From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> Subject: Re: x86/mce: suspicious RCU usage in 4.13.4 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:08:41 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20171010200841.uhniuwc7pulqgmic@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20171010194426.s7keveirclglx6vh@pd.tnic> > for (;;) { > entry = mce_log_get_idx_check(mcelog.next); Can't this get even simpler? Do we need the loop? The mutex will now protect us while we check to see if there is a slot to stash this new entry. Also just say: entry = mcelog.next; > for (;;) { > @@ -66,10 +67,10 @@ static int dev_mce_log(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, > * interesting ones: > */ > if (entry >= MCE_LOG_LEN) { > - set_bit(MCE_OVERFLOW, > - (unsigned long *)&mcelog.flags); > + set_bit(MCE_OVERFLOW, (unsigned long *)&mcelog.flags); Need to mutex_unlock(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex); here. > return NOTIFY_OK; > } > + > /* Old left over entry. Skip: */ > if (mcelog.entry[entry].finished) { > entry++; > @@ -77,15 +78,13 @@ static int dev_mce_log(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, > } > break; > } > - smp_rmb(); > - next = entry + 1; > - if (cmpxchg(&mcelog.next, entry, next) == entry) > - break; Ummm. Without this "break" how will we exit the loop (more fuel for getting rid of the loop. > + mcelog.next = entry + 1; > } -Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> Subject: x86/mce: suspicious RCU usage in 4.13.4 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:08:41 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20171010200841.uhniuwc7pulqgmic@intel.com> (raw) > for (;;) { > entry = mce_log_get_idx_check(mcelog.next); Can't this get even simpler? Do we need the loop? The mutex will now protect us while we check to see if there is a slot to stash this new entry. Also just say: entry = mcelog.next; > for (;;) { > @@ -66,10 +67,10 @@ static int dev_mce_log(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, > * interesting ones: > */ > if (entry >= MCE_LOG_LEN) { > - set_bit(MCE_OVERFLOW, > - (unsigned long *)&mcelog.flags); > + set_bit(MCE_OVERFLOW, (unsigned long *)&mcelog.flags); Need to mutex_unlock(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex); here. > return NOTIFY_OK; > } > + > /* Old left over entry. Skip: */ > if (mcelog.entry[entry].finished) { > entry++; > @@ -77,15 +78,13 @@ static int dev_mce_log(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, > } > break; > } > - smp_rmb(); > - next = entry + 1; > - if (cmpxchg(&mcelog.next, entry, next) == entry) > - break; Ummm. Without this "break" how will we exit the loop (more fuel for getting rid of the loop. > + mcelog.next = entry + 1; > } -Tony --- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-edac" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 20:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-10-10 19:00 x86/mce: suspicious RCU usage in 4.13.4 Jeremy Cline 2017-10-10 19:44 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-10-10 19:44 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-10-10 20:08 ` Luck, Tony [this message] 2017-10-10 20:08 ` Luck, Tony 2017-10-10 20:13 ` Andi Kleen 2017-10-10 20:13 ` Andi Kleen 2017-10-11 11:50 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-10-11 11:50 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-10-11 21:34 ` Luck, Tony 2017-10-11 21:34 ` Luck, Tony 2017-10-15 9:40 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-10-15 9:40 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-10-16 18:28 ` Luck, Tony 2017-10-16 18:28 ` Luck, Tony 2017-11-01 14:56 ` Laura Abbott 2017-11-01 14:56 ` Laura Abbott 2017-11-01 16:47 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-11-01 16:47 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-11-01 20:07 ` Luck, Tony 2017-11-01 20:07 ` Luck, Tony 2017-11-01 20:28 ` [tip:ras/urgent] x86/mcelog: Get rid of RCU remnants tip-bot for Borislav Petkov 2017-10-11 23:11 ` x86/mce: suspicious RCU usage in 4.13.4 Andi Kleen 2017-10-11 23:11 ` Andi Kleen 2017-10-12 9:02 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-10-12 9:02 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-10-12 22:13 ` Andi Kleen 2017-10-12 22:13 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20171010200841.uhniuwc7pulqgmic@intel.com \ --to=tony.luck@intel.com \ --cc=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=jcline@redhat.com \ --cc=labbott@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.