All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] mm/memblock.c: using uninitialized value idx in memblock_add_range()
@ 2017-09-08 22:15 ` gurugio
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: gurugio @ 2017-09-08 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel; +Cc: Gioh Kim, Gioh Kim

From: Gioh Kim <gurugio@hanmail.net>

In memblock_add_range(), idx variable is a local value
but I cannot find initialization of idx value.
I checked idx value on my Qemu emulator. It was zero.
Is there any hidden initialization code?

Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
---
 mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 7b8a5db..23374bc 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
 	bool insert = false;
 	phys_addr_t obase = base;
 	phys_addr_t end = base + memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
-	int idx, nr_new;
+	int idx = 0, nr_new;
 	struct memblock_region *rgn;
 
 	if (!size)
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [RFC] mm/memblock.c: using uninitialized value idx in memblock_add_range()
@ 2017-09-08 22:15 ` gurugio
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: gurugio @ 2017-09-08 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, linux-kernel; +Cc: Gioh Kim, Gioh Kim

From: Gioh Kim <gurugio@hanmail.net>

In memblock_add_range(), idx variable is a local value
but I cannot find initialization of idx value.
I checked idx value on my Qemu emulator. It was zero.
Is there any hidden initialization code?

Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
---
 mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 7b8a5db..23374bc 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
 	bool insert = false;
 	phys_addr_t obase = base;
 	phys_addr_t end = base + memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
-	int idx, nr_new;
+	int idx = 0, nr_new;
 	struct memblock_region *rgn;
 
 	if (!size)
-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] mm/memblock.c: using uninitialized value idx in memblock_add_range()
  2017-09-08 22:15 ` gurugio
@ 2017-09-12 15:07   ` Michal Hocko
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2017-09-12 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gurugio; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Gioh Kim, Gioh Kim

On Sat 09-09-17 00:15:33, gurugio@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Gioh Kim <gurugio@hanmail.net>
> 
> In memblock_add_range(), idx variable is a local value
> but I cannot find initialization of idx value.
> I checked idx value on my Qemu emulator. It was zero.
> Is there any hidden initialization code?

Yes for_each_memblock_type. Ugly as hell! Something to clean up I guess.
Just make the index explicit argument of the macro.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 7b8a5db..23374bc 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
>  	bool insert = false;
>  	phys_addr_t obase = base;
>  	phys_addr_t end = base + memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
> -	int idx, nr_new;
> +	int idx = 0, nr_new;
>  	struct memblock_region *rgn;
>  
>  	if (!size)
> -- 
> 2.7.4

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] mm/memblock.c: using uninitialized value idx in memblock_add_range()
@ 2017-09-12 15:07   ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2017-09-12 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gurugio; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Gioh Kim, Gioh Kim

On Sat 09-09-17 00:15:33, gurugio@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Gioh Kim <gurugio@hanmail.net>
> 
> In memblock_add_range(), idx variable is a local value
> but I cannot find initialization of idx value.
> I checked idx value on my Qemu emulator. It was zero.
> Is there any hidden initialization code?

Yes for_each_memblock_type. Ugly as hell! Something to clean up I guess.
Just make the index explicit argument of the macro.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 7b8a5db..23374bc 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
>  	bool insert = false;
>  	phys_addr_t obase = base;
>  	phys_addr_t end = base + memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
> -	int idx, nr_new;
> +	int idx = 0, nr_new;
>  	struct memblock_region *rgn;
>  
>  	if (!size)
> -- 
> 2.7.4

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-12 15:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-08 22:15 [RFC] mm/memblock.c: using uninitialized value idx in memblock_add_range() gurugio
2017-09-08 22:15 ` gurugio
2017-09-12 15:07 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-12 15:07   ` Michal Hocko

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.