All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [v2] rsi: sdio suspend and resume support
@ 2017-09-21 12:51 Amitkumar Karwar
  2017-09-21 13:38 ` Souptick Joarder
  2017-09-25  8:26 ` Kalle Valo
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Amitkumar Karwar @ 2017-09-21 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kalle Valo
  Cc: linux-wireless, Amitkumar Karwar, Prameela Rani Garnepudi,
	Karun Eagalapati

From: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>

SDIO suspend and resume handlers are implemented and verified
that device works after suspend/resume cycle.

Signed-off-by: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <amit.karwar@redpinesignals.com>
---
v2: Replaced never ending while loop with 20msecs loop(Kalle Valo)
---
 drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h     |   2 +
 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
index 8d3a483..b3f8006 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
@@ -1059,16 +1059,136 @@ static void rsi_disconnect(struct sdio_func *pfunction)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps(struct rsi_hw *adapter)
+{
+	struct rsi_91x_sdiodev *dev =
+		(struct rsi_91x_sdiodev *)adapter->rsi_dev;
+	struct sdio_func *func = dev->pfunction;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = sdio_set_host_pm_flags(func, MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER);
+	if (ret)
+		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "Set sdio keep pwr flag failed: %d\n", ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int rsi_sdio_disable_interrupts(struct sdio_func *pfunc)
+{
+	struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunc);
+	u8 isr_status = 0, data = 0;
+	int ret;
+	unsigned long t1;
+
+	rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "Waiting for interrupts to be cleared..");
+	t1 = jiffies;
+	do {
+		rsi_sdio_read_register(adapter, RSI_FN1_INT_REGISTER,
+				       &isr_status);
+		rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, ".");
+	} while ((isr_status) && (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - t1) < 20));
+	rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "Interrupts cleared\n");
+
+	sdio_claim_host(pfunc);
+	ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
+			"%s: Failed to read int enable register\n",
+			__func__);
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	data &= RSI_INT_ENABLE_MASK;
+	ret = rsi_cmd52writebyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, data);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
+			"%s: Failed to write to int enable register\n",
+			__func__);
+		goto done;
+	}
+	ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
+			"%s: Failed to read int enable register\n",
+			__func__);
+		goto done;
+	}
+	rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "int enable reg content = %x\n", data);
+
+done:
+	sdio_release_host(pfunc);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int rsi_sdio_enable_interrupts(struct sdio_func *pfunc)
+{
+	u8 data;
+	int ret;
+
+	sdio_claim_host(pfunc);
+	ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
+			"%s: Failed to read int enable register\n", __func__);
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	data |= ~RSI_INT_ENABLE_MASK & 0xff;
+
+	ret = rsi_cmd52writebyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, data);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
+			"%s: Failed to write to int enable register\n",
+			__func__);
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
+			"%s: Failed to read int enable register\n", __func__);
+		goto done;
+	}
+	rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "int enable reg content = %x\n", data);
+
+done:
+	sdio_release_host(pfunc);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int rsi_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
-	/* Not yet implemented */
-	return -ENOSYS;
+	int ret;
+	struct sdio_func *pfunction = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
+	struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunction);
+	struct rsi_common *common;
+
+	if (!adapter) {
+		rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "Device is not ready\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+	common = adapter->priv;
+	rsi_sdio_disable_interrupts(pfunction);
+
+	ret = rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps(adapter);
+	if (ret)
+		rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE,
+			"Setting power management caps failed\n");
+	common->fsm_state = FSM_CARD_NOT_READY;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int rsi_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
-	/* Not yet implemented */
-	return -ENOSYS;
+	struct sdio_func *pfunction = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
+	struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunction);
+	struct rsi_common *common = adapter->priv;
+
+	common->fsm_state = FSM_MAC_INIT_DONE;
+	rsi_sdio_enable_interrupts(pfunction);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static const struct dev_pm_ops rsi_pm_ops = {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h
index 95e4bed..49c549b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ enum sdio_interrupt_type {
 
 #define RSI_DEVICE_BUFFER_STATUS_REGISTER       0xf3
 #define RSI_FN1_INT_REGISTER                    0xf9
+#define RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER			0x04
+#define RSI_INT_ENABLE_MASK			0xfc
 #define RSI_SD_REQUEST_MASTER                   0x10000
 
 /* FOR SD CARD ONLY */
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [v2] rsi: sdio suspend and resume support
  2017-09-21 12:51 [v2] rsi: sdio suspend and resume support Amitkumar Karwar
@ 2017-09-21 13:38 ` Souptick Joarder
  2017-09-21 14:32   ` Amitkumar Karwar
  2017-09-25  8:26 ` Kalle Valo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Souptick Joarder @ 2017-09-21 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amitkumar Karwar
  Cc: Kalle Valo, linux-wireless, Amitkumar Karwar,
	Prameela Rani Garnepudi, Karun Eagalapati

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
>
> SDIO suspend and resume handlers are implemented and verified
> that device works after suspend/resume cycle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <amit.karwar@redpinesignals.com>
> ---
> v2: Replaced never ending while loop with 20msecs loop(Kalle Valo)
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h     |   2 +
>  2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> index 8d3a483..b3f8006 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
> @@ -1059,16 +1059,136 @@ static void rsi_disconnect(struct sdio_func *pfunction)
>  }
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps(struct rsi_hw *adapter)
> +{
> +       struct rsi_91x_sdiodev *dev =
> +               (struct rsi_91x_sdiodev *)adapter->rsi_dev;
> +       struct sdio_func *func = dev->pfunction;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = sdio_set_host_pm_flags(func, MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER);
> +       if (ret)
> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "Set sdio keep pwr flag failed: %d\n", ret);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rsi_sdio_disable_interrupts(struct sdio_func *pfunc)
> +{
> +       struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunc);
> +       u8 isr_status = 0, data = 0;
> +       int ret;
> +       unsigned long t1;
> +
> +       rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "Waiting for interrupts to be cleared..");
> +       t1 = jiffies;
> +       do {
> +               rsi_sdio_read_register(adapter, RSI_FN1_INT_REGISTER,
> +                                      &isr_status);
> +               rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, ".");
> +       } while ((isr_status) && (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - t1) < 20));
> +       rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "Interrupts cleared\n");
> +
> +       sdio_claim_host(pfunc);
> +       ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
> +                       "%s: Failed to read int enable register\n",
> +                       __func__);
> +               goto done;
> +       }
> +
> +       data &= RSI_INT_ENABLE_MASK;
> +       ret = rsi_cmd52writebyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, data);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
> +                       "%s: Failed to write to int enable register\n",
> +                       __func__);
> +               goto done;
> +       }
> +       ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
> +                       "%s: Failed to read int enable register\n",
> +                       __func__);
> +               goto done;
> +       }
> +       rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "int enable reg content = %x\n", data);
> +
> +done:
> +       sdio_release_host(pfunc);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rsi_sdio_enable_interrupts(struct sdio_func *pfunc)
> +{
> +       u8 data;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       sdio_claim_host(pfunc);
> +       ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
> +                       "%s: Failed to read int enable register\n", __func__);
> +               goto done;
> +       }
> +
> +       data |= ~RSI_INT_ENABLE_MASK & 0xff;
> +
> +       ret = rsi_cmd52writebyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, data);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
> +                       "%s: Failed to write to int enable register\n",
> +                       __func__);
> +               goto done;
> +       }
> +
> +       ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
> +                       "%s: Failed to read int enable register\n", __func__);
> +               goto done;
> +       }
> +       rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "int enable reg content = %x\n", data);
> +
> +done:
> +       sdio_release_host(pfunc);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int rsi_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -       /* Not yet implemented */
> -       return -ENOSYS;
> +       int ret;
> +       struct sdio_func *pfunction = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
> +       struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunction);
> +       struct rsi_common *common;
> +
> +       if (!adapter) {
> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "Device is not ready\n");
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +       }
> +       common = adapter->priv;
> +       rsi_sdio_disable_interrupts(pfunction);
> +
> +       ret = rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps(adapter);
> +       if (ret)
> +               rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE,
> +                       "Setting power management caps failed\n");
> +       common->fsm_state = FSM_CARD_NOT_READY;
> +
> +       return 0;

I think it should be return ret if rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps() fails.
>  }
>
>  static int rsi_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -       /* Not yet implemented */
> -       return -ENOSYS;
> +       struct sdio_func *pfunction = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
> +       struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunction);
> +       struct rsi_common *common = adapter->priv;
> +
> +       common->fsm_state = FSM_MAC_INIT_DONE;
> +       rsi_sdio_enable_interrupts(pfunction);
> +
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops rsi_pm_ops = {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h
> index 95e4bed..49c549b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ enum sdio_interrupt_type {
>
>  #define RSI_DEVICE_BUFFER_STATUS_REGISTER       0xf3
>  #define RSI_FN1_INT_REGISTER                    0xf9
> +#define RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER                        0x04
> +#define RSI_INT_ENABLE_MASK                    0xfc
>  #define RSI_SD_REQUEST_MASTER                   0x10000
>
>  /* FOR SD CARD ONLY */
> --
> 2.7.4
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [v2] rsi: sdio suspend and resume support
  2017-09-21 13:38 ` Souptick Joarder
@ 2017-09-21 14:32   ` Amitkumar Karwar
  2017-09-22  9:03     ` Arend van Spriel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Amitkumar Karwar @ 2017-09-21 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Souptick Joarder
  Cc: Kalle Valo, linux-wireless, Amitkumar Karwar,
	Prameela Rani Garnepudi, Karun Eagalapati

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
>>
>> SDIO suspend and resume handlers are implemented and verified
>> that device works after suspend/resume cycle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <amit.karwar@redpinesignals.com>
>> ---
>> v2: Replaced never ending while loop with 20msecs loop(Kalle Valo)
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h     |   2 +
>>  2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>> index 8d3a483..b3f8006 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>> @@ -1059,16 +1059,136 @@ static void rsi_disconnect(struct sdio_func *pfunction)
>>  }
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +static int rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps(struct rsi_hw *adapter)
>> +{
>> +       struct rsi_91x_sdiodev *dev =
>> +               (struct rsi_91x_sdiodev *)adapter->rsi_dev;
>> +       struct sdio_func *func = dev->pfunction;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       ret = sdio_set_host_pm_flags(func, MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "Set sdio keep pwr flag failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rsi_sdio_disable_interrupts(struct sdio_func *pfunc)
>> +{
>> +       struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunc);
>> +       u8 isr_status = 0, data = 0;
>> +       int ret;
>> +       unsigned long t1;
>> +
>> +       rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "Waiting for interrupts to be cleared..");
>> +       t1 = jiffies;
>> +       do {
>> +               rsi_sdio_read_register(adapter, RSI_FN1_INT_REGISTER,
>> +                                      &isr_status);
>> +               rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, ".");
>> +       } while ((isr_status) && (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - t1) < 20));
>> +       rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "Interrupts cleared\n");
>> +
>> +       sdio_claim_host(pfunc);
>> +       ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
>> +                       "%s: Failed to read int enable register\n",
>> +                       __func__);
>> +               goto done;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       data &= RSI_INT_ENABLE_MASK;
>> +       ret = rsi_cmd52writebyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, data);
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
>> +                       "%s: Failed to write to int enable register\n",
>> +                       __func__);
>> +               goto done;
>> +       }
>> +       ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
>> +                       "%s: Failed to read int enable register\n",
>> +                       __func__);
>> +               goto done;
>> +       }
>> +       rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "int enable reg content = %x\n", data);
>> +
>> +done:
>> +       sdio_release_host(pfunc);
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rsi_sdio_enable_interrupts(struct sdio_func *pfunc)
>> +{
>> +       u8 data;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       sdio_claim_host(pfunc);
>> +       ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
>> +                       "%s: Failed to read int enable register\n", __func__);
>> +               goto done;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       data |= ~RSI_INT_ENABLE_MASK & 0xff;
>> +
>> +       ret = rsi_cmd52writebyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, data);
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
>> +                       "%s: Failed to write to int enable register\n",
>> +                       __func__);
>> +               goto done;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       ret = rsi_cmd52readbyte(pfunc->card, RSI_INT_ENABLE_REGISTER, &data);
>> +       if (ret < 0) {
>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE,
>> +                       "%s: Failed to read int enable register\n", __func__);
>> +               goto done;
>> +       }
>> +       rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE, "int enable reg content = %x\n", data);
>> +
>> +done:
>> +       sdio_release_host(pfunc);
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int rsi_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>> -       /* Not yet implemented */
>> -       return -ENOSYS;
>> +       int ret;
>> +       struct sdio_func *pfunction = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
>> +       struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunction);
>> +       struct rsi_common *common;
>> +
>> +       if (!adapter) {
>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "Device is not ready\n");
>> +               return -ENODEV;
>> +       }
>> +       common = adapter->priv;
>> +       rsi_sdio_disable_interrupts(pfunction);
>> +
>> +       ret = rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps(adapter);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE,
>> +                       "Setting power management caps failed\n");
>> +       common->fsm_state = FSM_CARD_NOT_READY;
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>
> I think it should be return ret if rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps() fails.

This is intentional. We don't want to return error and abort system
suspend operation due to this.

Regards,
Amitkumar Karwar

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [v2] rsi: sdio suspend and resume support
  2017-09-21 14:32   ` Amitkumar Karwar
@ 2017-09-22  9:03     ` Arend van Spriel
  2017-09-22 11:50       ` Amitkumar Karwar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arend van Spriel @ 2017-09-22  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amitkumar Karwar, Souptick Joarder
  Cc: Kalle Valo, linux-wireless, Amitkumar Karwar,
	Prameela Rani Garnepudi, Karun Eagalapati

On 9/21/2017 4:32 PM, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> SDIO suspend and resume handlers are implemented and verified
>>> that device works after suspend/resume cycle.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <amit.karwar@redpinesignals.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2: Replaced never ending while loop with 20msecs loop(Kalle Valo)
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>   drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h     |   2 +
>>>   2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>>> index 8d3a483..b3f8006 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>>> @@ -1059,16 +1059,136 @@ static void rsi_disconnect(struct sdio_func *pfunction)

[...]

>>>   static int rsi_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>   {
>>> -       /* Not yet implemented */
>>> -       return -ENOSYS;
>>> +       int ret;
>>> +       struct sdio_func *pfunction = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
>>> +       struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunction);
>>> +       struct rsi_common *common;
>>> +
>>> +       if (!adapter) {
>>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "Device is not ready\n");
>>> +               return -ENODEV;
>>> +       }
>>> +       common = adapter->priv;
>>> +       rsi_sdio_disable_interrupts(pfunction);
>>> +
>>> +       ret = rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps(adapter);
>>> +       if (ret)
>>> +               rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE,
>>> +                       "Setting power management caps failed\n");
>>> +       common->fsm_state = FSM_CARD_NOT_READY;
>>> +
>>> +       return 0;
>>
>> I think it should be return ret if rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps() fails.
>
> This is intentional. We don't want to return error and abort system
> suspend operation due to this.

Has it been verified that powering down the SDIO bus during the suspend 
works for you device. In other words  does the claim in the commit 
message apply to a sdio host controller not supporting the KEEP_POWER 
flag as well?

Regards,
Arend

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [v2] rsi: sdio suspend and resume support
  2017-09-22  9:03     ` Arend van Spriel
@ 2017-09-22 11:50       ` Amitkumar Karwar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Amitkumar Karwar @ 2017-09-22 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arend van Spriel
  Cc: Souptick Joarder, Kalle Valo, linux-wireless, Amitkumar Karwar,
	Prameela Rani Garnepudi, Karun Eagalapati

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Arend van Spriel
<arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> wrote:
> On 9/21/2017 4:32 PM, Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> SDIO suspend and resume handlers are implemented and verified
>>>> that device works after suspend/resume cycle.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <amit.karwar@redpinesignals.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: Replaced never ending while loop with 20msecs loop(Kalle Valo)
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c | 128
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>   drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_sdio.h     |   2 +
>>>>   2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>>>> index 8d3a483..b3f8006 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
>>>> @@ -1059,16 +1059,136 @@ static void rsi_disconnect(struct sdio_func
>>>> *pfunction)
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>>>>   static int rsi_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>>   {
>>>> -       /* Not yet implemented */
>>>> -       return -ENOSYS;
>>>> +       int ret;
>>>> +       struct sdio_func *pfunction = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
>>>> +       struct rsi_hw *adapter = sdio_get_drvdata(pfunction);
>>>> +       struct rsi_common *common;
>>>> +
>>>> +       if (!adapter) {
>>>> +               rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "Device is not ready\n");
>>>> +               return -ENODEV;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +       common = adapter->priv;
>>>> +       rsi_sdio_disable_interrupts(pfunction);
>>>> +
>>>> +       ret = rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps(adapter);
>>>> +       if (ret)
>>>> +               rsi_dbg(INFO_ZONE,
>>>> +                       "Setting power management caps failed\n");
>>>> +       common->fsm_state = FSM_CARD_NOT_READY;
>>>> +
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>
>>>
>>> I think it should be return ret if rsi_set_sdio_pm_caps() fails.
>>
>>
>> This is intentional. We don't want to return error and abort system
>> suspend operation due to this.
>
>
> Has it been verified that powering down the SDIO bus during the suspend
> works for you device. In other words  does the claim in the commit message
> apply to a sdio host controller not supporting the KEEP_POWER flag as well?

Yes. It is verified. In this case, chip gets re enumerated and
firmware will be re-downloaded after resume.

Regards,
Amitkumar Karwar

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [v2] rsi: sdio suspend and resume support
  2017-09-21 12:51 [v2] rsi: sdio suspend and resume support Amitkumar Karwar
  2017-09-21 13:38 ` Souptick Joarder
@ 2017-09-25  8:26 ` Kalle Valo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2017-09-25  8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amitkumar Karwar
  Cc: linux-wireless, Amitkumar Karwar, Prameela Rani Garnepudi,
	Karun Eagalapati

Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
> 
> SDIO suspend and resume handlers are implemented and verified
> that device works after suspend/resume cycle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karun Eagalapati <karun256@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <amit.karwar@redpinesignals.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

20db07332736 rsi: sdio suspend and resume support

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9963895/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-25  8:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-21 12:51 [v2] rsi: sdio suspend and resume support Amitkumar Karwar
2017-09-21 13:38 ` Souptick Joarder
2017-09-21 14:32   ` Amitkumar Karwar
2017-09-22  9:03     ` Arend van Spriel
2017-09-22 11:50       ` Amitkumar Karwar
2017-09-25  8:26 ` Kalle Valo

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.