All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next 0/2] ipv6: addrconf: make two more doit functions not use rtnl mutex
@ 2017-10-11  8:27 Florian Westphal
  2017-10-11  8:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETNETCONF Florian Westphal
  2017-10-11  8:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETADDR Florian Westphal
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2017-10-11  8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

ipv6 RTM_GETNETCONF and RTM_GETADDR don't seem to require strict
serialization via rtnl mutex, so switch both to DOIT_UNLOCKED and increment
device reference counts instead.

Alternative would be to use rcu which would need some minor
code re-arrangements (we can't use GFP_ATOMIC for buffer allocation in that
case).

 addrconf.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETNETCONF
  2017-10-11  8:27 [PATCH net-next 0/2] ipv6: addrconf: make two more doit functions not use rtnl mutex Florian Westphal
@ 2017-10-11  8:28 ` Florian Westphal
  2017-10-12  3:17   ` David Miller
  2017-10-11  8:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETADDR Florian Westphal
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2017-10-11  8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Florian Westphal

Instead of relying on rtnl mutex bump device reference count.
After this change, values reported can change in parallel, but thats not
much different from current state, as anyone can change the settings
right after rtnl_unlock (and before userspace processed reply).

While at it, switch to GFP_KERNEL allocation.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index d9f6226694eb..5207f567ef28 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -616,23 +616,23 @@ static int inet6_netconf_get_devconf(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
 {
 	struct net *net = sock_net(in_skb->sk);
 	struct nlattr *tb[NETCONFA_MAX+1];
+	struct inet6_dev *in6_dev = NULL;
+	struct net_device *dev = NULL;
 	struct netconfmsg *ncm;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct ipv6_devconf *devconf;
-	struct inet6_dev *in6_dev;
-	struct net_device *dev;
 	int ifindex;
 	int err;
 
 	err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, sizeof(*ncm), tb, NETCONFA_MAX,
 			  devconf_ipv6_policy, extack);
 	if (err < 0)
-		goto errout;
+		return err;
 
-	err = -EINVAL;
 	if (!tb[NETCONFA_IFINDEX])
-		goto errout;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
+	err = -EINVAL;
 	ifindex = nla_get_s32(tb[NETCONFA_IFINDEX]);
 	switch (ifindex) {
 	case NETCONFA_IFINDEX_ALL:
@@ -642,10 +642,10 @@ static int inet6_netconf_get_devconf(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
 		devconf = net->ipv6.devconf_dflt;
 		break;
 	default:
-		dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
+		dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
 		if (!dev)
-			goto errout;
-		in6_dev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		in6_dev = in6_dev_get(dev);
 		if (!in6_dev)
 			goto errout;
 		devconf = &in6_dev->cnf;
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static int inet6_netconf_get_devconf(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
 	}
 
 	err = -ENOBUFS;
-	skb = nlmsg_new(inet6_netconf_msgsize_devconf(NETCONFA_ALL), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	skb = nlmsg_new(inet6_netconf_msgsize_devconf(NETCONFA_ALL), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!skb)
 		goto errout;
 
@@ -669,6 +669,10 @@ static int inet6_netconf_get_devconf(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
 	}
 	err = rtnl_unicast(skb, net, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid);
 errout:
+	if (in6_dev)
+		in6_dev_put(in6_dev);
+	if (dev)
+		dev_put(dev);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -6570,7 +6574,7 @@ int __init addrconf_init(void)
 	__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_GETANYCAST, NULL,
 			inet6_dump_ifacaddr, 0);
 	__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_GETNETCONF, inet6_netconf_get_devconf,
-			inet6_netconf_dump_devconf, 0);
+			inet6_netconf_dump_devconf, RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED);
 
 	ipv6_addr_label_rtnl_register();
 
-- 
2.13.6

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 2/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETADDR
  2017-10-11  8:27 [PATCH net-next 0/2] ipv6: addrconf: make two more doit functions not use rtnl mutex Florian Westphal
  2017-10-11  8:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETNETCONF Florian Westphal
@ 2017-10-11  8:28 ` Florian Westphal
  2017-10-12  3:17   ` David Miller
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2017-10-11  8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Florian Westphal

Similar to the previous patch, use the device lookup functions
that bump device refcount and flag this as DOIT_UNLOCKED to avoid
rtnl mutex.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 5207f567ef28..4603aa488f4f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -4890,17 +4890,15 @@ static int inet6_rtm_getaddr(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 	err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, sizeof(*ifm), tb, IFA_MAX, ifa_ipv6_policy,
 			  extack);
 	if (err < 0)
-		goto errout;
+		return err;
 
 	addr = extract_addr(tb[IFA_ADDRESS], tb[IFA_LOCAL], &peer);
-	if (!addr) {
-		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto errout;
-	}
+	if (!addr)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
 	if (ifm->ifa_index)
-		dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifm->ifa_index);
+		dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ifm->ifa_index);
 
 	ifa = ipv6_get_ifaddr(net, addr, dev, 1);
 	if (!ifa) {
@@ -4926,6 +4924,8 @@ static int inet6_rtm_getaddr(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 errout_ifa:
 	in6_ifa_put(ifa);
 errout:
+	if (dev)
+		dev_put(dev);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -6568,7 +6568,7 @@ int __init addrconf_init(void)
 	__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_NEWADDR, inet6_rtm_newaddr, NULL, 0);
 	__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_DELADDR, inet6_rtm_deladdr, NULL, 0);
 	__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_GETADDR, inet6_rtm_getaddr,
-			inet6_dump_ifaddr, 0);
+			inet6_dump_ifaddr, RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED);
 	__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_GETMULTICAST, NULL,
 			inet6_dump_ifmcaddr, 0);
 	__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_GETANYCAST, NULL,
-- 
2.13.6

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETNETCONF
  2017-10-11  8:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETNETCONF Florian Westphal
@ 2017-10-12  3:17   ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2017-10-12  3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fw; +Cc: netdev

From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:28:00 +0200

> Instead of relying on rtnl mutex bump device reference count.
> After this change, values reported can change in parallel, but thats not
> much different from current state, as anyone can change the settings
> right after rtnl_unlock (and before userspace processed reply).
> 
> While at it, switch to GFP_KERNEL allocation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>

Applied.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETADDR
  2017-10-11  8:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETADDR Florian Westphal
@ 2017-10-12  3:17   ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2017-10-12  3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fw; +Cc: netdev

From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:28:01 +0200

> Similar to the previous patch, use the device lookup functions
> that bump device refcount and flag this as DOIT_UNLOCKED to avoid
> rtnl mutex.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>

Applied.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-12  3:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-11  8:27 [PATCH net-next 0/2] ipv6: addrconf: make two more doit functions not use rtnl mutex Florian Westphal
2017-10-11  8:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETNETCONF Florian Westphal
2017-10-12  3:17   ` David Miller
2017-10-11  8:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] ipv6: addrconf: don't use rtnl mutex in RTM_GETADDR Florian Westphal
2017-10-12  3:17   ` David Miller

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.