All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks
@ 2017-10-18  9:32 Maarten Lankhorst
  2017-10-18 10:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2017-10-18  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

The original intent was to preserve watermarks as much as possible
in intel_pipe_wm.raw_wm, and put the validated ones in intel_pipe_wm.wm.

It seems this approach is insufficient and we don't always preserve
the raw watermarks, so just use the atomic iterator we're already using
to get a const pointer to all bound planes on the crtc.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.8+
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 51 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 8296df51408d..e348bd4b7305 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -499,7 +499,6 @@ struct intel_crtc_scaler_state {
 
 struct intel_pipe_wm {
 	struct intel_wm_level wm[5];
-	struct intel_wm_level raw_wm[5];
 	uint32_t linetime;
 	bool fbc_wm_enabled;
 	bool pipe_enabled;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index c42a65a93b3a..ea70c720f492 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2721,9 +2721,9 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_level(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 				 const struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
 				 int level,
 				 struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
-				 struct intel_plane_state *pristate,
-				 struct intel_plane_state *sprstate,
-				 struct intel_plane_state *curstate,
+				 const struct intel_plane_state *pristate,
+				 const struct intel_plane_state *sprstate,
+				 const struct intel_plane_state *curstate,
 				 struct intel_wm_level *result)
 {
 	uint16_t pri_latency = dev_priv->wm.pri_latency[level];
@@ -3043,28 +3043,24 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
 	struct intel_pipe_wm *pipe_wm;
 	struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
 	const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
-	struct intel_plane *intel_plane;
-	struct intel_plane_state *pristate = NULL;
-	struct intel_plane_state *sprstate = NULL;
-	struct intel_plane_state *curstate = NULL;
+	struct drm_plane *plane;
+	const struct drm_plane_state *plane_state;
+	const struct intel_plane_state *pristate = NULL;
+	const struct intel_plane_state *sprstate = NULL;
+	const struct intel_plane_state *curstate = NULL;
 	int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv), usable_level;
 	struct ilk_wm_maximums max;
 
 	pipe_wm = &cstate->wm.ilk.optimal;
 
-	for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, intel_crtc, intel_plane) {
-		struct intel_plane_state *ps;
-
-		ps = intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(state,
-							   intel_plane);
-		if (!ps)
-			continue;
+	drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state(plane, plane_state, &cstate->base) {
+		const struct intel_plane_state *ps = to_intel_plane_state(plane_state);
 
-		if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY)
+		if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY)
 			pristate = ps;
-		else if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY)
+		else if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY)
 			sprstate = ps;
-		else if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR)
+		else if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR)
 			curstate = ps;
 	}
 
@@ -3086,11 +3082,9 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
 	if (pipe_wm->sprites_scaled)
 		usable_level = 0;
 
-	ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, 0, cstate,
-			     pristate, sprstate, curstate, &pipe_wm->raw_wm[0]);
-
 	memset(&pipe_wm->wm, 0, sizeof(pipe_wm->wm));
-	pipe_wm->wm[0] = pipe_wm->raw_wm[0];
+	ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, 0, cstate,
+			     pristate, sprstate, curstate, &pipe_wm->wm[0]);
 
 	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
 		pipe_wm->linetime = hsw_compute_linetime_wm(cstate);
@@ -3100,8 +3094,8 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
 
 	ilk_compute_wm_reg_maximums(dev_priv, 1, &max);
 
-	for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
-		struct intel_wm_level *wm = &pipe_wm->raw_wm[level];
+	for (level = 1; level <= usable_level; level++) {
+		struct intel_wm_level *wm = &pipe_wm->wm[level];
 
 		ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, level, cstate,
 				     pristate, sprstate, curstate, wm);
@@ -3111,13 +3105,10 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
 		 * register maximums since such watermarks are
 		 * always invalid.
 		 */
-		if (level > usable_level)
-			continue;
-
-		if (ilk_validate_wm_level(level, &max, wm))
-			pipe_wm->wm[level] = *wm;
-		else
-			usable_level = level;
+		if (!ilk_validate_wm_level(level, &max, wm)) {
+			memset(wm, 0, sizeof(*wm));
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.14.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks
  2017-10-18  9:32 [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks Maarten Lankhorst
@ 2017-10-18 10:23 ` Patchwork
  2017-10-18 17:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  2017-10-27  8:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-18 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/32197/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 32197v1 drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/32197/revisions/1/mbox/

Test chamelium:
        Subgroup dp-crc-fast:
                fail       -> PASS       (fi-kbl-7500u) fdo#102514
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
                pass       -> INCOMPLETE (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#102846

fdo#102514 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102514
fdo#102846 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102846

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:439s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:454s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:377s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:527s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:183  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:106 time:265s
fi-bxt-dsi       total:289  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:500s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:498s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:253  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:495s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:249  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:478s
fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:423s
fi-gdg-551       total:289  pass:178  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:109 time:251s
fi-glk-1         total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:581s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:425s
fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:61  time:438s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:493s
fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:460s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:489s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:245  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16 
fi-kbl-7567u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:476s
fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:584s
fi-pnv-d510      total:289  pass:222  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:66  time:552s
fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:449s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:643s
fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:521s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:495s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:454s
fi-snb-2520m     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:567s
fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40  time:425s

8b18ad103908e9ccee79db8c0c29bc5a56ff81f8 drm-tip: 2017y-10m-18d-08h-27m-31s UTC integration manifest
6df5cb9919e5 drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6091/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks
  2017-10-18  9:32 [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks Maarten Lankhorst
  2017-10-18 10:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-10-18 17:38 ` Patchwork
  2017-10-27  8:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-18 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/32197/
State : failure

== Summary ==

Test kms_setmode:
        Subgroup basic:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#99912
Test perf:
        Subgroup polling:
                fail       -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#102252
        Subgroup oa-exponents:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#102254
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
        Subgroup fbc-1p-primscrn-shrfb-msflip-blt:
                pass       -> DMESG-FAIL (shard-hsw)

fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
fdo#102252 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102252
fdo#102254 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102254

shard-hsw        total:2489 pass:1397 dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:10  skip:1081 time:9062s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6091/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks
  2017-10-18  9:32 [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks Maarten Lankhorst
  2017-10-18 10:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2017-10-18 17:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2017-10-27  8:02 ` Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-27  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/32197/
State : failure

== Summary ==

Series 32197 revision 1 was fully merged or fully failed: no git log

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6091/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-27  8:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-18  9:32 [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks Maarten Lankhorst
2017-10-18 10:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-10-18 17:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-10-27  8:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.