All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
@ 2017-09-08  9:37 Marta Lofstedt
  2017-09-08 10:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marta Lofstedt @ 2017-09-08  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

During IGT testing it has been shown that the specification
defined polling time of 1 us for FCLK_DONE, is sometimes not
enough. This is most probably due to a firmware flaw. As a
workaround, it is better to wait a little bit longer for the
FCLK_DONE to come around, than to leave with an DRM_ERROR and
having FCLK_DONE at a randome time after.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102243
Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index d32911816fc2..f89232e0f6fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -669,8 +669,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
 	I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
 
+	/* According to the spec, it should be enough to poll for this 1 us.
+	 * However, extensive testing shows that this can take longer.
+	 */
 	if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
-			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
+			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 100))
 		DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
 
 	val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
  2017-09-08  9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
@ 2017-09-08 10:32 ` Patchwork
  2017-09-08 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-08 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 30006v1 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/1/mbox/

Test gem_ringfill:
        Subgroup basic-default-hang:
                none       -> INCOMPLETE (fi-pnv-d510) fdo#101600
Test kms_cursor_legacy:
        Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
                pass       -> FAIL       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100215
Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
                pass       -> SKIP       (fi-skl-x1585l) fdo#101781

fdo#101600 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101600
fdo#100215 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100215
fdo#101781 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101781

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:458s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:446s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:361s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:559s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:184  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:105 time:254s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:510s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:34  time:523s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:515s
fi-cfl-s         total:289  pass:250  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:465s
fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:230  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:59  time:439s
fi-glk-2a        total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:604s
fi-hsw-4770      total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:443s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:425s
fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:423s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:515s
fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:473s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:514s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:289  pass:270  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:600s
fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:593s
fi-pnv-d510      total:156  pass:113  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:42 
fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:470s
fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:536s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:517s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:447s
fi-skl-x1585l    total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:484s
fi-snb-2520m     total:289  pass:251  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:557s
fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:39  time:403s

16fef66706a3fcdd1d87009beab7e09de1f32807 drm-tip: 2017y-09m-08d-08h-41m-49s UTC integration manifest
00cfa502223f drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5616/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
  2017-09-08  9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
  2017-09-08 10:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-08 12:09 ` Daniel Vetter
  2017-09-08 13:16   ` Lofstedt, Marta
  2017-09-08 12:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2017-09-08 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 12:37:12PM +0300, Marta Lofstedt wrote:
> During IGT testing it has been shown that the specification
> defined polling time of 1 us for FCLK_DONE, is sometimes not
> enough. This is most probably due to a firmware flaw. As a
> workaround, it is better to wait a little bit longer for the
> FCLK_DONE to come around, than to leave with an DRM_ERROR and
> having FCLK_DONE at a randome time after.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102243
> Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>

I think it'd be good to add a summary of the alternate approaches you've
tested (preempt_disable, pm_qos, ...), just for the record to indicate
that there's quite a story hiding behind this patch.

With that fixed, plus ofc assuming full igt doesn't spot any issues:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Neat piece of hw r/eing here :-)
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> index d32911816fc2..f89232e0f6fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -669,8 +669,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
>  	I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
>  
> +	/* According to the spec, it should be enough to poll for this 1 us.
> +	 * However, extensive testing shows that this can take longer.
> +	 */
>  	if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
> -			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
> +			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 100))
>  		DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
>  
>  	val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
  2017-09-08  9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
  2017-09-08 10:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2017-09-08 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
@ 2017-09-08 12:19 ` Patchwork
  2017-09-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Marta Lofstedt
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-08 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : success

== Summary ==

Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup wf_vblank-ts-check-interruptible:
                fail       -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#100368
Test perf:
        Subgroup blocking:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#102252 +1

fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
fdo#102252 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102252

shard-hsw        total:2302 pass:1239 dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:11  skip:1052 time:9507s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5616/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
  2017-09-08 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
@ 2017-09-08 13:16   ` Lofstedt, Marta
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lofstedt, Marta @ 2017-09-08 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: intel-gfx



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Vetter
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 3:10 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW
> FCLK_DONE
> 
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 12:37:12PM +0300, Marta Lofstedt wrote:
> > During IGT testing it has been shown that the specification defined
> > polling time of 1 us for FCLK_DONE, is sometimes not enough. This is
> > most probably due to a firmware flaw. As a workaround, it is better to
> > wait a little bit longer for the FCLK_DONE to come around, than to
> > leave with an DRM_ERROR and having FCLK_DONE at a randome time
> after.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102243
> > Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
> 
> I think it'd be good to add a summary of the alternate approaches you've
> tested (preempt_disable, pm_qos, ...), just for the record to indicate that
> there's quite a story hiding behind this patch.
> 
> With that fixed, plus ofc assuming full igt doesn't spot any issues:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> 
> Neat piece of hw r/eing here :-)
> -Daniel
Thanks Daniel, 
Imre has been a great help while doing this.
V2 with more documentation is coming up.

/Marta
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > index d32911816fc2..f89232e0f6fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > @@ -669,8 +669,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> >  	val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
> >  	I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
> >
> > +	/* According to the spec, it should be enough to poll for this 1
> us.
> > +	 * However, extensive testing shows that this can take longer.
> > +	 */
> >  	if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
> > -			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE,
> 1))
> > +			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE,
> 100))
> >  		DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
> >
> >  	val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
  2017-09-08  9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-09-08 12:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-08 13:28 ` Marta Lofstedt
  2017-09-08 13:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2) Patchwork
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marta Lofstedt @ 2017-09-08 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

During IGT testing it has been shown that the specification
defined polling time of 1 us for FCLK_DONE, is sometimes not
enough. The issue is still reproducible while disabling
C-states through the PM QoS framework and also while disabling
preemtion. From this the most plausible explanation is that the
issue is due to a firmware flaw.
As a workaround, it is better to wait a little bit longer for
the FCLK_DONE to come around, than to leave with an DRM_ERROR
and having FCLK_DONE at a randome time after.
While spinning a list of igt tests prone to reproduce the issue
the FCLK_DONE poll failed at approximately 2% of the invocations
of the bdw_set_cdclk function. The longest poll time during this
testing was measured to ~7us. So, the suggested new poll time of
100us is on the safe side.

v2: Added more documentation about investigations done.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102243
Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index d32911816fc2..f89232e0f6fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -669,8 +669,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	val |= LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK;
 	I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
 
+	/* According to the spec, it should be enough to poll for this 1 us.
+	 * However, extensive testing shows that this can take longer.
+	 */
 	if (wait_for_us(I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
-			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 1))
+			LCPLL_CD_SOURCE_FCLK_DONE, 100))
 		DRM_ERROR("Switching to FCLK failed\n");
 
 	val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
  2017-09-08  9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-09-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Marta Lofstedt
@ 2017-09-08 13:58 ` Patchwork
  2017-09-11  9:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-08 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : warning

== Summary ==

Series 30006v2 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/2/mbox/

Test gem_ringfill:
        Subgroup basic-default:
                pass       -> SKIP       (fi-bsw-n3050)
Test kms_cursor_legacy:
        Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
                pass       -> FAIL       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100215
Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
                pass       -> SKIP       (fi-skl-x1585l) fdo#101781

fdo#100215 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100215
fdo#101781 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101781

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:456s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:443s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:364s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:242  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:47  time:551s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:184  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:105 time:255s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:525s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:34  time:520s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:513s
fi-cfl-s         total:289  pass:250  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:463s
fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:230  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:59  time:437s
fi-glk-2a        total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:617s
fi-hsw-4770      total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:447s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:427s
fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:424s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:512s
fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:478s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:513s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:289  pass:270  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:598s
fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:600s
fi-pnv-d510      total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:529s
fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:475s
fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:532s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:513s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:449s
fi-skl-x1585l    total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:486s
fi-snb-2520m     total:289  pass:251  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:552s
fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:39  time:414s

16fef66706a3fcdd1d87009beab7e09de1f32807 drm-tip: 2017y-09m-08d-08h-41m-49s UTC integration manifest
14265d7ea268 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5619/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
  2017-09-08  9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-09-08 13:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2017-09-11  9:33 ` Patchwork
  2017-09-11 11:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  2017-09-11 12:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-11  9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 30006v2 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/2/mbox/

Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
                pass       -> SKIP       (fi-skl-x1585l) fdo#101781

fdo#101781 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101781

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:450s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:458s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:377s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:533s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:184  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:105 time:268s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:506s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:34  time:498s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:490s
fi-cfl-s         total:289  pass:250  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:459s
fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:230  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:59  time:449s
fi-glk-2a        total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:597s
fi-hsw-4770      total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:428s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:407s
fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:436s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:487s
fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:461s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:491s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:289  pass:270  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:578s
fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:583s
fi-pnv-d510      total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:553s
fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:454s
fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:518s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:501s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:458s
fi-skl-x1585l    total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:469s
fi-snb-2520m     total:289  pass:251  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:571s
fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:422s

9ef5732ddf6924e98a5c5d034a3535cff14f72bf drm-tip: 2017y-09m-10d-21h-59m-53s UTC integration manifest
41717f219fee drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5636/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
  2017-09-08  9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-09-11  9:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-11 11:05 ` Patchwork
  2017-09-11 12:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-11 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : failure

== Summary ==

Test kms_setmode:
        Subgroup basic:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#99912
Test gem_flink_race:
        Subgroup flink_close:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#102655
Test gem_persistent_relocs:
        Subgroup forked-interruptible-faulting-reloc:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw)

fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
fdo#102655 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102655

shard-hsw        total:2302 pass:1236 dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:14  skip:1052 time:9627s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5636/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
  2017-09-08  9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-09-11 11:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-11 12:15 ` Patchwork
  2017-09-12  9:30   ` Imre Deak
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-09-11 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marta Lofstedt; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 30006v2 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/2/mbox/

Test kms_cursor_legacy:
        Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
                fail       -> PASS       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100215

fdo#100215 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100215

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:445s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:456s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:377s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:535s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:184  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:105 time:271s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:505s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:34  time:502s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:496s
fi-cfl-s         total:289  pass:250  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:447s
fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:230  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:59  time:452s
fi-glk-2a        total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:590s
fi-hsw-4770      total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:427s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:405s
fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:439s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:496s
fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:467s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:488s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:289  pass:270  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:587s
fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:589s
fi-pnv-d510      total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:554s
fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:459s
fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:521s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:503s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:457s
fi-skl-x1585l    total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:480s
fi-snb-2520m     total:289  pass:251  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:565s
fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:39  time:426s

b8ed44bfbb7cf1dd40a5b5c15da77053fdc0e0d0 drm-tip: 2017y-09m-11d-11h-22m-27s UTC integration manifest
4df9d5006ad9 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5639/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
  2017-09-11 12:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2017-09-12  9:30   ` Imre Deak
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2017-09-12  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Daniel Vetter

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:15:21PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30006/
> State : success

Thanks for the patch and review, pushed it to -dinq.

For the future please check the preferred multi-line comment format.
Fixed this up now while applying.

> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> Series 30006v2 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30006/revisions/2/mbox/
> 
> Test kms_cursor_legacy:
>         Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
>                 fail       -> PASS       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100215
> 
> fdo#100215 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100215
> 
> fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:445s
> fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:456s
> fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:64  time:377s
> fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:535s
> fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:184  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:105 time:271s
> fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:505s
> fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:34  time:502s
> fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:496s
> fi-cfl-s         total:289  pass:250  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:447s
> fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:230  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:59  time:452s
> fi-glk-2a        total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:590s
> fi-hsw-4770      total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:427s
> fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:405s
> fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:439s
> fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:496s
> fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:467s
> fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:488s
> fi-kbl-7560u     total:289  pass:270  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:587s
> fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:589s
> fi-pnv-d510      total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:554s
> fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:459s
> fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:521s
> fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:503s
> fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:457s
> fi-skl-x1585l    total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:480s
> fi-snb-2520m     total:289  pass:251  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:38  time:565s
> fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:39  time:426s
> 
> b8ed44bfbb7cf1dd40a5b5c15da77053fdc0e0d0 drm-tip: 2017y-09m-11d-11h-22m-27s UTC integration manifest
> 4df9d5006ad9 drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_5639/
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-12  9:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-08  9:37 [PATCH] drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE Marta Lofstedt
2017-09-08 10:32 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-09-08 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2017-09-08 13:16   ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-09-08 12:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
2017-09-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Marta Lofstedt
2017-09-08 13:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Increase poll time for BDW FCLK_DONE (rev2) Patchwork
2017-09-11  9:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-09-11 11:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-09-11 12:15 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-09-12  9:30   ` Imre Deak

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.