* [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
@ 2017-10-09 16:33 Ville Syrjala
2017-10-09 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: " Ville Syrjala
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjala @ 2017-10-09 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0
doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/kms_setmode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c
index 206d360607bb..ed5d97442255 100644
--- a/tests/kms_setmode.c
+++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void check_timings(int crtc_idx, const drmModeModeInfo *kmode)
memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait));
wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx);
- wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
+ wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait));
last_seq = wait.reply.sequence;
--
2.13.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala
@ 2017-10-09 16:33 ` Ville Syrjala
2017-10-09 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: " Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjala @ 2017-10-09 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0
doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/kms_flip.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
index acec95f0de72..9a96566edb67 100644
--- a/tests/kms_flip.c
+++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
@@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ static void calibrate_ts(struct test_output *o, int crtc_idx)
memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait));
wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx);
- wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
+ wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait));
last_seq = wait.reply.sequence;
--
2.13.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala
2017-10-09 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: " Ville Syrjala
@ 2017-10-09 19:01 ` Patchwork
2017-10-10 9:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Daniel Vetter
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-09 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31600/
State : failure
== Summary ==
IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build
f1e77e83d620f66f98401854a63b93dc4cead880 tests/kms_draw_crc: Skip tests for unsupported formats
with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_3197
18b15be401ec drm-tip: 2017y-10m-09d-17h-21m-07s UTC integration manifest
No testlist changes.
Test gem_exec_suspend:
Subgroup basic-s3:
pass -> DMESG-FAIL (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#103039
Subgroup basic-s4-devices:
pass -> DMESG-FAIL (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#102846 +1
Test gem_flink_basic:
Subgroup bad-flink:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#103049 +4
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-kbl-r)
fdo#103039 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103039
fdo#102846 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102846
fdo#103049 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103049
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:457s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:474s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:392s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:580s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:106 time:288s
fi-bxt-dsi total:289 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:531s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:526s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:253 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:538s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:510s
fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:256 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 time:556s
fi-cnl-y total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:633s
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:435s
fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:601s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:441s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:419s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:61 time:467s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:498s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:474s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:511s
fi-kbl-7560u total:125 pass:105 dwarn:5 dfail:2 fail:0 skip:12
fi-kbl-7567u total:289 pass:265 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:491s
fi-kbl-r total:245 pass:220 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24
fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:66 time:661s
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:482s
fi-skl-6700hq total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:655s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:517s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:472s
fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:584s
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:445s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_307/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala
2017-10-09 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-09 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: " Patchwork
@ 2017-10-10 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-10-10 9:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-10 19:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2017-10-11 4:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2017-10-10 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjala; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:33:49PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0
> doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_setmode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c
> index 206d360607bb..ed5d97442255 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_setmode.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void check_timings(int crtc_idx, const drmModeModeInfo *kmode)
>
> memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait));
> wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx);
> - wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
> + wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
Looking at drm_wait_vblank_is_query() in drm_vblank.c you also want to
drop NEXTONMISS. With that:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> on both.
Cheers, Daniel
> do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait));
>
> last_seq = wait.reply.sequence;
> --
> 2.13.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
2017-10-10 9:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Daniel Vetter
@ 2017-10-10 9:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-10 12:25 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-10-10 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:33:49PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0
> > doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/kms_setmode.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c
> > index 206d360607bb..ed5d97442255 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_setmode.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c
> > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void check_timings(int crtc_idx, const drmModeModeInfo *kmode)
> >
> > memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait));
> > wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx);
> > - wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
> > + wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
>
> Looking at drm_wait_vblank_is_query() in drm_vblank.c you also want to
> drop NEXTONMISS.
Hmm. I think we may want to line things up to a vblank boundary here
(but I'd have to re-read the code to confirm that). Without the
NEXTONMISS we would just query the current count and continue
immediately. Alternative I guess we could drop the NEXTONMISS but
instead wait for seq+1.
> With that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> on both.
>
> Cheers, Daniel
> > do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait));
> >
> > last_seq = wait.reply.sequence;
> > --
> > 2.13.5
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
2017-10-10 9:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
@ 2017-10-10 12:25 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2017-10-10 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:24:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:33:49PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0
> > > doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/kms_setmode.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c
> > > index 206d360607bb..ed5d97442255 100644
> > > --- a/tests/kms_setmode.c
> > > +++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c
> > > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void check_timings(int crtc_idx, const drmModeModeInfo *kmode)
> > >
> > > memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait));
> > > wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx);
> > > - wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
> > > + wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
> >
> > Looking at drm_wait_vblank_is_query() in drm_vblank.c you also want to
> > drop NEXTONMISS.
>
> Hmm. I think we may want to line things up to a vblank boundary here
> (but I'd have to re-read the code to confirm that). Without the
> NEXTONMISS we would just query the current count and continue
> immediately. Alternative I guess we could drop the NEXTONMISS but
> instead wait for seq+1.
NEXTONMISS means you don't actually query, but wait until that vblank
happened (as a blocking ioctl, you only get the event when asking for it).
I didn't really look into what the tests wants, just went with your
description of what you want to do ...
-Daniel
>
> > With that:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> on both.
> >
> > Cheers, Daniel
> > > do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait));
> > >
> > > last_seq = wait.reply.sequence;
> > > --
> > > 2.13.5
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-10-10 9:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Daniel Vetter
@ 2017-10-10 19:44 ` Patchwork
2017-10-11 4:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-10 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31600/
State : success
== Summary ==
IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build
d7c88290ab6a8393dc341b30c7fb5e27d2952901 syncobj: Add a test for SYNCOBJ_CREATE_SIGNALED
with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_3207
d82f454de90a drm-tip: 2017y-10m-10d-18h-40m-34s UTC integration manifest
No testlist changes.
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-j1900) fdo#101705 +1
fdo#101705 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101705
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:453s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:471s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:396s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:563s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:106 time:287s
fi-bxt-dsi total:289 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:533s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:532s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:253 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:537s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:524s
fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:253 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 time:563s
fi-cnl-y total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:629s
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:435s
fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:600s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:442s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:419s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:61 time:465s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:506s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:476s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:507s
fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:581s
fi-kbl-7567u total:289 pass:265 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:485s
fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:594s
fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:66 time:668s
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:474s
fi-skl-6700hq total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:658s
fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:534s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:516s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:472s
fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:576s
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:435s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_316/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-10-10 19:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
@ 2017-10-11 4:52 ` Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-11 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31600/
State : success
== Summary ==
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
Subgroup fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-render:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#102886 +3
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible:
fail -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#100368
Test kms_setmode:
Subgroup basic:
fail -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#99912
fdo#102886 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102886
fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
shard-hsw total:2552 pass:1432 dwarn:5 dfail:0 fail:12 skip:1103 time:9622s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_316/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-11 4:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala
2017-10-09 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-09 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: " Patchwork
2017-10-10 9:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Daniel Vetter
2017-10-10 9:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-10 12:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-10-10 19:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2017-10-11 4:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.