All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: oom: show unreclaimable slab info when unreclaimable slabs > user memory
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:33:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171009063316.qjmunbabyr2nzh52@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff7e0d92-0f12-46fa-dbc7-79c556ffb7c2@alibaba-inc.com>

On Sat 07-10-17 00:37:55, Yang Shi wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/6/17 2:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 05-10-17 05:29:10, Yang Shi wrote:
[...]
> > > +	list_for_each_entry_safe(s, s2, &slab_caches, list) {
> > > +		if (!is_root_cache(s) || (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT))
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		memset(&sinfo, 0, sizeof(sinfo));
> > 
> > why do you zero out the structure. All the fields you are printing are
> > filled out in get_slabinfo.
> 
> No special reason, just wipe out the potential stale data on the stack.

Do not add code that has no meaning. The OOM killer is a slow path but
that doesn't mean we should throw spare cycles out of the window.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: oom: show unreclaimable slab info when unreclaimable slabs > user memory
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:33:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171009063316.qjmunbabyr2nzh52@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff7e0d92-0f12-46fa-dbc7-79c556ffb7c2@alibaba-inc.com>

On Sat 07-10-17 00:37:55, Yang Shi wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/6/17 2:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 05-10-17 05:29:10, Yang Shi wrote:
[...]
> > > +	list_for_each_entry_safe(s, s2, &slab_caches, list) {
> > > +		if (!is_root_cache(s) || (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT))
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		memset(&sinfo, 0, sizeof(sinfo));
> > 
> > why do you zero out the structure. All the fields you are printing are
> > filled out in get_slabinfo.
> 
> No special reason, just wipe out the potential stale data on the stack.

Do not add code that has no meaning. The OOM killer is a slow path but
that doesn't mean we should throw spare cycles out of the window.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-09  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-04 21:29 [PATCH 0/3 v10] oom: capture unreclaimable slab info in oom message Yang Shi
2017-10-04 21:29 ` Yang Shi
2017-10-04 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] tools: slabinfo: add "-U" option to show unreclaimable slabs only Yang Shi
2017-10-04 21:29   ` Yang Shi
2017-10-04 21:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: slabinfo: dump CONFIG_SLABINFO Yang Shi
2017-10-04 21:29   ` Yang Shi
2017-10-07 11:45   ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-07 11:45     ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-07 12:06   ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-07 12:06     ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-04 21:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: oom: show unreclaimable slab info when unreclaimable slabs > user memory Yang Shi
2017-10-04 21:29   ` Yang Shi
2017-10-06  9:37   ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-06  9:37     ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-06 16:37     ` Yang Shi
2017-10-06 16:37       ` Yang Shi
2017-10-09  6:33       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-10-09  6:33         ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-09  6:36         ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-09  6:36           ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-09 16:44           ` Yang Shi
2017-10-09 16:44             ` Yang Shi
2017-10-09 18:53           ` Yang Shi
2017-10-09 18:53             ` Yang Shi
2017-10-09 21:00             ` Yang Shi
2017-10-09 21:00               ` Yang Shi
2017-10-07 10:10   ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-07 10:10     ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-07 13:05   ` kbuild test robot
2017-10-07 13:05     ` kbuild test robot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-10 17:25 [PATCH 0/3 v11] oom: capture unreclaimable slab info in oom message Yang Shi
2017-10-10 17:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: oom: show unreclaimable slab info when unreclaimable slabs > user memory Yang Shi
2017-10-10 17:25   ` Yang Shi
2017-10-17  0:15   ` David Rientjes
2017-10-17  0:15     ` David Rientjes
2017-10-17  7:44     ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-17  7:44       ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-17 20:59       ` David Rientjes
2017-10-17 20:59         ` David Rientjes
2017-10-17 21:40         ` Yang Shi
2017-10-17 21:40           ` Yang Shi
2017-10-17 21:50           ` David Rientjes
2017-10-17 21:50             ` David Rientjes
2017-10-17 22:20             ` Yang Shi
2017-10-17 22:20               ` Yang Shi
2017-10-17 22:39               ` David Rientjes
2017-10-17 22:39                 ` David Rientjes
2017-10-18 19:09                 ` Yang Shi
2017-10-18 19:09                   ` Yang Shi
2017-10-19  7:28                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-19  7:28                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-19 23:12                   ` Yang Shi
2017-10-19 23:12                     ` Yang Shi
2017-10-03 18:06 [PATCH 0/3 v8] oom: capture unreclaimable slab info in oom message Yang Shi
2017-10-03 18:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: oom: show unreclaimable slab info when unreclaimable slabs > user memory Yang Shi
2017-10-03 18:06   ` Yang Shi
2017-10-04 14:27   ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-04 14:27     ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-04 17:37     ` Yang Shi
2017-10-04 17:37       ` Yang Shi
2017-10-04 18:08     ` Yang Shi
2017-10-04 18:08       ` Yang Shi
2017-10-05  7:57       ` Michal Hocko
2017-10-05  7:57         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171009063316.qjmunbabyr2nzh52@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=yang.s@alibaba-inc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.