neat piece of hw r/eing here :-)
> -Daniel
Thanks Daniel,
Imre has been a great help while doing this.
V2 with more documentation is coming up.
/Marta
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > index d32911816fc2..f89232e0f6fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > @@ -669,8 +669,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> > val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
> > I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
> >
> > + /* According to the spec, it should be enough to poll for this 1
> us.
> > + * However, extensive testing shows that this can take longer.
> > + */
> > if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
> > - LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE,
> 1))
> > + LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE,
> 100))
> > DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
> >
> > val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
2017-09-08 9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-09-08 12:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-08 13:28 ` Marta Lofstedt
2017-09-08 13:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2) Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marta Lofstedt @ 2017-09-08 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
During IGT testing it has been shown that the specification
defined polling time of 1 us for FCLK_DONE, is sometimes not
enough. The issue is still reproducible while disabling
C-states through the PM QoS framework and also while disabling
preemtion. From this the most plausible explanation is that the
issue is due to a firmware flaw.
As a workaround, it is better to wait a little bit longer for
the FCLK_DONE to come around, than to leave with an DRM_ERROR
and having FCLK_DONE at a randome time after.
While spinning a list of igt tests prone to reproduce the issue
the FCLK_DONE poll failed at approximately 2% of the invocations
of the bdw_set_cdclk function. The longest poll time during this
testing was measured to ~7us. So, the suggested new poll time of
100us is on the safe side.
v2: Added more documentation about investigations done.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102243
Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index d32911816fc2..f89232e0f6fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -669,8 +669,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
+ /* According to the spec, it should be enough to poll for this 1 us.
+ * However, extensive testing shows that this can take longer.
+ */
if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
- LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
+ LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 100))
DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
2017-09-08 9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-09-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Marta Lofstedt
@ 2017-09-08 13:58 ` Patchwork
2017-09-11 9:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-08 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Series 30006v2 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/2/mbox/
Test gem_ringfill:
Subgroup basic-default:
pass -> SKIP (fi-bsw-n3050)
Test kms_cursor_legacy:
Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100215
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
pass -> SKIP (fi-skl-x1585l) fdo#101781
fdo#100215 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100215
fdo#101781 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101781
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:456s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:443s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:224 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:364s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:242 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:47 time:551s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:184 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:255s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:525s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:254 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34 time:520s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:513s
fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:250 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:463s
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:59 time:437s
fi-glk-2a total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:617s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:447s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:427s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:424s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:512s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:478s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:513s
fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:598s
fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:600s
fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:529s
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:475s
fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:532s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:513s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:449s
fi-skl-x1585l total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:486s
fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:552s
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:39 time:414s
16fef66706a3fcdd1d87009beab7e09de1f32807 drm-tip: 2017y-09m-08d-08h-41m-49s UTC integration manifest
14265d7ea268 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5619/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
2017-09-08 9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2017-09-08 13:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2017-09-11 9:33 ` Patchwork
2017-09-11 11:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-09-11 12:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-11 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 30006v2 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/2/mbox/
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
pass -> SKIP (fi-skl-x1585l) fdo#101781
fdo#101781 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101781
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:450s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:458s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:224 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:377s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:533s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:184 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:268s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:506s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:254 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34 time:498s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:490s
fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:250 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:459s
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:59 time:449s
fi-glk-2a total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:597s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:428s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:407s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:436s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:487s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:461s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:491s
fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:578s
fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:583s
fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:553s
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:454s
fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:518s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:501s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:458s
fi-skl-x1585l total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:469s
fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:571s
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:422s
9ef5732ddf6924e98a5c5d034a3535cff14f72bf drm-tip: 2017y-09m-10d-21h-59m-53s UTC integration manifest
41717f219fee drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5636/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
2017-09-08 9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2017-09-11 9:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-11 11:05 ` Patchwork
2017-09-11 12:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-11 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Test kms_setmode:
Subgroup basic:
pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw) fdo#99912
Test gem_flink_race:
Subgroup flink_close:
pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw) fdo#102655
Test gem_persistent_relocs:
Subgroup forked-interruptible-faulting-reloc:
pass -> FAIL (shard-hsw)
fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
fdo#102655 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102655
shard-hsw total:2302 pass:1236 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:14 skip:1052 time:9627s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5636/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
2017-09-08 9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2017-09-11 11:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-11 12:15 ` Patchwork
2017-09-12 9:30 ` Imre Deak
7 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-11 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 30006v2 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/2/mbox/
Test kms_cursor_legacy:
Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
fail -> PASS (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100215
fdo#100215 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100215
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:445s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:456s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:224 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:377s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:535s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:184 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:271s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:505s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:254 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34 time:502s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:496s
fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:250 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:447s
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:59 time:452s
fi-glk-2a total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:590s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:427s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:405s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:439s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:496s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:467s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:488s
fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:587s
fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:589s
fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:554s
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:459s
fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:521s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:503s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:457s
fi-skl-x1585l total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:480s
fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:565s
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:39 time:426s
b8ed44bfbb7cf1dd40a5b5c15da77053fdc0e0d0 drm-tip: 2017y-09m-11d-11h-22m-27s UTC integration manifest
4df9d5006ad9 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5639/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
2017-09-11 12:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-12 9:30 ` Imre Deak
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2017-09-12 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:15:21PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
> State : success
Thanks for the patch and review, pushed it to -dinq.
For the future please check the preferred multi-line comment format.
Fixed this up now while applying.
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 30006v2 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/2/mbox/
>
> Test kms_cursor_legacy:
> Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
> fail -> PASS (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100215
>
> fdo#100215 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100215
>
> fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:445s
> fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:456s
> fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:224 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:377s
> fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:535s
> fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:184 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:271s
> fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:505s
> fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:254 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34 time:502s
> fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:496s
> fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:250 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:447s
> fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:59 time:452s
> fi-glk-2a total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:590s
> fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:427s
> fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:405s
> fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:439s
> fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:496s
> fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:467s
> fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:488s
> fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:587s
> fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:589s
> fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:554s
> fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:459s
> fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:521s
> fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:503s
> fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:457s
> fi-skl-x1585l total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:480s
> fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 time:565s
> fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:39 time:426s
>
> b8ed44bfbb7cf1dd40a5b5c15da77053fdc0e0d0 drm-tip: 2017y-09m-11d-11h-22m-27s UTC integration manifest
> 4df9d5006ad9 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5639/
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-12 9:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-08 9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
2017-09-08 10:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-09-08 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2017-09-08 13:16 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-09-08 12:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
2017-09-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Marta Lofstedt
2017-09-08 13:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2) Patchwork
2017-09-11 9:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-09-11 11:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-09-11 12:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-09-12 9:30 ` Imre Deak
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.